Ralph Angenendt wrote:
Ralph Angenendt wrote:
Hey,
if you haven't started already, now would be a good time to begin
translating the release notes which are already on the wiki.
And now would be a good time finishing the translation, as we are slowly
syncing the release to the
Hello,
I would like to have access to the wiki /fr/* for translating articles from
English to French.
Thx
___
CentOS-docs mailing list
CentOS-docs@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs
Hi,
I didn't find the article about Banner files that I wrote a while ago
under the Tips and Trix menu on the wiki, is this right or hasn't it
been approved ?
What can I do to get it out there ?
___
CentOS-docs mailing list
CentOS-docs@centos.org
Hello,
I have send a message, but a i haven't give all information.
I would like to have access to the wiki /fr/* for translating articles from
English to French.
For begin, ia would like translating the FAQ
My username is AymericDerbois
Thx
___
aymeric derbois wrote:
I have send a message, but a i haven't give all information.
I would like to have access to the wiki /fr/* for translating articles from
English to French.
For begin, ia would like translating the FAQ
My username is AymericDerbois
Go ahead, you can edit under
Hello
I have finished to translate the frontpage of the FAQ.
Now I need a acces for translate this page
http://wiki.centos.org/fr/FAQ/CentOS5
Thanks
___
CentOS-docs mailing list
CentOS-docs@centos.org
Hi,
I have added a Download page to the wiki. Feel free to improve it (but
please do not make it more complex than it already is :-))
I would prefer to make it even more simple, but hate to have the
architecture-selection done by DirectoryIndex. Also the link behind each
architecture looks
Cette page réunit
et dans Questions/Réponses
Si vous souhaitez ajouter des questions et des réponses, regardez ...
bonsoir,
petites erreurs,
a+
--- En date de : Mar 24.6.08, aymeric derbois [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit :
De: aymeric derbois [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Objet: [CentOS-docs] To have a new
On Tue, Jun 24, 2008 at 11:40 AM, Dag Wieers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I have added a Download page to the wiki. Feel free to improve it (but
please do not make it more complex than it already is :-))
I would prefer to make it even more simple, but hate to have the
architecture-selection
Bonsoir
Merci pour ces corrections ;)
Par contre je ne vois pas d'erreur à la ligne :
"Si vous souhaitez ajouter des questions et des réponses, regardez ..."
+
john tatt a écrit :
Cette page réunit
et dans Questions/Réponses
Si vous souhaitez ajouter des questions
What? ;)
On Tue, Jun 24, 2008 at 6:55 PM, aymeric derbois [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have finished to translate the frontpage of the FAQ.
Now I need a acces for translate this page
http://wiki.centos.org/fr/FAQ/CentOS5
Since we have recursive permissions, you should be able to edit that
page
Oki, thx.
I hadn't seen ;)
Daniel de Kok a crit:
What? ;)
On Tue, Jun 24, 2008 at 6:55 PM, aymeric derbois [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have finished to translate the frontpage of the FAQ.
Now I need a acces for translate this page
http://wiki.centos.org/fr/FAQ/CentOS5
non lol sur la page il est écrit regarder et non regardez
par ailleurs sur la derniere page traduite
1) au singulier reseau s'écrit sans x
mais
2) plus de paquet semble s'entendre au pluriel donc avec un s à paquets
cdt,
--- En date de : Mar 24.6.08, Aymeric DERBOIS [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit :
Oki merci pour cette correction ;)
J'espère qu'il n'y a pas trop d'autres fautes de grammaire et
d'orthographe.
john tatt a écrit :
non lol sur la page il est écrit "regarder" et non
"regardez"
par ailleurs sur la derniere page traduite
1) au singulier reseau
We are pleased to announce the immediate availability of CentOS-5.2 for
the i386 and x86_64 Architectures.
