[ccp4bb] weak magnet of goniometer of MAR345dtb

2009-08-28 Thread aidong

Hi,

We have recently installed a new home source diffraction system using  
MAR 345 dtb. It works much better than the rigaku because this new  
device has automatic motor control system.  However, we have a lot of  
trouble to mount crystals.  The magnet of MAR goniometer is  
significantly weak so the pins do not stick on.  The old pins we used  
nicely in old rigaku are not working most of time.  The new pins from  
hampton research particularly designed for ALS high-through put data  
collection are not easily working either.   I wonder whether anyone  
has similar experience and it could be fixed by replacing with a  
stronger magnet base.   Thanks for your suggestions in advance.


Sincerely,

Aidong


Re: [ccp4bb] Lipid Removal from Proteins

2009-08-28 Thread Dima Klenchin

I dug around on the net and found this method to remove lipids from
proteins:


More precisely, from denatured proteins. That's what methanol/chloroform 
phase does for most proteins.


Wessel  Fluegge (1984), Anal. Biochem. 138:141-143. Itґs a methanol/ 
chloroform precipitation and gives you a pellet that is easily

redissolved. The method was especially devised for removing lipids or
detergents, so it should be perfect for you.

  -- http://www.bio.net/bionet/mm/methods/1996-December/052513.html


By far the best method of concentration/desalting/de-lipidizing proteins 
for SDS gels. I've used it extensively over the years. Even then, the 
efficiency of precipitation drops off very significantly for most small 
proteins at low [protein].



Is this still the preferred way? I do not want to use reagents that
are *themselves* likely to denature my protein. Has anyone tried
cyclodextrins?


Lots of people did. They work. So if you have protein that you can easily 
immobilize, washing the matrix extensively with b-cyclodextrin will do the 
trick. But immobilized cyclodextrins are not readily available for 
reasonable price. So for untagged protein your next bet would be various 
detergent removal sorbents available from Calbiochem, Pierce, Bio-Rad and 
likely many others. All of these WILL bind your protein to various extent, 
but usually not completely because they are also work as size exclusion.



I'm specifically trying to strip sarcosyl. I want to do
it completely.


What's the definition of completely? If you are lucky and your protein 
binds to cation exchangers, simply washing the column with 20 CV of low 
salt buffer (even better with non-denaturing concentrations of alcohols or 
glycols) usually will decrease sarcosyl concentration by ~ 100X. Pretty 
much the same if your his-tagged protein is bound to IMAC sorbent.


- Dima


Re: [ccp4bb] weak magnet of goniometer of MAR345dtb

2009-08-28 Thread Andrew Purkiss-Trew

Quoting aidong a...@xmu.edu.cn:


Hi,

We have recently installed a new home source diffraction system  
using MAR 345 dtb. It works much better than the rigaku because this  
new device has automatic motor control system.  However, we have a  
lot of trouble to mount crystals.  The magnet of MAR goniometer is  
significantly weak so the pins do not stick on.  The old pins we  
used nicely in old rigaku are not working most of time.  The new  
pins from hampton research particularly designed for ALS  
high-through put data collection are not easily working either.   I  
wonder whether anyone has similar experience and it could be fixed  
by replacing with a stronger magnet base.   Thanks for your  
suggestions in advance.




Have you made sure that the electro-magnet for the goniometer is  
switched on and working. You can switch the magnet on and off on the  
control panel and a pin will not 'stick' without a green light here.




This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.


Re: [ccp4bb] Is there Windows version of O ?

2009-08-28 Thread Tim Gruene

On Thu, 27 Aug 2009, lei feng wrote:


maybe a little offtopic, but I really need anotehr model buiding software
that can run on windows system ( I already have coot)

May I ask why you need another modelling tool if you don't even know it?
  

I found Alwyn Jones 's website, which has version 12 of the O software ,
but the win_ono.exe is a very small file.  I am wondering is it only less
than 3MB?  I opened the file, it was not a typical windows interface
software like win-coot. Am I missing something ? anyone used the windows
version?
You probably picked up the right file. The Linux version also only has 
2.5MB. You need a lot a data-files, too, if you want to enjoy the program. 
You get what you need from the same ftp-server.


