Oh, gosh. Pete, I am sorry but I had already submitted a proposal. As you say
nanogravity is surely next up and then picogravity. While I am waiting for Elon
to get back to me I have been looking into an ultimate brightness ‘top pocket
synchrotron’. This single electron device has the smallest e
ehalf Of Pete Dunten
Sent: Tuesday, April 2, 2024 3:49 AM
To: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
Subject: Re: [ccp4bb] request for applications
The obvious project worthy of such funding is crystallization in ultra low
gravity. Perfectly formed crystals are priceless and the basis for advances in
structur
Dunten
Sent: Tuesday, April 2, 2024 3:49 AM
To: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
Subject: Re: [ccp4bb] request for applications
The obvious project worthy of such funding is crystallization in ultra low
gravity. Perfectly formed crystals are priceless and the basis for advances in
structural biology. Cryst
The obvious project worthy of such funding is crystallization in ultra low
gravity. Perfectly formed crystals are priceless and the basis for advances in
structural biology. Crystal growth on the ISS, in orbit 254 miles above the
Earth, is considered growth in microgravity. Now consider the M
> what would YOU do if you had $1e12 USD for your science?
(a) Embezzle most of and (b) do sociologically relevant research with the rest,
like
https://www.ruppweb.org/Garland/PICD.html
Best, BR
-
Bernhard Rupp
k.k. Hofkristallamt
On Mon, Apr 01, 2024, James Holton wrote:
My question for the BB is: what would YOU do if you had $1e12 USD for
your science? No non-scientific proposals please. There are plenty of
other forums for those. This BB is about biological structural
science, so please stay on-topic. OK? And now
?
Sent from tiny silly touch screen
*From:* James Holton
*Sent:* Monday, 1 April 2024 08:01
*To:* CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
*Subject:* [ccp4bb] request for applications
Hey Everyone,
It may sound like an incredibly boring thing that
mail.ac.uk> wrote:
>
>> Oh dear, your prime number oversupply crashed the crypto Ponzi scheme
>> market. Will you accept $10e2 proposals now?
>>
>> Sent from tiny silly touch screen
>> --
>> *From:* James Holton
>> *Sent:* Mon
I'm sorry Phil, but your application has been administratively rejected
because it did not conform to the bioscience-only stipulation that was
clearly stated in the RFA.
We look forward to an improved version of your proposal in the future,
and please try to read the instructions more carefull
*From:* James Holton
*Sent:* Monday, 1 April 2024 08:01
*To:* CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
*Subject:* [ccp4bb] request for applications
Hey Everyone,
It may sound like an incredibly boring thing that there has never
been a
formal mathemat
:: I expect to have ~ $1e12 USD on current ledgers.
Presumably via the Bankman-Fried algorithm
Phil
On 4/1/24 3:01 AM, James Holton wrote:
Hey Everyone,
It may sound like an incredibly boring thing that there has never been a
formal mathematical proof that finding the prime factors of very l
accept $10e2 proposals now?
>
> Sent from tiny silly touch screen
> --
> *From:* James Holton
> *Sent:* Monday, 1 April 2024 08:01
> *To:* CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
> *Subject:* [ccp4bb] request for applications
>
> Hey Everyone,
>
> It may sou
by www.jiscmail.ac.uk, terms & conditions are available at
https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/
From: James Holton
Sent: Monday, 1 April 2024 08:01
To: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
Subject: [ccp4bb] request for applications
Hey Everyone,
It may sound lik
Hey Everyone,
It may sound like an incredibly boring thing that there has never been a
formal mathematical proof that finding the prime factors of very large
numbers doesn't have a more efficient algorithm than simply trying every
single one of them. Nevertheless, to this day, encryption keys
14 matches
Mail list logo
