Re: [ccp4bb] A challenging MR problem

2022-11-09 Thread Eleanor Dodson
ess stated otherwise, > this e-mail represents only the views of the Sender and not the views of > The University of Queensland. > > > > > > > > *From: *CCP4 bulletin board on behalf of > Medhanjali DasGupta > *Reply to: *Medhanjali DasGupta > *Date: *Thursd

Re: [ccp4bb] A challenging MR problem

2022-11-09 Thread Bostjan Kobe
of Medhanjali DasGupta Reply to: Medhanjali DasGupta Date: Thursday, 10 November 2022 at 9:05 am To: "CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK" Subject: Re: [ccp4bb] A challenging MR problem The data resolution is 2A. I have 16 chains in my model out of which only one of the chains has the "

Re: [ccp4bb] A challenging MR problem

2022-11-09 Thread Medhanjali DasGupta
The data resolution is 2A. I have 16 chains in my model out of which only one of the chains has the "missing" domain modeled. Is there a way to do MR to predict where the missing domains will go in the rest of the chains, based on my solved structure? Thanks for all the helpful suggestions!! M

Re: [ccp4bb] A challenging MR problem

2022-11-09 Thread Eleanor Dodson
Well you could just try the buccaneer pipeline. It would use the phases from your solved domain and try to fit the missing sequence. What are your twin fractions? And what is the resolution? Eleanor On Wed, 9 Nov 2022 at 21:06, Tim Gruene wrote: > Dear Medhanjali DasGupta, > unless the

Re: [ccp4bb] A challenging MR problem

2022-11-09 Thread Tim Gruene
Dear Medhanjali DasGupta, unless the resolution is really poor, the quickest try would be shelxe, starting from what you already have. It might work at, say, 2.8A resolution or better... Best, Tim On Wed, 9 Nov 2022 14:34:28 -0600 Medhanjali DasGupta wrote: > Hello! > My protein structure has