Any chance validation reports will ever be made for obsoleted entries?
Eric
On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 1:01 PM, Gerard DVD Kleywegt
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> You may not have noticed, but 19 March 2014 was VR Day - the day that new
> style wwPDB validation reports for all X-ray structures were made publ
Was there a reason that you turned off the scaling in Aimless ("onlymerge")? If
the data have come from Mosflm, this is definitely wrong - the result is that
(among other things) you have negative CCanom values which is unusual to say
the least
Just run it with the default options, that's usual
... and there will be (shameless self-advertising):
Ponnusamy et al. 2014 Acta D accepted
You may also want to make pseudo-precession photographs using LABELIT.
This will give you a better indication on the characteristics and
directionality of the disorder.
Bernhard
Thanks to all who res
Dear Faisal,
the lack of the CCanom line in the shelxc output suggests that your data
are already merged, and my guess is you processed your data with HKL2000
- all other integration programs I am aware of do not merge the data at
such an early stage giving you access to the CCanom Eleanor mention
Look at the aimless plot of CCanom . That is the best indicator I think and
very sensitive when you have such high redundancy
Eleanor
On 25 Apr 2014, at 22:13, Jim Pflugrath wrote:
> should be above 0.80
>
> There seems to be plenty of signal there with all values above 1.02. We have
> solv
