Re: dvd+rw-tools Write Error

Bikrant Neupane wrote: Hi, I have been using dvd+rw-tool for writing data in dvds for more than 7-8 months without any problem. I am running Red Hat Linux 7.2 with 2.4.24. I have no problem with HP dvd+rw 4.7GB (1x/2x) disc. But I came into this problem with new Memorex DVD+RW 4.7 Gb discs. I am u

Re: dvd burning problem, dvd+rw-tools, LG GSA-4120B

Ronny Haryanto wrote: On Sun, Sep 26, 2004 at 12:50:58AM +1000, Ronny Haryanto wrote: :-[ [EMAIL PROTECTED] failed with SK=4h/ASC=09h/ACQ=01h]: Input/output error builtin_dd: 1716384*2KB out @ average 3.8x1385KBps :-( write failed: Input/output error /dev/hdc: flushing cache :-[ FL

Re: cdrtools-2.01 ready

Joerg Schilling wrote: After nearly 2 years of hard work for Free Software, i am proud to announce the final version of cdrtools-2.01. Check ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/cdrecord/ for the sources. Jörg Thanks! -- E. Robert Bogusta It seemed like a good idea at the time -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to

Re: cdrecord problems with TDK 440n DVD+/-rw

On Mon, 19 Jul 2004, Joerg Schilling wrote: > > >From: Bill Davidsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > >Dan wrote: > >> On Sat, 2004-07-17 at 19:19, Bill Davidsen wrote: > >> > >>>lsof and see what process is causing the problem. > >> > >> > >> Here's a ps -A and lsof of when I kill as much as I can an

Re: same Rock Ridge name

Nick Urbanik wrote: Dear Folks, On Wed, Jul 07, 2004 at 08:02:43AM +0800, Nick Urbanik wrote: Dear Folks, I tried the following: growisofs -Z /dev/scd0 -J -R 19* 2000_0[1-6]_* Aha, it seems that I should use the --graft-points option to preserve the directory names in the pathspecs. I am in

Re: Backup thousands of files 1 at a time with growisofs?

Volker Kuhlmann wrote: I would particularly like to have my music uncompressed, untarred so I can just put the dvd into a machine and play them. This would require each disk to have an in itself complete iso fs with a subset of the files. Each disk may be slightly underfull. http://www.seri

Re: 100% system CPU usage with cdrecord

Joerg Schilling wrote: From: Rob Bogus mail account <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> I *strongly* suggest using ide-scsi with 2.4 kernels. You want to boot with something like "hdc=ide-scsi" I believe, that what I use for all my working 2.4 systems. The device will probably be 0.0.0,

Re: 100% system CPU usage with cdrecord

On Wed, 30 Jun 2004, Charles Steinkuehler wrote: > The only kind of odd thing I'm doing is using the ATA support in > cdrecord to talk to the burner rather than SCSI emulation (I was having > problems getting that going...apparently I don't yet fully understand > the interaction of the new libata

Re: Problem burning DVD's with one batch of Ritek DVD-R blanks

On Tue, 29 Jun 2004, Bill Sidhipong wrote: > Hello folks, > > I am just getting started with burning DVD's for backup purposes. > So far I have burned about 10 disks from a small "trial pack" :-) > and I thought all was set to go for the real thing when the pack > was used up. > > Wrong. On the

Re: HD_BURN

On Tue, 22 Jun 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On 21. June 2004 at 6:27PM -0400, > Bill Davidsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I just got a dual-layer DVD burner which includes a feature > > identified as HD_BURN, which claims to be able to put 1.4GB on > > a CD blank readable in a DVD reader

Re: Best way to write DVD+R?

Joerg Schilling wrote: From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] The same command as above Note that with dev=ATAPI: you will never get DMA and writing is s slow. I thought that had been fixed, I would swear that cdrecord uses DMA with ATAPI and 2.6 kernels. Now I have to go back and check, I re

Re: Best way to write DVD+R?

Joerg Schilling wrote: From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] The same command as above Note that with dev=ATAPI: you will never get DMA and writing is s slow. I thought that had been fixed, I would swear that cdrecord uses DMA with ATAPI and 2.6 kernels. Now I have to go back and check, I

Re: Best way to write DVD+R?