CentOS-5.2 is based on the upstream release EL 5.2.0, and includes
packages from all variants including Server and Client. All upstream
repositories have been combined into one, to
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2008:0556
https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2008-0556.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors:
i386:
freetype-2.1.9-7.el4.6.i386.rpm
freetype-demos-2.1.9-7.el4.6.i386.rpm
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2008:0556
https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2008-0556.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors:
x86_64:
freetype-2.1.9-7.el4.6.i386.rpm
freetype-2.1.9-7.el4.6.x86_64.rpm
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2008:0497
https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2008-0497.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors:
x86_64:
sblim-cmpi-base-1.5.4-13a.el4_6.1.x86_64.rpm
sblim-cmpi-base-devel-1.5.4-13a.el4_6.1.x86_64.rpm
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2008:0497
https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2008-0497.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors:
i386:
sblim-cmpi-base-1.5.4-13a.el4_6.1.i386.rpm
sblim-cmpi-base-devel-1.5.4-13a.el4_6.1.i386.rpm
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2008:0497
https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2008-0497.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors:
ia64:
updates/ia64/RPMS/sblim-cmpi-base-1.5.4-13a.c4.1.ia64.rpm
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2008:0497
https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2008-0497.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors:
s390:
updates/s390/RPMS/sblim-cmpi-base-1.5.4-13a.c4.1.s390.rpm
El mar, 24-06-2008 a las 09:35 -0500, César Martínez escribió:
Muchas gracias a todos los que me ayudaron a despejar la consulta
ahora ya tengo más claro la pelicula ahora la pregunta seria cuando yo
busco un programa para instalar en linux en este caso Centos cual
seria el más fácil sin dejar
On 5/28/08, Ing. Ernesto Pérez Estévez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hola
...
... aqui están las notas en Español:
http://wiki.centos.org/Manuals/ReleaseNotes/CentOS5.2/Spanish
Tomadas de las notas en Inglés:
http://wiki.centos.org/Manuals/ReleaseNotes/CentOS5.2
En estos momentos tenemos una
--- O. T. Suarez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hola:
nombredelprograma.noarch.rpm
noarch= no importa la arquitectura, debe trabajar,
este es el que te servirá
seguramente para tu trabajo
nombredelprograma.src.rpm
Es el código fuente del rpm anterior, lo puedes
utilizar para
On 24/06/2008, at 3:28 PM, fabian dacunha wrote:
Dear All
i have a centos 5 server running as a backup PC server and is working
perfect for abt 3 months
jus a couple of days back when i tried to telnet to the server it
gave me
connection refused
What on earth are you using telnet for?
Timothy Murphy wrote:
Well, I assumed from the title of the message that Centos-5.2 had been
officially released.
Well then you assume wrong!
It hasn't been released yet!
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
fabian dacunha wrote:
jus a couple of days back when i tried to telnet to the server it gave me
connection refused
i go to the server
and when i say telnet localhost it says
getaddrinfo: localhost Name or service not known
Are there lots of telnet sessions already running? You could have
Hi, folks.
I have download the DVD image of CentOS 5.2. Comparing with the DVD
image of Upstream OS Provider, I got a surprise:
The size of the DVD image of Upstream OS Provider is just 2.87
GB(i386), but the size of the DVD image of CentOS 5.2(i386) is so
large that is 3.74 GB!
I kown that
On Tue, Jun 24, 2008 at 10:24 AM, Michael Liang [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have download the DVD image of CentOS 5.2. Comparing with the DVD
image of Upstream OS Provider, I got a surprise:
The size of the DVD image of Upstream OS Provider is just 2.87
GB(i386), but the size of the DVD image
Michael,
did you get an official announcement for 5.2? I didn't. To my knowledge any 5.2 release yet is
unofficial. Therefor I wouldn't use it.
Gerald
Michael Liang wrote:
Hi, folks.
I have download the DVD image of CentOS 5.2. Comparing with the DVD
image of Upstream OS Provider, I got a
Will CentOS 5.2 support Intel GM965 / GL960 graphic shipset?
