Re: I hate the new mail system

2017-03-07 Thread Tor Arntsen via cctalk
On 7 March 2017 at 15:57, Pete Turnbull via cctalk wrote: > On 07/03/2017 13:47, Christian Corti via cctalk wrote: >> >> On Tue, 7 Mar 2017, Pete Turnbull wrote: >>> >>> No, Mouse is right, it's broken: >> >> >> Works for me (also from different networks outside the

Re: Fluorescent lights (Was: Full immersion emulation)

2017-03-07 Thread Ed via cctalk
have no idea... wife bought them at home depot they were not cheap but just twisted ino fixture and done. I am going to do dame in some of the rooms at SMECC museum too. I like a simple fix and this was! In a message dated 3/7/2017 12:43:24 P.M. US Mountain Standard Time,

Looking to re-home some NeXT hardware

2017-03-07 Thread Chris Reuter via cctalk
I have some NeXT hardware that I'm looking to re-home. Items include: 1 NeXT cube with an unknown expansion card 2 Monochrome monitors 2 NeXTStation "slab" workstations, non-functional Boxed NeXTStep installation media with manuals (may not be complete) 2 Mice, 3 keyboards,

Re: MIPS I-IV instruction set standards

2017-03-07 Thread Robert Ferguson via cctalk
> On Mar 7, 2017, at 3:42 PM, Maciej W. Rozycki via cctech > wrote: > > On Tue, 28 Feb 2017, Angelo Papenhoff via cctech wrote: > >> I'm wondering where the MIPS I-IV standards that are referenced >> everywhere are defined. I was able to actually find what seems to be

Re: MIPS I-IV instruction set standards

2017-03-07 Thread Maciej W. Rozycki via cctalk
On Tue, 28 Feb 2017, Angelo Papenhoff via cctech wrote: > I'm wondering where the MIPS I-IV standards that are referenced > everywhere are defined. I was able to actually find what seems to be the > IV standard [1] but found no such thing for I-III. I didn't even find > any bibliographic

Re: I hate the new mail system

2017-03-07 Thread Sean Conner via cctalk
It was thus said that the Great Fred Cisin via cctalk once stated: > On Tue, 7 Mar 2017, Eric Christopherson via cctalk wrote: > >What makes it so that other mailing lists don't unsubscribe people when > >bounces occur? > > This list displays (not "full headers"): > Date: Tue, 7 Mar 2017 20:23:42

Re: Fluorescent lights (Was: Full immersion emulation)

2017-03-07 Thread Jon Elson via cctalk
On 03/07/2017 01:04 PM, Ed via cctalk wrote: we had tubes with LEDs in them... took old florescent tube out of fixture.. twisted in the thing with the LEDs in it that hacked wight into the lighting fixture and done! Ed# We had hideous 30-year old magnetic ballasts in the kitchen.

Re: I hate the new mail system

2017-03-07 Thread Paul Berger via cctalk
On 2017-03-07 10:45 PM, Paul Berger wrote: On 2017-03-07 10:38 PM, Fred Cisin via cctalk wrote: On Tue, 7 Mar 2017, Eric Christopherson via cctalk wrote: What makes it so that other mailing lists don't unsubscribe people when bounces occur? This list displays (not "full headers"): Date:

Re: I hate the new mail system

2017-03-07 Thread Fred Cisin via cctalk
On Tue, 7 Mar 2017, Eric Christopherson via cctalk wrote: What makes it so that other mailing lists don't unsubscribe people when bounces occur? This list displays (not "full headers"): Date: Tue, 7 Mar 2017 20:23:42 -0600 From: Eric Christopherson via cctalk Reply-To:

Re: I hate the new mail system

2017-03-07 Thread Eric Christopherson via cctalk
On Tue, Mar 07, 2017, Eric Smith via cctalk wrote: > On Tue, Mar 7, 2017 at 2:48 AM, Christian Corti via cctalk < > cctalk@classiccmp.org> wrote: > > > And cctalk@... is neither responsible for the writing of the message nor > > does it belong to the author of the message. But replies should be

RE: Fluorescent lights (Was: Full immersion emulation)

2017-03-07 Thread Dave Wade G4UGM via cctalk
> -Original Message- > From: cctalk [mailto:cctalk-boun...@classiccmp.org] On Behalf Of jim > stephens via cctalk > Sent: 07 March 2017 19:43 > To: General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts > > Subject: Re: Fluorescent lights (Was: Full immersion emulation) >

