On Tue, 12 Feb 2019, Chuck Guzis via cctalk wrote:
Lattice C was recommended by Microsoft to OEMs in the DOS 1.-2. days.
Two-step compilation process LC1, LC2, then link for executable.
Microsoft didn't yet have their own C.
Microsoft C 1.0 WAS Lattice C. 1983?
(so, after recommending it, they
On 2/12/19 4:06 PM, Frank McConnell via cctalk wrote:
> I remember moving Lattice C v2 from IBM PC diskettes to an HP 150. It was
> MS-DOS applications and compiler and linker worked on the 150. No copy
> protection.
Lattice C was recommended by Microsoft to OEMs in the DOS 1.-2. days.
Two-step
Is Lattice C 2.whatever for 8086 uncommon? I have a copy on a couple
of floppies.
--Chuck
On Feb 12, 2019, at 14:16, Warner Losh via cctalk wrote:
>
> On Tue, Feb 12, 2019 at 2:55 PM Ethan Dicks via cctalk <
> cctalk@classiccmp.org> wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Feb 6, 2019 at 10:08 AM Phil Pemberton via cctalk
>> wrote:
>>> Does anyone have copies of any of the following -- or any other C
>>
On Tue, Feb 12, 2019 at 5:16 PM Warner Losh wrote:
>> > Does anyone have copies of any of the following...
>> >* Lattice C
>>
>> Entirely randomly, I just opened a box I received today. Expected in
>> the box was the DEC Rainbow. Unexpected was an original box of
>> Lattice C 2.15 for 8086 -
On Tue, Feb 12, 2019 at 2:55 PM Ethan Dicks via cctalk <
cctalk@classiccmp.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 6, 2019 at 10:08 AM Phil Pemberton via cctalk
> wrote:
> > Does anyone have copies of any of the following -- or any other C
> > compilers for the 68K which were around at that time?
> >
> >*
On Wed, Feb 6, 2019 at 10:08 AM Phil Pemberton via cctalk
wrote:
> Does anyone have copies of any of the following -- or any other C
> compilers for the 68K which were around at that time?
>
>* Lattice C
Entirely randomly, I just opened a box I received today. Expected in
the box was the DEC
Guys,
Thanks for the tips and info.
Wrt:
- C-Lab Notator - I do not think I will need this, as it seems to be
musician's stuff.
- Amiga vs Atari quality - I have never had any hands on experience
with AtariST, so I will stick to other people's opinions for a
while...
- TOSEC - I have che
> From: Al Kossow
> I have a source tape. I'm trying to figure out why modern tar doesn't
> understand it.
I had an issue reading some TAR's of Unix V7 stuff; I brought up an older
version of TAR under Windoze and they read fine with it. I don't recall if I
figured out what the proble
On 2/9/19 10:35 AM, Al Kossow via cctalk wrote:
>
>
> On 2/7/19 8:05 AM, Noel Chiappa via cctalk wrote:
>
>> I have the man pages for it, the assembler and linker, the c.out format it
>> produced, etc if those are any use/interest.
>
> I have a source tape. I'm trying to figure out why moder
On 2/9/19 10:39 AM, Al Kossow via cctalk wrote:
> There is also an MIT compiler tape around with a bunch of different PCC ports
> including the Brooklyn Poly x86 compiler.
http://bitsavers.org/bits/MIT/trix/MIT_Compiler_Tape
was mistaken about the x86 compiler origins
there are a lot more ver
On 2/6/19 11:45 AM, Tom Uban via cctalk wrote:
> I have a copy of the source for a set of 68k tools (compiler, assembler,
> loader, etc)
> which was based on work done by Chris Terman at MIT. This work was done back
> in
> the mid 80s, so some work is likely needed to compile with modern tools
On 2/7/19 8:05 AM, Noel Chiappa via cctalk wrote:
> I have the man pages for it, the assembler and linker, the c.out format it
> produced, etc if those are any use/interest.
I have a source tape. I'm trying to figure out why modern tar doesn't
understand it.
On 2/7/19 10:09 PM, Doug Salot wrote:
> Alcyon as in Regulus? Pretty sure they got it from Green Hills.
Copyright 1982
Alcyon Corporation
8716 Production Ave.
San Diego, Ca. 92121
@(#)optab.c 2.3 11/15/84
On Fri, 2019-02-08 at 12:00 -0600, cctalk-requ...@classiccmp.org wrote:
> Re: Looking for: 68000 C compilers
There is a GNU OS for the Atari 68k-based ST, TT, and Falcon computers
which might be fun to play with. It is called MiNT. FreeMiNT and
SpareMiNT are two distros. They are availa
>
> tl;dr: Is there a software repository for AtariST comparable to Aminet?
