On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 10:28 PM, Jasper Siepkes jas...@siepkes.nl wrote:
Yeah thats the background info I meant.
Then go ahead: http://wiki.centos.org/TipsAndTricks/TmpOnTmpfs
I'll link to it when it is ready.
Cheers,
Ralph
___
CentOS-docs mailing
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 5:46 PM, Jerry Amundson jamun...@gmail.com wrote:
Please grant edit permission to my account, JerryAmundson.
Initially, I'll change my personal page. Later, I can expand into
areas that need changes made, especially if they involve aspects of
CentOS I use daily - xen,
Dear Ralph,
ralph.angene...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 5:46 PM, Jerry Amundson jamun...@gmail.com wrote:
Please grant edit permission to my account, JerryAmundson.
Initially, I'll change my personal page. Later, I can expand into
areas that need changes made, especially if they
On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 5:29 AM, Ralph Angenendt
ralph.angene...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 12:29 PM, Ralph Angenendt
ralph.angene...@gmail.com wrote:
What is it with all those personal pages? Not wanting to turn you
off (you are getting one, no problem), but why does everybody
On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 5:29 AM, Ralph Angenendt
ralph.angene...@gmail.com wrote:
Yes, I know the contribute page says so, I'd like to know if there
is a personal need to get one.
I now I see the template page you give us - that is *awesome*!!
Yes, every new contributor should definitely start
Geerd-Dietger Hoffmann wrote on 10/14/2009 09:51 PM:
Hey
And it is this time of the month again when we are about to release a
new Newsletter (#0906).
Please could people start checking spelling and contribute their parts.
The deadline is the 19th of Oct as we don't want to release on a
On Sat, 2009-10-17 at 00:29 +0200, Ralph Angenendt wrote:
Am 16.10.09 22:48, schrieb Phil Schaffner:
Geerd-Dietger Hoffmann wrote on 10/14/2009 09:51 PM:
If someone is interested in helping please contact me.
Seems to be too well protected.
I guess that's why ... see above :)
Well, if
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2009:1501 Important
Upstream details at : http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2009-1501.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors:
source:
xpdf-3.00-22.el4_8.1.src.rpm
x86_64:
xpdf-3.00-22.el4_8.1.x86_64.rpm
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2009:1501 Important
Upstream details at : http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2009-1501.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors:
source:
xpdf-3.00-22.el4_8.1.src.rpm
i386:
xpdf-3.00-22.el4_8.1.i386.rpm
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2009:1503 Important
Upstream details at : http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2009-1503.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors:
source:
gpdf-2.8.2-7.7.2.el4_8.5.src.rpm
i386:
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2009:1503 Important
Upstream details at : http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2009-1503.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors:
source:
gpdf-2.8.2-7.7.2.el4_8.5.src.rpm
x86_64:
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2009:1512 Important
Upstream details at : http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2009-1512.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors:
source:
kdegraphics-3.3.1-15.el4_8.2.src.rpm
i386:
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2009:1512 Important
Upstream details at : http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2009-1512.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors:
source:
kdegraphics-3.3.1-15.el4_8.2.src.rpm
x86_64:
Hi,
maybe Gentoo Linux will be up on this server.
my buddy has successfully ran it on Sun Blade 1000, but there is a
UltraSPARC III and UltraSPARC III Cu CPUs (
UltraSPARC IIIi on the SF240).
I think OpenSolaris will be better there ;)
really have fun :)
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 9:44 PM, ML
Am Donnerstag, den 15.10.2009, 04:17 +0200 schrieb David Mehler:
Hello,
I'm trying to do an unattended CentOS 5.3 install. For the most part
it's working. As of right now i'm statically assigning the machine an
IP which i believe will allow %post to resolve names? I also like
knowing where
Am Mittwoch, den 14.10.2009, 19:37 +0200 schrieb David Mehler:
Hello,
I'm doing an unattended CentOS 5.3 install in a virtual machine
vmware. I'm redirecting output to a serial console because production
boxes won't have monitors. I'm getting to the point of doing the post
installation then
Am Donnerstag, den 15.10.2009, 22:02 +0200 schrieb Miguel Di Ciurcio
Filho:
Mathieu Baudier wrote:
I'm not sure that I understand.
Is there indeed such a public repository of the build scriptds / RPM
specs used by CentOS?
That would indeed be fascinating and useful to have a look at
On 10/15/2009 04:17 AM, David Mehler wrote:
Hello,
I'm trying to do an unattended CentOS 5.3 install. For the most part
it's working. As of right now i'm statically assigning the machine an
IP which i believe will allow %post to resolve names? I also like
knowing where the box will show up.