Re: 3B2 stuff-maybe

2017-03-07 Thread Seth Morabito via cctalk
* On Tue, Mar 07, 2017 at 11:08:37AM -0600, Electronics Plus via cctalk wrote: > I called the only place I know of that supported 3B2 stuff, which is > Communications Hardware in TX. They recently had a change in technicians, > and a lot of the older stuff they no longer

Re: Fluorescent lights (Was: Full immersion emulation)

2017-03-07 Thread jim stephens via cctalk
On 3/7/2017 11:04 AM, Ed via cctalk wrote: we had tubes with LEDs in them... took old florescent tube out of fixture.. twisted in the thing with the LEDs in it that hacked wight into the lighting fixture and done! Ed# I've asked about those and have no sources of such. They do

Re: I hate the new mail system

2017-03-07 Thread Holm Tiffe via cctalk
Mouse via cctalk wrote: > >> And BTW, what you are doing is not clever at all: > >> mo...@rodents-montreal.org > >> SMTP error from remote mail server after initial connection: > >> host MX-4.rodents-montreal.org [98.124.61.89]: > >> 550-.de's whois server, whois.denic.de, is

Re: Fluorescent lights (Was: Full immersion emulation)

2017-03-07 Thread Ed via cctalk
we had tubes with LEDs in them... took old florescent tube out of fixture.. twisted in the thing with the LEDs in it that hacked wight into the lighting fixture and done! Ed# In a message dated 3/7/2017 10:23:36 A.M. US Mountain Standard Time, cctalk@classiccmp.org writes:

Re: Fluorescent lights (Was: Full immersion emulation)

2017-03-07 Thread Noel Chiappa via cctalk
> From: Jon Elson > I have converted our kitchen to LEDs. Yeah, I've already done ours, too. Our fixtures are let into the ceiling, so just replacing them with LED ones wasn't an option; I couldn't find ones that took the same opening. But I bought an under-ceiling fluorescent-sized LED

Re: 3B2 stuff-maybe

2017-03-07 Thread SPC via cctalk
Thanks. I must check my 3B2/400 and the 3B1. The first one had some issues but I don't touched it for a long time. Regards Sergio 2017-03-07 18:08 GMT+01:00 Electronics Plus via cctalk : > I called the only place I know of that supported 3B2 stuff, which is >

3B2 stuff-maybe

2017-03-07 Thread Electronics Plus via cctalk
I called the only place I know of that supported 3B2 stuff, which is Communications Hardware in TX. They recently had a change in technicians, and a lot of the older stuff they no longer support got culled, but they are willing to look for boards, drives, or whatever would help the collectors get

Re: FTGH (you come get): VAXstation 100 terminals

2017-03-07 Thread Ethan Dicks via cctalk
On Tue, Mar 7, 2017 at 9:19 AM, Stefan Skoglund via cctalk wrote: >> > On Mar 5, 2017, at 11:56 PM, Cameron Kaiser via cctalk >> > wrote: >> > >> > I picked these up as part of an estate liquidation, but I don't have a >> > Unibus setup to run

Re: Still Looking For AT 3B2 Internals Docs

2017-03-07 Thread Liam Proven via cctalk
On 7 March 2017 at 01:09, Jerry Kemp via cctalk wrote: > Much in relationship, to, at least at one time, the Novell Netware system > sat on top of DOS. Very very kinda sortof. Netware 2 could cold-boot itself. Netware 3 & 4 needed DOS as a bootloader. If you wanted, you

Re: Atari 1400XL for sale...

2017-03-07 Thread Liam Proven via cctalk
On 7 March 2017 at 04:22, Craig.B Mitchell via cctalk wrote: > Hi, is your 1400xl still for sale? If so, what are you looking to get? Who are you asking? You just posted to a thousand people on a mailing list. -- Liam Proven • Profile: https://about.me/liamproven

Re: I hate the new mail system

2017-03-07 Thread Pete Turnbull via cctalk
On 07/03/2017 15:07, Mouse via cctalk wrote: $ telnet whois.denic.de 43 Trying 81.91.170.6... Connected to whois.denic.de. Escape character is '^]'. whois -r uni-stuttgart.de % Error: 557 Request not clearly specified Connection closed by foreign host. $ That's broken. In that

Re: I hate the new mail system

2017-03-07 Thread Alfred M. Szmidt via cctalk
>> No, Mouse is right, it's broken: > > Works for me (also from different networks outside the university network): Interesting... I still get the same errors. Could it be location-dependant in some way? Tried from Boston, and Stockholm, so I don't think so. Are you using the