>
>
I don't follow it much, so I can't really say for sure what systems or software
are in the archive. But there was an effort for collecting "all" games and
software for many systems called TOSEC. Unfortunately, it
Alcyon as in Regulus? Pretty sure they got it from Green Hills. And
Green Hills is still around.
On Thu, Feb 7, 2019 at 2:02 PM Al Kossow via cctalk
wrote:
>
>
> On 2/7/19 12:17 PM, Ethan Dicks via cctalk wrote:
>
> > $ set def [steve.cpm68k.c.preproc]
>
> 'steve' == Steve Williams
>
> this
On 2/7/19 12:17 PM, Ethan Dicks via cctalk wrote:
> $ set def [steve.cpm68k.c.preproc]
'steve' == Steve Williams
this is the Alcyon C cross-compiler
(especially if they started with MS DOS, as I observed). OTOH, in
retrospect, I wonder if I would spent the money wiser by choosing
AtariST or going straight to 286 (not the same experience, I know, but
cheap and easier to sell away). Or, if I wanted it really cheap, C128
I grew up Atari 8bit th
On Thu, Feb 07, 2019 at 09:06:03AM -0600, John Foust via cctalk wrote:
> At 03:13 PM 2/6/2019, Tomasz Rola via cctalk wrote:
> >Lattice was the thing, back when I had Amiga. Too bad I could not
> >afford a harddisk :-).
>
> As I related here back in 2005 and 2007:
>
> I believe I stuck with Manx
On Thu, Feb 7, 2019 at 1:35 PM emanuel stiebler via cctalk
wrote:
> On 2019-02-07 11:34, Ron Pool via cctalk wrote:
> > The CP/M-68K 1.0x source distribution at
> > http://www.uxpro.com/cpm/www.cpm.z80.de/source.html includes a VAX/VMS
> > distribution of Digital Research's 68K cross development s
On 2019-02-07 11:34, Ron Pool via cctalk wrote:
> The CP/M-68K 1.0x source distribution at
> http://www.uxpro.com/cpm/www.cpm.z80.de/source.html includes a VAX/VMS
> distribution of Digital Research's 68K cross development software for
> VAX/VMS. After unpacking the source distribution, look in v1
The CP/M-68K 1.0x source distribution at
http://www.uxpro.com/cpm/www.cpm.z80.de/source.html includes a VAX/VMS
distribution of Digital Research's 68K cross development software for
VAX/VMS. After unpacking the source distribution, look in v102/cross for
that distribution. Excerpt from v102/cross
> From: Bill Gunshannon
> What about all the cross compilers that ran on PDP-11's?
Good point; by coincidence, I just found the stuff about the 68K
cross-compiler from Alcyon (in San Diego) which we used at Proteon;
it ran on an -11/73 running Ultrix.
According to the ad sheet, it also
At 03:13 PM 2/6/2019, Tomasz Rola via cctalk wrote:
>Lattice was the thing, back when I had Amiga. Too bad I could not
>afford a harddisk :-).
As I related here back in 2005 and 2007:
I believe I stuck with Manx Aztec C throughout my entire era of Amiga
development. I liked it because it was mo
On Thu, Feb 7, 2019 at 3:50 AM Phil Pemberton via cctalk
wrote:
> On Wed, 6 Feb 2019, Tomasz Rola wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Feb 06, 2019 at 03:08:14PM +, Phil Pemberton via cctalk wrote:
> >> I'm (still) trying to reverse-engineer a ton of M68K ROM code which
> >> was apparently compiled with a cir
On 2/7/19 4:49 AM, Phil Pemberton via cctalk wrote:
> On Wed, 6 Feb 2019, Tomasz Rola wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Feb 06, 2019 at 03:08:14PM +, Phil Pemberton via cctalk
>> wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I'm (still) trying to reverse-engineer a ton of M68K ROM code which
>>> was apparently compiled with a ci
On Wed, 6 Feb 2019, John Ames wrote:
I know there's an old (I think) official Sega Genesis devkit that's,
erm, "around" on various console homebrew sites. No idea which exact C
compiler is included, but it's not too difficult to find.
Thanks for that, John - I think I've just found the devkit
On Wed, 6 Feb 2019, Tomasz Rola wrote:
On Wed, Feb 06, 2019 at 03:08:14PM +, Phil Pemberton via cctalk wrote:
Hi,
I'm (still) trying to reverse-engineer a ton of M68K ROM code which
was apparently compiled with a circa-1990 C compiler.
