Hello,
I don’t know if crystallographic software is commonly GPU-accelerated. Most
software we use to process cryoEM data is and requires CUDA, which only works
on Nvidia hardware with their driver. Also seems to be the case for a lot of
deep learning software. Like it or not, it’s simply a
Hope this helps,
>
>Andy
>
>
>From: CCP4 bulletin board on behalf of Harry Powell
><193323b1e616-dmarc-requ...@jiscmail.ac.uk>
>Sent: 26 April 2024 16:46
>To: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
>Subject: [ccp4bb] replacement for Scientific Linux
>
>
>External Se
Hi Harry,
I started using Debian about 10-15 years ago, and never changed my
opinion since. I had tested various others before, like redhat, suse,
ubuntu etc. The stable version of Debian is indeed very stable, as
there are no version changes, only bug fixes etc. The new release
is about every
If you want to keep as close to scientific linux as possible, I would
suggest Alma or Rocky Linux. Those were the two options my group considered
when the writing was on the wall for scientific linux and we were ramping
up our workstations. We ended up going with Alma, but I'm not sure it is
any
Hello Harry
Any of the top 50 on distrowatch.com will basically be fine and the next 20 or
so on the list will probably be fine. Then you start getting into the twilight
zone. I am sure that will help greatly to narrow down your choice ;-0
Best wishes, Jon Cooper. jon.b.coo...@protonmail.com
the default OS.
Hope this helps,
Andy
From: CCP4 bulletin board on behalf of Harry Powell
<193323b1e616-dmarc-requ...@jiscmail.ac.uk>
Sent: 26 April 2024 16:46
To: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
Subject: [ccp4bb] replacement for Scientific Linux
External Sende
Hi folks
For many years I’ve been using Scientific Linux as my OS of choice (when not
using my Mac) - but it’s been discontinued. SL was based on RHEL, and had
useful things like a less-buggy Fortran/C/C++ compiler than that released by RH.
What do people here recommend as a replacement?
