Good morning all,
We are looking for an enthusiastic methods developer to join the team here at
Diamond developing integration methods for small molecule X-ray diffraction
data:
http://www.diamond.ac.uk/Careers/Vacancies/All/132_17_CH.html
The focus of this work is the analysis of more
Dear colleagues,
The Müller group at EMBL Heidelberg in collaboration with
GlaxoSmithKline (GSK) seeks to recruit an outstanding postdoctoral
fellow to explore the use of cryo-EM to study small-molecule
ligand-bound structures of chromatin complexes. The successful candidate
will apply
I showed you pdbset ..
Find the centre of mass for your assembly.
Move it where you will
pdbset xyzin mow.pdb
end
Find CoM 0.7 1.3 -0.2
Hmm - a little thought - centre at 1 -1 0 say
pdbset yzin now.pdb xyzout changed.pdb
symgen x , y-2, z
end
New CoM 0.7 -0.7 -0.2
Eleanor
On 18
Dear all,
We are looking for two highly motivated Post-Docs with a Ph.D. in Structural
biology, Biophysics or related disciplines to work in the lab of David Drew at
Stockholm University in Sweden. Our international team aims to dissect the
molecular mechanisms of small molecule transport
Dear ccp4 community,
I would like to remind you of the announcement below.
You can now find the complete programme of the Course following the
indicated link.
Kind regards,
Marco Marcia
**
EMBO Practical Course on *Characterization of macromolecular complexes
by
The Institute of Cancer Research, London, is one of the world’s most
influential cancer research institutes, with an outstanding record of
achievement dating back more than 100 years. We provided the first convincing
evidence that DNA damage is the basic cause of cancer, laying the foundation
On 12/18/2017 05:39 AM, Eleanor Dodson wrote:
I showed you pdbset ..
Find the centre of mass for your assembly.
Move it where you will
Thanks. What James was suggesting was somewhat different (if I understood
correctly): move EVERY ATOM to 1,1,1.
like:
awk -v FIELDWIDTHS="30 24 26" \
This is something you would normally not do in the course of refining a protein
structure, because the structure would no longer correspond to the observed
structure factors and no longer be consistent with the symops of the particular
space group.
There are applications for it in
thanks. i may mean something other. for example, if i rotate the pdb by 30
degree (or 29.5 degree), or i shift the pdb along x-axis by something for
example 0.123*a, then how i move the mtz map correspondingly for the fitting of
mtz into the transformed map?
| |
Smith Liu
|
|
Assuming you have a good reason for doing that, I'd suggest the best
approach would be to first generate a real-space map covering your
original coordinates, and then apply the transform to that. To transform
a volumetric map, all you're actually transforming is the (x,y,z)
coordinate of its
If you use coot with on the fly map calculation (e.g. you load an mtz and not a
map file), you do not need to transform the map. Otherwise I would recommend to
run one more round of refinement and produce a new map your usual way. This
will also get rid of any rounding errors due to the
Dear Colleagues,
We have an immediate job opening in our protein sciences group for a
molecular biologist/protein expression scientist (Application link and
details provided below). I would greatly appreciate if you can forward to
suitable candidates.
33174BR
sorry, how i move the mtz into the transformed pdb for the question in my
previous email?
| |
Smith Liu
|
|
邮箱:smith_liu...@163.com
|
签名由 网易邮箱大师 定制
在2017年12月18日 23:37,Smith Liu 写道:
thanks. i may mean something other. for example, if i rotate the pdb by 30
degree (or 29.5 degree), or i
Hi
Which electron density map (fo-fc or 2fo-fc) should I use for representing
the density of the bound ligand?
Thanks
Raj
Dear All,
If I have a set of PDB with the corresponding density map, after I transform
the PDB based on the suggestion of everybody, is any way to transform the map
so that the map will be fit with the transformed PDB?
Smith
At 2017-12-18 18:39:34, "Eleanor Dodson"
Thanks sir
On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 11:05 AM, Bernhard Rupp
wrote:
> *Unbiased positive omit* difference density, not just any fo-fc.
>
> Br
>
> On Dec 18, 2017 9:22 PM, "chenzhonghao...@163.com" <
> chenzhonghao...@163.com> wrote:
>
> Dear Raj,
>
> Usually, fo-fc
Dear Aidong,
as I don't have access to HKL2000 myself, I can't tell you what might need
to be done to have the software display EIGER X 16M images. Wladek showed
me that it was possible. It might just be a question of getting the latest
version.
There are alternatives to HKL-2000.
DIALS can
Dear all,
in case anybody is interested in a used 3D setup for crystallography one is
still available:
See here for more details:
https://www.mail-archive.com/ccp4bb@jiscmail.ac.uk/msg41144.html
Kind regards,
Matic.
On 12. 12. 2017 08:39, Jim Fairman wrote:
Reporting in a setup that we just
Dear Aidong,
As Dr. Förster has rightly pointed out you need to have the latest version of
HKL2000 to work with the HDF5 files from the Eiger detectors and as you must be
aware the HKL2000 license should include use of Eiger detectors. We have
recently used HKL2000 to process data from
Well, yes, a one-liner to move every atom to 1,1,1 would be:
awk '! /^ATOM|^HETAT/{print;next} {print substr($0,1,30) " 1.000
1.000 1.000" substr($0,55)}' whatever.pdb > ref.pdb
Which I suppose is a bit of a long one-liner, but still only one line.
The next line would be a call to
HI Jiyong,
If you still have protein left, you may try to sequence it. In some cases,
even N-terminal digestion is very helpful. In my previous, I always got a
90KDa protein, which was very close to my target kinase. Based on the
protein sequencing, we identified it was one of those chaperones.
http://journals.iucr.org/d/issues/2013/02/00/index.html
Best, BR
From: CCP4 bulletin board [mailto:CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK] On Behalf Of raj kumar
Sent: Monday, December 18, 2017 8:37 PM
To: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
Subject: [ccp4bb] Electron density map for publications
Hi
Which electron
Dear Raj,
Usually, fo-fc is the best way to show.
best,
chenzhonghao...@163.com
From: raj kumar
Date: 2017-12-19 13:07
To: CCP4BB
Subject: [ccp4bb] Electron density map for publications
Hi
Which electron density map (fo-fc or 2fo-fc) should I use for representing the
density of the
*Unbiased positive omit* difference density, not just any fo-fc.
Br
On Dec 18, 2017 9:22 PM, "chenzhonghao...@163.com"
wrote:
Dear Raj,
Usually, fo-fc is the best way to show.
best,
--
chenzhonghao...@163.com
*From:* raj kumar
Hi All,
We have recently collected several data sets in the Shanghai synchrotron
facility with a newly installed Eiger 16M. However, we are not able to process
these data using our home HKL2000 package. Even though we can easily add this
detector in, we can not display images. I believe ours
On 18/12/2017 13:15, Smith Liu wrote:
Dear All,
If I have a set of PDB with the corresponding density map, after I transform the PDB based on the suggestion
of everybody, is any way to transform the map so that the map will be fit with the transformed PDB?
Seeing as no-one else has
26 matches
Mail list logo