Re: On: raising the semantic level of a program

2020-06-29 Thread Chuck Guzis via cctalk
On 6/29/20 12:41 PM, Rich Alderson via cctalk wrote: > From: Chuck Guzis > Sent: Sunday, June 28, 2020 4:51 PM > >> It's noteworthy that on the Univac 1100 series, a "byte" could be 6, 9 >> or 12 bits, but not 8. (36 bit words). The PDP-10 had similar issues, >> such as the "packed" string

Re: Bringing up MVME 197LE (88k)

2020-06-29 Thread Richard Sheppard via cctalk
A few of the self-tests I’ve seen on the 147s set BRDFAIL if the NVRAM doesn’t pass, so perhaps changing the NVRAM for a known good would be a place to start. Richard Sent from Mail for Windows 10

RE: IDE-SD adapter question

2020-06-29 Thread W2HX via cctalk
Jonas, I am using an SD card, not CF because I need to move files from a laptop to this computer using the SD. Having said that, I suspect everything you said is still true. I don't have access to any linux. But do you think I could make a 300MB partition (for example) on the SD card and use

RE: On: raising the semantic level of a program

2020-06-29 Thread Rich Alderson via cctalk
From: Chuck Guzis Sent: Sunday, June 28, 2020 4:51 PM > It's noteworthy that on the Univac 1100 series, a "byte" could be 6, 9 > or 12 bits, but not 8. (36 bit words). The PDP-10 had similar issues, > such as the "packed" string format of 5 7-bit characters per word, with > one bit unused. Of

Re: Hp 21mx loader rom set

2020-06-29 Thread J. David Bryan via cctalk
On Sunday, June 28, 2020 at 22:20, CuriousMarc via cctech wrote: > I also have a 91740-80033/34/35 set which I don't know what it is. Does > anyone know? Those are DS/1000 revision 1826. Page 3-130 of the HP "Communicator/1000 for Software Update 6.0" (5951-6201, December 1992) has a full

Bringing up MVME 197LE (88k)

2020-06-29 Thread r...@hack.net ryan--- via cctalk
Anyone have experience with the Moto 88k VME boards? I have an MVME197LE that I’m trying to bring up but it’s staying in BRDFAIL, while SYSCON and RUN are green and pressing RESET appears to work. Nothing on console at all. (via a 712 transition module) Same behavior with the NVRAM removed.

Re: A tool many of you may make find useful!

2020-06-29 Thread Liam Proven via cctalk
On Sun, 28 Jun 2020 at 22:55, Richard Pope via cctalk wrote: > > Will, > Ultimate Zip is showing that the file is empty. Hum! I have been > using Ultimate Zip for decades. Hum! I wounder what is going on! I've never even heard of this tool before. I looked it up, and

More DECnet/E items

2020-06-29 Thread Paul Koning via cctalk
Following up on my earlier Y2K fixes for DECnet/E, I implemented proper support in EVTLOG and NCP for the undocumented RSTS feature supporting DECnet over terminal lines. You can find it in the same place, specifically the "decnete" subdirectory. The main changes are in the new NCP.TSK; there

Re: Hp 21mx loader rom set

2020-06-29 Thread J. David Bryan via cctalk
On Saturday, June 27, 2020 at 14:48, grant--- via cctech wrote: > 12992-80011 > 91740-80070 > 91740-80071 > 91740-80072 > > there is a set of 91740 on bit savers but with a suffix of 67-69 ? These are the original DS/1000 ROMs (date code 2003) without the 7974 loader extension. That was

Re: Mame vt100 emulation. Cool

2020-06-29 Thread Tor Arntsen via cctalk
On Sun, 28 Jun 2020 at 04:20, Kevin Lee via cctalk wrote: > > https://zork.net/~st/jottings/Real-VT102-emulation-with-MAME.html MAME is a beast. Sometimes it kind of works (for other stuff), here it just hits me with an "Abort" with no indication as to why.

Re: RSTS/E has just had its 50th Birthday...

2020-06-29 Thread Peter Dick via cctalk
Good morning Noel Thanks for the link  While I appreciate "retired" might describe your current status, I was looking for a better description of how you were/are involved with RSTS. And... You might be amused to learn I was the author of the RSTS 80th Birthday document.  It was "frozen"

Re: RSTS/E has just had its 50th Birthday...

2020-06-29 Thread Ethan Dicks via cctalk
On Sun, Jun 28, 2020 at 2:36 PM Paul Koning via cctalk wrote: > > Err, I expect that that was RSTS-11 in June, 1970, not RSTS-E. Since RSTS-11 > > (which I learned to program on; happy memories :-) was a BASIC-PLUS only > > system, and ran on a PDP-11/20, I suspect it was a fairly different > >