Re: Looking for a home for most issues of BYTE Magazine
Thank you all for all of the interest. The first person who wrote me isn't far away at all and will give it a good home, so I'm going to go with him. While I'm fetching those, I'm going to make a list of other older hardware for which I'd like to find homes, so I'll post about that, and possibly about other magazines, in a week or so. Thanks! John
Re: Looking for a home for most issues of BYTE Magazine
> On Dec 14, 2018, at 11:54 PM, Randy Dawson wrote: > > Zane, your comments are appreciated. > > I have paid for subscriptions to ebooks that cost ~10 a month, and they are > OK for text, but when a schematic comes up, it sucks (scribd) you cant zoom > or increase the resolution. > I also follow you on your purchase experience with out of print and search. > I am dumb or spend hours on search, then find it and think everybody already > knows but me. Most recent all the Dr. Dobbs and Byte, Pop Sci online I only > found recently. > I suppose there is money to be made if you can check in your morals. I see > all this (now) public domain type stuff (including Al's bitsavers manuals) > for sale on ebay DVDs. > The unwashed will be relieved from their dollars. > > Randy Now you’re touching on something that really ticks me off, and I’ve seen it done using Google Books, and others (the book I bought before I knew what was going on was done using a Google Books scan). That’s the growing market on “Print On Demand” books done using these scans. Many of these books are still covered under the original copywrite. And of course, there are the folks selling the CD’s and DVD’s on eBay. The people offering “reproductions" for sale in these fashions harm the community as a whole. It also makes it rather challenging to find original copies for sale, as you have to wade through so many of these offerings. Zane
Re: Looking for a home for most issues of BYTE Magazine
these may already be scanned and out there. we have hardcopy and what a joy to sit and just look though in a big arm chair If you have space always great to have them in prit as the images for displays etc are better than what usually is out compressed on the net. I have found though internet archive has some jpeg2000 I think it is pages for many things that are pretty sharp. In a message dated 12/14/2018 11:50:36 AM US Mountain Standard Time, cctalk@classiccmp.org writes: On 12/14/18 11:16 AM, John Klos via cctalk wrote: > Hi, all, Hi John, > Does anyone know of any person or organization within a reasonable > distance from southern California who might take these magazines and > preserve them, instead of just selling them on eBay? Have you contacted the Internet Archive and / or BitSavers? I think one or both of them will take things like this and scan them for preservation and to share with other people. -- Grant. . . . unix || die
Re: Looking for a home for most issues of BYTE Magazine
Kilobaud is also up on the Internet archive. https://archive.org/details/kilobaudmagazine Kilobaud Microcomputing Magazine - Internet Archive<https://archive.org/details/kilobaudmagazine> Kilobaud Microcomputing was a magazine dedicated to the computer homebrew hobbyists from the end of the 1970s until the beginning of the 1980s. Wayne Green, the Publisher/Editor of kilobaud, had been the publisher of BYTE magazine, (another influential microcomputer magazine of the time) where he... archive.org From: cctalk on behalf of ben via cctalk Sent: Saturday, December 15, 2018 12:27 AM To: cctalk@classiccmp.org Subject: Re: Looking for a home for most issues of BYTE Magazine On 12/15/2018 12:54 AM, Randy Dawson via cctalk wrote: > Zane, your comments are appreciated. > > I have paid for subscriptions to ebooks that cost ~10 a month, and > they are OK for text, but when a schematic comes up, it sucks > (scribd) you cant zoom or increase the resolution. I also follow you > on your purchase experience with out of print and search. I am dumb > or spend hours on search, then find it and think everybody already > knows but me. Most recent all the Dr. Dobbs and Byte, Pop Sci online > I only found recently. That still leaves Kilobaud scans. > I suppose there is money to be made if you can check in your morals. > I see all this (now) public domain type stuff (including Al's > bitsavers manuals) for sale on ebay DVDs. The unwashed will be > relieved from their dollars. I better shower, so I can clean and EVIL. > Randy Ben.
Re: Looking for a home for most issues of BYTE Magazine
On 12/15/2018 12:54 AM, Randy Dawson via cctalk wrote: Zane, your comments are appreciated. I have paid for subscriptions to ebooks that cost ~10 a month, and they are OK for text, but when a schematic comes up, it sucks (scribd) you cant zoom or increase the resolution. I also follow you on your purchase experience with out of print and search. I am dumb or spend hours on search, then find it and think everybody already knows but me. Most recent all the Dr. Dobbs and Byte, Pop Sci online I only found recently. That still leaves Kilobaud scans. I suppose there is money to be made if you can check in your morals. I see all this (now) public domain type stuff (including Al's bitsavers manuals) for sale on ebay DVDs. The unwashed will be relieved from their dollars. I better shower, so I can clean and EVIL. Randy Ben.
