Re: Doesn't wodim close disk ?

2008-01-04 Thread Gregoire Favre
On Fri, Jan 04, 2008 at 01:19:04PM +0100, Joerg Schilling wrote: This is a reminder..2 days have passed. As you still did not send the requested informataion that is needed to help you, you verified that yoy are not interested in help but only in ranting. Oh come on :-( Please notice

Re: Doesn't wodim close disk ?

2008-01-04 Thread Joerg Schilling
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Joerg Schilling) wrote: You seem to be only interested in ranting :-( No, that's not true. Why then don't you send the requested information that could probably prove that you have problems? If you don't send information, I have to judge on the most probable cause

Re: Doesn't wodim close disk ?

2008-01-04 Thread Joerg Schilling
Thomas Schmitt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, Joerg Schilling: There is one closed session. The disk has not been closed to prevent appending further data and for this reason, there is one invisible session. But the track still reports RT=0, Blank=0 with READ TRACK INFORMATION. If it

Re: Doesn't wodim close disk ?

2008-01-04 Thread Thomas Schmitt
Hi, me: But the track still reports RT=0, Blank=0 with READ TRACK INFORMATION. If it was closed then RT should be 1. Joerg Schilling: Which track? Logical track number 1 as reported by dvd+rw-mediainfo. As reported by Gregoire Favre: READ TRACK INFORMATION[#1]: Track State:

Re: Doesn't wodim close disk ?

2008-01-04 Thread Joerg Schilling
Gregoire Favre [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, Jan 04, 2008 at 01:19:04PM +0100, Joerg Schilling wrote: This is a reminder..2 days have passed. As you still did not send the requested informataion that is needed to help you, you verified that yoy are not interested in help but

Re: Doesn't wodim close disk ?

2008-01-04 Thread Gregoire Favre
On Fri, Jan 04, 2008 at 03:27:03PM +0100, Thomas Schmitt wrote: Hello :-) Only way to put it in question is to ask Gregoire whether dvd+rw-mediainfo meanwhile does not say invisible any more. From today's `dvd+rw-mediainfo /dev/sr0` : INQUIRY:[LITE-ON ][DVDRW SH-16A7S

Re: Doesn't wodim close disk ?

2008-01-04 Thread Joerg Schilling
Thomas Schmitt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, me: But the track still reports RT=0, Blank=0 with READ TRACK INFORMATION. If it was closed then RT should be 1. Joerg Schilling: Which track? Logical track number 1 as reported by dvd+rw-mediainfo. Well, I hate this caps only

Re: Doesn't wodim close disk ?

2008-01-04 Thread Thomas Schmitt
Hi, Gregoire Favre: From today's `dvd+rw-mediainfo /dev/sr0` : INQUIRY:[LITE-ON ][DVDRW SH-16A7S ][WS04] Track State: invisible Well, at least that did not change. I made own tests with DVD+R meanwhile. Track #1 in closed single-session and all tracks in

Re: Doesn't wodim close disk ?

2008-01-04 Thread Gregoire Favre
On Fri, Jan 04, 2008 at 06:33:48PM +0100, Thomas Schmitt wrote: What kind of drive is on strike in OSX ? Is it the same hardware as with Linux ? If not: can the OSX drive burn DVD ? It's only a DVD reader and CD-rw drive's. If you are willing to risk to lose the problematic DVD+R media

Re: Doesn't wodim close disk ?

2008-01-04 Thread Thomas Schmitt
Hi, Gregoire Favre: Disc status: complete Track Size:2146272*2KB Track Size:146784*2KB Now we got two tracks with an ISO 9660 header of the second one pointing to the directory tree of the first one. This might be inappropriate for your UDF image. under

Re: Doesn't wodim close disk ?

2008-01-04 Thread Joerg Schilling
Gregoire Favre [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Number of Sessions:2 State of Last Session: complete Number of Tracks: 2 READ TRACK INFORMATION[#1]: Track State: invisible Track Start Address: 0*2KB Free Blocks: 0*2KB Track Size:2146272*2KB ROM