I have one or two in my garage ;-0
Best wishes, Jon Cooper. jon.b.coo...@protonmail.com
Sent from Proton Mail mobile
Original Message
On 27 Jan 2024, 19:46, Randy John Read wrote:
> Hi, The current policy of the PDB is that you can deposit a re-refinement of
> a structure
Hi,
The current policy of the PDB is that you can deposit a re-refinement of a
structure deposited by someone else only if you publish a new paper about it,
so that there is a citation associated with the structure. Of course, echoing
Eleanor, if you find an issue with someone else’s structure
I second Eleanor's suggestions. In fact I would hope the PDB made
re-depisitions known to the original authors. I had an incident recently
where someone (I believe possibly a student) had used one of my structures
for MR but then did the deposition as a re-refinement (because they used it
as MR
Did you make the original deposition ? If so the pdb accepts
re-depositions...
If it was done by someone else I guess the courteous thing is to notify
them and maybe talk to the pdb- redo team?
Cheers Eleanor
On Sat, 27 Jan 2024 at 01:53, Lucas Souza
wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> After auditing and
Dear all,
After auditing and reprocessing a deposited structure with clear processing
mistakes (missing/wrong residues and ligands with evident density) prior to
some analysis that are going to be published, what should be done? Re-deposit
the structure with a "reprocess" flag? Reopen the PDB