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 4:02 PM, Miguel Di Ciurcio Filho
mig...@ic.unicamp.br wrote:
http://dev.centos.org/centos/buildsys/
There really doesn't look like there's a lot of packages there.
Why haven't we tried to set up Koji? (If the answer's not enough
time, or not-enough knowledge, I'm
On Thu, 2009-10-15 at 22:17 -0400, Jim Wildman wrote:
On Thu, 15 Oct 2009, Les Mikesell wrote:
Could someone describe to me what the rush is? I mean what drives
the need that you need to have it _right now_ ?
There is always the risk that a critical security vulnerability will be
Hi,
Can anyone recommend a good OS for a machine that will do apache,
postfix, mysql, etc.
Do you have a specific reason not to use Solaris?
If you don't want to do that I've had excellent results with Debian on
Sparc, and NetBSD.
S.
___
CentOS
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
thus nate spake:
| Yves Bellefeuille wrote:
| If I remember correctly, when version 5.3 was released, about 95% was
| made available by BitTorrent before the official release date, so that
| the entire file would be available as soon as possible after
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
thus Stephen Nelson-Smith spake:
| Hi,
|
| Can anyone recommend a good OS for a machine that will do apache,
| postfix, mysql, etc.
|
| Do you have a specific reason not to use Solaris?
|
| If you don't want to do that I've had excellent results with
On 16/10/09 08:06, Ian Wilson wrote:
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 4:02 PM, Miguel Di Ciurcio Filho
mig...@ic.unicamp.br wrote:
http://dev.centos.org/centos/buildsys/
There really doesn't look like there's a lot of packages there.
Why haven't we tried to set up Koji? (If the answer's
2009/10/16 Timo Schoeler timo.schoe...@riscworks.net:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
thus Stephen Nelson-Smith spake:
| Hi,
|
| Can anyone recommend a good OS for a machine that will do apache,
| postfix, mysql, etc.
|
| Do you have a specific reason not to use Solaris?
|
Jake Shipton wrote:
Post #148.
You count your posts?
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
nate schrieb:
Yves Bellefeuille wrote:
If I remember correctly, when version 5.3 was released, about 95% was
made available by BitTorrent before the official release date, so that
the entire file would be available as soon as possible after the
release.
Could the same be done this time?
From: Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com
To: CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org
Sent: Thursday, October 15, 2009 5:57:42 PM
Subject: Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5.4? anyone? - debate
Gabriel - IP Guys wrote:
When someone asked “When will **CentOS 5.4 come out??** The answer is,
“When it
On 16/10/09 09:38, Ian Blackwell wrote:
Jake Shipton wrote:
Post #148.
You count your posts?
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
No, that's the post # in the thread, of which
Jake Shipton wrote:
On 16/10/09 09:38, Ian Blackwell wrote:
Jake Shipton wrote:
Post #148.
You count your posts?
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
No, that's the
Hello Everyone,
I configured a server for a friend's Internet cafe. He has 2 ISPs.
Here is what I did:
## NAT
-A POSTROUTING -s 10.0.0.0/255.255.255.128 -o eth2 -j SNAT --to-source
82.77.148.83
-A POSTROUTING -s 10.0.0.0/255.255.255.128 -o eth0 -j SNAT --to-source
83.103.190.175
## Removing
Les Mikesell a écrit :
I think for a lot of us, the 'we'll release when it's ready' mentality
is the main reason we aren't using debian. I don't think CentOS should
repeat their mistakes.
Well, I'm glad they actually *do* repeat that special mistake. Do you
prefer
http://mirror.switch.ch/ftp/mirror/centos/5.3/os/SRPMS/
There are SRPM's there. If that's what you mean.
I believe CentOS still uses Plague (internally)
I found this mail on the dev mailing list:
[CentOS-devel] CentOS 5 build scripts
Niki Kovacs schrieb:
Les Mikesell a écrit :
I think for a lot of us, the 'we'll release when it's ready' mentality
is the main reason we aren't using debian. I don't think CentOS should
repeat their mistakes.
Well, I'm glad they actually *do* repeat that special mistake. Do
First I'd like to make sure I am not complaining about this delay between
the RHEL and CentOS releases per se. I did not help in any way to make it
happen faster and usually I don't mind having a three weeks gap between
them.
But I've noticed that we had two security related kernel updates
from
On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 5:25 AM, Rainer Duffner rai...@ultra-secure.de wrote:
It's good to have a fixed date to work towards.
Otherwise, you get feature-creep, where more and more stuff goes into
the release but never stabilizes.
