Re: [ccp4bb] atom names for beta-D-xylopyranose

2014-06-03 Thread Thomas Lütteke
Hi Andrew, I can only make a guess: As the atom that actually should be O1 is called O4A, and all the other atom names look fine apart from a B added to the them, it looks as if this residue was derived from a disaccharide, where the XYP part was linked to O4 of another residue. But I agree

Re: [ccp4bb] Alternate sugar conformations in refmac 5.5.0110

2013-04-19 Thread Thomas Lütteke
Hi Markus, I had a brief look at the structure fragment that you had included in your mail, and I don't think that you really observe these two conformations. Stereochemistry of the A conformation looks fine, but the sugar in the alternate B conformation is not an NAG but an NDG (i.e. it has

Re: [ccp4bb] Automatic LINK generation

2011-03-10 Thread Thomas Lütteke
Dear Hailiang, as Herman Schreuder already wrote sugars are quite likely to contain errors. We are developing the PDB CArbohydrate REsidue check tool (pdb-care) in our group to help crystallographers locating problems in sugars. There will be an update soon, which includes checks for

Re: [ccp4bb] Automatic LINK generation

2011-03-10 Thread Thomas Lütteke
Dear Enrico, you can find information on PDB entries with carbohydrates in the GLYCOSCIENCES.de database: http://www.glycosciences.de/database/index.php To find entries with O-Glycans linked to Thr you can use the substructure search at

Re: [ccp4bb] To model or not to model...

2010-04-15 Thread Thomas Lütteke
Dear Katherine, I would like to add a futher point to this discussion: If you do model residues with poor or no electron density, then you should be sure of what you are doing and not just make more or less unguided guesses. This seems obvious but unfortunately it isn't, at least not to

Re: [ccp4bb] geometry problems with sugars

2010-04-23 Thread Thomas Lütteke
On Thu, 22 Apr 2010 10:13:40 -0700, tirumal ch_tiru...@yahoo.com wrote: If you have a poor density (which I guess, generally is the case for large glycoprotein structures) you have to depend on trial and error strategy to get the right NAG conformation. I don't know how other refinement

Re: [ccp4bb] correlated alternate confs - validation?

2014-07-25 Thread Thomas Lütteke
Just a quick thought that might be a workaround solution within the PDB format restrictions: In NMR structures there are often multiple conformations stored in different MODEL sections - this should in principle be possible for x-ray structures as well, shouldn't it? Of course this is a waste

Re: [ccp4bb] N-linked glycosylation check

2017-06-20 Thread Thomas Lütteke
Dear Chris, this is not an answer to your question but may be helpful anyway. I checked your glycan with pdb-care at http://www.glycosciences.de/tools/pdbcare/ and found what I already assumed from looking at the image you had sent: Some of your residues feature a wrong anomer. BMA303B is an

Re: [ccp4bb] O-linked glycans

2018-07-25 Thread Thomas Lütteke
Dear Goran et al., when building O-linked glycans one should keep in mind that in contrast to N-glycans there is no single core structure in O-glycans, but a variety of different structures exist. Therefore, the NAG-SER linkage might be correct (if it is an O-GlcNAc modification, which is