Hello,
MFM Since DVD-Rs have UDF (extensions?|Along with ISO9660?) on them
MFM as well, I'm assuming their overhead would be slightly greater as
MFM well, correct?
One should note that there are more and more DVDs without the UDF
file system. In particular, all newer DVDs sent by Microsoft to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] quoted and then wrote:
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Pierre Duhem)
Reply-to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Pierre Duhem)
To:[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Mike Fox Morrey)
Mike,
MFM Since DVD-Rs have UDF (extensions?|Along with ISO9660?) on them
MFM as well, I'm assuming their
From: Mike Fox Morrey [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This is definitely the best solution:
Check for the overhead for your typical case. If you put 2 files on the
disk, it should be easy to find a solition that does not waste more than
5% of
the media size.
Good idea - something I'll start
Mike,
MFM Since DVD-Rs have UDF (extensions?|Along with ISO9660?) on them
MFM as well, I'm assuming their overhead would be slightly greater as
MFM well, correct?
One should note that there are more and more DVDs without the UDF
file system. In particular, all newer DVDs sent by Microsoft to
Hello Mike,
MFM Hey guys..
MFM Quick technical question...
MFM I was under the impression that the size that a filesystem took on the
MFM disk varied, depending on the files/direcory structure, but am now starting
MFM to believe this is incorrect.
MFM On a
the filesystem overhead (as you
clearly state). I tried looking at the mkisofs code to
figure this out but it was more complicated than I was
willing to do so instead I used the command mkisofs
-print-size DIR to determine how big an ISO of that
directory would be. I then compare it to my disc size
the filesystem overhead (as you
clearly state). I tried looking at the mkisofs code to
figure this out but it was more complicated than I was
willing to do so instead I used the command mkisofs
-print-size DIR to determine how big an ISO of that
directory would be. I then compare it to my disc size
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jun 25 17:35:15 2002
The waste of space due to rounding can be avoided using the patch
attached.
Eduardo Pérez
--oJ71EGRlYNjSvfq7
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=mkisofs_notevenpathtables.diff
---
From: Mike Fox Morrey [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Now, I can run the -print-size option, but that causes (for me)
unneccessary overhead and gives: 1. The OS/mkisofs to cause an error and
abort the automated burn, and/or 2. The user to intr it or susp it or
otherwise 'get in the way', which I
This is definitely the best solution:
Check for the overhead for your typical case. If you put 2 files on the
disk, it should be easy to find a solition that does not waste more than
5% of
the media size.
Good idea - something I'll start tackling once I finish the latest
update
Hey guys..
Quick technical question...
I was under the impression that the size that a filesystem took on the
disk varied, depending on the files/direcory structure, but am now starting
to believe this is incorrect.
On a standard ISO9660 disk, is the filesystem
11 matches
Mail list logo
