m: CCP4 bulletin board [mailto:CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK] On Behalf Of Phil Evans
Sent: 31 January 2016 22:45
To: ccp4bb
Subject: Re: [ccp4bb] Spacegroups, screw axes and ordering
Back to the original question
I still fail to see the objection to space groups such as P 21 2 21 - these are
consistent with int
the original mtz file as
input for refinement!
Best,
Herman
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: CCP4 bulletin board [mailto:CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK] Im Auftrag von Kay
Diederichs
Gesendet: Freitag, 29. Januar 2016 13:51
An: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
Betreff: Re: [ccp4bb] Spacegroups, screw axes
: Freitag, 29. Januar 2016 16:16
An: Schreuder, Herman R/DE; CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
Betreff: Re: AW: [ccp4bb] Spacegroups, screw axes and ordering
Dear Herman,
I did not write anything about the question of assigning a spacegroup
based on screw axes absences. _Of course_ this is unreliable
t;>>>
>>>>> On 29 Jan 2016, at 20:52, Quyen Hoang <qqho...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Sure, but you would need to expand space group X in order to see the
>>>>> intermolecular interactions that would have been seen i
bout how non-crystallographers might use our
>>> structural models deposited in the PDB, I doubt that many of them would
>>> know how to expand.
>>>
>>> I am not advocating, just discussing.
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Quyen
>>>
t; Sent from my BlackBerry 10 smartphone.
>> From: Keller, Jacob
>> Sent: Friday, January 29, 2016 2:20 PM
>> To: Quyen Hoang; CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
>> Subject: RE: [ccp4bb] Spacegroups, screw axes and ordering
>>
>>> I mean, would it not be more informati
m not advocating, just discussing.
>
> Cheers,
> Quyen
>
> Sent from my BlackBerry 10 smartphone.
> From: Keller, Jacob
> Sent: Friday, January 29, 2016 2:20 PM
> To: Quyen Hoang; CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
> Subject: RE: [ccp4bb] Spacegroups, screw axes and ordering
>
> >I
