Hi,
I only read the topic this morning -
In some cases, I have to wait 30+ hours to see colonies when I transform
BL21 DE3 Star while normally they should appear after 14 hours.
Dianfan
ar...@xtals.org wrote:
Hello
In order to know *exactly* what the reason for poor transformation outcome
David Briggs schrieb:
Bart Hazes used to have an excellent set of notes online about heavy
atom derivatisation - I can't seem to find the URL right now...
I believe the CCP4 wiki has the information that you're looking for (at
Dear colleagues,
we have two announcements to make:
_
7th International NCCR Symposium on New Trends in Structural Biology
7 + 8 September 2009, ETH Zürich, Lecture Hall HG E7, Zürich, Switzerland
The Schaffitzel laboratory at the European Molecular Biology Laboratory (EMBL)
Grenoble, France seeks to recruit an outstanding postdoctoral scientist in
structural biology with a research focus directed towards the structure of
macromolecular assemblies. The major theme within the group is
I obtained Coot using Fink, and I'm on a MacBook Pro running OS 10.5.7. I've
found that in Coot, but in no other programs, my keystrokes are altered. Space
bar unzooms, 2 reads r, and delete returns a ,. Downloading from
William Scott's webpage didn't help. Any suggestions?
-Sarah
I had this problem earlier in the week. Apparently it's recently become an
issue.
I found the answer here
http://www.techsupportforum.com/alternative-computing/mac-support/389812-x1
1-keyboard-map-messed-up.html
Briefly, there seems to be a problem with they keyboard mapping in X11. You
Warren,
Do you have a link to the beta drivers?
On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 1:20 AM, Warren DeLano war...@delsci.com wrote:
FYI, for folks not subscribed to pymol-users:
nVidia today released beta drivers which at last enable OpenGL-based stereo
3D visualization on 120 Hz LCDs using Quadro
Does anyone know of a detailed rigorous discussion of how the
scalepack error model/Bayesian reasoning works? The scalepack manual
has no equations for this.
Richard Gillilan
MacCHESS
Dear all,
The EU FP7 programs SPINE-2-Complexes, 3d-Repertoire and TEACH-SH are
organizing a joined workshop about:
What is a Macromolecular Complex?
As the subtitle implies, we want to look at the Shades of Meaning
across Cellular, Systems and Structural Biology.
We have what we
Dear ALL:
We are trying to do a molecular replacement using EPMR. IT is weird that
we got high CC(0.56) but with high R factor about 0.89 as well.
How can we optimize our EPMR trials to get a definitive correct
solutions?
Thanks a lot for the help.
Have a nice
Described in:
Borek, D., Minor, W. Otwinowski, Z. (2003) Measurement errors and
their consequences in protein crystallography. Acta Cryst. D59: 2031-2038.
http://scripts.iucr.org/cgi-bin/paper?ba5035
(open access) or
Dear Richard,
I *think* it works like this, don't know if it's detailed or rigourous
enough for you!
If I(l,h,i) is the intensity of the ith observation of reflection h on
frame l, with error sig(l,h,i), and S(l) is the (inverse) scale factor to
be applied to frame l, then the error in the scaled
Dear Richard,
I *think* it works like this, don't know if it's detailed or rigourous
enough for you!
If I(l,h,i) is the intensity of the ith observation of reflection h on
frame l, with error sig(l,h,i), and S(l) is the (inverse) scale factor to
be applied to frame l, then the error in the scaled
Use the scan.
And yes, don't fry your crystal doing it. The best way to do this is put
the fluorescence detector as close to the sample as you can and then
optimize the count rate by attenuating the beam. However, some beamlines
are set up to hit your crystal with full beam and then back off
Hi everyone,
I forgot to mention the price in the advertisement for the FPLC. We are asking
$11,000 CAD for the system. Thanks,
Natalie Roy
Dear ALL:
We are trying to do a molecular replacement using EPMR. IT is weird that
we got high CC(0.58) but with high R factor about 0.89 as well.
The second tier of solutions have cc about 0.54 and R factor about 0.95.
How can we optimize our EPMR trials to get a
Thanks Joe and others.
Bits and pieces of this story appear in 11.4.8 of International
Tables volume F, Borek et. al. Acta Cryst D59 (2003) and the
Scalepack manual, but none are complete or have enough detail to
follow easily. None of them give the expression for Chi-square for
this
The scalepack log file gives the formula:
Summary of reflections intensities and R-factors by intensity bins
R linear = SUM ( ABS(I - I)) / SUM (I)
R square = SUM ( (I - I) ** 2) / SUM (I ** 2)
Chi**2 = SUM ( (I - I) ** 2) / (Error ** 2 * N / (N-1) ) )
which equivalent to the
Here are the solutions from 100 runs(sorry for the long list). Would you please
help to have a look?
Thanks a million.---Jerry
Soln 1 Rot= 162.63 98.47 303.11 Trn= 26.48 73.35 105.32 CC= 0.452 R= 0.996
Soln 1 Rot= 111.26 104.75 41.63 Trn= 31.00 24.66 69.53 CC= 0.528 R= 0.961
Soln
Testers would be appreciated for the release candidate binary kits for the
RasMol 2.7.5 on sourceforge:
http://downloads.sf.net/openrasmol/RasWin_2_7_5_Install_17Jul09.exe
http://downloads.sf.net/openrasmol/RasMol_2_7_5_i686_Slackware_17Jul09.tar.gz
20 matches
Mail list logo