Re: Looking for a home for most issues of BYTE Magazine
Zane, your comments are appreciated. I have paid for subscriptions to ebooks that cost ~10 a month, and they are OK for text, but when a schematic comes up, it sucks (scribd) you cant zoom or increase the resolution. I also follow you on your purchase experience with out of print and search. I am dumb or spend hours on search, then find it and think everybody already knows but me. Most recent all the Dr. Dobbs and Byte, Pop Sci online I only found recently. I suppose there is money to be made if you can check in your morals. I see all this (now) public domain type stuff (including Al's bitsavers manuals) for sale on ebay DVDs. The unwashed will be relieved from their dollars. Randy From: cctalk on behalf of Zane Healy via cctalk Sent: Friday, December 14, 2018 5:40 PM To: Fred Cisin; General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts Subject: Re: Looking for a home for most issues of BYTE Magazine > On Dec 14, 2018, at 1:22 PM, Fred Cisin via cctalk > wrote: > >>> There exist some people who DISCARD materials once they have been scanned. >>> Some people object to calling that "preservation". > > On Fri, 14 Dec 2018, Zane Healy wrote: >> Aren’t these the same people that scan at such poor quality that only the >> text is “usable”, and illustrations are largely unusable? > > I wouldn't be surprised if there is substantial overlap between the two > groups. Although one would hope that those who think that digital copies are > adequate would care about making them adequate. > Admittedly, there are SOME materials where scans need only be adequate for > OCR. Certainly Murphy would hold that the least available ones would be those > that most need quality scanning. And scan in colour, where it’s important! >> Case in point, I’m trying to track down a 150 year old book, by one of my >> favorite photography authors, it’s on Google books, but the illustrations, >> which are vital to understanding what the author is talking about, are >> largely useless. > > Hmmm. 150 year old photography book would be just after civil war. > My preference for photography books isusually from about 60 to 80 years ago, > when publishers could do a good job of B plates, and the technology of 35mm > was coming along. (Morgan and Lester, etc.) > Occasionally, I'll drive to Carmel to look at Ansel Adams prints at the > Weston Gallery - "megapixel" just doesn't cut it! It’s less a technical book, and more a philosophical book on composition, and uses works of a well known 19th century painter in most examples. As for books in the time frame you’re mentioning, don’t forget the “Ilford Manual of Photography”, the examples for troubleshooting are actually easy to use compared to the newer “Manual of Photography”, even though they’re mostly the same photo’s. Right now I’m fighting with some processing issues with 8x10 and 11x14 film. Though if I was driving to Carmel, it wouldn’t be to look at Ansel Adams prints, it would be to look at Edward Weston’s. His work for Walt Whitman’s “Leaves of Grass”, drives much of my efforts. > Is there any way to penetrate the Google infrastructure, to track down who > scanned the book, and where it now is? I think I’ve finally tracked down a copy. Part of the hold-up has been ensuring that I don’t buy an older edition. There were at least 4 editions. It’s also *not* a cheap book. Oddly enough, some of the techniques used in the book, seem better suited to Adobe Photoshop. :-) H.P. Robinson was a man before his time! Zane
Re: Looking for a home for most issues of BYTE Magazine
> On Dec 14, 2018, at 1:22 PM, Fred Cisin via cctalk > wrote: > >>> There exist some people who DISCARD materials once they have been scanned. >>> Some people object to calling that "preservation". > > On Fri, 14 Dec 2018, Zane Healy wrote: >> Aren’t these the same people that scan at such poor quality that only the >> text is “usable”, and illustrations are largely unusable? > > I wouldn't be surprised if there is substantial overlap between the two > groups. Although one would hope that those who think that digital copies are > adequate would care about making them adequate. > Admittedly, there are SOME materials where scans need only be adequate for > OCR. Certainly Murphy would hold that the least available ones would be those > that most need quality scanning. And scan in colour, where it’s important! >> Case in point, I’m trying to track down a 150 year old book, by one of my >> favorite photography authors, it’s on Google books, but the illustrations, >> which are vital to understanding what the author is talking about, are >> largely useless. > > Hmmm. 150 year old photography book would be just after civil war. > My preference for photography books isusually from about 60 to 80 years ago, > when publishers could do a good job of B plates, and the technology of 35mm > was coming along. (Morgan and Lester, etc.) > Occasionally, I'll drive to Carmel to look at Ansel Adams prints at the > Weston Gallery - "megapixel" just doesn't cut it! It’s less a technical book, and more a philosophical book on composition, and uses works of a well known 19th century painter in most examples. As for books in the time frame you’re mentioning, don’t forget the “Ilford Manual of Photography”, the examples for troubleshooting are actually easy to use compared to the newer “Manual of Photography”, even though they’re mostly the same photo’s. Right now I’m fighting with some processing issues with 8x10 and 11x14 film. Though if I was driving to Carmel, it wouldn’t be to look at Ansel Adams prints, it would be to look at Edward Weston’s. His work for Walt Whitman’s “Leaves of Grass”, drives much of my efforts. > Is there any way to penetrate the Google infrastructure, to track down who > scanned the book, and where it now is? I think I’ve finally tracked down a copy. Part of the hold-up has been ensuring that I don’t buy an older edition. There were at least 4 editions. It’s also *not* a cheap book. Oddly enough, some of the techniques used in the book, seem better suited to Adobe Photoshop. :-) H.P. Robinson was a man before his time! Zane
Re: Looking for a home for most issues of BYTE Magazine