Joerg Schilling wrote: From: Gregoire Favre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Normally, I use this script to write my DVD (video): #!/bin/tcsh setenv SIZE `mkisofs -dvd-video -f -q -print-size -V $1 $2` setenv CDR_SECURITY "8:d ... " mkisofs -dvd-video -f -V $1 $2 | cdrecord-prodvd -v dev

Re: Best way to write DVD+R?

Joerg Schilling wrote: From: Gregoire Favre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Normally, I use this script to write my DVD (video): #!/bin/tcsh setenv SIZE `mkisofs -dvd-video -f -q -print-size -V $1 $2` setenv CDR_SECURITY "8:d ... " mkisofs -dvd-video -f -V $1 $2 | cdrecord-prodvd -v de

Re: cannot setup HP7200 anymore

Joerg Schilling wrote: To: cdwrite@other.debian.org I was suddenly hit by recent changes in linux. I tried today to use my old HP 7200 parallel port CD-Writer and there is no way I could make it appear as scsi device. I manage to load all the modules and I get pg: pg version 1.02

Re: cannot setup HP7200 anymore

Joerg Schilling wrote: To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] I was suddenly hit by recent changes in linux. I tried today to use my old HP 7200 parallel port CD-Writer and there is no way I could make it appear as scsi device. I manage to load all the modules and I get pg: pg version 1.02, majo

Re: LF-D311 support?

Colette Dryden wrote: We are looking for a repair place that fixes these dvd ram drives? Also for the older style LF-D211V. Is there a place that does repair on panasonic dvd drives? You may want to investigate the cost of repair vs. the cost of a new unit. If there is a new unit which you can

Re: LF-D311 support?

Colette Dryden wrote: We are looking for a repair place that fixes these dvd ram drives? Also for the older style LF-D211V. Is there a place that does repair on panasonic dvd drives? You may want to investigate the cost of repair vs. the cost of a new unit. If there is a new unit which you ca

Re: Updated DVD patch for cdrecord

Warly wrote: Available at http://people.mandrakesoft.com/~warly/files/cdrtools/ Updated DVD patch (at present against a25) with a better DVD+RW formatting and burning support. scanbus will also display dev=ATA scanning if no dev option is passed on the command line, mostly because we are defaulting

Re: Updated DVD patch for cdrecord

Warly wrote: Available at http://people.mandrakesoft.com/~warly/files/cdrtools/ Updated DVD patch (at present against a25) with a better DVD+RW formatting and burning support. scanbus will also display dev=ATA scanning if no dev option is passed on the command line, mostly because we are defaulti

Re: extension of mkisofs for incremental backups

Joerg Schilling wrote: From: Rob Bogus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> The alternative would be to group them by function, such as putting things which affect the device (dev=, speed=, burnfree, etc) in one group, things which affect format (-D -R -N, etc) in another, things which affect h

Re: extension of mkisofs for incremental backups

Joerg Schilling wrote: From: Rob Bogus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> The alternative would be to group them by function, such as putting things which affect the device (dev=, speed=, burnfree, etc) in one group, things which affect format (-D -R -N, etc) in another, things which affect h

Re: extension of mkisofs for incremental backups

Joerg Schilling wrote: From: Patrick Ohly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> The patch to the man page indserts things disordered Where would you like me to insert the description of the new options? A while ago, I did try to have the options in alphabetical order. This seems to be the best

Re: Compilation problem under SuSE 9.0

Plamen Neykov wrote: Hi all, I have problem compiling the cdrtools 2.01a25 under SuSE 9.0. The error message is: /usr/lib/gcc-lib/i586-suse-linux/3.3.1/../../../../i586-suse-linux/bin/ld: cannot find -lscg No clue, although adding the location of the library to the exvironment symbol LD_LIBRARY

Re: extension of mkisofs for incremental backups

Joerg Schilling wrote: From: Patrick Ohly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> The patch to the man page indserts things disordered Where would you like me to insert the description of the new options? A while ago, I did try to have the options in alphabetical order. This seems to be the bes

