[mailto:ccp...@jiscmail.ac.uk] On Behalf Of
rui
Sent: 22 April 2009 17:06
To: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
Subject: [ccp4bb] microbatch vs hanging drop
Hi,
I have a question about the method for crystallization. With traditional
hanging drop(24 wells), one slide can also hold for multiple drops
:* [ccp4bb] microbatch vs hanging drop
Hi,
I have a question about the method for crystallization. With traditional
hanging drop(24 wells), one slide can also hold for multiple drops but it
requires the buffer quite a lot, 600uL? Microbatch can save buffers,only
100uL is required, and also
Hi,
I have a question about the method for crystallization. With traditional
hanging drop(24 wells), one slide can also hold for multiple drops but it
requires the buffer quite a lot, 600uL? Microbatch can save buffers,only
100uL is required, and also can hold up to three samples in the sitting
] microbatch vs hanging drop
Hi,
I have a question about the method for crystallization. With traditional
hanging drop(24 wells), one slide can also hold for multiple drops but it
requires the buffer quite a lot, 600uL? Microbatch can save buffers,only
100uL is required, and also can hold up
:
[ccp4bb] microbatch vs hanging drop
Hi,
I have a question about the method for crystallization. With traditional
hanging drop(24 wells), one slide can also hold for multiple drops but
it requires the buffer quite a lot, 600uL? Microbatch can save