But I suggest you find someone already familiar with O to start using it.

Tim  


--
Tim Gruene
Institut fuer anorganische Chemie
Tammannstr. 4
D-37077 Goettingen

GPG Key ID = A46BEE1A


[ccp4bb] Conference Membranes and Modules in Berlin

2009-08-28 Thread Oliver Daumke

Dear crystallographers,

we are organising a conference Membranes and Modules which takes place 
in Berlin from December 10 - 13, 2009. It covers a number of topics 
related to structural biology, macromolecular complexes, biophysics and 
biochemistry of membranes/membrane proteins and cellular dynamics, and 
might be of interest to many of you. We have an amazing speaker list, 
please have a look at our webpage (www.mam2009.de) and convince yourself.  

Hope to see you in Berlin in December (also for a Gluehwein on one of 
the christmas markets), 


Oli Daumke

--
Dr. Oliver Daumke
Max-Delbrück-Centrum for Molecular Medicine
Crystallography
Robert-Roessle-Strasse 10
13125 Berlin
Tel.: 0049-309406-3425
Fax.: 0049-309406-3814


Re: [ccp4bb] Arpwarp not recognised by latest version of ccp4

2009-08-28 Thread Anastassis Perrakis

Hi -

There is no specific reason, to my knowledge, why ARP/wARP will not be  
recognized by the latest version of ccp4i.
At worse, you can re-install the GUI from 'Install Task' from the  
ccp4i, which should still work.


If you have any specific trouble/error messages, please do let me know.

Best, Tassos

On Aug 26, 2009, at 16:23, Sylvia Fanucchi wrote:


Hi

Does anyone know how to configure ArpWARP manually so that it will  
be recognized by the latest version of ccp4?




Best regards

Sylvia Fanucchi Ph.D

Protein Structure-Function Research Unit
East Campus, Gate House Room 416
School of Molecular and Cell Biology
University of the Witwatersrand
Johannesburg 2050
South Africa

Tel: +27 (11) 717-6348 Fax: +27 (11) 717-6351
E-mail: sylvia.fanuc...@wits.ac.za



This communication is intended for the addressee only. It is  
confidential. If you have received this communication in error,  
please notify us immediately and destroy the original message. You  
may not copy or disseminate this communication without the  
permission of the University. Only authorized signatories are  
competent to enter into agreements on behalf of the University and  
recipients are thus advised that the content of this message may not  
be legally binding on the University and may contain the personal  
views and opinions of the author, which are not necessarily the  
views and opinions of The University of the Witwatersrand,  
Johannesburg. All agreements between the University and outsiders  
are subject to South African Law unless the University agrees in  
writing to the contrary.




P please don't print this e-mail unless you really need to
Anastassis (Tassos) Perrakis, Principal Investigator / Staff Member
Department of Biochemistry (B8)
Netherlands Cancer Institute,
Dept. B8, 1066 CX Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Tel: +31 20 512 1951 Fax: +31 20 512 1954 Mobile / SMS: +31 6 28 597791






Re: [ccp4bb] Is there Windows version of O ?

2009-08-28 Thread William G. Scott

Apropos to installing windows crystallography programs:


Re: [ccp4bb] Computer hardware and OS survey
Jon Wright
Fri, 01 May 2009 10:24:28 -0700

Link,Todd M wrote:

... I did not find an equal web support page for Windows.


It just isn't needed. If there is a windows version of a program you  
get to download, install, run and then get on with your life.

Jon



http://www.mail-archive.com/ccp4bb@jiscmail.ac.uk/msg10636.html

But if for some reason everything is not manifestly self-evident, this  
page might help:

http://alpha2.bmc.uu.se/~alwyn/O_to_Go/O_to_Go_frameset.html


On Aug 28, 2009, at 1:16 AM, Tim Gruene wrote:


On Thu, 27 Aug 2009, lei feng wrote:

maybe a little offtopic, but I really need anotehr model buiding  
software

that can run on windows system ( I already have coot)
May I ask why you need another modelling tool if you don't even know  
it?