Re: Compilation problem under SuSE 9.0

Plamen Neykov wrote: Hi all, I have problem compiling the cdrtools 2.01a25 under SuSE 9.0. The error message is: /usr/lib/gcc-lib/i586-suse-linux/3.3.1/../../../../i586-suse-linux/bin/ld: cannot find -lscg No clue, although adding the location of the library to the exvironment symbol LD_LIBRA

Re: Interesting DVD behaviour

Dan The Carpetman wrote: I have the same problem. After spending 5 hours with Sony tech support all the way up to their engineers, I found that once you upgrade the firmware to 1.40 + your drive will burn 1X & 2X DVD at 1X only. 4X DVD will burn at 2X. The upgrade cut back the speed

Re: how to read second track of a multisessioned dvd+r, in the burner ?

Andrea Tasso wrote: Hi all, I burn a dvd+r, with multisession. The commands I issued were: growisofs -Z /dev/dvd -R -J firstfile growisofs -M /dev/dvd -R -J secondfile how can I access secondfile ? I am trying to do it in the same recorder I used to burn the dvd, not in a dvd-ROM ... if I try moun

Re: Interesting DVD behaviour

Dan The Carpetman wrote: I have the same problem. After spending 5 hours with Sony tech support all the way up to their engineers, I found that once you upgrade the firmware to 1.40 + your drive will burn 1X & 2X DVD at 1X only. 4X DVD will burn at 2X. The upgrade cut back the speed

Re: how to read second track of a multisessioned dvd+r, in the burner ?

Andrea Tasso wrote: Hi all, I burn a dvd+r, with multisession. The commands I issued were: growisofs -Z /dev/dvd -R -J firstfile growisofs -M /dev/dvd -R -J secondfile how can I access secondfile ? I am trying to do it in the same recorder I used to burn the dvd, not in a dvd-ROM ... if I try mou

[Fwd: [Fwd: [ANNOUNCE] linux-libc-headers 2.6.2.0]]

For people writing software against Linux 2.6, this info may be useful. -- E. Robert Bogusta It seemed like a good idea at the time --- Begin Message --- Send to mn/l -- bill davidsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> CTO TMR Associates, Inc Doing interesting things with small computers since 1979 --- Begin

[Fwd: [Fwd: [ANNOUNCE] linux-libc-headers 2.6.2.0]]

For people writing software against Linux 2.6, this info may be useful. -- E. Robert Bogusta It seemed like a good idea at the time --- Begin Message --- Send to mn/l -- bill davidsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> CTO TMR Associates, Inc Doing interesting things with small computers since 1979 --- Begi

Re: growisofs hangs on DD0203

Daniel Tessier wrote: On Sat, 2004-02-07 at 05:28, Rob Bogus wrote: Or at least try another supported media brand. Maybe... Although the discs I have now are RICOHJPN/W11, which are supposed to be pretty good, and are on the campatibility page for my drive. I've

Re: growisofs hangs on DD0203

Daniel Tessier wrote: On Sat, 2004-02-07 at 05:28, Rob Bogus wrote: Or at least try another supported media brand. Maybe... Although the discs I have now are RICOHJPN/W11, which are supposed to be pretty good, and are on the campatibility page for my drive. I've

Re: growisofs hangs on DD0203

Daniel Tessier wrote: After 5 minutes or so, the busy light goes out, but I still can't get any info: [EMAIL PROTECTED] media $ dvd+rw-mediainfo /dev/dvd INQUIRY:[OPTORITE][DVD RW DD0203 ][2.30] GET [CURRENT] CONFIGURATION: Mounted Media: 1Ah, DVD+RW Current Write Speed:

Re: growisofs hangs on DD0203

Daniel Tessier wrote: After 5 minutes or so, the busy light goes out, but I still can't get any info: [EMAIL PROTECTED] media $ dvd+rw-mediainfo /dev/dvd INQUIRY:[OPTORITE][DVD RW DD0203 ][2.30] GET [CURRENT] CONFIGURATION: Mounted Media: 1Ah, DVD+RW Current Write Speed:

Re: DVD Compatiblity issue

Andy Polyakov wrote: It prints both as far as I understand. Requestor should be able to clarify which one, intended velocity in the beginning or average summary at the end, he was referring to. Cheers. A. cdrecord prints the average on a track or session at the end of that burn, and with -v rep

