Andrew Miller wrote:
> alan.ga...@dpag.ox.ac.uk wrote:
>> We should be open and therefore allow people to go for whatever license
>> they want. However, they should be made aware that by doing so, they
>> take
>> the risk of their model not being used, etc. This being said, some
>> authors
>> might
alan.ga...@dpag.ox.ac.uk wrote:
James Lawson wrote:
We (Catherine, Poul and I) were thinking that there are basically
three places where you'd want to display / store this information
within PMR2: in the metadata itself (thereby allowing it to be
rendered by software, indexed and searched etc.),
James Lawson wrote:
> We (Catherine, Poul and I) were thinking that there are basically
> three places where you'd want to display / store this information
> within PMR2: in the metadata itself (thereby allowing it to be
> rendered by software, indexed and searched etc.), on the exposure
> somewher
n@cellml.org
Subject: [cellml-discussion] ABI CellML meeting minutes 2009-12-16
I have put the minutes from this week's meeting up at:
http://www.cellml.org/community/meeting/minutes/2009/12.16
Just a quick comment about the minutes:
- "Randall said we will need a good way to indicate w
> From: cellml-discussion-boun...@cellml.org [mailto:cellml-discussion-
> boun...@cellml.org] On Behalf Of Dougal Cowan
> Sent: 17 December 2009 01:55
> To: cellml-discussion@cellml.org
> Subject: [cellml-discussion] ABI CellML meeting minutes 2009-12-16
>
> I have put
I have put the minutes from this week's meeting up at:
http://www.cellml.org/community/meeting/minutes/2009/12.16
Dougal
___
cellml-discussion mailing list
cellml-discussion@cellml.org
http://www.cellml.org/mailman/listinfo/cellml-discussion