On Tue, Jun 24, 2008 at 2:17 AM, Miguel Medalha [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Let me be the first (maybe):
CentOS 5.2 is here (at least):
http://mirror.chpc.utah.edu/pub/centos/5.2/
Thank you all who worked on it!
No virus found in
Michael Liang wrote:
Hi, folks.
I have download the DVD image of CentOS 5.2. Comparing with the DVD
image of Upstream OS Provider, I got a surprise:
The size of the DVD image of Upstream OS Provider is just 2.87
GB(i386), but the size of the DVD image of CentOS 5.2(i386) is so
large that
2008/6/24 Dirk Gfroerer [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
as Tim already wrote, CentOS 5.2 is not released yet, so don't use it.
Also please note there are two DVDs on RHN:
the server version with 2,934 MB
and the client version with 3,682 MB
CentOS distributes only one DVD which contains everything
2008/6/24 Mogens Kjaer [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
...
This is because you download a not-released version of CentOS 5.2. The
iso you have is faulty.
Isn't it just the x86_64 ISO that's wrong?
I just have downloaded the i386 DVD image. The sha1sum.txt:
9e8da103db2217f10e07b0387edce09395723cbf
On Tue, Jun 24, 2008 at 10:59 AM, Michael Liang [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just have downloaded the i386 DVD image. The sha1sum.txt:
9e8da103db2217f10e07b0387edce09395723cbf CentOS-5.2-i386-bin-1of6.iso
e9d0a51d638caf1ed3adde834672d0f6a82cfd92 CentOS-5.2-i386-bin-2of6.iso
Hi
I have bonding working and i can failover between active (eth0) and
backup (eth1) without issue, however is there a way to automatically
fail back to eth0 when this link once again becomes available?
I understand this may be undesirable due to flapping etc but i just
wonder if its
I think so, at least you do the way I use it because you boot the
machine off the Clonezilla CD, then mount the device/partition you're
backing up to and select the device/partition being backed up.
But Clonezilla also has a whole network mode of operation involving a
Clonezilla server, so I
Adriano dos Santos Vieira (Hapia IN) wrote:
Hi, guys!
Please, could I ask you by some documentation about XEN and Cluster on
CEntOS-5. Theese one could be from basic to advanced level.
http://www.centos.org/docs/5/
Not that hard to find.
Ralph
pgpkHIampCbRE.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Tom Brown wrote:
Hi
I have bonding working and i can failover between active (eth0) and
backup (eth1) without issue, however is there a way to automatically
fail back to eth0 when this link once again becomes available?
I understand this may be undesirable due to flapping etc but i just
I believe you can do this with the 'primary' option to the bonding
module - in your case 'primary=eth0'
yes - that does it thanks
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Craig White wrote:
I like to keep reasonably up-to-date with distributions I am running,
so would like to update to Centos-5.2 as and when it is released.
you will be up to date simply by running 'yum update'
When 5.2 is released, those updates will be installed
Are you saying that
Timothy Murphy wrote:
Craig White wrote:
I like to keep reasonably up-to-date with distributions I am running,
so would like to update to Centos-5.2 as and when it is released.
you will be up to date simply by running 'yum update'
When 5.2 is released, those updates will be
Yup
All upgrades / updates in the major versions (5.0 - 5.1 - 5.1) will happen
automatically when you run yum upgrade, and when it's officially released
for updates. And I'm almost certain most, if not every, other Linux distro
also works like this
sorry for the studid question but do we
On Tue, Jun 24, 2008 at 1:50 PM, Michael Simpson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yup
All upgrades / updates in the major versions (5.0 - 5.1 - 5.1) will happen
automatically when you run yum upgrade, and when it's officially released
for updates. And I'm almost certain most, if not every, other
Michael Simpson wrote:
Yup
All upgrades / updates in the major versions (5.0 - 5.1 - 5.1) will happen
automatically when you run yum upgrade, and when it's officially released
for updates. And I'm almost certain most, if not every, other Linux distro
also works like this
sorry for the
Rudi Ahlers wrote:
...
upgrade
Is the same as the update command with the --obsoletes flag
set. See update for more details.