There exist some people who DISCARD materials once they have been scanned. Some people object to calling that "preservation". On Fri, 14 Dec 2018, Zane Healy wrote: Aren’t these the same people that scan at such poor quality that only the text is “usable”, and illustrations are largely unusable? I wouldn't be surprised if there is substantial overlap between the two groups. Although one would hope that those who think that digital copies are adequate would care about making them adequate. Admittedly, there are SOME materials where scans need only be adequate for OCR. Certainly Murphy would hold that the least available ones would be those that most need quality scanning. Case in point, I’m trying to track down a 150 year old book, by one of my favorite photography authors, it’s on Google books, but the illustrations, which are vital to understanding what the author is talking about, are largely useless. Hmmm. 150 year old photography book would be just after civil war. My preference for photography books isusually from about 60 to 80 years ago, when publishers could do a good job of B plates, and the technology of 35mm was coming along. (Morgan and Lester, etc.) Occasionally, I'll drive to Carmel to look at Ansel Adams prints at the Weston Gallery - "megapixel" just doesn't cut it! Is there any way to penetrate the Google infrastructure, to track down who scanned the book, and where it now is? -- Grumpy Ol' Fred ci...@xenosoft.com
Re: Looking for a home for most issues of BYTE Magazine
> On Dec 14, 2018, at 12:10 PM, Fred Cisin via cctalk > wrote: > > There exist some people who DISCARD materials once they have been scanned. > Some people object to calling that "preservation". Aren’t these the same people that scan at such poor quality that only the text is “usable”, and illustrations are largely unusable? Case in point, I’m trying to track down a 150 year old book, by one of my favorite photography authors, it’s on Google books, but the illustrations, which are vital to understanding what the author is talking about, are largely useless. Zane
Re: Looking for a home for most issues of BYTE Magazine
Does anyone know of any person or organization within a reasonable distance from southern California who might take these magazines and preserve them, instead of just selling them on eBay? On Fri, 14 Dec 2018, Grant Taylor via cctalk wrote: Have you contacted the Internet Archive and / or BitSavers? I think one or both of them will take things like this and scan them for preservation and to share with other people. Q1: Which issues of BYTE have not been scanned yet?? Q2: What do Internet Archive and Bitsavers do with materials after scanning? (or duplicates? or incoming materials that they have aready scanned?) Maybe they could sell them on eBay to fund their activities, . . . There exist some people who DISCARD materials once they have been scanned. Some people object to calling that "preservation".
Re: Looking for a home for most issues of BYTE Magazine
Hi John, If you have not gotten any takers, I will step up. I am in Los Angeles (Thousand Oaks). I see most if not all is online at internet achive an here: https://www.americanradiohistory.com/Byte_Magazine.htm I would rather have the physical magazine. Let me know what others you want to get rid of (Kilobaud?) Randy BYTE MAGAZINE: Early computer publication<https://www.americanradiohistory.com/Byte_Magazine.htm> Byte magazine was an early microcomputer magazine, influential in the late 1970s and throughout the 1980s because of its wide-ranging editorial coverage. Byte started in 1975, shortly after the first personal computers appeared as kits which were advertised in the back of electronics magazines. www.americanradiohistory.com From: cctalk on behalf of John Klos via cctalk Sent: Friday, December 14, 2018 10:16 AM To: cctalk@classiccmp.org Subject: Looking for a home for most issues of BYTE Magazine Hi, all, I have a collection of most of BYTE Magazine from the beginning through about 1985. Instead of selling it on eBay, I'd rather find a home for it where people can enjoy it. I also have a small collection of other computer magazines from the late 1970s and early 1980s which I'd like to include. Does anyone know of any person or organization within a reasonable distance from southern California who might take these magazines and preserve them, instead of just selling them on eBay? Thanks! John -- I don't know which scares me more - that people adhere to the idea of an omnipotent being powerful enough to create the universe, but whose supposedly most cherished creation is a race modeled after himself which can't stop hurting and killing each other, or the idea that those same people cannot or will not consider the possibility that the universe is random and unfeeling, and it's up to us to create order and beauty out of chaos and entropy.
Re: Looking for a home for most issues of BYTE Magazine
On 12/14/18 11:16 AM, John Klos via cctalk wrote: Hi, all, Hi John, Does anyone know of any person or organization within a reasonable distance from southern California who might take these magazines and preserve them, instead of just selling them on eBay? Have you contacted the Internet Archive and / or BitSavers? I think one or both of them will take things like this and scan them for preservation and to share with other people. -- Grant. . . . unix || die
Looking for a home for most issues of BYTE Magazine
Hi, all, I have a collection of most of BYTE Magazine from the beginning through about 1985. Instead of selling it on eBay, I'd rather find a home for it where people can enjoy it. I also have a small collection of other computer magazines from the late 1970s and early 1980s which I'd like to include. Does anyone know of any person or organization within a reasonable distance from southern California who might take these magazines and preserve them, instead of just selling them on eBay? Thanks! John -- I don't know which scares me more - that people adhere to the idea of an omnipotent being powerful enough to create the universe, but whose supposedly most cherished creation is a race modeled after himself which can't stop hurting and killing each other, or the idea that those same people cannot or will not consider the possibility that the universe is random and unfeeling, and it's up to us to create order and beauty out of chaos and entropy.
