RE: DECstation 220 Impasse Reached

2017-07-28 Thread Rob Jarratt via cctalk
> -Original Message- > From: Phil Blundell [mailto:p...@pbcl.net] > Sent: 28 July 2017 18:27 > To: r...@jarratt.me.uk; Rob Jarratt <robert.jarr...@ntlworld.com>; General > Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts <cctalk@classiccmp.org> > Subject: Re:

RE: DECstation 220 Impasse Reached

2017-07-28 Thread Rob Jarratt via cctalk
age- > From: Paul Koning [mailto:paulkon...@comcast.net] > Sent: 28 July 2017 18:17 > To: r...@jarratt.me.uk; Robert Jarratt <robert.jarr...@ntlworld.com>; General > Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts <cctalk@classiccmp.org> > Subject: Re: DECstation 220 Impasse Reached &

Re: DECstation 220 Impasse Reached

2017-07-28 Thread Paul Koning via cctalk
> On Jul 28, 2017, at 1:04 PM, Rob Jarratt via cctalk > wrote: > > Anyone have any thoughts on whether those data signals look right? It's hard to guess at signals when the horizontal and vertical scales are not stated, nor where in the circuit the signal was found.

RE: DECstation 220 Impasse Reached

2017-07-28 Thread Rob Jarratt via cctalk
Anyone have any thoughts on whether those data signals look right? Thanks Rob From: Rob Jarratt [mailto:robert.jarr...@ntlworld.com] Sent: 27 July 2017 21:18 To: General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts (cctalk@classiccmp.org) Subject: DECstation 220