Doesn't /etc/yum.conf have obsoletes=1 by default, thus making
yum update do the same as yum upgrade?
Mogens
--
Mogens Kjaer, Carlsberg A/S,
Mogens Kjaer wrote:
Rudi Ahlers wrote:
...
upgrade
Is the same as the update command with the --obsoletes
flag set. See update for more details.
Doesn't /etc/yum.conf have obsoletes=1 by default, thus making
yum update do the same as yum upgrade?
Mogens
Why don't you
Thanks guys.
these things often occur to me at work where i am surrounded by
windows boxen and 22 is blocked on the firewall.
had to get special dispensation for gmail!
/me has instant gratification problems
:-)
___
CentOS mailing list
This will be the first version change with my local repo so I want to
check the steps out.
I have a /Centos/5.1 directory with all the contents of the ISO CDs.
I have a /Centos/5 directory with a symbolic link to the 5.1 directory.
I ASSUME that I will create a /Centos/5.2 directory and drop
Rudi Ahlers wrote:
Are you saying that simply running yum update on a Centos-5.1 system
will convert it to Centos-5.2, as and when that is released?
All upgrades / updates in the major versions (5.0 - 5.1 - 5.1) will
happen automatically when you run yum upgrade, and when it's officially
Timothy Murphy wrote:
Sorry to be dumb, but what is the point of calling it Centos-5.2?
Is it just that if installing Centos from scratch,
one could download a more up-to-date version?
Think of it as a rebase with added kernel drivers, some newer features
and so on, while still basically
Michael Simpson wrote:
...
sorry for the studid question but do we use yum upgrade or yum update
and what is the difference between the 2
/etc/yum.conf has obsoletes=1, thus yum upgrade behaves like
yum update.
No need to read the manuals :-)
Mogens
--
Mogens Kjaer, Carlsberg A/S, Computer
On Tue, 2008-06-24 at 14:16 +0100, Timothy Murphy wrote:
Rudi Ahlers wrote:
Are you saying that simply running yum update on a Centos-5.1 system
will convert it to Centos-5.2, as and when that is released?
All upgrades / updates in the major versions (5.0 - 5.1 - 5.1) will
happen
Timothy Murphy wrote:
Rudi Ahlers wrote:
Are you saying that simply running yum update on a Centos-5.1 system
will convert it to Centos-5.2, as and when that is released?
All upgrades / updates in the major versions (5.0 - 5.1 - 5.1) will
happen automatically when you run yum
Ralph Angenendt wrote:
Sorry to be dumb, but what is the point of calling it Centos-5.2?
Is it just that if installing Centos from scratch,
one could download a more up-to-date version?
Think of it as a rebase with added kernel drivers, some newer features
and so on, while still basically
admin wrote:
I think so, at least you do the way I use it because you boot the
machine off the Clonezilla CD, then mount the device/partition you're
backing up to and select the device/partition being backed up.
But Clonezilla also has a whole network mode of operation involving a
Clonezilla
Timothy Murphy wrote:
Ralph Angenendt wrote:
Sorry to be dumb, but what is the point of calling it Centos-5.2?
Is it just that if installing Centos from scratch,
one could download a more up-to-date version?
Think of it as a rebase with added kernel drivers, some newer features
and
Timothy Murphy wrote:
Ralph Angenendt wrote:
Sorry to be dumb, but what is the point of calling it Centos-5.2?
Is it just that if installing Centos from scratch,
one could download a more up-to-date version?