I don't think feature-creep is an issue in CentOS. I think the
Hi everybody,
thanks for your immediate response. I will replace the board, but I am
wondering what the error message actually means?
Oct 16 14:07:36 xenserver1 kernel: EDAC MC0: UE row 0, channel-a= 0
channel-b= 1 labels -: NON-FATAL recoverable (Branch=0 DRAM-Bank=0
Buffer ID = 0 RDWR=Read
On 10/16/2009 05:25 AM, Rainer Duffner wrote:
Niki Kovacs schrieb:
Les Mikesell a écrit :
I think for a lot of us, the 'we'll release when it's ready' mentality
is the main reason we aren't using debian. I don't think CentOS should
repeat their mistakes.
Well, I'm glad they
On 10/15/2009 07:12 AM, Mathew S. McCarrell wrote:
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 7:45 AM, mbneto mbn...@gmail.com
mailto:mbn...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
The last status (from twitter) is 2 days old with the '5.4 is baked!
centos internal network will start syncing up today. Release ~
Majian wrote on 10/16/2009 06:57 AM:
...
But I've noticed that we had two security related kernel updates
from RHEL since the RHEL 5.3 release and there is no word on when it will be
released or why is it taking so long.
So hope it would release soon ~~~
The -164 kernel has been in updates
Soon means soon ... we have to get the tree stable on many servers
before we can make it available. This stuff takes time.
I think this is the major source of this latest flurry
about the release date.
The twitter posting from KB said soon and then things
went quiet for 2 days without any
You Centos guys just aren't getting the message are you?
We need to know EXACTLY what is going on with the release! None of this
soon crap will do. Please post a progress report on packages built,
isos transfered, server update progress by region, hours worked,
keystrokes typed, bathroom
Toby Bluhm wrote:
You Centos guys just aren't getting the message are you?
We need to know EXACTLY what is going on with the release! None of this
soon crap will do. Please post a progress report on packages built,
isos transfered, server update progress by region, hours worked,
keystrokes
Toby Bluhm wrote:
You Centos guys just aren't getting the message are you?
We need to know EXACTLY what is going on with the release! None of this
soon crap will do. Please post a progress report on packages built,
isos transfered, server update progress by region, hours worked,
On Fri, 16 Oct 2009 09:13:21 -0400
Toby Bluhm t...@alltechmedusa.com wrote:
You Centos guys just aren't getting the message are you?
We need to know EXACTLY what is going on with the release! None of this
soon crap will do. Please post a progress report on packages built,
isos transfered,
You know if this was a new X-Box, or PlayStation, we might be sleeping
in a tent next to the front of the store selling them wait for the store
to be open. Or sleeping in line at the New Opening Release of Star Wars
12 Return of the O/S... We are all a little bit of a geek and this
stuff
Adrian Sevcenco schrieb:
Toby Bluhm wrote:
You Centos guys just aren't getting the message are you?
We need to know EXACTLY what is going on with the release! None of
this soon crap will do. Please post a progress report on packages
built, isos transfered, server update progress by region,
On Fri, 16 Oct 2009 14:28:11 +0100
Marcelo M. Garcia marcelo.maia.gar...@googlemail.com wrote:
Toby Bluhm wrote:
You Centos guys just aren't getting the message are you?
We need to know EXACTLY what is going on with the release! None of this
soon crap will do. Please post a progress
Marcelo M. Garcia wrote:
Toby Bluhm wrote:
You Centos guys just aren't getting the message are you?
We need to know EXACTLY what is going on with the release! None of this
soon crap will do. Please post a progress report on packages built,
isos transfered, server update progress by region,
Marcelo M. Garcia wrote:
Toby Bluhm wrote:
You Centos guys just aren't getting the message are you?
We need to know EXACTLY what is going on with the release! None of this
soon crap will do. Please post a progress report on packages built,
isos transfered, server update progress by region,
Nicolas Thierry-Mieg wrote:
Marcelo M. Garcia wrote:
Toby Bluhm wrote:
You Centos guys just aren't getting the message are you?
We need to know EXACTLY what is going on with the release! None of this
soon crap will do. Please post a progress report on packages built,
isos transfered,
Toby Bluhm wrote:
You Centos guys just aren't getting the message are you?
We need to know EXACTLY what is going on with the release! None of this
soon crap will do. Please post a progress report on packages built,
isos transfered, server update progress by region, hours worked,
On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 8:41 AM, Nicolas Thierry-Mieg
nicolas.thierry-m...@imag.fr wrote:
Marcelo M. Garcia wrote:
Toby Bluhm wrote:
You Centos guys just aren't getting the message are you?