Re: Automounters - more info wanted (was Re: Re: plextor px-708uf: cannot get disk type)

Rob Bogus wrote: Volker Kuhlmann wrote: What I meant was those autothingies should keep their hands off a disk while a burn process is happening. Dunno whether it's possible to detect this, but isn't that the way it should be? The burner software can open exclusive - see man open. Aft

Re: DVD Compatiblity issue

Andy Polyakov wrote: It prints both as far as I understand. Requestor should be able to clarify which one, intended velocity in the beginning or average summary at the end, he was referring to. Cheers. A. cdrecord prints the average on a track or session at the end of that burn, and with -v re

Re: Automounters - more info wanted (was Re: Re: plextor px-708uf: cannot get disk type)

Rob Bogus wrote: Volker Kuhlmann wrote: What I meant was those autothingies should keep their hands off a disk while a burn process is happening. Dunno whether it's possible to detect this, but isn't that the way it should be? The burner software can open exclusive - see man op

Re: DVD Compatiblity issue

Joerg Schilling wrote: The cdrecord README clearly states that you _need_ working DMA in order to write DVDs. If you have burnfree ON the drive just dramatically slows down. If the DVD unit were set to 4x, but data underrun were reducing the effective transfer speed to 2x, would cdrecord report

Re: DVD Compatiblity issue

Joerg Schilling wrote: The cdrecord README clearly states that you _need_ working DMA in order to write DVDs. If you have burnfree ON the drive just dramatically slows down. If the DVD unit were set to 4x, but data underrun were reducing the effective transfer speed to 2x, would cdrecord repor

Re: Automounters - more info wanted (was Re: Re: plextor px-708uf: cannot get disk type)

Joerg Schilling wrote: From: Lourens Veen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> NO, if you like to check for a media change you need to access the TOC. Thanks, but that's not what I was asking. What I want to know is, if I were writing a volume man

Re: Automounters - more info wanted (was Re: Re: plextor px-708uf: cannot get disk type)

Volker Kuhlmann wrote: What I meant was those autothingies should keep their hands off a disk while a burn process is happening. Dunno whether it's possible to detect this, but isn't that the way it should be? The burner software can open exclusive - see man open. -- E. Robert Bogusta It seemed

Re: Automounters - more info wanted (was Re: Re: plextor px-708uf: cannot get disk type)

Joerg Schilling wrote: Well, if you do it right, then then the automounter is the wrong place for this functionality: - The task os an automounter is to watch where you try to step in. If you step into some magic land, it opens a door for you. If you go out of the magic land, the automo

Re: Automounters - more info wanted (was Re: Re: plextor px-708uf: cannot get disk type)

Lourens Veen wrote: On Tue 27 January 2004 11:16, Lourens Veen wrote: On Tue 27 January 2004 08:06, Lourens Veen wrote: Then there is autofs (http://freshmeat.net/projects/autofs/?topic_id=142, can't find a real homepage) and KDE uses fam (http://oss.sgi.com/project

Re: Automounters - more info wanted (was Re: Re: plextor px-708uf: cannot get disk type)

Joerg Schilling wrote: From: Lourens Veen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> NO, if you like to check for a media change you need to access the TOC. Thanks, but that's not what I was asking. What I want to know is, if I were writing a volume man

Re: Automounters - more info wanted (was Re: Re: plextor px-708uf: cannot get disk type)

Volker Kuhlmann wrote: What I meant was those autothingies should keep their hands off a disk while a burn process is happening. Dunno whether it's possible to detect this, but isn't that the way it should be? The burner software can open exclusive - see man open. -- E. Robert Bogusta It seem

Re: Automounters - more info wanted (was Re: Re: plextor px-708uf: cannot get disk type)

Joerg Schilling wrote: Well, if you do it right, then then the automounter is the wrong place for this functionality: - The task os an automounter is to watch where you try to step in. If you step into some magic land, it opens a door for you. If you go out of the magic land, the automo

Re: Automounters - more info wanted (was Re: Re: plextor px-708uf: cannot get disk type)