Think of it as a rebase with added kernel drivers, some newer features
and
2008/6/24 Tim Verhoeven [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I don't wan to be rude. But you won't get any official
support/news/help about this until the release has been announced
officially.
But, as you know, the famous distro users had jammed the download
server when new distro launched didn't show their
Rudi Ahlers wrote:
...
Why don't you check? :)
On a 5.1 machine ready for 5.2:
# yum update /tmp/update.log
n
# yum upgrade /tmp/upgrade.log
n
# diff /tmp/update.log /tmp/upgrade.log
2c2
Setting up Update Process
---
Setting up Upgrade Process
Looks to me that update==upgrade.
Why does
I did a yum update last night at about 23h15 EDT (-4). No upgrade.
I just did a yum update this morning at about 08h45 (-4). for my system
there's about 348 megs of updates.
Now all I have to do is figure out how to remove OO.o 2.0.whatever which
is being upgraded to 2.3.whatever. I'm using
Mogens Kjaer wrote:
Rudi Ahlers wrote:
...
Why don't you check? :)
On a 5.1 machine ready for 5.2:
# yum update /tmp/update.log
n
# yum upgrade /tmp/upgrade.log
n
# diff /tmp/update.log /tmp/upgrade.log
2c2
Setting up Update Process
---
Setting up Upgrade Process
Looks to me that
After failing to install on two different machines that were running
Windows, I realized that one machine had a bad hard-drive, and the other
bad memory. So I've collected the good parts into one machine and
installed CentOS with SME. This was the fastest install of Linux I have
every seen, 15
Donald Buchan wrote:
I did a yum update last night at about 23h15 EDT (-4). No upgrade.
I just did a yum update this morning at about 08h45 (-4). for my system
there's about 348 megs of updates.
Now all I have to do is figure out how to remove OO.o 2.0.whatever which
is being upgraded
Donald Buchan wrote:
I did a yum update last night at about 23h15 EDT (-4). No upgrade.
I just did a yum update this morning at about 08h45 (-4). for my system
there's about 348 megs of updates.
Now all I have to do is figure out how to remove OO.o 2.0.whatever which
is being upgraded to
Robert Moskowitz wrote:
This will be the first version change with my local repo so I want to
check the steps out.
I have a /Centos/5.1 directory with all the contents of the ISO CDs.
I have a /Centos/5 directory with a symbolic link to the 5.1 directory.
I ASSUME that I will create a
On Tue, 24 Jun 2008 09:13:54 -0400
Donald Buchan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Now all I have to do is figure out how to remove OO.o 2.0.whatever which
is being upgraded to 2.3.whatever. I'm using 2.4.1 on my 4.6 boxes
(have always been using the latest OO.o on them since installation a
couple of
Michael wrote:
After failing to install on two different machines that were running
Windows, I realized that one machine had a bad hard-drive, and the other
bad memory. So I've collected the good parts into one machine and
installed CentOS with SME. This was the fastest install of Linux I have
Thanks Johnny, I'll look into it. (Trying to remove the CentOS version,
and install the OO.o rpms.)
I'll also try Ross' suggestion.
(the 5.2 upgrade is still happily chugging along with the downloads at
09h50 (-4), at #145 of 222 downloads.)
On Tue, 2008-06-24 at 08:43 -0500, Johnny Hughes
Hi,
has the CentOS version of php 5.2.x also been released yet? I couldn't find it.
Thanks
Gerald
--
Gerald Balzer, Senior Partner
T: +41 44 440 55 13
E: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
E: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
**
Unicum Consulting Marketing GmbH
Luzernerstrasse 51a,
Gerald Balzer wrote:
Hi,
has the CentOS version of php 5.2.x also been released yet? I couldn't
find it.
The version of php for centos is 5.1.6-20 ...
