Original message
From: Raymond Wiker
Date: 2017-01-02 11:01 PM (GMT-08:00)
To: "General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts"
Subject: Re: National Semiconductor IMP mini
I see he also has an Apple II that he wants $2000 for
Appeared here:
http://github.com/PDP-10/FOONEX
Hi all --
Thought I'd share this fix with you all just in case someone in the
future might make use of it.
Long story short: Got myself a CMD 710/M UNIBUS SCSI controller with
the intent to use it in my VAX-11/750, running 4.3BSD-Quasijarus.
Unfortunately it won't boot (it hangs shortly
I see he also has an Apple II that he wants $2000 for --- it's listed as "NON
WORKING ELECTRICAL COMPONENTS FROM EXTREME AGE", and from date codes and
copyright markings it appears to be far from original. In fact, the
motherboard seems to be a Rev 7 RFI motherboard, and the processor is (I
think)
Hi folks,
Happy new year to all!
Is anyone here familiar with the innards of Viewdata? I'm still deep in the
bowels of this Executel viewdata phone system and one thing that it should
be doing but isn't is puzzling me.
The teletext chip is a Plessey MR9735, datasheet here:
On Mon, Jan 2, 2017 at 1:56 PM, Adrian Graham
wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> Happy new year to all!
>
> Is anyone here familiar with the innards of Viewdata? I'm still deep in the
Yes, and teletext. But not this chip
> bowels of this Executel viewdata phone system and
Then again, there are plenty of Pantone colors that have no RGB equivalent...
For printing banner panels, would CMYK be a better fit than sRGB?
Are there no records of what DEC specified to their sub-contractors?
I learned the basics half a century ago, with "Color As Seen And
Photographed",
On Mon, Jan 2, 2017 at 2:57 PM, Fred Cisin wrote:
>> Then again, there are plenty of Pantone colors that have no RGB
>> equivalent...
>
>
> For printing banner panels, would CMYK be a better fit than sRGB?
> Are there no records of what DEC specified to their sub-contractors?
On Sun, Jan 01, 2017 at 12:13:05PM +, Rod Smallwood wrote:
>
>
> On 31/12/2016 07:56, Pontus Pihlgren wrote:
> >On Fri, Dec 30, 2016 at 11:04:26AM +0100, Pontus Pihlgren wrote:
> >>I'll provide examples of some of these. Others can be found online.
> >Here are three panels I could easily get
> On Jan 2, 2017, at 11:53 AM, Pete Lancashire wrote:
>
> Here is a site that you can give it RGB and it will give the closest Pantone
>
> http://rgb.to/0,72,145
Then again, there are plenty of Pantone colors that have no RGB equivalent...
paul
> On Jan 2, 2017, at 2:57 PM, Fred Cisin wrote:
>
>> Then again, there are plenty of Pantone colors that have no RGB equivalent...
>
> For printing banner panels, would CMYK be a better fit than sRGB?
> Are there no records of what DEC specified to their sub-contractors?
On Mon, 2 Jan 2017, Charles Dickman wrote:
My motivation was for no other reason than to see what the colors
looked like on a web page.
The page shows what DEC used and that was Munsell and/or Ostwald
notation along with one Pantone and a couple paint manufacturers and
colors. That is all
On 01/01/2017 05:38 PM, Al Kossow wrote:
> I'll put my copy on line. It's 70mb, the mirrors should have it sometime
> tomorrow.
>
> On 1/1/17 2:26 PM, Antonio Carlini wrote:
>
>> I did see a bunch of DEC STDs sitting on bitsavers but 070 doesn't seem to
>> be one of them.
>>
>
Other standards
On 01/01/2017 02:39 PM, Mattias EngdegÄrd wrote:
> Would someone with a real DEC VT terminal be so kind and help settle, once
> and for all, the question about how they behave with respect to
> line-wrapping, exactly? It is something that isn't covered by any standard,
> nor by any of DEC's
On Mon, Jan 2, 2017 at 10:48 AM, Noel Chiappa wrote:
> > From: Pete Lancashire
>
> > To convert from Muncell to RGB
>
> Interesting. For one colour (D.C. Blue), listed on Charles' page as Munsell
> 5PB 3/10, that page gives it as 'outside sRGB gamut', whereas the
On 01/02/2017 02:39 AM, Christian Corti wrote:
On Fri, 30 Dec 2016, Jon Elson wrote:
Is your drum in good condition? Ours was full of dust,
and 3 tracks had been ground down to the brass due to
dust packing under the heads.
