Andrew Miller wrote:
> David Nickerson wrote:
>> Thanks Andrew, cleared a few things up. So now for some more
>> ideas/questions...
>>
>> When defining a graph outside the scope of a single model or when
>> combining results from multiple model's, does it still make sense to use
>> the about="mo
David Nickerson wrote:
> Thanks Andrew, cleared a few things up. So now for some more
> ideas/questions...
>
> When defining a graph outside the scope of a single model or when
> combining results from multiple model's, does it still make sense to use
> the about="modelid" ?
>
> I have been look
Thanks Andrew, cleared a few things up. So now for some more
ideas/questions...
When defining a graph outside the scope of a single model or when
combining results from multiple model's, does it still make sense to use
the about="modelid" ?
I have been looking at how to define my graph externa
David Nickerson wrote:
> Thats good to see Andrew. Have you tried running the same experiment
> with one of the GSL integrators?
No, but I have compared other models (e.g. the Zhang S.A.N. model from
Alan), and it is significantly faster.
> The next step will be to see how the
> simulation goes
Thats good to see Andrew. Have you tried running the same experiment
with one of the GSL integrators? The next step will be to see how the
simulation goes when runs within PCEnv (which is essentially a GUI
around the CIS, right? or is CIS not using the cellml_corba_bridge?)
The simulation time
David Nickerson wrote:
> Alan Garny wrote:
>
>> As you know, there is a CellML 1.0 version of the epicardial version of the
>> ten Tusscher model, which we have. I computed that model for one-second
>> worth of cardiac activity, plotting the trans-membrane potential. From
>> there, we could extr
Hi all,
The RFC defining the correct media type for CellML documents to be
application/cellml+xml has now been published, as RFC4708.
It can now be viewed at ftp://ftp.rfc-editor.org/in-notes/rfc4708.txt.
Best regards,
Andrew Miller
___
cellml-discus
David Nickerson wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I have just been looking through the graphing metadata specification
> (http://www.cellml.org/specifications/metadata/graphs) and have a couple
> of questions (pretty much due to my continuing RDF ignorance). This
> specification seems to have dropped behind
Hi all,
I have just been looking through the graphing metadata specification
(http://www.cellml.org/specifications/metadata/graphs) and have a couple
of questions (pretty much due to my continuing RDF ignorance). This
specification seems to have dropped behind the simulation specification
a bi
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> David Nickerson
> Sent: 30 October 2006 10:50
> To: For those interested in contributing to the development of CellML.
> Subject: Re: [cellml-discussion] pcenv development priorities
>
> Alan Garny
Alan Garny wrote:
> As you know, there is a CellML 1.0 version of the epicardial version of the
> ten Tusscher model, which we have. I computed that model for one-second
> worth of cardiac activity, plotting the trans-membrane potential. From
> there, we could extrapolate to 70 minutes by saying th
As you know, there is a CellML 1.0 version of the epicardial version of the
ten Tusscher model, which we have. I computed that model for one-second
worth of cardiac activity, plotting the trans-membrane potential. From
there, we could extrapolate to 70 minutes by saying that the frequency of
the st
Just thought it might be useful to establish some benchmarks for
comparison of performance amongst the various tools.
I have attached my version of the ten Tusscher et. al (2004) human
ventricular cell electrophysiology model, its in CellML 1.1 and uses
relative URIs for all the imports. If th
Hi All,
Maybe we aim for one every 2 months at the moment. What's probably
useful is for people to email me or the list with items they would
like to bring up in a conference call discussion.
Maybe the first one should be kept to something short - like an hour.
Then from there we can see what we
14 matches
Mail list logo