Re: Manuals looking for a home
On 21/11/2018 20:08, Mike Norris via cctalk wrote: Hi Guys, I have the following manuals looking for a home, free except for postage/delivery. (Based in UK). 1. 11/44 Field Maintenance Print Set (includes memory inverter, MS11-M, TU58) 2. RWP04 moving head disk subsystem maintenance manual 3. RM05 Disk Subsystem User guide + RM05 Fault Isolation Guide + RM05 IPB + RM05 Disk Subsystem Service Manual 4. DEC Station 220 Installation and Operations Guide 5. RA80 Maintenance Guide + RA81 Disk Drive Maintenance Guide + RA60 Maintenance Guide 6. MDM Microvax Diagnostic Monitor User's guide + Wartips (Warrington Support) - SID Registers, Boot lists, DCL Bits 7 Bobs. Will happily give further details if required, otherwise these go into recycling Hi, It looks like you have a taker for some of those manuals already. To be honest I have too much stuff already so I'm hoping that someone else does come along to take (1), (2) and (4), but no-one does, please let me know and I'll pony up the necessary postage. Thanks Antonio -- Antonio Carlini anto...@acarlini.com
Re: Manuals looking for a home
Hi Mike, Could I take 3, 5 & 6. I am also in the uk. If that is ok, I will send you my details and payment for postage. Thanks, Mark Sent from my iPhone > On 21 Nov 2018, at 20:08, Mike Norris via cctalk > wrote: > > Hi Guys, > > > I have the following manuals looking for a home, free except for > postage/delivery. (Based in UK). > > > 1. > 11/44 Field Maintenance Print Set (includes memory inverter, MS11-M, TU58) > 2. > RWP04 moving head disk subsystem maintenance manual > 3. > RM05 Disk Subsystem User guide + RM05 Fault Isolation Guide + RM05 IPB + RM05 > Disk Subsystem Service Manual > 4. > DEC Station 220 Installation and Operations Guide > 5. > RA80 Maintenance Guide + RA81 Disk Drive Maintenance Guide + RA60 Maintenance > Guide > 6. > MDM Microvax Diagnostic Monitor User's guide + Wartips (Warrington Support) - > SID Registers, Boot lists, DCL Bits 7 Bobs. > > > Will happily give further details if required, otherwise these go into > recycling > > > Regards Mike Norris
Manuals looking for a home
Hi Guys, I have the following manuals looking for a home, free except for postage/delivery. (Based in UK). 1. 11/44 Field Maintenance Print Set (includes memory inverter, MS11-M, TU58) 2. RWP04 moving head disk subsystem maintenance manual 3. RM05 Disk Subsystem User guide + RM05 Fault Isolation Guide + RM05 IPB + RM05 Disk Subsystem Service Manual 4. DEC Station 220 Installation and Operations Guide 5. RA80 Maintenance Guide + RA81 Disk Drive Maintenance Guide + RA60 Maintenance Guide 6. MDM Microvax Diagnostic Monitor User's guide + Wartips (Warrington Support) - SID Registers, Boot lists, DCL Bits 7 Bobs. Will happily give further details if required, otherwise these go into recycling Regards Mike Norris
Re: Looking for a home
Have you determined a price for the HP? Regards, Brian On Feb 4, 2018 19:46, "Pete Lancashire via cctalk"wrote: > Need to start cleaning aut, will have more/better pictures soon > > The Alphas have full True64 feature certificates, at least one ran > before going into storage and has 2 72 GBs and at least 3 new 300 GB > drives. > > One of the Suns is a Sun1 pre-production > > https://photos.app.goo.gl/c8dHa89KUaUGVn9n1 > > The IBM RS6000 has been spoken for > > -pete >
Re: Looking for a home
How much for the vax 3100? Please? Sent from my iPhone > On 5 Feb 2018, at 01:46, Pete Lancashire via cctalk> wrote: > > Need to start cleaning aut, will have more/better pictures soon > > The Alphas have full True64 feature certificates, at least one ran > before going into storage and has 2 72 GBs and at least 3 new 300 GB drives. > > One of the Suns is a Sun1 pre-production > > https://photos.app.goo.gl/c8dHa89KUaUGVn9n1 > > The IBM RS6000 has been spoken for > > -pete
Re: Looking for a home
sorry i ment sparc 1, it was "loaned" to me by Sun, I had the first Suns in the Portland Area, was totally different back then, has a problem with VI and Bill Joy took the ticket. I started with 3's -pete On Sun, Feb 4, 2018 at 4:58 PM, Richard Lokenwrote: > On Sun, 4 Feb 2018, Pete Lancashire via cctalk wrote: > > One of the Suns is a Sun1 pre-production >> > > Perhaps a pre-production Sparc? I had a long personal relationship with > a Sun-1 and nothing there looks remotely like a Sun-1. > > -- > Richard Loken VE6BSV: "...underneath those tuques we wear, > Athabasca, Alberta Canada : our heads are naked!" > ** rllo...@telus.net ** :- Arthur Black > >
Re: Looking for a home
On Sun, 4 Feb 2018, Pete Lancashire via cctalk wrote: One of the Suns is a Sun1 pre-production Perhaps a pre-production Sparc? I had a long personal relationship with a Sun-1 and nothing there looks remotely like a Sun-1. -- Richard Loken VE6BSV: "...underneath those tuques we wear, Athabasca, Alberta Canada : our heads are naked!" ** rllo...@telus.net ** :- Arthur Black
Re: Looking for a home
I think that is the pre-production Sparc 1 On Sun, Feb 4, 2018 at 4:49 PM, ftg...@elbonia.orgwrote: > What's the slab on the top? > > Sent from my iPhone > > > On 5 Feb 2018, at 01:46, Pete Lancashire via cctalk < > cctalk@classiccmp.org> wrote: > > > > Need to start cleaning aut, will have more/better pictures soon > > > > The Alphas have full True64 feature certificates, at least one ran > > before going into storage and has 2 72 GBs and at least 3 new 300 GB > drives. > > > > One of the Suns is a Sun1 pre-production > > > > https://photos.app.goo.gl/c8dHa89KUaUGVn9n1 > > > > The IBM RS6000 has been spoken for > > > > -pete > > >
Re: Looking for a home
