I'd vote for big VAX list. The minutiae of marketing names is
pretty boring and irrelevant to such a list isn't it?
Should the requirement be weight,
physical size,
or what tools are lost in it?
I have found that bounces can be reduced if you play around with the
receiving mail server.For example, turn off greylisting (returns 400
level codes some servers don't like).
On Tue, Jul 7, 2015 at 10:37 AM, Mouse mo...@rodents-montreal.org wrote:
I've only been back on the list for about
sending live URL's in the text that don't require a multi step copy
paste, or even save email edit, feed to lynx would be nice. Html email
does that.
thanks
Jim
On 7/7/2015 7:44 AM, dwight wrote:
What happened to email. If your into looking at something, look at the
source of this simple
Dwight, yes I think so as I am on many lists and some hate the
aol address more than others do
Ed#
In a message dated 7/7/2015 7:29:43 A.M. US Mountain Standard Time,
dkel...@hotmail.com writes:
As providers get more crowded, they will have more bounces.
They tend to
On 2015-07-06 3:33 PM, Clem Cole wrote:
...
One other note about the MC-500. If was the first commercial
Multiprocessor UNIX (predating the 386 bases symmetric boxes but a few
years) as well as being the first real time UNIX box. I still have working
one in my basement. It has 4 CPU boards
will this include micro vax also? Ed#
In a message dated 7/6/2015 8:03:25 P.M. US Mountain Standard Time,
ape...@snowmoose.com writes:
Is there any interest in starting a VAX-11/750 registry? I wouldn't
mind knowing who else out there has one and where they are now. If you
are
It was thus said that the Great william degnan once stated:
I have found that bounces can be reduced if you play around with the
receiving mail server.For example, turn off greylisting (returns 400
level codes some servers don't like).
I do greylisting on my email server [1] and I have
sending live URL's in the text that don't require a multi step copy
paste, or even save email edit, feed to lynx would be nice.
This is a client-side issue; there is no need to uglify the rest of the
email just because someone has an email reader that doesn't know what
to do with URLs.
Html
It was thus said that the Great jwsmobile once stated:
sending live URL's in the text that don't require a multi step copy
paste, or even save email edit, feed to lynx would be nice. Html email
does that.
There are some on this list (such as I) that do not use a graphical email
client,
It was thus said that the Great couryho...@aol.com once stated:
Dwight, yes I think so as I am on many lists and some hate the
aol address more than others do
I've had my fights with AOL (since I run my own email server). I think in
the end, I had to tell AOL that I was
Should the requirement be weight,
physical size,
or what tools are lost in it?
BTU requirements.
I'd vote for big VAX list.
I'd say any VAX with a UNIBUS, SDI, BI or XMI bus, at least, should qualify.
I think that would include all the 7xx, 6xxx, 8xxx, and 7xxx/1 machines. I
don't really know what was in a 9000...
BTW, is this list limited to machines that are in operable
On 2015-07-07 20:54, Robert Armstrong wrote:
I'd vote for big VAX list.
I'd say any VAX with a UNIBUS, SDI, BI or XMI bus, at least, should qualify.
I think that would include all the 7xx, 6xxx, 8xxx, and 7xxx/1 machines.
I don't really know what was in a 9000...
9000 is also XMI.
I'd say any VAX with a UNIBUS, SDI, BI or XMI bus, at least, should
qualify. I think that would include all the
7xx, 6xxx, 8xxx, and 7xxx/1 machines. I don't really know what was in
a 9000...
9000 is also XMI. Several of them, if I remember right. SDI on the other
hand is
Sorry for the scope creep; but perhaps it might be more
useful/interesting to make it a registry of any VAX that has a name of
the form VAX-11/7xx? (Which could also include the VAX 8600 and
VAX
8650, since were originally to be called the VAX-11/790 and
VAX-11/795.)
I'd vote
From: jwsmobile: Tuesday, July 07, 2015 3:43 PM
If there were a technical reason to keep it in a simple format that
would be fine, but as Al K pointed out quite some time ago, Google
already indexes all of this quite fine as it and most search engines do,
so the list is text searchable.
For
On 2015-07-08 01:25, Antonio Carlini wrote:
On 07/07/15 23:06, Johnny Billquist wrote:
I honestly don't have a good idea of what defines a large VAX. Buses
feels unsuitable. Power connector maybe? :-)
If the intention is to avoid a huge list then excluding MicroVAXes and
VAXstations should
On 07/07/2015 03:43 PM, jwsmobile wrote:
I just don't see inconveniencing an entire list because a few people
want to run on internet connected 286 machines, with attached ASR33's.
And to say that should carry much weight on selecting the format of the
email is pretty inconsiderate to
On Tuesday (07/07/2015 at 04:18PM -0700), Vincent Slyngstad wrote:
For me, HTML mail is disdained because it's a security nightmare.
I don't want to worry about transparent tracking images, cookies,
javascript, and who knows what else they've invented or will invent.
