First just to check that in the the connection elements 'flux' should
be 'fluxes'? For example, 'substance_a' component contains no variable
'flux', I assume you meant the set_of_lambda_of_real 'fluxes'?
I think I like this! When will it be released? ;-P
I don't know enough about the lambda
Michael Cooling wrote:
First just to check that in the the connection elements 'flux' should
be 'fluxes'? For example, 'substance_a' component contains no variable
'flux', I assume you meant the set_of_lambda_of_real 'fluxes'?
Thanks for pointing that out - it is hard to validate
because if connections don't have directionality, then it makes no
sense in the language to say
that a connection is from A to B, as opposed to from B to A, and we
wouldn't want to force users to duplicate information and provide both
Oops I didn't mean to imply directionality. I shouldn't
Michael Cooling wrote:
because if connections don't have directionality, then it makes no
sense in the language to say
that a connection is from A to B, as opposed to from B to A, and we
wouldn't want to force users to duplicate information and provide both
Oops I didn't mean to
Michael Cooling wrote:
if both state variables have the same initial values and
rates (which they would...
why should they have the same initial values? I agree if they did then
it makes
no difference to the correctness of the model but it seems very possible to
create a model of
If two models contradict each other (such as by each stating a
initial value for concentrations of the same species, or a different
mechanism for the exact same reaction), then this contradiction has
to be fixed before the models can be composed.
It's not just about composition - during
Hi Andrew,
This looks quite intriguing. As you mention later in this thread I
currently take the approach of adding an extra real scalar term and
exposing that as a way to hook future (in my case) currents into ion
concentration rate equations. Such and approach works well when I only
have
David Nickerson wrote:
Hi Andrew,
This looks quite intriguing. As you mention later in this thread I
currently take the approach of adding an extra real scalar term and
exposing that as a way to hook future (in my case) currents into ion
concentration rate equations. Such and approach