What's the slab on the top? Sent from my iPhone > On 5 Feb 2018, at 01:46, Pete Lancashire via cctalk> wrote: > > Need to start cleaning aut, will have more/better pictures soon > > The Alphas have full True64 feature certificates, at least one ran > before going into storage and has 2 72 GBs and at least 3 new 300 GB drives. > > One of the Suns is a Sun1 pre-production > > https://photos.app.goo.gl/c8dHa89KUaUGVn9n1 > > The IBM RS6000 has been spoken for > > -pete
Looking for a home
Need to start cleaning aut, will have more/better pictures soon The Alphas have full True64 feature certificates, at least one ran before going into storage and has 2 72 GBs and at least 3 new 300 GB drives. One of the Suns is a Sun1 pre-production https://photos.app.goo.gl/c8dHa89KUaUGVn9n1 The IBM RS6000 has been spoken for -pete
Re: Looking to re-home some NeXT hardware
Hi CHris -We wanted one cleaner! for the exterior view. also 2 are good. one can be showed set up and another one for people to peek inside. OK did that with pair of Altairs which due to conditions worked out well had pristine looking Altair with replacedpower supply and mother board ... blahright? but left closed for exterior view in display looks great. had 2ed one nasty out side and front pane front... not so nice l but inside it has the correct orig. wimpy power supply and the little linked together mother board segments with 100 jumper wiresholding each together...this MADE A GREAT INTERIOR display. Ed# _www.smecc.org_ (http://www.smecc.org) In a message dated 3/14/2017 12:08:45 P.M. US Mountain Standard Time, cmhan...@eschatologist.net writes: On Mar 12, 2017, at 7:26 PM, Ed via cctalkwrote: > > OK anyone else have a cube out there that is cosmetically decent? does > not need to be internally complete? > > Ours is a bit of a beater for the display What’s wrong with yours that you can’t clean it up for a non-operational display? -- Chirs
Re: Looking to re-home some NeXT hardware
On Mar 12, 2017, at 7:26 PM, Ed via cctalkwrote: > > OK anyone else have a cube out there that is cosmetically decent? does > not need to be internally complete? > > Ours is a bit of a beater for the display What’s wrong with yours that you can’t clean it up for a non-operational display? -- Chirs
Re: NeXT in Toronto/Canada - was Re: Looking to re-home some NeXT hardware
On Mar 8, 2017, at 7:01 PM, Mouse via cctalkwrote: > >> I'm also a Cube owner in Toronto. Maybe we should start a local >> collector's / user's group :D > >> Any others care to speak up? > > I'm in Ottawa. I've got a - very small! - collection of NeXT hardware. > A slab or two, at least one megapixel display (the 2bpp greyscale > kind), some small number of keyboards, a mouse or two, that's probably > about it. I gave away my Cube years back. > > I've been tempted to get rid of them, but feel sentimental enough about > having developed MouseX that I've so far avoided doing so. Also, I've > been holding out the (admittedly slight) hope that hardware > documentation will surface for the interesting hardware; I do not run > closed-source software, so that's important to me. Sufficient hardware documentation has been available to write emulators (Previous) and port NetBSD. That said, I don’t understand why one would have NeXT hardware and then run NetBSD on it instead of the NEXTSTEP/OPENSTEP operating system that was designed for it and is period-appropriate. If you’re not going to use it as NeXT hardware, maybe someone who will use it that way would be happy to have it. Also, especially for software that’s (1) built using a common and well-undertsood architecture, (2) not “secured” in any way, and (3) not being updated, you really can maintain and improve it yourself pretty reasonably. Heck, there’s a pretty accurate Open Source decompiler for Objective-C called “code-dump” (derived Steve Nygard’s “class-dump”) to which it would probably be straightforward to add 68040 support… -- Chris
Re: Looking to re-home some NeXT hardware
On Mar 12, 2017, at 9:12 PM, Santo Nucifora via cctalkwrote: > Thanks to Chris, I have given the equipment a new home. Pics have been > taken of the two NeXT Cube boards in question and pics of the motherboard, > for good measure. I've made a post on the NeXT computer forum here for > those who may be interested: > http://www.nextcomputers.org/forums/viewtopic.php?t=4027 > > Thanks, > Santo Good photos, thank you for posting! Looks like this cube had a pretty interesting life so far! It might well be you find some interesting drivers or other software on the hard drive. - Mark
Re: Looking to re-home some NeXT hardware
OK anyone else have a cube out there that is cosmetically decent? does not need to be internally complete? Ours is a bit of a beater for the display thanks Ed Sharpe archivist for smecc In a message dated 3/12/2017 7:18:42 P.M. US Mountain Standard Time, santo.nucif...@gmail.com writes: On Sun, Mar 12, 2017 at 10:13 PM,wrote: ok can you spare the cube? Ed# _www.smecc.org_ (http://www.smecc.org/) No. As I noted, I haven't even booted it up yet to try it. I will be keeping that, one of the mono NeXTstations (the one for parts ) and passing on a NeXTstation to a fellow collector. I appreciate the interest but it hasn't even warmed up yet from the cold :) Santo
Re: Looking to re-home some NeXT hardware
On Sun, Mar 12, 2017 at 10:13 PM,wrote: > ok can you spare the cube? > Ed# www.smecc.org > > No. As I noted, I haven't even booted it up yet to try it. I will be keeping that, one of the mono NeXTstations (the one for parts ) and passing on a NeXTstation to a fellow collector. I appreciate the interest but it hasn't even warmed up yet from the cold :) Santo
Re: Looking to re-home some NeXT hardware