Lourens Veen wrote: On Tue 27 January 2004 11:16, Lourens Veen wrote: On Tue 27 January 2004 08:06, Lourens Veen wrote: Then there is autofs (http://freshmeat.net/projects/autofs/?topic_id=142, can't find a real homepage) and KDE uses fam (http://oss.sgi.com/project

Re: Problems burning CD-R's with Plextor PX-708A and cdrecord

jeff beck wrote: I'm sure I am doing something wrong and am only allowing myself to get yelled at by Mr. Schilling by posting, but I can't seem to write CD-R's successfully with my new Plextor PX-708A. I am using SONY CD-R 80's which are 32 speed. Nearly all the burns I try fail unless I use drive

Re: [Cdrecord-video] Re: [Cdrecord-developers] Cdrtools-2.01a25: Patch UPDATED ! Last was wrong !

Joerg Schilling wrote: From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jan 23 14:28:34 2004 Using kernel headers is inherently broken, a clever programmer would have avoided creating version-dependent executables. You fail to understand that Linux kernel series are in many cases as unlike as HP-UX You compl

Re: [Cdrecord-video] Re: [Cdrecord-developers] Cdrtools-2.01a25: Patch to make cdrtools 2.01a25 Linux compatible

Joerg Schilling wrote: Please don't comment things you obviously don't really understand. 1) The include files on /usr/src/linux have been absolutely needed for a long time to be able to compile at all. 2) The include files under /usr/src/linux are definitely more recent resp. closer

Re: Problems burning CD-R's with Plextor PX-708A and cdrecord

jeff beck wrote: I'm sure I am doing something wrong and am only allowing myself to get yelled at by Mr. Schilling by posting, but I can't seem to write CD-R's successfully with my new Plextor PX-708A. I am using SONY CD-R 80's which are 32 speed. Nearly all the burns I try fail unless I use driv

Re: [Cdrecord-video] Re: [Cdrecord-developers] Cdrtools-2.01a25: Patch UPDATED ! Last was wrong !

Joerg Schilling wrote: From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jan 23 14:28:34 2004 Using kernel headers is inherently broken, a clever programmer would have avoided creating version-dependent executables. You fail to understand that Linux kernel series are in many cases as unlike as HP-UX You comp

Re: [Cdrecord-video] Re: [Cdrecord-developers] Cdrtools-2.01a25: Patch to make cdrtools 2.01a25 Linux compatible

Joerg Schilling wrote: Please don't comment things you obviously don't really understand. 1) The include files on /usr/src/linux have been absolutely needed for a long time to be able to compile at all. 2) The include files under /usr/src/linux are definitely more recent resp. close

Re: wave file size -pad option doesn't work.

Ignatius Cheng wrote: I am having problem with the size of the wave file.. I put -pad option but it is not padding and I don't know why. Just want to see if anyone know why -pad option is not working at all. Sincerely, Ignatius [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~/cdrtools-2.0/cdre

Re: [Cdrecord-video] Re: [Cdrecord-developers] Cdrtools-2.01a25: Patch UPDATED ! Last was wrong !

Joerg Schilling wrote: From: Meino Christian Cramer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> according to Joerg, my last patch to cdrtools 2.01a25 wasnt correct. The corrected patch is attached to this mail. Even this one is not needed. It you _relly_ need to compile against

Re: [Cdrecord-developers] Cdrtools-2.01a25: Patch to make cdrtools 2.01a25 Linux compatible

Joerg Schilling wrote: From: Meino Christian Cramer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Hi, attached there is a patch to make cdrtools 2.01 compatible to Linux 2.6.1. If the patch is not needed for some distros, which are assembled somehow, it does not harm

Re: Cdrtools-2.01a25: Patch to make cdrtools 2.01a25 Linux compatible

Meino Christian Cramer wrote: Hi, attached there is a patch to make cdrtools 2.01 compatible to Linux 2.6.1. If the patch is not needed for some distros, which are assembled somehow, it does not harm anything... Kind regards, Meino Cramer diff -Naur cdrtools-2.01/libscg/

Re: wave file size -pad option doesn't work.

Ignatius Cheng wrote: I am having problem with the size of the wave file.. I put -pad option but it is not padding and I don't know why. Just want to see if anyone know why -pad option is not working at all. Sincerely, Ignatius [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~/cdrtools-2.0/cdr

Re: [Cdrecord-video] Re: [Cdrecord-developers] Cdrtools-2.01a25: Patch UPDATED ! Last was wrong !

