Re: [cellml-discussion] My specification draft in progress is nowpushed to the CellML site

2007-11-27 Thread David Nickerson
Hi Andrew, A short wiki page with a summary of this specification development stuff (repository location(s), your static page link and others that people might add, docbook processing examples, etc) would be very useful for those of us that perhaps don't have time to work out how to use git an

[cellml-discussion] My specification draft in progress is now pushed to the CellML site

2007-11-27 Thread Andrew Miller
Hi all, For those of you who are interested in looking at the drafts currently being developed for the next CellML specification but don't have the time to set up git, DocBook, etc..., I have provided two ways to view the specification more easily: 1) Viewing a static page generated from the s

Re: [cellml-discussion] specification draft and docbook

2007-11-27 Thread David Nickerson
Randall Britten wrote: > Is there a way we could use some kind of variable substitution for the term > "CellML file"/"CellML document"? I think it would actually be much better for the community to decide one way or the other fairly soon - and I was happy enough with Andrew's definition/explanat

Re: [cellml-discussion] specification draft and docbook

2007-11-27 Thread David Brooks
Docbook supports user defined entities - see http://tldp.org/LDP/LDP-Author-Guide/html/tools-entities.html for examples. On 28/11/07 9:46 AM, Randall Britten wrote: > Is there a way we could use some kind of variable substitution for the term > "CellML file"/"CellML document"? > > >> -Ori

Re: [cellml-discussion] specification draft and docbook

2007-11-27 Thread Randall Britten
Is there a way we could use some kind of variable substitution for the term "CellML file"/"CellML document"? > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:cellml-discussion- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Andrew Miller > Sent: Wednesday, 28 November 2007 9:14 a.m. > To: For thos

Re: [cellml-discussion] specification draft and docbook

2007-11-27 Thread Andrew Miller
David Nickerson wrote: > Hi Andrew, > > I have just starting looking at using git and checking your current > draft of the specification. I have made a few changes and attach the > patch (generated with git diff -p > andre.patch). Not really sure the > best way to do things in order to share cha