Oh, gosh. Pete, I am sorry but I had already submitted a proposal. As you say
nanogravity is surely next up and then picogravity. While I am waiting for Elon
to get back to me I have been looking into an ultimate brightness ‘top pocket
synchrotron’. This single electron device has the smallest
Sent: Tuesday, April 2, 2024 3:49 AM
To: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
Subject: Re: [ccp4bb] request for applications
The obvious project worthy of such funding is crystallization in ultra low
gravity. Perfectly formed crystals are priceless and the basis for advances in
structural biology. Crystal
, April 2, 2024 3:49 AM
To: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
Subject: Re: [ccp4bb] request for applications
The obvious project worthy of such funding is crystallization in ultra low
gravity. Perfectly formed crystals are priceless and the basis for advances in
structural biology. Crystal growth on the ISS
The obvious project worthy of such funding is crystallization in ultra low
gravity. Perfectly formed crystals are priceless and the basis for advances in
structural biology. Crystal growth on the ISS, in orbit 254 miles above the
Earth, is considered growth in microgravity. Now consider the
> what would YOU do if you had $1e12 USD for your science?
(a) Embezzle most of and (b) do sociologically relevant research with the rest,
like
https://www.ruppweb.org/Garland/PICD.html
Best, BR
-
Bernhard Rupp
k.k.
On Mon, Apr 01, 2024, James Holton wrote:
My question for the BB is: what would YOU do if you had $1e12 USD for
your science? No non-scientific proposals please. There are plenty of
other forums for those. This BB is about biological structural
science, so please stay on-topic. OK? And
Of course, Frank! No amount is too small if it makes a difference in
the world.
Can you please provide a budget justification?
On 4/1/2024 1:22 AM, Frank Von Delft wrote:
Oh dear, your prime number oversupply crashed the crypto Ponzi
schememarket. Will you accept $10e2 proposals now?
Hi James,
The elevator pitch has to be 90 degrees, no? Otherwise it would travel
horizontally as well.
Or, perhaps, we should petition these types of elevators to be added to
building codes for large, multi-entrance buildings?
Best,
Nukri
On Mon, Apr 1, 2024 at 10:08 AM James Holton wrote:
>
I'm sorry Phil, but your application has been administratively rejected
because it did not conform to the bioscience-only stipulation that was
clearly stated in the RFA.
We look forward to an improved version of your proposal in the future,
and please try to read the instructions more
For you, Eleanor? Of course! I look forward to it.
But do you have an "elevator pitch"?
I feel that a lively exchange of short messages conveys ideas much more
efficiently and effectively than an annual exchange of hyper-dense
documents.
Cheers,
-James Holton
MAD Scientist
On 4/1/2024
:: I expect to have ~ $1e12 USD on current ledgers.
Presumably via the Bankman-Fried algorithm
Phil
On 4/1/24 3:01 AM, James Holton wrote:
Hey Everyone,
It may sound like an incredibly boring thing that there has never been a
formal mathematical proof that finding the prime factors of very
It. Will probably take me a. Full year to draft the. Application - is that
too slow?
On Mon, 1 Apr 2024 at 09:22, Frank Von Delft <
bcb385fe5582-dmarc-requ...@jiscmail.ac.uk> wrote:
> Oh dear, your prime number oversupply crashed the crypto Ponzi scheme
> market. Will you accept $10e2
Oh dear, your prime number oversupply crashed the crypto Ponzi scheme market.
Will you accept $10e2 proposals now?
Sent from tiny silly touch screen
From: James Holton
Sent: Monday, 1 April 2024 08:01
To: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
Subject: [ccp4bb] request for
13 matches
Mail list logo
