Re: [Cegcc-devel] proposed patch to install docs

2006-12-20 Thread Danny Backx
On Mon, 2006-12-18 at 20:51 +, Pedro Alves wrote: > > I'll start trying to build an RPM based on the current work as soon as I > > have the --coverage stuff working too. I'm still working on two issues > > there (a build problem : the build appears to disable a lot of stuff > > because -Dinhibi

Re: [Cegcc-devel] proposed patch to install docs

2006-12-18 Thread Pedro Alves
Danny Backx escreveu: > On Mon, 2006-12-18 at 17:15 +, Pedro Alves wrote: >> I think cross-toolchains are >> special, in the sense that they shouldn't be mixed with the >> system headers/libs. I don't have an official pointer describing >> it, but it seems everybody does it. > > Looks like a

Re: [Cegcc-devel] proposed patch to install docs

2006-12-18 Thread Danny Backx
On Mon, 2006-12-18 at 17:15 +, Pedro Alves wrote: > I think cross-toolchains are > special, in the sense that they shouldn't be mixed with the > system headers/libs. I don't have an official pointer describing > it, but it seems everybody does it. Looks like a good argument, I won't fiddle wi

Re: [Cegcc-devel] proposed patch to install docs

2006-12-18 Thread Pedro Alves
Danny Backx wrote: > On Mon, 2006-12-18 at 10:23 +, Pedro Alves wrote: > >>Danny Backx wrote: >> >>>The reason I'm also asking about the installation path is I'd want to >>>create an RPM based on these scripts. Do we keep the funky path for now >>>(I used to do the same with my scripts in scri

Re: [Cegcc-devel] proposed patch to install docs

2006-12-18 Thread Danny Backx
On Mon, 2006-12-18 at 10:23 +, Pedro Alves wrote: > Danny Backx wrote: > > The reason I'm also asking about the installation path is I'd want to > > create an RPM based on these scripts. Do we keep the funky path for now > > (I used to do the same with my scripts in scripts/linux), or do we mov

Re: [Cegcc-devel] proposed patch to install docs

2006-12-18 Thread Pedro Alves
Danny Backx wrote: > Pedro, > > Can I commit this patch, and a similar one for the cegcc script? Ok. > One of the issues might be where to install the documentation, another > is where to install the whole toolchain (currently this is what you > wrote in it - /opt/mingw32ce ). > > The reason I

[Cegcc-devel] proposed patch to install docs

2006-12-17 Thread Danny Backx
Pedro, Can I commit this patch, and a similar one for the cegcc script? One of the issues might be where to install the documentation, another is where to install the whole toolchain (currently this is what you wrote in it - /opt/mingw32ce ). The reason I'm also asking about the installation path