I just want to read
On Jul 7, 2015, at 4:18 PM, Chuck Guzis ccl...@sydex.com wrote:
using Thunderbird
Which I’ve noticed has problems parsing the
General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts
cctalk@classiccmp.org
No matter which platform anyone is using, it’s always Thunderbird that creates
the
On 2015-07-07 23:49, tony duell wrote:
I'd say any VAX with a UNIBUS, SDI, BI or XMI bus, at least, should
qualify. I think that would include all the
7xx, 6xxx, 8xxx, and 7xxx/1 machines. I don't really know what was in a
9000...
9000 is also XMI. Several of them, if I remember
At 07:18 PM 7/7/2015, Vincent Slyngstad wrote:
For me, HTML mail is disdained because it's a security nightmare.
I don't want to worry about transparent tracking images, cookies, javascript,
and who knows what else they've invented or will invent.
That is one reason why I still run Eudora Pro,
It was thus said that the Great jwsmobile once stated:
On 7/7/2015 12:43 PM, Sean Conner wrote:
It was thus said that the Great jwsmobile once stated:
sending live URL's in the text that don't require a multi step copy
paste, or even save email edit, feed to lynx would be nice. Html email
On 07/07/2015 4:44 PM, Chris Osborn wrote:
On Jul 7, 2015, at 4:18 PM, Chuck Guzis ccl...@sydex.com wrote:
using Thunderbird
Which I’ve noticed has problems parsing the
General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts
cctalk@classiccmp.org
No matter which platform anyone is using,
On 7/7/2015 5:43 PM, Lyndon Nerenberg wrote:
On Jul 7, 2015, at 3:43 PM, jwsmobile j...@jwsss.com wrote:
If there were a technical reason to keep it in a simple format that would be
fine, but as Al K pointed out quite some time ago, Google already indexes all
of this quite fine as it and
On 7/7/2015 6:14 PM, Chris Osborn wrote:
Begin forwarded message:
From: John Robertson pinb...@telus.net
Subject: Re: email gripe
Date: July 7, 2015 at 6:03:49 PM PDT
To: gene...@classiccmp.org,
discuss...@classiccmp.org:On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts
cctalk@classiccmp.org
Reply-To:
yes html email gets deleted for the most part
On 7/7/2015 7:13 PM, Jay West wrote:
Chris wrote...
Boy, count another vote against HTML-izing this list if that's what's being
considered.
-
No, forcing the list to send email as HTML has never been done, nor is it
being considered.
I do
On 07/07/2015 06:41 PM, jwsmobile wrote:
Thunderbird does have a bad habit of interpolating and remembering
typos, however, so if you at some point in time type in
gene...@classicmp.org, there is an entry in the Thunderbird address book
called collected addresses. It may have your general @
On 7/7/2015 4:18 PM, Vincent Slyngstad wrote:
From: jwsmobile: Tuesday, July 07, 2015 3:43 PM
If there were a technical reason to keep it in a simple format that
would be fine, but as Al K pointed out quite some time ago, Google
already indexes all of this quite fine as it and most search
Begin forwarded message:
From: John Robertson pinb...@telus.net
Subject: Re: email gripe
Date: July 7, 2015 at 6:03:49 PM PDT
To: gene...@classiccmp.org,
discuss...@classiccmp.org:On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts
cctalk@classiccmp.org
Reply-To: pinb...@telus.net, General Discussion:
On 2015-07-06 11:17 PM, Christian Gauger-Cosgrove wrote:
On 6 July 2015 at 23:03, Alan Perry ape...@snowmoose.com wrote:
Is there any interest in starting a VAX-11/750 registry? I wouldn't mind
knowing who else out there has one and where they are now. If you are
interested, send me e-mail
On 07/07/2015 07:27 PM, wulfman wrote:
yes html email gets deleted for the most part
I don't have that option--customers send whatever they want.
Another annoyance is when they send attachments in that Outlook
winmail.dat format. I think that Libre office can open it.
--Chuck
On Tue, 7 Jul 2015, Chuck Guzis wrote:
Let's see if my reply has the same problem as Chris cited.
Yep!
It took
General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts cctalk@classiccmp.org
and parsed it into:
gene...@classiccmp.org,
discuss...@classiccmp.org:On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts
On 07/07/2015 08:29 PM, Fred Cisin wrote:
On Tue, 7 Jul 2015, Chuck Guzis wrote:
Let's see if my reply has the same problem as Chris cited.
Yep!
It took General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts
cctalk@classiccmp.org
and parsed it into:
gene...@classiccmp.org,
What happened to email. If your into looking at something, look at the
source of this simple email.
What is all that html code for?
This is just a few simple text strings with nothing special needed.
Dwight
I've only been back on the list for about a week and already it has
determined that my address has too many bounces.
There must be a parameter that can be set to adjust the sensitivity.
I wouldn't count on it. I've already run into aspects of mailman which
exhibit astonishing blind spots.
36 matches
Mail list logo
