Not cost effective at nearly $10,000! I understand they're very rare,
given they were only used for a few years in industry and they're
clocking on 3/4 of a century old, but even then, that seems an order of
magnitude or two off the real value.
Actually, looking them up, doesn't seem they wer
On 2022-Jan-06, at 12:19 AM, Joshua Rice via cctech wrote:
> Not cost effective at nearly $10,000! I understand they're very rare, given
> they were only used for a few years in industry and they're clocking on 3/4
> of a century old, but even then, that seems an order of magnitude or two off
>
Perhaps even rarer were the EBAM tubes that CDC worked with during the
1970s. I recall seeing a 6' rack of a complete assembly sitting in a
hallway at ADL around 1974. If CDC followed the dictates of management
then, the unit was probably utterly demolsihed before being sold as
scrap metal.
--
Prototypes don't count.
--
Will
On Thu, Jan 6, 2022 at 12:41 PM Chuck Guzis via cctech
wrote:
>
>
> Perhaps even rarer were the EBAM tubes that CDC worked with during the
> 1970s. I recall seeing a 6' rack of a complete assembly sitting in a
> hallway at ADL around 1974. If CDC followed the di
It would be a lot easier to replace the large circular regulator if you're
taking the shotgun approach, and much more likely that the regulator is a
source of faults. and it's cheaper. For the h744, 45, 54. BUT measuring
things is the best way if you can do it. Pull the values from the
backpla
On Thu, Jan 6, 2022, 01:20 Joshua Rice via cctech
wrote:
>
> Not cost effective at nearly $10,000! I understand they're very rare,
> given they were only used for a few years in industry and they're
> clocking on 3/4 of a century old, but even then, that seems an order of
> magnitude or two off t
