Re: 11/35 on eBait

2016-10-24 Thread allison
On 10/24/16 8:51 AM, Pontus Pihlgren wrote: On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 01:12:50PM +0200, Philipp Hachtmann wrote: On 10/19/2016 02:42 AM, Noel Chiappa wrote: > From: Glen Slick >> Went unsold at $3500. Relisted, this time at $5000. > there was a taker for that 11/35 at $5000

Re: 11/35 on eBait

2016-10-24 Thread Noel Chiappa
> Philipp Hachtmann wrote: > Was it really sold? I can't figure that out from here. Only "listing > has ended". And when I try to search for it, the website doesn't show > it :-( ??? If you go to the listing: http://www.ebay.com/itm/142146207101 the image has 'Sold'

Re: 11/35 on eBait

2016-10-24 Thread Pontus Pihlgren
On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 01:12:50PM +0200, Philipp Hachtmann wrote: > > > On 10/19/2016 02:42 AM, Noel Chiappa wrote: > >> From: Glen Slick > > > >>> Went unsold at $3500. Relisted, this time at $5000. > > > >> there was a taker for that 11/35 at $5000 today > > > >Smack me with a

Re: 11/35 on eBait

2016-10-24 Thread Philipp Hachtmann
On 10/19/2016 02:42 AM, Noel Chiappa wrote: > From: Glen Slick >> Went unsold at $3500. Relisted, this time at $5000. > there was a taker for that 11/35 at $5000 today Smack me with a wet halibut. They must not have seen the original listing? I can't come up with any other

Re: 11/35 on eBait

2016-10-18 Thread Glen Slick
On Oct 11, 2016 11:34 PM, "Glen Slick" wrote: > > On Oct 2, 2016 11:03 AM, "Noel Chiappa" wrote: > > > > So there's another 11/35 up on eBait: > > > > http://www.ebay.com/itm/142135416325 > > > > Went unsold at $3500. Relisted, this time at

Re: 11/35 on eBait

2016-10-12 Thread jim stephens
On 10/12/2016 2:02 AM, Dave Wade wrote: > >http://www.ebay.com/itm/142146207101 >Surely if someone asks a simple question like that then how difficult could it >be to accomodate? Obviously too much effort for that seller it seems. I just wonder if they have seen that PDP/11 panels fetch

RE: 11/35 on eBait

2016-10-12 Thread Dave Wade
> -Original Message- > From: cctalk [mailto:cctalk-boun...@classiccmp.org] On Behalf Of > ste...@malikoff.com > Sent: 12 October 2016 07:45 > To: General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts > <cctalk@classiccmp.org> > Subject: Re: 11/35 on eBait > >

Re: 11/35 on eBait

2016-10-12 Thread steven
> On Oct 2, 2016 11:03 AM, "Noel Chiappa" wrote: >> >> So there's another 11/35 up on eBait: >> >> http://www.ebay.com/itm/142135416325 >> > > Went unsold at $3500. Relisted, this time at $5000. > > Buy it this time before it goes up to $6500 next time??? > >

Re: 11/35 on eBait

2016-10-12 Thread Glen Slick
On Oct 2, 2016 11:03 AM, "Noel Chiappa" wrote: > > So there's another 11/35 up on eBait: > > http://www.ebay.com/itm/142135416325 > Went unsold at $3500. Relisted, this time at $5000. Buy it this time before it goes up to $6500 next time???

Re: 11/35 on eBait

2016-10-03 Thread william degnan
On Mon, Oct 3, 2016 at 2:27 PM, Paul Koning wrote: > > > On Oct 3, 2016, at 2:05 PM, Pete Turnbull > wrote: > > > > ... > > I agree with Paul. I've seen dozens of RT-11 systems and non-parity MOS > memory has been more common in the ones I've

Re: 11/35 on eBait

2016-10-03 Thread Paul Koning
> On Oct 3, 2016, at 2:05 PM, Pete Turnbull wrote: > > ... > I agree with Paul. I've seen dozens of RT-11 systems and non-parity MOS > memory has been more common in the ones I've seen. I see no reason to think > it would be a problem. True, 16K is small even for

Re: 11/35 on eBait

2016-10-03 Thread Pete Turnbull
On 03/10/2016 17:46, william degnan wrote: On Mon, Oct 3, 2016 at 12:13 PM, Paul Koning wrote: On Oct 3, 2016, at 12:07 PM, william degnan wrote: ... I should have been more precise, but my point is that this is a non-parity RAM basic 11/35

Re: 11/35 on eBait

2016-10-03 Thread william degnan
On Mon, Oct 3, 2016 at 12:13 PM, Paul Koning wrote: > > > On Oct 3, 2016, at 12:07 PM, william degnan > wrote: > > ... > > I should have been more precise, but my point is that this is a > non-parity > > RAM basic 11/35 system useful for peripheral

Re: 11/35 on eBait

2016-10-03 Thread Paul Koning
> On Oct 3, 2016, at 12:07 PM, william degnan wrote: > ... > I should have been more precise, but my point is that this is a non-parity > RAM basic 11/35 system useful for peripheral interfacing and > communications. As is, not good for something like RT11. I wouldn't

Re: 11/35 on eBait

2016-10-03 Thread william degnan
On Mon, Oct 3, 2016 at 11:37 AM, Noel Chiappa wrote: > > From: Al Kossow > > > Stack Limit > > That's there - that's the KJ11. > > > From: Tony Duell > > > KW11-L line time clock? > > I don't really consider the LTC as a CPU option. It's on the actual

Re: 11/35 on eBait

2016-10-03 Thread Noel Chiappa
> From: Al Kossow > Stack Limit That's there - that's the KJ11. > From: Tony Duell > KW11-L line time clock? I don't really consider the LTC as a CPU option. It's on the actual UNIBUS, it's just in a specially wired UNIBUS slot that's only one slot wide, and only has BR/G6 and

RE: 11/35 on eBait

2016-10-03 Thread tony duell
> Huh? The KT11-D is there, as is the KE11-E and KE11-E, and even a KJ11-A of > sorts (might be an after-market one, doesn't have the standard DEC handle). > What other 11/40 CPU options are there? KW11-L line time clock? -tony

Re: 11/35 on eBait

2016-10-03 Thread Al Kossow
On 10/3/16 8:08 AM, Noel Chiappa wrote: > What other 11/40 CPU options are there? > Stack Limit and RTC

Re: 11/35 on eBait

2016-10-03 Thread Noel Chiappa
> From: William Degnan > Some of the CPU options not present. Huh? The KT11-D is there, as is the KE11-E and KE11-E, and even a KJ11-A of sorts (might be an after-market one, doesn't have the standard DEC handle). What other 11/40 CPU options are there? Noel