RE: RS-232 Tx / Rx monitoring LEDs?

2015-08-23 Thread Steve Moulding
-Original Message- From: cctalk [mailto:cctalk-boun...@classiccmp.org] On Behalf Of Brent Hilpert Sent: Sunday, August 23, 2015 3:07 AM To: General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts Subject: Re: RS-232 Tx / Rx monitoring LEDs? On 2015-Aug-22, at 11:55 PM, drlegendre . wrote

Re: RS-232 Tx / Rx monitoring LEDs?

2015-08-23 Thread Brent Hilpert
On 2015-Aug-23, at 9:06 AM, Chuck Guzis wrote: On 08/23/2015 07:10 AM, dwight wrote: I've used the capacitor method to provide most of the drop in the past. I don't usually max out the LEDs at 20ma. I find there is little difference between 10 and 20ma. Yes, the 10 ( or 20ma ) is current flow

RE: RS-232 Tx / Rx monitoring LEDs?

2015-08-23 Thread tony duell
Those ubiquitous motion detectors for outdoor lights use capacitive dropping to supply the low voltage for the ICs and electronics. Cap and small R in series with the AC input to a bridge rectifier. Works out well in that the bridge rectifier permits current flow in both directions,

Re: RS-232 Tx / Rx monitoring LEDs?

2015-08-23 Thread Brent Hilpert
On 2015-Aug-23, at 9:54 AM, Steve Moulding wrote: -Original Message- From: cctalk [mailto:cctalk-boun...@classiccmp.org] On Behalf Of Brent Hilpert Sent: Sunday, August 23, 2015 3:07 AM To: General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts Subject: Re: RS-232 Tx / Rx monitoring LEDs

Re: RS-232 Tx / Rx monitoring LEDs?

2015-08-23 Thread drlegendre .
To: General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts Subject: Re: RS-232 Tx / Rx monitoring LEDs? On 2015-Aug-22, at 11:55 PM, drlegendre . wrote: On Sun, Aug 23, 2015 at 1:17 AM, Chuck Guzis ccl...@sydex.com wrote: On 08/22/2015 10:23 PM, dwight wrote: I would think the reverse voltage sum

Re: RS-232 Tx / Rx monitoring LEDs?

2015-08-23 Thread Chuck Guzis
On 08/22/2015 11:55 PM, drlegendre . wrote: I've also seen C-R series voltage dropping circuits, here there. Correct me if I'm wrong, but doesn't the series cap dissipate power just as it would, were it a series resistor? I mean, if the LED is passing 20mA, the cap is also doing 20mA - and at

Re: RS-232 Tx / Rx monitoring LEDs?

2015-08-23 Thread Chuck Guzis
On 08/23/2015 07:10 AM, dwight wrote: I've used the capacitor method to provide most of the drop in the past. I don't usually max out the LEDs at 20ma. I find there is little difference between 10 and 20ma. Yes, the 10 ( or 20ma ) is current flow through the capacitor. It is necessary to have

RE: RS-232 Tx / Rx monitoring LEDs?

2015-08-23 Thread tony duell
I've also seen C-R series voltage dropping circuits, here there. Correct me if I'm wrong, but doesn't the series cap dissipate power just as it would, were it a series resistor? I mean, if the LED is passing 20mA, the cap is also doing 20mA - and at whatever the Vdrop is. Right? If

Re: RS-232 Tx / Rx monitoring LEDs?

2015-08-23 Thread Brent Hilpert
On 2015-Aug-22, at 11:55 PM, drlegendre . wrote: On Sun, Aug 23, 2015 at 1:17 AM, Chuck Guzis ccl...@sydex.com wrote: On 08/22/2015 10:23 PM, dwight wrote: I would think the reverse voltage sum of the diodes is enough. Different diodes also can handle different voltages. Since the sum of

Re: RS-232 Tx / Rx monitoring LEDs?

2015-08-23 Thread Chuck Guzis
On 08/22/2015 10:23 PM, dwight wrote: I would think the reverse voltage sum of the diodes is enough. Different diodes also can handle different voltages. Since the sum of the forward voltages is enough to handle AC, I'd suspect the reverse voltages each would handle is quite small as well. The

RE: RS-232 Tx / Rx monitoring LEDs?

2015-08-22 Thread dwight
From: ccl...@sydex.com On 08/21/2015 08:36 AM, dwight wrote: I was going to add something but it has already been said several times. I will add that if using a LED on an AC like signal of high voltage, one should use a diode. I recommend using a shunt diode rather than a series diode

RS-232 Tx / Rx monitoring LEDs?

2015-08-21 Thread dwight
I was going to add something but it has already been said several times. I will add that if using a LED on an AC like signal of high voltage, one should use a diode. I recommend using a shunt diode rather than a series diode when high voltages are being dropped by the resistor. It reduces the need

Re: RS-232 Tx / Rx monitoring LEDs?

2015-08-21 Thread Charles Anthony
On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 8:36 AM, dwight dkel...@hotmail.com wrote: I was going to add something but it has already been said several times. I will add that if using a LED on an AC like signal of high voltage, one should use a diode. I recommend using a shunt diode rather than a series diode

RE: RS-232 Tx / Rx monitoring LEDs?

2015-08-21 Thread tony duell
for a high voltage diode but makes the resistor hotter. Some red LEDs glow orange when not protected from 12VAC. I discovered (over 35 years ago) that green LEDs glow orange if massively overcurrented (you know what I mean). No they don't last long like that. It doesn't appear to be a thermal

Re: RS-232 Tx / Rx monitoring LEDs?