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
CentOS mailing list
Gerald Balzer wrote:
Hi,
has the CentOS version of php 5.2.x also been released yet? I couldn't
find it.
its in the testing repo, it never made it to release because clearly no
one really uses it. They all just got together made a lot of noise about
it just to be heard, and then when we
Johnny Hughes wrote:
Michael wrote:
After failing to install on two different machines that were running
Windows, I realized that one machine had a bad hard-drive, and the
other bad memory. So I've collected the good parts into one machine
and installed CentOS with SME. This was the fastest
Karanbir Singh wrote:
Gerald Balzer wrote:
Hi,
has the CentOS version of php 5.2.x also been released yet? I couldn't
find it.
its in the testing repo, it never made it to release because clearly no
one really uses it. They all just got together made a lot of noise about
it just to be
Right, but according to Karanbir Singh you were working on a official 5.2.x version for CentOS 5.
This version was to be released on the centoplus repos some time ago. Therefore I asked.
Gerald
Johnny Hughes wrote:
Gerald Balzer wrote:
Hi,
has the CentOS version of php 5.2.x also been
Sad, I needed it, since some apps that we are hosting require 5.2.4+ . I'm currently running the
version 5.2.5 from the yjl.repo. But I'd appreciate to have a more official one, of course.
Gerald
Karanbir Singh wrote:
Karanbir Singh wrote:
Gerald Balzer wrote:
Hi,
has the CentOS version
Gerald Balzer wrote:
Sad, I needed it, since some apps that we are hosting require 5.2.4+ .
I'm currently running the version 5.2.5 from the yjl.repo. But I'd
appreciate to have a more official one, of course.
If you want to organise a testing group of people, maybe 5 or so, who
would be
Hi everybody,
depends on what you expect, but I'm willing to help in testing that -
seems that I will need PHP 5.2 in the near future, and I'd be happy if
it would be available for CentOS 5.
cu,
__
/homas
--
Thomas Bleier, DI
Information Management
Austrian Research Centers GmbH - ARC
HG Wien
Thanks for your kind offer, but since I'm the only one in my group using centos 5 (rest is on
fedora) I think I'll switch to the remi repo and wait for the next major release.
Of course if someone on this list wants to join, we can start.
Thanks again
Gerald
Karanbir Singh wrote:
Gerald
hi...
i've got an access denied issue with rsh on one of my boxes (and before we
start, no use ssh comments.. rsh is what i'm dealing with for now!!)
i've got a few boxes in my network, and i can successfully rsh into them
with no issue. however, on one box, i can't access it using rsh, and i'm
Karanbir Singh wrote:
Bleier Thomas wrote:
Hi everybody,
depends on what you expect, but I'm willing to help in testing that -
seems that I will need PHP 5.2 in the near future, and I'd be happy if
it would be available for CentOS 5.
Sounds good, over the next few days lets try and get
Michael wrote:
After failing to install on two different machines that were running
Windows, I realized that one machine had a bad hard-drive, and the other
bad memory. So I've collected the good parts into one machine and
installed CentOS with SME. This was the fastest install of Linux I have
Dear All,
i have the following setup
CentOS 5 server running as a primary DNS server for a long time and is
working perfectly fine
the server is on public IP and we have abt 5 zones apart from the reverse
n local zone
now our sister company have recently setup their own DNS and we are
supposed
fabian dacunha wrote:
really wd apprecite your help and ideas with examples
add this to your bind options section
forwarders { 172.31.1.240; };
and restart named, your named will now forward all requests that
it's not authoritative for to the above system.
nate
on: Sun Jun 22 08:00:34 UTC 2008, Gergely Buday gbuday at gmail.com wrote:
Dear CentOs users,
I have a centos server with nothing important at the moment, but I
would like to install some web-based project management tool (trac for
the curious) that would contain important data. And, as my
Rudi Ahlers wrote:
Sorry to be dumb, but what is the point of calling it Centos-5.2?
Think of it as a rebase with added kernel drivers, some newer features
and so on, while still basically being CentOS 5.
Or - if you come from the windows world - CentOS 5, service pack 2.
