On 6/12/07, Tommy Yu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Matt wrote:
> > On 6/11/07, Tommy Yu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> Matt wrote:
> >>> I have concluded that they are now talking about the web site and not
> >>> keywords in general.
> >>>
> >>> My assumption was that the category field selections
Matt wrote:
> On 6/11/07, Tommy Yu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Matt wrote:
>>> I have concluded that they are now talking about the web site and not
>>> keywords in general.
>>>
>>> My assumption was that the category field selections are not persisted
>>> in the model metadata at all.
>>>
>> Act
On 6/11/07, Tommy Yu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Matt wrote:
> > I have concluded that they are now talking about the web site and not
> > keywords in general.
> >
> > My assumption was that the category field selections are not persisted
> > in the model metadata at all.
> >
>
> Actually they are
Ugh, looks like Thunderbird clobbered my last message when I told it to
converted html to plain text. This is my reply.
> Okay, I've re-read the metadata specification, specifically the RDF
> schema draft section at the bottom of the document, and the RDF schema
> for Dublin Core (which was re
David Nickerson wrote:
>
> I'd suggest that since you are deciding how keywords are extracted,
> edited, and put back into the models that you are the best person to
> answer that. Otherwise there should have been some discussion on this
> mailing list as to how to handle this issue.
>
Okay, I've r
