: cegcc-devel
Subject: Re: [Cegcc-devel] Porting cegcc changes to latest version of cegcc
Everything is not over yet.
There is still a large amount of windows mobile device out there that deserve
cegcc.
"windows phone" may be a silly thing, it's not the dominant os on the marke
Everything is not over yet.
There is still a large amount of windows mobile device out there that
deserve cegcc.
"windows phone" may be a silly thing, it's not the dominant os on the market
yet.
I hope cegcc will continue to live for those of us who have normal WM
phones.
Remember, there is sti
Pavel Pavlov wrote:
>
> I think I was subscribed to cegcc before 4.5.0 was released (release date
> is like a couple of months ago).
> I tried to merge and see what I can do to fix it, but I came to conclusion
> that it's all wasted time. I'm not going to do this same job once there is
> a new g
> -Original Message-
> From: Vincent Richomme [mailto:foru...@smartmobili.com]
> Sent: Friday, July 16, 2010 16:22
> To: Pavel Pavlov
> Cc: danny.ba...@scarlet.be; cegcc-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [Cegcc-devel] Porting cegcc changes to latest version of
On Thu, 15 Jul 2010 16:45:51 -0400
wrote:
>> > I also thought about updating cegcc, but decided against it because I
>> > found merging/rebasing with Subversion too cumbersome. Thought about
>> > doing it cleanly with git (import gcc svn with all its history, copy
>> > cegcc on top, rebase on late
> > I also thought about updating cegcc, but decided against it because I
> > found merging/rebasing with Subversion too cumbersome. Thought about
> > doing it cleanly with git (import gcc svn with all its history, copy
> > cegcc on top, rebase on latest gcc) - this way, we could easily
> > extrac
> -Original Message-
> From: Danny Backx [mailto:danny.ba...@scarlet.be]
> Sent: Monday, July 12, 2010 16:20
> To: Pavel Pavlov
> Cc: cegcc-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: RE: [Cegcc-devel] Porting cegcc changes to latest version of cegcc
>
> On Mon, 2
On Mon, 2010-07-12 at 08:23 +0200, Max Kellermann wrote:
> On 2010/07/11 10:11, Danny Backx wrote:
> > I can give you and other interested parties write access to the cegcc
> > svn if you like.
>
> Hi Danny & Pavel,
>
> I also thought about updating cegcc, but decided against it because I
> foun
On Mon, 2010-07-12 at 14:59 -0400, Pavel Pavlov wrote:
> After checking some files I noticed that VERSIONS file and checked out
> octorer 17 2009 version of binutils. I merged all the changes into
> latest version of binutils. Also, I noticed that versions of binutils
> in cegcc svn has some strang
> > On 2010/07/11 10:11, Danny Backx wrote:
> >> I can give you and other interested parties write access to the cegcc
> >> svn if you like.
> >
> > Hi Danny & Pavel,
> >
> > I also thought about updating cegcc, but decided against it because I
> > found merging/rebasing with Subversion too cumber
> -Original Message-
> From: Danny Backx [mailto:danny.ba...@scarlet.be]
> Cc: cegcc-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [Cegcc-devel] Porting cegcc changes to latest version of cegcc
>
> On Sat, 2010-07-10 at 19:41 -0400, Pavel Pavlov wrote:
> > I'm
On Mon, 12 Jul 2010, Max Kellermann wrote:
> On 2010/07/11 10:11, Danny Backx wrote:
>> I can give you and other interested parties write access to the cegcc
>> svn if you like.
>
> Hi Danny & Pavel,
>
> I also thought about updating cegcc, but decided against it because I
> found merging/rebas
On 2010/07/11 10:11, Danny Backx wrote:
> I can give you and other interested parties write access to the cegcc
> svn if you like.
Hi Danny & Pavel,
I also thought about updating cegcc, but decided against it because I
found merging/rebasing with Subversion too cumbersome. Thought about
doing i
On Sat, 2010-07-10 at 19:41 -0400, Pavel Pavlov wrote:
> I'm thinking to update my version of cegcc to latest version of gcc. It look
> as the project is almost sleeping now.
That's because my wife and daughter "stole" my two devices in exchange
for me being "allowed" to buy an Android phone.
>
14 matches
Mail list logo