2015-08-21 Thread Chuck Guzis
On 08/21/2015 08:36 AM, dwight wrote: I was going to add something but it has already been said several times. I will add that if using a LED on an AC like signal of high voltage, one should use a diode. I recommend using a shunt diode rather than a series diode when high voltages are being

Re: RS-232 Tx / Rx monitoring LEDs?

2015-08-20 Thread Mouse
Totem pole outputs have comparable drive strength in both directions, that$ That's true for CMOS outputs. TTL outputs pull down much more strongly than$ Ok, but when you refer to drive strength I assumed you were talking about $ Maybe _rated_ current, but, even there, I don't think so (my TTL

Re: RS-232 Tx / Rx monitoring LEDs?

2015-08-20 Thread Mouse
A consideration with RS232 is that the signals swing to either side of 0, so$ It's been a while since I read the spec, but I think it's -3 to -20 volts one way and +3 to +20 the other, with the -3 to +3 range deliberately left ambiguous. I think there are slew rate limits, too, but I don't

Re: RS-232 Tx / Rx monitoring LEDs?

2015-08-20 Thread Brian L. Stuart
On Thu, 8/20/15, Mouse mo...@rodents-montreal.org wrote: Maybe _rated_ current, but, even there, I don't think so (my TTL doc hasn't been unpacked yet, or I'd go check, but I'm fairly sure they are generally specced to sink more current to GND than source from Vcc). It so happens I have a

Re: RS-232 Tx / Rx monitoring LEDs?

2015-08-20 Thread Mark J. Blair
On Aug 20, 2015, at 09:54 , Paul Koning paulkon...@comcast.net wrote: Ok, but when you refer to drive strength I assumed you were talking about current, not voltage. By that measure totem pole outputs are pretty much symmetrical. Again, CMOS totem pole outputs are pretty much

Re: RS-232 Tx / Rx monitoring LEDs?

2015-08-20 Thread Paul Koning
On Aug 19, 2015, at 11:40 PM, dwight dkel...@hotmail.com wrote: I think the main issue is that TTL is usually a weak pullup and a hard pulldown. RS 232 levels are equal up and down. That depends. Open collector outputs, yes, but those are the less common case. Totem pole outputs have

Re: RS-232 Tx / Rx monitoring LEDs?

2015-08-20 Thread Eric Smith
On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 10:54 AM, Paul Koning paulkon...@comcast.net wrote: Ok, but when you refer to drive strength I assumed you were talking about current, not voltage. By that measure totem pole outputs are pretty much symmetrical. Not for true (bipolar) TTL. See the specs for the

Re: RS-232 Tx / Rx monitoring LEDs?

2015-08-20 Thread Paul Koning
On Aug 20, 2015, at 3:40 PM, Eric Smith space...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 10:54 AM, Paul Koning paulkon...@comcast.net wrote: Ok, but when you refer to drive strength I assumed you were talking about current, not voltage. By that measure totem pole outputs are pretty much

Re: RS-232 Tx / Rx monitoring LEDs?

2015-08-20 Thread Paul Koning
On Aug 20, 2015, at 11:58 AM, Mark J. Blair n...@nf6x.net wrote: On Aug 20, 2015, at 06:27, Paul Koning paulkon...@comcast.net wrote: Totem pole outputs have comparable drive strength in both directions, that's precisely their purpose (to provide symmetric rise/fall times when driving

RE: RS-232 Tx / Rx monitoring LEDs?

2015-08-20 Thread tony duell
A consideration with RS232 is that the signals swing to either side of 0, so if you use an LED referenced to 0, it either needs a series diode or a sufficiently high reverse voltage rating. A diode in inverse parallel with the LED Is more normal when you want to run an LED off

Re: RS-232 Tx / Rx monitoring LEDs?

2015-08-20 Thread Mark J. Blair
On Aug 20, 2015, at 06:27, Paul Koning paulkon...@comcast.net wrote: Totem pole outputs have comparable drive strength in both directions, that's precisely their purpose (to provide symmetric rise/fall times when driving capacitive loads). That's true for CMOS outputs. TTL outputs pull

RE: RS-232 Tx / Rx monitoring LEDs?

2015-08-19 Thread dwight
are intended to account for this. Usually the line is lower impedance than the input termination, requiring the source to absorb the reflected signal. This is why 422/485 came to be. The impedance of the loads better match that of the termination. Dwight Subject: Re: RS-232 Tx / Rx monitoring LEDs

RS-232 Tx / Rx monitoring LEDs?

2015-08-18 Thread drlegendre .
As part of my C-64 RS-232 to M15 60mA CL project, I've put together a simple MAX232 based interface to connect the TTL levels on the C-64 to the standard RS-232 +/- levels. Is there any reason that I can or cannot install LEDs - on either side of the MAX232 converter - to give some indication of

Re: RS-232 Tx / Rx monitoring LEDs?

2015-08-18 Thread Jim Brain
On 8/18/2015 10:40 PM, drlegendre . wrote: As part of my C-64 RS-232 to M15 60mA CL project, I've put together a simple MAX232 based interface to connect the TTL levels on the C-64 to the standard RS-232 +/- levels. Is there any reason that I can or cannot install LEDs - on either side of the

Re: RS-232 Tx / Rx monitoring LEDs?

2015-08-18 Thread Mark J. Blair
Those little RS232 testers with LEDs built into a double DB25 connector box are usually just made of LEDs and resistors connected to each signal line. They can load signals enough to cause problems at high speeds, with weak drivers, or with long cables, but usually they don't cause problems. If