Joerg Schilling wrote: From: Meino Christian Cramer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> according to Joerg, my last patch to cdrtools 2.01a25 wasnt correct. The corrected patch is attached to this mail. Even this one is not needed. It you _relly_ need to compile against

Re: [Cdrecord-developers] Cdrtools-2.01a25: Patch to make cdrtools 2.01a25 Linux compatible

Joerg Schilling wrote: From: Meino Christian Cramer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Hi, attached there is a patch to make cdrtools 2.01 compatible to Linux 2.6.1. If the patch is not needed for some distros, which are assembled somehow, it does not harm

Re: Cdrtools-2.01a25: Patch to make cdrtools 2.01a25 Linux compatible

Meino Christian Cramer wrote: Hi, attached there is a patch to make cdrtools 2.01 compatible to Linux 2.6.1. If the patch is not needed for some distros, which are assembled somehow, it does not harm anything... Kind regards, Meino Cramer diff -Naur cdrtools-2.01/libscg/

Re: [Cdrecord-video] Re: Cdrtools-2.01a25 ready

Joerg Schilling wrote: From: Meino Christian Cramer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> The problem is, that the compilation process done by the makefile system of cdrecord does not break hard on compilation errors. The compilation error was in line 69 of ./lib

Re: [Cdrecord-video] Re: Cdrtools-2.01a25 ready

Joerg Schilling wrote: From: Meino Christian Cramer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> The problem is, that the compilation process done by the makefile system of cdrecord does not break hard on compilation errors. The compilation error was in line 69 of ./lib

Re: cdrecord and scsi-3 compliance

Carsten Neumann wrote: On Tue, 13 Jan 2004, Rob Bogus wrote: Looks like you confuse the Target ID with the lun. I'm not sure what would lead you to that, I haven't even opened the boxes to see if these drives *have* LUN jumpers. Typically they are on the drive electro

Re: cdrecord and scsi-3 compliance

Carsten Neumann wrote: On Tue, 13 Jan 2004, Rob Bogus wrote: Looks like you confuse the Target ID with the lun. I'm not sure what would lead you to that, I haven't even opened the boxes to see if these drives *have* LUN jumpers. Typically they are on the drive electro

Re: cdrecord and scsi-3 compliance

Joerg Schilling wrote: From: Rob Bogus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> I have some (admitedly old) CD readers with micro-jumpers about 2mm wide to set the LUN, and I've used SCSI drives with pads to solder a jumper, so I would not be surprised to find that some SCSI burners still have

Re: cdrecord and scsi-3 compliance

Joerg Schilling wrote: From: Rob Bogus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> I have some (admitedly old) CD readers with micro-jumpers about 2mm wide to set the LUN, and I've used SCSI drives with pads to solder a jumper, so I would not be surprised to find that some SCSI burners still have

Re: cdrecord and scsi-3 compliance

Carsten Neumann wrote: On Sat, 10 Jan 2004, Rob Bogus wrote: Joerg Schilling wrote: Well, portability in a quality as with my software takes a lot of effort. Speaking for cdrecord, the change not really needed as no writer uses something differnt from lun 0

Re: cdrecord and scsi-3 compliance

Carsten Neumann wrote: On Sat, 10 Jan 2004, Rob Bogus wrote: Joerg Schilling wrote: Well, portability in a quality as with my software takes a lot of effort. Speaking for cdrecord, the change not really needed as no writer uses something differnt from lun 0

Re: cdrecord and scsi-3 compliance

Joerg Schilling wrote: Well, portability in a quality as with my software takes a lot of effort. Speaking for cdrecord, the change not really needed as no writer uses something differnt from lun 0. Does this mean that if a real SCSI burner is used with a LUN of >0 it doesn't work with your soft

Re: cdrtools-2.01a22 ready

Joerg Schilling wrote: And this is definitely wrong! Unfortunately, Linux-2.6 did change iterfaces in a way so it is impossible to run all applications compiled under earlier releases. To avoid confusion you probably should say "not all applications... will run" since clearly you don't mean tha