We need to know EXACTLY what is going on with the release! None of this
soon crap will do. Please post
On Fri, 16 Oct 2009, Les Mikesell wrote:
Someone is obviously sarcasm-challenged today. But there is
a middle ground for people who would like a best-effort idea
of what to expect.
and 'best-efforts' is a SLA concept -- if an SLA is needed,
you already know the answer
-- Russ herrold
On 16/10/09 14:13, Toby Bluhm wrote:
You Centos guys just aren't getting the message are you?
We need to know EXACTLY what is going on with the release! None of this
soon crap will do. Please post a progress report on packages built,
isos transfered, server update progress by region, hours
R P Herrold wrote:
On Fri, 16 Oct 2009, Les Mikesell wrote:
Someone is obviously sarcasm-challenged today. But there is
a middle ground for people who would like a best-effort idea
of what to expect.
and 'best-efforts' is a SLA concept -- if an SLA is needed,
you already know the
: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 253 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
Url :
http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-announce/attachments/20091016/e656b47a/attachment-0001.bin
--
Message: 2
Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2009 08:29:46 -0500
From: Johnny
Adrian Sevcenco wrote:
Toby Bluhm wrote:
You Centos guys just aren't getting the message are you?
We need to know EXACTLY what is going on with the release! None of
this soon crap will do. Please post a progress report on packages
built, isos transfered, server update progress by region,
Look, it's not me that wants it. It's . . . it's the servers, OKAY? I
think they've got a jones on for 5.4. I walk past the cpu room and hear
trashing and growling. I look inside and it's all quiet and normal and
all that - but I *know* something is going on in there. They're
emanating a
no, no, just kidding, but this is interesting:
http://news.cnet.com/8301-13505_3-10376762-16.html
rday
--
Robert P. J. Day Waterloo, Ontario, CANADA
Linux Consulting, Training and
Does anyone have any recommendations for the best way to bring up a
iSCSI Target on a C5.3+ server ? Various blogs suggest compiling IET
from source, but thats not real appealing to me (not that I can't do it,
I just don't want to have to support it long term). I looked in
rpmforge but
On Fri, 16 Oct 2009, Les Mikesell wrote:
R P Herrold wrote:
and 'best-efforts' is a SLA concept -- if an SLA is needed,
you already know the answer
It's also the sort of thing people in a community try to do
for each other without needing legal terms for enforcement.
You raise a new
John R Pierce wrote:
Does anyone have any recommendations for the best way to bring up a
iSCSI Target on a C5.3+ server ? Various blogs suggest compiling IET
from source, but thats not real appealing to me (not that I can't do it,
I just don't want to have to support it long term). I
Does anyone have any recommendations for the best way to bring up a
iSCSI Target on a C5.3+ server ? Various blogs suggest compiling IET
from source, but thats not real appealing to me (not that I can't do it,
I just don't want to have to support it long term). I looked in
rpmforge but didn't
R P Herrold wrote:
and 'best-efforts' is a SLA concept -- if an SLA is needed,
you already know the answer
It's also the sort of thing people in a community try to do
for each other without needing legal terms for enforcement.
You raise a new argument, an orthogonal strawman, as is your
On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 5:41 AM, Johnny Hughes joh...@centos.org wrote:
Soon means soon ... we have to get the tree stable on many servers
before we can make it available. This stuff takes time.
Take all the time you need, as always. We all appreciate the great
work you folks do, and if
Mathieu Baudier wrote on 10/15/2009 02:23 PM:
from [CentOS] CentOS 5.4? anyone?
Is that a big problem for the people who write the code and have every
revision preserved for posterity (and for others to learn from) in a
public revision control system?
I'm not sure that I understand.
Is
On Fri, 16 Oct 2009, Les Mikesell wrote:
No one questions your effort on the technical side - or has a right to.
Why is it so hard to share what is going on?
I began publishing the pre-centos cAos (or fedora.us)
buildsystem in February 2002 under the GPL (then v2) and
updated it from time
Hi
Sorry for the silly question, but is it safe to build packages, like
rpms, in virtual machines (virtualbox) and use this packages in real
machines? Some of these machines are CentOS and others ares Opensuse.
I need to build (or would be very useful to have) Ganglia 3.1.x
Thanks
Marcelo
Marcelo M. Garcia wrote:
Hi
Sorry for the silly question, but is it safe to build packages, like
rpms, in virtual machines (virtualbox) and use this packages in real
machines? Some of these machines are CentOS and others ares Opensuse.