ok can you spare the cube? Ed# _www.smecc.org_ (http://www.smecc.org) In a message dated 3/12/2017 7:12:11 P.M. US Mountain Standard Time, cctalk@classiccmp.org writes: Thanks to Chris, I have given the equipment a new home. Pics have been taken of the two NeXT Cube boards in question and pics of the motherboard, for good measure. I've made a post on the NeXT computer forum here for those who may be interested: http://www.nextcomputers.org/forums/viewtopic.php?t=4027 Thanks, Santo On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 12:19 PM, Ed via cctalkwrote: > let me put my name back in the hat for the cube next computer... > all the other stuff we have looks ok but appears like our cube may > have met a baseball bat on part of it > > poor thing would not look good in a display. > Ed Sharpe archivist for SMECC > > > In a message dated 3/10/2017 10:13:29 A.M. US Mountain Standard Time, > cctalk@classiccmp.org writes: > > On 9 March 2017 at 01:21, Ian Finder via cctalk > wrote: > > Is someone testing a Markov chainer on the list? If so, you have some > more > > work to do... > > > It would explain the resolute & total failure of our efforts to > explain top-quoting to him. Er, to it. > > -- > Liam Proven • Profile: https://about.me/liamproven > Email: lpro...@cix.co.uk • Google Mail/Talk/Plus: lpro...@gmail.com > Twitter/Facebook/Flickr: lproven • Skype/LinkedIn/AIM/Yahoo: liamproven > UK: +44 7939-087884 • ČR/WhatsApp/Telegram/Signal: +420 702 829 053 >
Re: Looking to re-home some NeXT hardware
Thanks to Chris, I have given the equipment a new home. Pics have been taken of the two NeXT Cube boards in question and pics of the motherboard, for good measure. I've made a post on the NeXT computer forum here for those who may be interested: http://www.nextcomputers.org/forums/viewtopic.php?t=4027 Thanks, Santo On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 12:19 PM, Ed via cctalkwrote: > let me put my name back in the hat for the cube next computer... > all the other stuff we have looks ok but appears like our cube may > have met a baseball bat on part of it > > poor thing would not look good in a display. > Ed Sharpe archivist for SMECC > > > In a message dated 3/10/2017 10:13:29 A.M. US Mountain Standard Time, > cctalk@classiccmp.org writes: > > On 9 March 2017 at 01:21, Ian Finder via cctalk > wrote: > > Is someone testing a Markov chainer on the list? If so, you have some > more > > work to do... > > > It would explain the resolute & total failure of our efforts to > explain top-quoting to him. Er, to it. > > -- > Liam Proven • Profile: https://about.me/liamproven > Email: lpro...@cix.co.uk • Google Mail/Talk/Plus: lpro...@gmail.com > Twitter/Facebook/Flickr: lproven • Skype/LinkedIn/AIM/Yahoo: liamproven > UK: +44 7939-087884 • ČR/WhatsApp/Telegram/Signal: +420 702 829 053 >
Re: Looking to re-home some NeXT hardware
let me put my name back in the hat for the cube next computer... all the other stuff we have looks ok but appears like our cube may have met a baseball bat on part of it poor thing would not look good in a display. Ed Sharpe archivist for SMECC In a message dated 3/10/2017 10:13:29 A.M. US Mountain Standard Time, cctalk@classiccmp.org writes: On 9 March 2017 at 01:21, Ian Finder via cctalkwrote: > Is someone testing a Markov chainer on the list? If so, you have some more > work to do... It would explain the resolute & total failure of our efforts to explain top-quoting to him. Er, to it. -- Liam Proven • Profile: https://about.me/liamproven Email: lpro...@cix.co.uk • Google Mail/Talk/Plus: lpro...@gmail.com Twitter/Facebook/Flickr: lproven • Skype/LinkedIn/AIM/Yahoo: liamproven UK: +44 7939-087884 • ČR/WhatsApp/Telegram/Signal: +420 702 829 053
Re: Looking to re-home some NeXT hardware
On 9 March 2017 at 01:21, Ian Finder via cctalkwrote: > Is someone testing a Markov chainer on the list? If so, you have some more > work to do... It would explain the resolute & total failure of our efforts to explain top-quoting to him. Er, to it. -- Liam Proven • Profile: https://about.me/liamproven Email: lpro...@cix.co.uk • Google Mail/Talk/Plus: lpro...@gmail.com Twitter/Facebook/Flickr: lproven • Skype/LinkedIn/AIM/Yahoo: liamproven UK: +44 7939-087884 • ČR/WhatsApp/Telegram/Signal: +420 702 829 053
Re: NeXT in Toronto/Canada - was Re: Looking to re-home some NeXT hardware
> I'm also a Cube owner in Toronto. Maybe we should start a local > collector's / user's group :D > Any others care to speak up? I'm in Ottawa. I've got a - very small! - collection of NeXT hardware. A slab or two, at least one megapixel display (the 2bpp greyscale kind), some small number of keyboards, a mouse or two, that's probably about it. I gave away my Cube years back. I've been tempted to get rid of them, but feel sentimental enough about having developed MouseX that I've so far avoided doing so. Also, I've been holding out the (admittedly slight) hope that hardware documentation will surface for the interesting hardware; I do not run closed-source software, so that's important to me. /~\ The ASCII Mouse \ / Ribbon Campaign X Against HTMLmo...@rodents-montreal.org / \ Email! 7D C8 61 52 5D E7 2D 39 4E F1 31 3E E8 B3 27 4B
Re: Looking to re-home some NeXT hardware
On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 15:50 Ed wrote: > we may some parts pieces maybe when we stage our next cube... > > who knows might pop up and work by it self.. > > let me know what you are not going to used there. > thx Ed# > _www.smecc.org_ (http://www.smecc.org) Is someone testing a Markov chainer on the list? If so, you have some more work to do... -- Ian Finder (206) 395-MIPS ian.fin...@gmail.com
Re: Looking to re-home some NeXT hardware
