On 2017-11-28 7:11 PM, Brent Hilpert via cctalk wrote:
On 2017-Nov-28, at 2:54 PM, Fred Cisin via cctalk wrote:
On Tue, 28 Nov 2017, Brent Hilpert via cctalk wrote:
I couldn't find the ebay listing for the NCR modem for some reason, either
using the number or by searching by keywords.
On 2017-Nov-28, at 2:54 PM, Fred Cisin via cctalk wrote:
> On Tue, 28 Nov 2017, Brent Hilpert via cctalk wrote:
>> I couldn't find the ebay listing for the NCR modem for some reason, either
>> using the number or by searching by keywords.
>
> https://www.ebay.com/itm/132411929563
That works .
On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 3:58 PM, Brent Hilpert via cctalk <
cctalk@classiccmp.org> wrote:
>
> Thanks for the additional datapoint.
> It does suggest Model A production may likely have started in 1968.
> Actual date codes in mine were 6908 to 7008.
> The larger caps are also a good place to look
On 2017-Nov-27, at 5:25 PM, steve shumaker via cctalk wrote:
> On 11/27/2017 2:26 PM, Fred Cisin via cctalk wrote:
The Livermore Data Systems modems that I sold off were from about 1964?
>>
>> On Mon, 27 Nov 2017, Brent Hilpert via cctalk wrote:
>>> Were those the Livermore Data Systems
On 11/27/2017 2:26 PM, Fred Cisin via cctalk wrote:
The Livermore Data Systems modems that I sold off were from about 1964?
On Mon, 27 Nov 2017, Brent Hilpert via cctalk wrote:
Were those the Livermore Data Systems modems in a wood box you were
selling?
Did you have anything to ascertain the
On 11/27/2017 2:26 PM, Fred Cisin via cctalk wrote:
The Livermore Data Systems modems that I sold off were from about 1964?
On Mon, 27 Nov 2017, Brent Hilpert via cctalk wrote:
Were those the Livermore Data Systems modems in a wood box you were
selling?
Did you have anything to ascertain the
The Livermore Data Systems modems that I sold off were from about 1964?
On Mon, 27 Nov 2017, Brent Hilpert via cctalk wrote:
Were those the Livermore Data Systems modems in a wood box you were selling?
Did you have anything to ascertain the 1964 date for LDS, or were you
getting that date
On 2017-Nov-26, at 2:38 PM, Fred Cisin via cctalk wrote:
> On Sun, 26 Nov 2017, couryho...@aol.com wrote:
>> does the 71 sate seem early?
>
> No, a 1971 date does not seem too early.
>
> The price seems steep, even for a "relatively" early modem.
>
> Bell 103 (300bps) dates from 1962.
> The
On Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 12:54 PM, Chuck Guzis via cctalk <
cctalk@classiccmp.org> wrote:
> On 11/27/2017 11:15 AM, Alan Frisbie via cctalk wrote:
>
> > Back in those days you could not connect anything directly to the
> telephone
> > lines -- you had to use the telco-supplied DAA (kaching!) or an
On 11/27/2017 11:15 AM, Alan Frisbie via cctalk wrote:
> Back in those days you could not connect anything directly to the telephone
> lines -- you had to use the telco-supplied DAA (kaching!) or an acoustic
> coupler. I don't know if this modem can be connected directly to a phone
> line
Tim,
cctalk@classiccmp.org writes:
couryho...@aol.com wrote:
> what is this NCR modem? what did it go to?
>
> NEW Vintage 1971 NCR Acoustic Coupler Modem, NOS, Factory Boxed, C260-400
> / F01 132411929563 on the bay
It is a Bell 103A compatible modem (110 or 30
couryho...@aol.com wrote:
what is this NCR modem? what did it go to?
NEW Vintage 1971 NCR Acoustic Coupler Modem, NOS, Factory Boxed, C260-400
/ F01 132411929563 on the bay
It is a Bell 103A compatible modem (110 or 300 baud) used with the NCR 260
series of thermal printing
thanks for dates. yes that all makes sense. some how my mind slipped a
decade.
I a looking for a GE Diginet tdm-114 acoustic coupler.
2 reasons, GE computer related
but also my first acoustic coupler I had with an ASR-35 teletype
I am also looking for the top mental
does the 71 sate seem early?
On Sun, 26 Nov 2017, Chuck Guzis via cctalk wrote:
Looking at the modem, perhaps a little too early, judging from its size.
Patent date perhaps?
1971 is the copyright date on the "Basic Concepts Manual" with it.
On Sun, 26 Nov 2017, couryho...@aol.com wrote:
does the 71 sate seem early?
No, a 1971 date does not seem too early.
The price seems steep, even for a "relatively" early modem.
Bell 103 (300bps) dates from 1962.
The Bell 101 (110 baud) was 1958.
SCROTUS "Carterfone" was 1968 (ruling
On 11/26/2017 02:09 PM, Ed via cctalk wrote:
> does the 71 sate seem early?
Looking at the modem, perhaps a little too early, judging from its size.
Patent date perhaps?
But 300 baud acoustic coupler modems date into the 1960s.
--Chuck
does the 71 sate seem early?
In a message dated 11/26/2017 2:38:17 P.M. US Mountain Standard Time,
cctalk@classiccmp.org writes:
The NCR 260 (first part of the part number) was a KSR portable
thermal printing terminal.
Somewhat similar to the Silent 700.
But, the NCR 260 had an
The NCR 260 (first part of the part number) was a KSR portable
thermal printing terminal.
Somewhat similar to the Silent 700.
But, the NCR 260 had an integrated modem with acoustic coupler
On Sun, 26 Nov 2017, Ed via cctalk wrote:
what is this NCR modem? what did it go to?
NEW Vintage 1971 NCR Acoustic Coupler Modem, NOS, Factory Boxed, C260-400
/ F01 132411929563 on the bay
not mine etc etc etc
"What did it go to?"
It connected a terminal, or computer i
what is this NCR modem? what did it go to?
NEW Vintage 1971 NCR Acoustic Coupler Modem, NOS, Factory Boxed, C260-400
/ F01 132411929563 on the bay
not mine etc etc etc
ed#
20 matches
Mail list logo