But does one
fabian dacunha wrote:
Dear All,
i have the following setup
CentOS 5 server running as a primary DNS server for a long time and is
working perfectly fine
the server is on public IP and we have abt 5 zones apart from the reverse
n local zone
now our sister company have recently setup their own
Just reread your message.
I was still having problems with the 2.0 centos version coming back even
though I'd removed it.
I tried Ross' suggesting, it removed things successfully (for both
2.0.whatever and 2.4.1.) But the new 2.4.1 won't install because
package jre-1.6.0_04-fcs is already
Donald Buchan wrote:
Just reread your message.
I was still having problems with the 2.0 centos version
coming back even
though I'd removed it.
I tried Ross' suggesting, it removed things successfully (for both
2.0.whatever and 2.4.1.) But the new 2.4.1 won't install because
package
Timothy Murphy wrote:
Rudi Ahlers wrote:
Sorry to be dumb, but what is the point of calling it Centos-5.2?
Think of it as a rebase with added kernel drivers, some newer features
and so on, while still basically being CentOS 5.
Or - if you come from the windows world - CentOS 5, service
Jason Pyeron wrote:
Looking for a radio tuner for my audio server.
Needs to do AM.
Any hardware reccomendations?
I hooked up an original Griffin RadioShark to my CentOS 5.1 server
for a lark last month, streaming with DarkIce. Unfortunately,
that machine is dark and 2500 miles away - I
On Tue, 24 Jun 2008 10:41:37 -0500
Johnny Hughes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
CentOS-5.0, CentOS-5.1 and CentOS-5.2 are update sets of CentOS-5 ...
and are still CentOS-5. The .0, .1, and .2 are update sets and are
really just a frozen point in time of CentOS-5.
I think that the problem is the
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 24 Jun 2008 10:41:37 -0500
Johnny Hughes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
CentOS-5.0, CentOS-5.1 and CentOS-5.2 are update sets of CentOS-5 ...
and are still CentOS-5. The .0, .1, and .2 are update sets and are
really just a frozen point in time of CentOS-5.
Karanbir Singh wrote:
We are pleased to announce the immediate availability of CentOS-5.2
for the i386 and x86_64 Architectures.
and let the fun begin...
$ rsync -avH --delete --exclude=ia64 --exclude=s390\*
--exclude=alpha \
mirrors.kernel.org::mirrors/centos
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ken Key
Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2008 12:00 PM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] AM/FM tuner for centos 4 or 5?
Jason Pyeron wrote:
Looking for a radio tuner for my audio server.
Is there a detailed history/diff of what 5.1 adds/removes/changes from
5.0, and the same for 5.2 from 5.1 and 5.0?
I checked around the centos.org but couldn't obviously find this.
Thanks.
Scott
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
Ignore. I found it.
On Tue, 24 Jun 2008, Scott R. Ehrlich wrote:
Is there a detailed history/diff of what 5.1 adds/removes/changes from 5.0,
and the same for 5.2 from 5.1 and 5.0?
I checked around the centos.org but couldn't obviously find this.
Thanks.
Scott
why not do both and look at your options...
john plemons
Jason Pyeron wrote:
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ken Key
Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2008 12:00 PM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] AM/FM tuner for centos 4 or 5?
On Tue, Jun 24, 2008 at 12:20 PM, Scott R. Ehrlich [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there a detailed history/diff of what 5.1 adds/removes/changes from 5.0,
and the same for 5.2 from 5.1 and 5.0?
I checked around the centos.org but couldn't obviously find this.
More than what's in the wiki? -
Scott R. Ehrlich wrote:
Is there a detailed history/diff of what 5.1 adds/removes/changes from
5.0, and the same for 5.2 from 5.1 and 5.0?
I checked around the centos.org but couldn't obviously find this.
Look through the release notes for 5.1 and 5.2
1 - 100 of 159 matches
Mail list logo