Re: cdrecord and scsi-3 compliance

Joerg Schilling wrote: Well, portability in a quality as with my software takes a lot of effort. Speaking for cdrecord, the change not really needed as no writer uses something differnt from lun 0. Does this mean that if a real SCSI burner is used with a LUN of >0 it doesn't work with your so

Re: cdrtools-2.01a22 ready

Joerg Schilling wrote: And this is definitely wrong! Unfortunately, Linux-2.6 did change iterfaces in a way so it is impossible to run all applications compiled under earlier releases. To avoid confusion you probably should say "not all applications... will run" since clearly you don't mean t

CD booting question

I have been creating bootable (el torrito style) CDs since the capability was added to mkisofs ages ago. However, from time to time I find a system which doesn't know how to boot CD and must boot from floppy. With programs like Linux boot disks that's not a problem, one is included. My question

CD booting question

I have been creating bootable (el torrito style) CDs since the capability was added to mkisofs ages ago. However, from time to time I find a system which doesn't know how to boot CD and must boot from floppy. With programs like Linux boot disks that's not a problem, one is included. My question

Re: dvd+rw-tools update [5.16.4.8.5, brown-bag bug fix:-(]

Andy Polyakov wrote: (*) This is how the bug actually slipped through: 5.15 was tested with Pioneer unit under Solaris only. Otherwise it was tested with HP dvd300n, HP dvd400c, Plextor PX708A and Optorite DD0203 under Linux, and Sony DRU-510A under FreeBSD. To quote myself, "procrastination is

Re: dvd+rw-tools update [5.16.4.8.5, brown-bag bug fix:-(]

Andy Polyakov wrote: (*) This is how the bug actually slipped through: 5.15 was tested with Pioneer unit under Solaris only. Otherwise it was tested with HP dvd300n, HP dvd400c, Plextor PX708A and Optorite DD0203 under Linux, and Sony DRU-510A under FreeBSD. To quote myself, "procrastination is

Re: dvd+rw-tools-5.14.4.7.4 / BTC - sequence error

Andy Polyakov wrote: Keep in mind that autofs daemon is not the only culprit. There're magicdev, supermount, who knows what else... If anybody can provide additional clues, I'll only be grateful:-) If I may offer a suggestion for a link on your useful description page, if there were a VERY short d

Re: dvd+rw-tools-5.14.4.7.4 / BTC - sequence error

Andy Polyakov wrote: Keep in mind that autofs daemon is not the only culprit. There're magicdev, supermount, who knows what else... If anybody can provide additional clues, I'll only be grateful:-) If I may offer a suggestion for a link on your useful description page, if there were a VERY short

Re: Geting rid of ide-scsi ?

Emmanuel Charpentier wrote: Dear Andy, dear list, I just read the release notes for the still-wet 2.6.0 Linux kernel. Among other thigs is mentioned the fact that the ide-scsi emulation module is currently broken in this kernel, and that there exists very few enthousiasm to fix it. 1 - no, it's

Re: Plextor PX-W1210A

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Jackman wrote: I have the following two drives installed on my system: 0,0,0 0) 'TOSHIBA ' 'DVD-ROM SD-R1202' '1026' Removable CD-ROM 0,1,0 1) 'PLEXTOR ' 'CD-R PX-W1210A' '1.09' Removable CD-ROM The Plextor works fine. Every disk I burn with the Toshiba has problems tho

Re: Geting rid of ide-scsi ?

Emmanuel Charpentier wrote: Dear Andy, dear list, I just read the release notes for the still-wet 2.6.0 Linux kernel. Among other thigs is mentioned the fact that the ide-scsi emulation module is currently broken in this kernel, and that there exists very few enthousiasm to fix it. 1 - no, it

Re: Plextor PX-W1210A

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Jackman wrote: I have the following two drives installed on my system: 0,0,0 0) 'TOSHIBA ' 'DVD-ROM SD-R1202' '1026' Removable CD-ROM 0,1,0 1) 'PLEXTOR ' 'CD-R PX-W1210A' '1.09' Removable CD-ROM The Plextor works fine. Every disk I burn with the Toshiba has problems t

