[ccp4bb] Phenix refine distorting a sidechain despite correct density

2020-12-02 Thread Igor Petrik
I am refining a 1.71A X-ray structure with phenix refine. I have everything modelled in - ~150 residues in the ASU and a heme - and my R-work/R-free is 0.17/0.22. But when I went to deposit it, PDB pointed out that two of my sidechains have distorted geometries. One is a His, and looking at it in

Re: [ccp4bb] Phenix refine distorting a sidechain despite correct density

2020-12-02 Thread Nigel Moriarty
Igor There is a Phenix BB for your Phenix related questions. You can subscribe here. http://www.phenix-online.org/mailman/listinfo/phenixbb In the meantime, please send the Phenix version and OS to myself and Pavel privately and I'm sure we can help. We may also need the inputs (privately, of

Re: [ccp4bb] Phenix refine distorting a sidechain despite correct density

2020-12-02 Thread Folmer Fredslund
Dear Igor There's a phenix bulletin board for question like this, which is where you should post the question. ( I crosspost here) I would choose to not do the real space refinement in phenix.refine during the last rounds of refinement of a model, when sidechain positions are essentially

Re: [ccp4bb] Refmac not handling microheterogeneity?

2020-12-02 Thread Ian Tickle
Hi Keitaro Perfect! Thanks, that's great. Cheers -- Ian On Wed, 2 Dec 2020 at 22:31, Keitaro Yamashita wrote: > Dear Ian, > > For the moment in Refmac5 we need to use insertion codes to handle > microheterogeneity. LINKR records are also needed in the header. So > 7a5v.pdb should be

Re: [ccp4bb] Refmac not handling microheterogeneity?

2020-12-02 Thread Keitaro Yamashita
Dear Ian, For the moment in Refmac5 we need to use insertion codes to handle microheterogeneity. LINKR records are also needed in the header. So 7a5v.pdb should be changed like this: 954a955,957 LINKRTHR A 279 LYS A 279A gap LINKRC VAL A

Re: [ccp4bb] Phenix refine distorting a sidechain despite correct density

2020-12-02 Thread Pavel Afonine
Hi Folmer, I would choose to not do the real space refinement in phenix.refine during > the last rounds of refinement of a model, when sidechain positions are > essentially correct. > by design it is supposed to place and fit side chains as good as possible, satisfying both map fit and geometry

[ccp4bb] Registration for CCP4 Virtual Study Weekend 2021 is now live

2020-12-02 Thread McIntyre, Karen (STFC,RAL,SC)
The CCP4 study weekend is going online for 2021! We would like to welcome you to join us for this year's meeting which will run from 5th-8th January. The theme this year is: Integrating Structural Biology We have invited a diverse group of speakers to give insights into different

Re: [ccp4bb] Refmac not handling microheterogeneity?

2020-12-02 Thread Eleanor Dodson
Only a hunch but this works: ATOM 1036 OD1AASN A 172 -7.722 13.371 -18.195 0.50 5.12 O ATOM 1037 OD1BASN A 172 -7.152 14.800 -15.791 0.50 7.63 O And here you have:ATOM 2354 N ATHR A 279 138.241 168.068 154.050 0.50 27.65 N ATOM 2355 CA ATHR A 279 136.909 167.684 153.607 0.50 28.45 C ATOM

[ccp4bb] Refmac not handling microheterogeneity?

2020-12-02 Thread Ian Tickle
Dear All I just downloaded a PDB file (7A5V) from the EBI server, tried to run Refmac on it and got the error: ERROR: in chain A residue: 279 different residues have the same number There is an error in the input coordinate file At least one the chains has 2 residues with the same number ===>

Re: [ccp4bb] Refmac not handling microheterogeneity?

2020-12-02 Thread Robbie Joosten
Hi Ian, AFAIK there is no clean solution for this and I imagine this problem goes very deep into the internal representation of the model in REFMAC. That said, 1 in 6 missing PDB-REDO entries is caused by this problem, so a solution would be very welcome. Cheers, Robbie > -Original

Re: [ccp4bb] Refmac not handling microheterogeneity?

2020-12-02 Thread Ian Tickle
Sorry Eleanor, same problem in 'interleaved' order (except for 2 extra atoms in LYS). Strangely the error message is now repeated 91 times, even though there are only 16 atoms (7+9) in the 2 residues: previously I only got the message once ! Guess I must have imagined that it worked - it's