we may some parts pieces maybe when we stage our next cube... who knows might pop up and work by it self.. let me know what you are not going to used there. thx Ed# _www.smecc.org_ (http://www.smecc.org) In a message dated 3/8/2017 2:07:11 P.M. US Mountain Standard Time, cctalk@classiccmp.org writes: Hi Mark, Works for me or I can post. I am "snuci" on http://www.nextcomputers.org and have been a member for a little while. I have a couple of NeXTs already including only one that I've put on my site at http://vintagecomputer.ca/next-dimension-cube-turbo One of these will go to a friend who has a small collection and is new to NeXT so we'll have another potential member soon :) For the record, that blog post is old. I have the Cube working with dual monitors and have no issues with that one at all. Santo On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 3:50 PM, Tapley, Markwrote: > On Mar 8, 2017, at 1:28 PM, Santo Nucifora > wrote: > > > Hi Mark, > > > > I have reached out to Chris (I am local) and will providing a new home > for the lot. I will be happy to take hi-res pics of the board when I get > them over the weekend. > > > > Santo > > Santo, > that’s great! Wonderful to hear they are going to a good home. > I will try to pass on the photos to > > http://www.nextcomputers.org > > if that’s OK with you, or you can do so directly. That seems to be > one of the biggest active repositories of NeXT information. > If you want to get them running, there is also a lot of useful > information in the forum area on the same site, including pretty detailed > steps on how to implement a SCSI2SD or other hard drives. Some of that may > be helpful with the cube as well. > - Mark > >
Re: NeXT in Toronto/Canada - was Re: Looking to re-home some NeXT hardware
On 3/8/2017 2:16 PM, Toby Thain via cctalk wrote: On 2017-03-08 4:07 PM, Santo Nucifora via cctalk wrote: Hi Mark, Works for me or I can post. I am "snuci" on http://www.nextcomputers.org and have been a member for a little while. I have a couple of NeXTs already including only one that I've put on my site at Hi Santo I'm also a Cube owner in Toronto. Maybe we should start a local collector's / user's group :D Any others care to speak up? --Toby APPLE of the BORG ... All CUBES are US. :) Ben.
NeXT in Toronto/Canada - was Re: Looking to re-home some NeXT hardware
On 2017-03-08 4:07 PM, Santo Nucifora via cctalk wrote: Hi Mark, Works for me or I can post. I am "snuci" on http://www.nextcomputers.org and have been a member for a little while. I have a couple of NeXTs already including only one that I've put on my site at Hi Santo I'm also a Cube owner in Toronto. Maybe we should start a local collector's / user's group :D Any others care to speak up? --Toby http://vintagecomputer.ca/next-dimension-cube-turbo One of these will go to a friend who has a small collection and is new to NeXT so we'll have another potential member soon :) For the record, that blog post is old. I have the Cube working with dual monitors and have no issues with that one at all. Santo
Re: Looking to re-home some NeXT hardware
Hi Mark, Works for me or I can post. I am "snuci" on http://www.nextcomputers.org and have been a member for a little while. I have a couple of NeXTs already including only one that I've put on my site at http://vintagecomputer.ca/next-dimension-cube-turbo One of these will go to a friend who has a small collection and is new to NeXT so we'll have another potential member soon :) For the record, that blog post is old. I have the Cube working with dual monitors and have no issues with that one at all. Santo On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 3:50 PM, Tapley, Markwrote: > On Mar 8, 2017, at 1:28 PM, Santo Nucifora > wrote: > > > Hi Mark, > > > > I have reached out to Chris (I am local) and will providing a new home > for the lot. I will be happy to take hi-res pics of the board when I get > them over the weekend. > > > > Santo > > Santo, > that’s great! Wonderful to hear they are going to a good home. > I will try to pass on the photos to > > http://www.nextcomputers.org > > if that’s OK with you, or you can do so directly. That seems to be > one of the biggest active repositories of NeXT information. > If you want to get them running, there is also a lot of useful > information in the forum area on the same site, including pretty detailed > steps on how to implement a SCSI2SD or other hard drives. Some of that may > be helpful with the cube as well. > - Mark > >
Re: Looking to re-home some NeXT hardware
On Mar 8, 2017, at 1:28 PM, Santo Nuciforawrote: > Hi Mark, > > I have reached out to Chris (I am local) and will providing a new home for > the lot. I will be happy to take hi-res pics of the board when I get them > over the weekend. > > Santo Santo, that’s great! Wonderful to hear they are going to a good home. I will try to pass on the photos to http://www.nextcomputers.org if that’s OK with you, or you can do so directly. That seems to be one of the biggest active repositories of NeXT information. If you want to get them running, there is also a lot of useful information in the forum area on the same site, including pretty detailed steps on how to implement a SCSI2SD or other hard drives. Some of that may be helpful with the cube as well. - Mark
Re: Looking to re-home some NeXT hardware