Re: Pioneer DVR-106D issues

Andy Polyakov wrote: OK, requestor has reported that readcd performs at >2-3x accompanied by irresonsiveness of the system. This *does* appear as lack of DMA and it agrees pretty well with those reports from NEC users I mentioned yesterday. Yes, DMA must be off (or not being used on that particular

Re: Pioneer DVR-106D issues

Kuwanger wrote: Given all this, My question is should I test out another IDE cable given how ide-scsi works but has issues and ide-cd is horribly slow, or does the behavior rule out it being the ide cable's fault? I can always try out another cable if someone thinks it'll help. Of course! Y

Re: Pioneer DVR-106D issues

Kuwanger wrote: PS: Andy, I guess I didn't make it clear in my original post but the system was kernel panicing. Since I never was at console all those times, I never had seen the actuall OOPs, but caps and scroll lock were flashing which told me it was a kernel panic. After your comment, thou

Re: Dual format DVD burner drive problem

Joerg Schilling wrote: May be the firmware of the drive is not very stable or Linux did hang. I would suspect the firmware first. I had a similar problem with my A104 before I upgraded the firmware, which doesn't prove it IS the firmware, but that firmware can cause just these problems. Joerg

Re: Dual format DVD burner drive problem

James Finnall wrote: On Monday 15 December 2003 06:00, Joerg Schilling wrote: Did you try cdrecord-ProDVD? ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/cdrecord/ProDVD/ Jörg The drive appears to back to functioning once again. I had to reboot several times. I was able to do what I wanted to do though and t

Re: Pioneer DVR-106D issues

Andy Polyakov wrote: OK, requestor has reported that readcd performs at >2-3x accompanied by irresonsiveness of the system. This *does* appear as lack of DMA and it agrees pretty well with those reports from NEC users I mentioned yesterday. Yes, DMA must be off (or not being used on that particula

Re: Pioneer DVR-106D issues

Kuwanger wrote: Given all this, My question is should I test out another IDE cable given how ide-scsi works but has issues and ide-cd is horribly slow, or does the behavior rule out it being the ide cable's fault? I can always try out another cable if someone thinks it'll help. Of course!

Re: Pioneer DVR-106D issues

Kuwanger wrote: PS: Andy, I guess I didn't make it clear in my original post but the system was kernel panicing. Since I never was at console all those times, I never had seen the actuall OOPs, but caps and scroll lock were flashing which told me it was a kernel panic. After your comment, tho

Re: Dual format DVD burner drive problem

Joerg Schilling wrote: May be the firmware of the drive is not very stable or Linux did hang. I would suspect the firmware first. I had a similar problem with my A104 before I upgraded the firmware, which doesn't prove it IS the firmware, but that firmware can cause just these problems. Joe

Re: Dual format DVD burner drive problem

James Finnall wrote: On Monday 15 December 2003 06:00, Joerg Schilling wrote: Did you try cdrecord-ProDVD? ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/cdrecord/ProDVD/ Jörg The drive appears to back to functioning once again. I had to reboot several times. I was able to do what I wanted to do though a

ide-scsi and 2.4 kernels

I saw a claim that recent versions of cdrecord could use the ATAPI interface added for 2.6 in 2.4 kernels. Has anyone actually found this to be the case? As of 2.01a19 it seems to think the unit needs power cycling and can't do any operations. Why do I care? I wanted to see if audio burning wit

ide-scsi and 2.4 kernels

I saw a claim that recent versions of cdrecord could use the ATAPI interface added for 2.6 in 2.4 kernels. Has anyone actually found this to be the case? As of 2.01a19 it seems to think the unit needs power cycling and can't do any operations. Why do I care? I wanted to see if audio burning wit

Re: highest priority?

Joerg Schilling wrote: From: Hanspeter Roth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> It may be that you are hit by Linux ps missfeatures :-( And what are »Linux ps missfeatures« ? (I'm running cdrecord and cdda2wav on FreeBsd.) It ignores th

Interesting DVD behaviour

I have a Pioneer DVR-104 with a recent firmware upgrade. I note from the -prcap output that cdrecord identifies this as a 1X top speed drive. However, since I upgraded the firmware, growisofs burns with it at 2X (using 4X media). Would someone really sharp care to clarify how/why that happens?

<    1   2   3   >