I found Alwyn Jones 's website, which has version 12 of the O  
software ,
but the win_ono.exe is a very small file.  I am wondering is it  
only less

than 3MB?  I opened the file, it was not a typical windows interface
software like win-coot. Am I missing something ? anyone used the  
windows

version?
You probably picked up the right file. The Linux version also only  
has 2.5MB. You need a lot a data-files, too, if you want to enjoy  
the program. You get what you need from the same ftp-server.


But I suggest you find someone already familiar with O to start  
using it.


Tim
 


Re: [ccp4bb] Lipid Removal from Proteins

2009-08-28 Thread R.M. Garavito

James,

Dima is right.  One of the protocols for protein-refolding with  
sarcosyl uses cyclodextrins to remove it.   However, sarcosyl is an  
anionic detergent above pH 5.5 under most conditions, so any ion  
exchange platform should work well to markedly reduce its presence in  
a preparation.  Also, it is extremely insoluble in the presence of  
divalent cations (as SDS is) and crystallizes readily.  I probably  
wouldn't try removing it with an IMAC column as it will bind to some  
extent and lead to continued contamination (something we have seen).   
It is possible that hydroxyapatite column might be a good matrix for  
removing it.


As sarcosyl is anionic, it is slower to dialyze across most membranes.  
However, we have had good results for detergent removal just using a  
standard spin-desalting column with G-25 Sephedex.  It is not  
absolutely quantitative detergent removal, but 100x decreases are  
easily reached in less than 20 min.  For sarcosyl, you could set up  
the column with G-25 DEAE-Sephedex at a pH where your protein doesn't  
bind and comes out in the flow-through.  After 1-2 centrifugations,  
your protein should be free of sarcosyl.


Regards,

Michael


R. Michael Garavito, Ph.D.
Professor of Biochemistry  Molecular Biology
513 Biochemistry Bldg.
Michigan State University
East Lansing, MI 48824-1319
Office:  (517) 355-9724 Lab:  (517) 353-9125
FAX:  (517) 353-9334Email:  garav...@msu.edu



On Aug 28, 2009, at 1:24 AM, James Stroud wrote:


Hello All,

I dug around on the net and found this method to remove lipids from  
proteins:


Wessel  Fluegge (1984), Anal. Biochem. 138:141-143. It´s a  
methanol/chloroform precipitation and gives you a pellet that is  
easily redissolved. The method was especially devised for removing  
lipids or detergents, so it should be perfect for you.


 -- http://www.bio.net/bionet/mm/methods/1996-December/052513.html

Is this still the preferred way? I do not want to use reagents that  
are *themselves* likely to denature my protein. Has anyone tried  
cyclodextrins? I'm specifically trying to strip sarcosyl. I want to  
do it completely.


James




[ccp4bb] Postdoctoral position, Karolinska Institute, Sweden

2009-08-28 Thread Bernhard Lohkamp
*Postdoctoral position in molecular and structural biology of protein
complexes in nerve development and disease*
Dept. of Medical Biochemistry and Biophysics, Karolinska Institute 
  
A postdoctoral position is available immediately in the Molecular Structural
Biology group at the Karolinska Institute in Stockholm
(http://phillips.mbb.ki.se/). The position is initially available for 2
years with the possibility of extension to three years.
We are seeking a motivated scientist to join a new research project on
structural and functional studies of protein-protein complexes involved in
nerve cell development and disease. The project focuses on the
characterization of the complexes and their function in the cell. The
experiments will involve a broad range of techniques, such as protein
expression/purification, site-directed mutagenesis, enzyme kinetics, and
various methods of structure determination (X-ray crystallography, EM, SAXS).
Applicants should have a background in biochemistry or molecular biology,
and possess experience with cloning, protein expression/purification
techniques. Biochemists and molecular biologists who would like to learn
structural biology are encouraged to apply. Experience in mammalian cell
culturing is a plus.
Interested candidates should send a cover letter including CV and names and
e-mail addresses of three references before the 15th September 2009 to:
Dr. Bernhard Lohkamp
Div. of Molecular Structural Biology 
Dept. of Medical Biochemistry and Biophysics 
Karolinska Institutet 
SE-17177 Stockholm
Sweden 
e-mail: Bernhard.Lohkamp(at)ki.se, phone: +46 8 5248 7673, fax: +46 8 32 7626


[ccp4bb] Rfactor got stuck with a data having alternate strong and weak reflections.