I do it all the time, a couple of (Xen) VMs packed
Marcelo M. Garcia wrote:
Hi
Sorry for the silly question, but is it safe to build packages, like
rpms, in virtual machines (virtualbox) and use this packages in real
machines? Some of these machines are CentOS and others ares Opensuse.
I do this all the time, and have been for years, no
Marcelo M. Garcia wrote:
Sorry for the silly question, but is it safe to build packages, like
rpms, in virtual machines (virtualbox) and use this packages in real
machines? Some of these machines are CentOS and others ares Opensuse.
It's actually recommended to do it that way. :-)
--
Marcelo M. Garcia a écrit :
Hi
Sorry for the silly question, but is it safe to build packages, like
rpms, in virtual machines (virtualbox) and use this packages in real
machines? Some of these machines are CentOS and others ares Opensuse.
On Oct 16, 2009, at 2:42 PM, John R Pierce pie...@hogranch.com wrote:
Does anyone have any recommendations for the best way to bring up a
iSCSI Target on a C5.3+ server ? Various blogs suggest compiling IET
from source, but thats not real appealing to me (not that I can't do
it,
I just
Ross Walker wrote:
On Oct 16, 2009, at 2:42 PM, John R Pierce pie...@hogranch.com wrote:
Does anyone have any recommendations for the best way to bring up a
iSCSI Target on a C5.3+ server ? Various blogs suggest compiling IET
from source, but thats not real appealing to me (not that I
Just tried to play a movie/DVD and Totem (what automatically popped up
when I inserted the DVD) said it needed plug-ins... it didn't say which
plug-ins. The website listed in the help page no longer exists. I have
four of the gstreamer packages and libdvdcss installed, but I guess
there's
i use the atrpm iscsitarget for a long time now in high traffic setups.
it performs very well, and is rock solid. no problems until now. go for
it :) but disabling the atrpms repo after installing the iscsitarget
wouldnt be a bad idea.
i wont go with userspace solutions like tgt, my benchmarks
I am running CentOS 5.3 and have just the two accounts root and
buz. I would like to be able to issue shutdown from the account
buz, and thus created
/etc/shutdown.allow with the single entry buz (without any quotes).
I still
get the error message only root can do this (or something similar)
Juergen Gotteswinter wrote:
i use the atrpm iscsitarget for a long time now in high traffic setups.
it performs very well, and is rock solid. no problems until now. go for
it :) but disabling the atrpms repo after installing the iscsitarget
wouldnt be a bad idea.
i wont go with userspace
Buz Davis wrote:
I am running CentOS 5.3 and have just the two accounts root and
buz. I would like to be able to issue shutdown from the account
buz, and thus created
/etc/shutdown.allow with the single entry buz (without any quotes).
I still
get the error message only root can do this
At Fri, 16 Oct 2009 22:57:23 +0100 CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org
wrote:
Hi
Sorry for the silly question, but is it safe to build packages, like
rpms, in virtual machines (virtualbox) and use this packages in real
machines? Some of these machines are CentOS and others ares
On Thu, 2009-10-15 at 16:01 -0700, nate wrote:
Could someone describe to me what the rush is? I mean what drives
the need that you need to have it _right now_ ? Me I always like
to wait at least a week or two to see if others run into issues,
and wait for the mirrors to become less clogged.
Buz Davis wrote:
I am running CentOS 5.3 and have just the two accounts root and
buz. I would like to be able to issue shutdown from the account
buz, and thus created
/etc/shutdown.allow with the single entry buz (without any quotes).
I still
get the error message only root can do
On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 7:19 PM, Buz Davis buzda...@earthlink.net wrote:
I am running CentOS 5.3 and have just the two accounts root and
buz. I would like to be able to issue shutdown from the account
buz, and thus created
/etc/shutdown.allow with the single entry buz (without any quotes).
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 5:18 PM, Yves Bellefeuille y...@storm.ca wrote:
If I remember correctly, when version 5.3 was released, about 95% was
made available by BitTorrent before the official release date, so that
the entire file would be available as soon as possible after the
release.
Could
On Oct 16, 2009, at 8:24 PM, John R Pierce pie...@hogranch.com wrote:
Juergen Gotteswinter wrote:
i use the atrpm iscsitarget for a long time now in high traffic
setups.
it performs very well, and is rock solid. no problems until now. go
for
it :) but disabling the atrpms repo after
Hey guys.
I have a server that is owned by me and can confirm through servint that it
is owned by me.
I would like to do a penetration test and of course to allow you to upload
files on the server and kind of trash it to the point where it is always
restarting and running out of memory etc etc.
87 matches
Mail list logo