Hi Mark, I have reached out to Chris (I am local) and will providing a new home for the lot. I will be happy to take hi-res pics of the board when I get them over the weekend. Santo On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 2:22 PM, Tapley, Mark via cctalk < cctalk@classiccmp.org> wrote: > On Mar 8, 2017, at 1:09 PM,wrote: > > > It's been a long time since I had the Cube open so this is from memory. > However, I'm reasonably sure that this was based off a NeXT card (whose > name escapes me) that was half bus interface and half prototype board so > that you could build one-off interfaces. I originally bought the Cube as > surplus from the University of Waterloo, so I'm guessing that it's an > interface to some piece of lab equipment. > > > > Here's a slightly blurry picture of the Cube's back: > > > >https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B0Sme9n3mG2UYUxuVWZ2eXhfS2M/view > > > > The Mystery Board occupies the leftmost slot (IIRC). > > Now that is interesting! I concur completely, this does not look > anything like my NeXTDimension. But it looks from the outside as though you > have not one but two boards on the left side. My cube originally had only > the board on the right of your picture (and in that same location). Unless > there are internal connections between the two slots on the left side, you > may have two Mystery Boards. > > Very neat! I hope we get to hear more about this system eventually. > - Mark > >
Re: Looking to re-home some NeXT hardware
On Mar 8, 2017, at 1:09 PM,wrote: > It's been a long time since I had the Cube open so this is from memory. > However, I'm reasonably sure that this was based off a NeXT card (whose name > escapes me) that was half bus interface and half prototype board so that you > could build one-off interfaces. I originally bought the Cube as surplus from > the University of Waterloo, so I'm guessing that it's an interface to some > piece of lab equipment. > > Here's a slightly blurry picture of the Cube's back: > >https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B0Sme9n3mG2UYUxuVWZ2eXhfS2M/view > > The Mystery Board occupies the leftmost slot (IIRC). Now that is interesting! I concur completely, this does not look anything like my NeXTDimension. But it looks from the outside as though you have not one but two boards on the left side. My cube originally had only the board on the right of your picture (and in that same location). Unless there are internal connections between the two slots on the left side, you may have two Mystery Boards. Very neat! I hope we get to hear more about this system eventually. - Mark
Re: Looking to re-home some NeXT hardware
On 2017-03-08 11:06, Tapley, Mark wrote: On Mar 7, 2017, at 10:10 PM, Chris Reuter via cctalk <cctalk@classiccmp.org> wrote: I have some NeXT hardware that I'm looking to re-home. Items include: 1 NeXT cube with an unknown expansion card One reasonable candidate would be a NeXTDimension video card. It's been a long time since I had the Cube open so this is from memory. However, I'm reasonably sure that this was based off a NeXT card (whose name escapes me) that was half bus interface and half prototype board so that you could build one-off interfaces. I originally bought the Cube as surplus from the University of Waterloo, so I'm guessing that it's an interface to some piece of lab equipment. Here's a slightly blurry picture of the Cube's back: https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B0Sme9n3mG2UYUxuVWZ2eXhfS2M/view The Mystery Board occupies the leftmost slot (IIRC). --Chris
Re: Looking to re-home some NeXT hardware
On Mar 7, 2017, at 10:10 PM, Chris Reuter via cctalk <cctalk@classiccmp.org> wrote: > > I have some NeXT hardware that I'm looking to re-home. Items include: > >1 NeXT cube with an unknown expansion card One reasonable candidate would be a NeXTDimension video card. Connectors on mine, from the top: 1) DE-9 2) DIN 3) RCA 4) DIN 5) RCA 6) RCA (large space) 7) video, with coax imbedded among other connectors in a D shell - 13W3, I think. If true, this is a reasonably valuable card. However it would make sense for there to be a color monitor (Sun or NeXT or similar) somewhere nearby if that’s what this is. >2 Mice, 3 keyboards, various cables, SCSI drives, odds and ends. Those all look to me like the original non-ADB keyboards and mice > The monitors both worked when I last tried them. One had succumbed to > the dimness problem but the other was still bright, if blurry. > Presumably, you could swap CRTs and have one like-new NeXT monochrome > monitor. “Blurry”, in my experience, often clears up after 12-24 hours of running. It may be worthwhile to power it up and leave it that way for a day or so to see whether this works for you as well. I truly hope someone saves these!
Looking to re-home some NeXT hardware
I have some NeXT hardware that I'm looking to re-home. Items include: 1 NeXT cube with an unknown expansion card 2 Monochrome monitors 2 NeXTStation "slab" workstations, non-functional Boxed NeXTStep installation media with manuals (may not be complete) 2 Mice, 3 keyboards, various cables, SCSI drives, odds and ends. (Picture at <https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B0Sme9n3mG2USjNJa3BaSVFJekk/view>; the fruit is not included.) I'm located in Toronto; preference will be given to anyone who is willing to come here and haul it away. I *may* be willing to ship it somewhere, but if so, you're paying for it and it can't cause me a lot of hassle. Everything is believed to work unless marked otherwise; however, it's been years since I powered up any of these so I can't promise anything. The monitors both worked when I last tried them. One had succumbed to the dimness problem but the other was still bright, if blurry. Presumably, you could swap CRTs and have one like-new NeXT monochrome monitor. One of the two slabs would get partway through its boot sequence before hanging so it might be easily fixable. The other one was stripped for parts before I got it. The Cube worked the last time I tried it. I did, however, try to add a second drive, which didn't work. This may have screwed up the SCSI termination. My preferred contact email is <ch...@blit.ca>. --Chris -- Chris Reuter http://www.blit.ca "I used to be able to count to 1023 on my fingers in two minutes, but then I got better." --Eb Oesch, <903f6dfe.0303242039.1f9e6...@posting.google.com>