2009-08-28 Thread Jerry McCully

Dear all:

  I am currently refining a structure solved by MAD and somehow the R 
factor got stuck around 30% with 2.2 resolution.

  There are four molecules in one ASU. Two had very good density map 
and the other two were not equally good.

  I tried using NCS during refinement but it did not help much.

 Then I checked my data. Actually I found that there are alternate 
layers of strong and  weak reflections. 
THe crystal is in a thin-plate shape with orthorombic space group.

  Then I looked at my molecular replacement solution from Phaser using my 
native data.

  Actually phaser gave two sets of solutions, which showed slightly 
different positions.

You can also see that there is a translation inside the same set of solution.


SOLU SET  RFZ=12.8 TFZ=21.4 PAK=0 LLG=452 RFZ=10.7 TFZ=47.9 PAK=0 LLG=1693 
RFZ=13.0 TFZ=47.6 PAK=0 LLG=2791 RFZ=10.7 TFZ=46.1 PAK=0 LLG=4045
SOLU 6DIM ENSE ensemble1 EULER  184.0520.185  175.770 FRAC -0.49889 
-0.00218 -0.0
SOLU 6DIM ENSE ensemble1 EULER  225.1160.167  134.696 FRAC -0.47056  
0.49706  0.00051
SOLU 6DIM ENSE ensemble1 EULER  359.333   31.677  180.633 FRAC  0.75769 
-0.71475 -0.14004
SOLU 6DIM ENSE ensemble1 EULER  359.373   31.969  180.711 FRAC  0.73074 
-0.21423 -0.14108
SOLU SET  RFZ=12.8 TFZ=21.4 PAK=0 LLG=452 RFZ=10.7 TFZ=47.9 PAK=0 LLG=1693 
RFZ=13.0 TFZ=47.6 PAK=0 LLG=2791 RFZ=10.7 TFZ=47.3 PAK=0 LLG=4042
SOLU 6DIM ENSE ensemble1 EULER  213.1150.173  146.741 FRAC -0.49931 
-0.00269  0.00045
SOLU 6DIM ENSE ensemble1 EULER  248.1730.254  111.665 FRAC -0.47091  
0.49661  0.00101
SOLU 6DIM ENSE ensemble1 EULER  359.399   31.602  180.578 FRAC  0.75808 
-0.71455 -0.13980
SOLU 6DIM ENSE ensemble1 EULER  359.378   31.255  180.361 FRAC  0.78370 
-0.21555 -0.13830


 I remember there is a discussion in CCP4bb about the same topic with the 
focus of pseudo-symmetry or translational pseudo-symmetry. 
   
 
Can anybody give some troubleshooting about my issue?

 Thanks a lot and have a nice weekend,

Jerry McCully



_
Windows Live: Keep your friends up to date with what you do online.
http://windowslive.com/Campaign/SocialNetworking?ocid=PID23285::T:WLMTAGL:ON:WL:en-US:SI_SB_online:082009

[ccp4bb] Problem with Coot reading monomer library file.

2009-08-28 Thread Peter Chan

Dear Crystallographers,

I've been spending 10 hours trying (googling, manually editting cif files 
based on templates in Coot's library, asking around, rtfm and reading this bbs) 
to figure out why Coot the geometric restraints wouldn't load.

The molecule I have is difluoroacetate (and some analogs).  I drew it in 
sketcher and tried regularized it using both the refmac from sketcher as well 
as the 'normal' refmac.  From what I can tell, Coot can read this cif file 
without errors, but when it keeps telling me that it doesn't have the library 
descriptions when I try to do real space refinement.

My system and programs:
-Windows Vista 32 bit Home
-Coot 0.5 as well as 0.6
-CCP4i 6.1.1

Out of desperation, I also tested this on Coot v0.1 which has worked for me 
before...  and I was surprised that I can do real space refinement without 
problem.  Could there be some settings that I've missed?

Any insights would be greatly appreciated.

Peter

_
Stay in the loop and chat with friends, right from your inbox!
http://go.microsoft.com/?linkid=9671354