You can relocate bad tracks as there are a couple of spare
tracks.
On 02/01/17 15:45, Noel Chiappa wrote:
Even at 1K pages, it shouldn't be anything like that big, if scanned using
the most space-efficient encoding.
For _manuals_, scan at 300 dpi with Black+White encoding (i.e. 1 bit per
pixel), then store as TIFFs with CCITT Group 4 (fax) compression. That
On 02/01/2017 14:17, "Tony Duell" wrote:
> That was quite common. I remember pins in one of the Philips chipsets
> with names like 'After Hours Sync'. Basically if there is a television signal
> it will be synced to it (so you can, for example, overlay teletext on a
>
> From: Pete Lancashire
> To convert from Muncell to RGB
Interesting. For one colour (D.C. Blue), listed on Charles' page as Munsell
5PB 3/10, that page gives it as 'outside sRGB gamut', whereas the page you
list gives it as sRGB [0,72,145].
Noel
> On Jan 1, 2017, at 6:25 PM, allison wrote:
>
> On 01/01/2017 05:38 PM, Al Kossow wrote:
>> I'll put my copy on line. It's 70mb, the mirrors should have it sometime
>> tomorrow.
>>
>> On 1/1/17 2:26 PM, Antonio Carlini wrote:
>>
>>> I did see a bunch of DEC STDs sitting
> From: Antonio Carlini
> My scan is ~400MB (and 1090 pages long!)
Even at 1K pages, it shouldn't be anything like that big, if scanned using
the most space-efficient encoding.
For _manuals_, scan at 300 dpi with Black+White encoding (i.e. 1 bit per
pixel), then store as TIFFs with
1 jan. 2017 kl. 23.38 skrev Al Kossow :
>
> I'll put my copy on line. It's 70mb, the mirrors should have it sometime
> tomorrow.
Many thanks! Very interesting reading; the information I was looking for is on
page D-13.
While the document makes the architectural intent
Here is a site that you can give it RGB and it will give the closest Pantone
http://rgb.to/0,72,145
On Mon, Jan 2, 2017 at 7:48 AM, Noel Chiappa wrote:
> > From: Pete Lancashire
>
> > To convert from Muncell to RGB
>
> Interesting. For one colour (D.C. Blue),
This system looks pretty interesting, though pricey. I'm thinking it is
going to be a development machine as all the switches and display would
not probably have been on a production machine.
I don't think National made many minicomputer format machines, in their
history, someone correct me.
On 1/2/17 7:22 PM, jim stephens wrote:
This system looks pretty interesting, though pricey. I'm thinking it
is going to be a development machine as all the switches and display
would not probably have been on a production machine.
I don't think National made many minicomputer format
Original message
From: Josh Dersch
Date: 2017-01-02 7:37 PM (GMT-08:00)
To: "General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts"
Subject: Re: National Semiconductor IMP mini
On 1/2/17 7:22 PM, jim stephens wrote:
> This system
On 1/2/17 7:58 PM, Brad H wrote:
Original message
From: Josh Dersch
Date: 2017-01-02 7:37 PM (GMT-08:00)
To: "General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts"
Subject: Re: National Semiconductor IMP mini
On 1/2/17 7:22 PM, jim
I have manual.
Sent from AOL Mobile Mail
On Monday, January 2, 2017 Josh Dersch wrote:
On 1/2/17 7:58 PM, Brad H wrote:
>
> Original message
> From: Josh Dersch
> Date: 2017-01-02 7:37 PM (GMT-08:00)
> To: "General Discussion: On-Topic
On 1/2/2017 8:08 PM, Josh Dersch wrote:
On 1/2/17 7:58 PM, Brad H wrote:
Original message
From: Josh Dersch
Date: 2017-01-02 7:37 PM (GMT-08:00)
To: "General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts"
Subject: Re: National
SMECC's book is on 16 c
talks about adding front panel and display etc... 16 sw and 16 led book
dated jan 74
16c seems to designate the card maybe 16 b is inclusive of PS an add
on panel and case..
also have a 8C book too.
ED# _www.smecc.org_ (http://www.smecc.org)
Odd I
Bitsavers
http://bitsavers.trailing-edge.com/pdf/national/imp/4200021C_IMP16C_App_Jan74.pdf
is same manual..
the 16 P is the machine in ebay. yea a beauty.
Ed#
In a message dated 1/2/2017 9:28:59 P.M. US Mountain Standard Time,
couryho...@aol.com writes:
SMECC's book is on 16 c
31 matches
Mail list logo