Happy New Year everyone
Sorry for posting this again, but the application deadline is 18 January
(still 2 weeks away) and it has been a while since I posted this the first
time. Thanks to everyone who applied already!
POSTDOCTORAL POSITION IN MACROMOLECULAR CRYSTALLOGRAPHY, UNIVERSITY OF
Sylvia Fanucchi wrote:
Hi and Happy New Year to you all
Hello Sylvia.
I have a little question about editing phi and psi angles in coot. When
I click on the residue to adjust, it brings up a Ramachandran plot with
a single dot corresponding to the phi and psi angles of the residue
james09 pruza wrote:
Dear All,
I am using Refmac5 and have metal in the structure. The refmac program is
not reading this from the library file and hence not refining this metal
ion.
What is the way to solve this problem.
Thanks in advance.
J...
Do you have the correct format for the ATOM
Hello Paul,
I almost never use this tool these days. You can find out why at the study
weekend :)
Paul.
What about those who don't attend? Tant pis?
Cheers, Tim
Dear all,
I just finished my first protein structure. More or less. I'm using right now
the pdb validation server to check the data and the data look quite well.. The
only point irretating is following line in the Adit Validation Report:
The following residues have unexpected configuration of
Dear all,
I downloaded ARP/wARP 7.1 from EMBL-Hamburg and executed ./install.sh.
All tests pass up to and including refmac version check (see log below).
After that, a Badly formed number in an if test. What could be the
issue?
The system is Redhat EL 5.4, tcsh.
Thanks.
Andreas
The attached slightly modified script fixes that problem
Phil
install_csh.sh.gz
Description: GNU Zip compressed data
On 4 Jan 2010, at 11:15, Andreas Förster wrote:
Dear all,
I downloaded ARP/wARP 7.1 from EMBL-Hamburg and executed ./install.sh. All
tests pass up to and including
As Phil realized, the leading zeros in the refmac5 version number were
the culprit that broke the original installation script. His modified
version works beautifully.
Thanks.
Andreas
On 04/01/2010 11:27, Phil Evans wrote:
The attached slightly modified script fixes that problem
Phil
We are offering RapiData 2010, the twelfth offering of our popular course:
Rapid Data Collection and Structure Solving at the NSLS: A Practical
Course in Macromolecular X-Ray Diffraction Measurement
The course will be held 11-16 April 2010. Students could be at any level from
Highly motivated and creative postdoctoral candidates are sought to work at
the Center for Computational Medicine Bioinformatics, University of Michigan
Medical School. The candidates will work on developing algorithms for protein
structure prediction, structure modeling of membrane proteins
Hi,
I have a question about the refinement by Refmac program in CCP4 package. I
tried both the old version(1.4.4) and the latest version (2.0.5) for restrained
refinement, and they gave me different result. For old version, it's
0.192/0.250-- 0.191/0.247, while for the latest version,
This might be of interest to the scientific computing community:
http://www.osnews.com/story/22683/Intel_Forced_to_Remove_Cripple_AMD_Function_from_Compiler_
Intel Forced to Remove Cripple AMD Function from Compiler?
posted by Thom Holwerda on Sun 3rd Jan 2010 20:32 UTC
Icon
Here's
Scientist Structural Biology
Constellation Pharmaceuticals is a rapidly growing biopharmaceutical company
dedicated to the development of novel therapeutics in the emerging field of
Epigenetics.
The structural biology group at Constellation is looking for an enthusiastic
and collaborative
Hi Feng,
just my speculations (of course, the respective authors of the program
you use may provide you with a better answer):
In terms of refinement results, all pairs of numbers below look the same
to me (regardless the refinement program used):
0.192/0.250
0.191/0.247
0.202/0.254
What are the versions of refmac you are using.
Differences (as Pavel mentioned) could be scaling and different
scaling parameters.
If you would send your log file to me I can try to find out and try to
sort out this problem.
regards
Garib
On 4 Jan 2010, at 17:35, Feng Guo wrote:
Hi,
I
15 matches
Mail list logo