lk@classiccmp.org>
To: "Chuck Guzis" <ccl...@sydex.com>; "General Discussion: On-Topic and
Off-Topic Posts" <cctalk@classiccmp.org>
Sent: Sunday, October 29, 2017 9:30 AM
Subject: Re: NEC 4164-12
Nice chart Chuck.
Dwight
From: cctal
Nice chart Chuck.
Dwight
From: cctalk <cctalk-boun...@classiccmp.org> on behalf of Chuck Guzis via
cctalk <cctalk@classiccmp.org>
Sent: Saturday, October 28, 2017 10:19:53 PM
To: dwight via cctalk
Subject: Re: NEC 4164-12
On 10/28/2017 10:14 PM
On 10/28/2017 10:14 PM, dwight via cctalk wrote:
> One caution for 4164s. When they first came out, there were some that were
> 256 cycle refresh and others that were 128 cycle.
>
> There is no way by looking at them to tell which is which other than getting
> a matching original manufacture
lt;cctalk@classiccmp.org>
Sent: Saturday, October 28, 2017 1:31:36 PM
To: e. stiebler; General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts
Subject: Re: NEC 4164-12
Hi, Emanuel,
I have a quantity of 4164 DRAM from the Comboard days, new in tube. It is
likely to mostly be 150ns and I don't kno
Hi, Emanuel,
I have a quantity of 4164 DRAM from the Comboard days, new in tube. It is
likely to mostly be 150ns and I don't know the brands until I dig it out,
but I will check when I get home. If it matches what you need, I'm happy
to send some to you.
-ethan
On Oct 28, 2017 12:32, "emanuel
Hi all,
anybody has some spare in the bin, he doesn't need?
Looking for 18 pieces, preferably NEC, -12.
Thanks!
