[ccp4bb] AW: Twinning problem - almost solved.

2013-06-21 Thread Herman . Schreuder
- From: CCP4 bulletin board [mailto:CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK] On Behalf Of herman.schreu...@sanofi.com Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2013 8:04 AM To: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK Subject: [ccp4bb] AW: Twinning problem Dear Mitch (and Philip and Phil), It is clear that I should give refmac a go with the non

Re: [ccp4bb] AW: Twinning problem - almost solved.

2013-06-21 Thread Roger Rowlett
To: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK Subject: [ccp4bb] AW: Twinning problem Dear Mitch (and Philip and Phil), It is clear that I should give refmac a go with the non-detwinned F's and just the TWIN command. Thank you for your suggestions, Herman -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Miller

Re: [ccp4bb] AW: Twinning problem - almost solved.

2013-06-21 Thread Eleanor Dodson
: Thursday, June 20, 2013 8:04 AM To: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK Subject: [ccp4bb] AW: Twinning problem Dear Mitch (and Philip and Phil), It is clear that I should give refmac a go with the non-detwinned F's and just the TWIN command. Thank you for your suggestions, Herman

Re: [ccp4bb] AW: Twinning problem - almost solved.

2013-06-21 Thread Robbie Joosten
To: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK Subject: Re: [ccp4bb] AW: Twinning problem - almost solved. At your resolution that seems to me a reasonable gap between R and Rfree? Eleanor On 21 Jun 2013, at 12:28, herman.schreu...@sanofi.com wrote: Dear Bulletin Board, After some headbanging (Refmac5 had

[ccp4bb] AW: [ccp4bb] AW: Twinning problem - almost solved.

2013-06-21 Thread Herman . Schreuder
, Herman -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: CCP4 bulletin board [mailto:CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK] Im Auftrag von Robbie Joosten Gesendet: Freitag, 21. Juni 2013 16:21 An: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK Betreff: Re: [ccp4bb] AW: Twinning problem - almost solved. Hi Herman, Tighter restraints typically

Re: [ccp4bb] AW: [ccp4bb] AW: Twinning problem - almost solved.

2013-06-21 Thread Tim Gruene
@JISCMAIL.AC.UK] Im Auftrag von Robbie Joosten Gesendet: Freitag, 21. Juni 2013 16:21 An: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK Betreff: Re: [ccp4bb] AW: Twinning problem - almost solved. Hi Herman, Tighter restraints typically close the gap between R and R-free. This does not mean one should just tighten

[ccp4bb] AW: [ccp4bb] AW: [ccp4bb] AW: Twinning problem - almost solved.

2013-06-21 Thread Herman . Schreuder
- Von: Tim Gruene [mailto:t...@shelx.uni-ac.gwdg.de] Gesendet: Freitag, 21. Juni 2013 17:30 An: Schreuder, Herman RD/DE Cc: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK Betreff: Re: [ccp4bb] AW: [ccp4bb] AW: Twinning problem - almost solved. -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Dear Herman, a large gap

[ccp4bb] AW: Twinning problem

2013-06-20 Thread Herman . Schreuder
Dear Mitch (and Philip and Phil), It is clear that I should give refmac a go with the non-detwinned F's and just the TWIN command. Thank you for your suggestions, Herman -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Miller, Mitchell D. [mailto:mmil...@slac.stanford.edu] Gesendet: Donnerstag, 20.