Re: I hate the new mail system

2017-03-07 Thread Mouse via cctalk
>> And BTW, what you are doing is not clever at all: >> mo...@rodents-montreal.org >> SMTP error from remote mail server after initial connection: >> host MX-4.rodents-montreal.org [98.124.61.89]: >> 550-.de's whois server, whois.denic.de, is completely broken, handing >> 550-out

Re: I hate the new mail system

2017-03-07 Thread Pete Turnbull via cctalk
On 07/03/2017 13:47, Christian Corti via cctalk wrote: On Tue, 7 Mar 2017, Pete Turnbull wrote: No, Mouse is right, it's broken: Works for me (also from different networks outside the university network): Interesting... I still get the same errors. Could it be location-dependant in some

Re: I hate the new mail system

2017-03-07 Thread Alfred M. Szmidt via cctalk
> No, Mouse is right, it's broken: Works for me Ditto FWIW.

Re: FTGH (you come get): VAXstation 100 terminals

2017-03-07 Thread Stefan Skoglund via cctalk
mån 2017-03-06 klockan 20:52 -0800 skrev Zane Healy via cctalk: > > On Mar 5, 2017, at 11:56 PM, Cameron Kaiser via cctalk > > wrote: > > > > I picked these up as part of an estate liquidation, but I don't have a > > Unibus setup to run them off, and they are large and

Re: I hate the new mail system

2017-03-07 Thread Christian Corti via cctalk
On Tue, 7 Mar 2017, Pete Turnbull wrote: No, Mouse is right, it's broken: Works for me (also from different networks outside the university network): # whois uni-stuttgart.de % Copyright (c) 2010 by DENIC % Version: 2.0 % % Restricted rights. % % Terms and Conditions of Use % % The data in

Re: I hate the new mail system

2017-03-07 Thread Pete Turnbull via cctalk
On 07/03/2017 09:57, Christian Corti via cctalk wrote: And BTW, what you are doing is not clever at all: mo...@rodents-montreal.org SMTP error from remote mail server after initial connection: host MX-4.rodents-montreal.org [98.124.61.89]: 550-.de's whois server, whois.denic.de, is

Re: I hate the new mail system

2017-03-07 Thread Eric Smith via cctalk
On Tue, Mar 7, 2017 at 2:48 AM, Christian Corti via cctalk < cctalk@classiccmp.org> wrote: > And cctalk@... is neither responsible for the writing of the message nor > does it belong to the author of the message. But replies should be directed > there, so there should be a Reply-To: field

Re: HP 2647A BASIC/AUTOPLOT47 and DEMO tape preservation

2017-03-07 Thread Ed via cctalk
smecc would like a tape also! neat! In a message dated 3/7/2017 1:08:12 A.M. US Mountain Standard Time, cctalk@classiccmp.org writes: Dave, I am interested. I have an HP 2647 with two restored tape drives, and have been looking for this exact tape set. I have some "new" Athana tapes.

Re: I hate the new mail system

2017-03-07 Thread Christian Corti via cctalk
On Mon, 6 Mar 2017, Mouse wrote: [...] And BTW, what you are doing is not clever at all: mo...@rodents-montreal.org SMTP error from remote mail server after initial connection: host MX-4.rodents-montreal.org [98.124.61.89]: 550-.de's whois server, whois.denic.de, is completely

Re: I hate the new mail system

2017-03-07 Thread Christian Corti via cctalk
On Mon, 6 Mar 2017, Mouse wrote: Yes, and it must not be in the Reply-To: field because in normal cases, this field is the one used for replying, and I want to reply to the list, and only to the list. ...that's sure what this sounds like. If so, I have little sympathy for your position. So

Re: Test

2017-03-07 Thread Adrian Graham via cctalk
On 07/03/2017 07:12, "Tor Arntsen" wrote: > On 7 March 2017 at 01:18, Adrian Graham via cctalk > wrote: >> Test again, None of my posts seem to be getting through... > > Saw it. And also what you sent a day ago(?), about using the 79L05 Thanks for

Re: HP 2647A BASIC/AUTOPLOT47 and DEMO tape preservation

2017-03-07 Thread CuriousMarc via cctalk
Dave, I am interested. I have an HP 2647 with two restored tape drives, and have been looking for this exact tape set. I have some "new" Athana tapes. Step 1 would be to copy them to a new Athana master tape. Then step to could be to make copies available to the group. Step 3 would be to