Does anyone have copies of any of the following -- or
On 2/6/19 1:23 PM, Tomasz Rola via cctalk wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 06, 2019 at 10:13:57PM +0100, Tomasz Rola via cctalk
> wrote: [...]
>> quite a few compilers in there:
>>
>> http://aminet.net/tree?path=dev
>
> And on page 1 of 5 in /dev/asm section I have spotted at least two
> disassemblers, ther
On Wed, Feb 06, 2019 at 10:13:57PM +0100, Tomasz Rola via cctalk wrote:
[...]
> quite a few compilers in there:
>
> http://aminet.net/tree?path=dev
And on page 1 of 5 in /dev/asm section I have spotted at least two
disassemblers, there might be more. Caution: never used any.
http://aminet.net/de
I have a copy of the source for a set of 68k tools (compiler, assembler,
loader, etc)
which was based on work done by Chris Terman at MIT. This work was done back in
the mid 80s, so some work is likely needed to compile with modern tools. Let me
know if you would like a copy.
On 2/6/19 10:27 AM,
On Wed, Feb 06, 2019 at 06:44:27PM +0100, Götz Hoffart wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I could offer Lattice C 3 and 5 for 68k / Atari ST.
>
> Regards
> Götz
Lattice was the thing, back when I had Amiga. Too bad I could not
afford a harddisk :-).
BTW, I just recalled the Aminet is still there and seems to be
Hi,
I could offer Lattice C 3 and 5 for 68k / Atari ST.
Regards
Götz
... auf dem Sprung ...
> Am 06.02.2019 um 17:21 schrieb Tomasz Rola via cctalk :
>
>> On Wed, Feb 06, 2019 at 03:08:14PM +, Phil Pemberton via cctalk wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'm (still) trying to reverse-engineer a ton of M6
I know there's an old (I think) official Sega Genesis devkit that's,
erm, "around" on various console homebrew sites. No idea which exact C
compiler is included, but it's not too difficult to find.
At 12:26 PM 2/6/2019, Ethan Dicks via cctalk wrote:
>OTOH, at home, I'd had an Amiga since 1986 and used a variety of
>native tools (Lattice C later SAS/C, and various assemblers either
>commercial or from a Fish Disk).
Somewhere I have the DOS-hosted C compiler for the Amiga that was part
of the
> From: Phil Pemberton
> * Anything not on this list ;)
The TRIX project at MIT-LCS did a 68K compiler very early on (soon after the
first 68K wa released)x, using Steve Johnson's Portable C Compiler as a base.
Noel
On Wed, Feb 6, 2019 at 10:27 AM Ethan Dicks wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 6, 2019 at 9:08 AM Phil Pemberton via cctalk
> wrote:
> > I'm (still) trying to reverse-engineer a ton of M68K ROM code which was
> > apparently compiled with a circa-1990 C compiler.
>
> > Does anyone have copies of any of the foll
e-
> From: cctalk On Behalf Of Phil Pemberton
> via cctalk
> Sent: 06 February 2019 15:08
> To: cctalk@classiccmp.org
> Subject: Looking for: 68000 C compilers
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm (still) trying to reverse-engineer a ton of M68K ROM code which was
> apparently
On Wed, Feb 6, 2019 at 9:08 AM Phil Pemberton via cctalk
wrote:
> I'm (still) trying to reverse-engineer a ton of M68K ROM code which was
> apparently compiled with a circa-1990 C compiler.
I used to do a lot of m68k ROM code development c. 1985-1993...
> Does anyone have copies of any of the fo
On Wed, Feb 06, 2019 at 03:08:14PM +, Phil Pemberton via cctalk wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm (still) trying to reverse-engineer a ton of M68K ROM code which
> was apparently compiled with a circa-1990 C compiler.
>
> Does anyone have copies of any of the following -- or any other C
> compilers for th
On 2019-02-06 10:08, Phil Pemberton via cctalk wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm (still) trying to reverse-engineer a ton of M68K ROM code which was
> apparently compiled with a circa-1990 C compiler.
>
AT&T B1 UNIX?
And, we did at this time a lot on the OS/9 on microware. But I shink
there is still a copyr
Hi,
I'm (still) trying to reverse-engineer a ton of M68K ROM code which was
apparently compiled with a circa-1990 C compiler.
Does anyone have copies of any of the following -- or any other C
compilers for the 68K which were around at that time?
* Sierra Systems 68000 C compiler (was part
43 matches
Mail list logo
