On Wed, Mar 17, 2021 at 2:15 PM R C wrote:
> Hello,
>
>
> I installed 72G ram in a Dell (it canhandle 72G according to Dell). The
> BIOS says there are 9 8G DIMMs install (BIOS test shows no errors).
> dmidecode says there are indeed 9 DIMMs, and they show all fine, no
> errors etc. However,
On 03/18/2021 05:53 PM, Paul Heinlein wrote:
> On Thu, 18 Mar 2021, H wrote:
>
>> I just checked and I cannot see that the organization publishing these data
>> files offer any XSLT stylesheet. IOW, I am, perhaps incorrectly, assuming
>> that the publisher of the data would be one with said
At 02:03 PM 3/18/2021, you wrote:
> At 11:47 AM 3/18/2021, you wrote:
>>On Thu, Mar 18, 2021 at 04:44:18PM -, Mark Woolfson wrote:
>> > I have a requirement to load CentOS 7.3 on to a server. I have the
>> > distribution on a bootable USB key.
>>
>>I know this comes up on the list quite
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2021:0856 Important
Upstream details at : https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2021:0856
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
x86_64:
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2021:0854
Upstream details at : https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2021:0854
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
x86_64:
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2021:0861
Upstream details at : https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2021:0861
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
x86_64:
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2021:0808 Important
Upstream details at : https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2021:0808
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
x86_64:
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2021:0863
Upstream details at : https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2021:0863
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
x86_64:
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2021:0868
Upstream details at : https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2021:0868
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
x86_64:
CentOS Errata and Enhancement Advisory 2021:0866
Upstream details at : https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHEA-2021:0866
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
x86_64:
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2021:0864
Upstream details at : https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2021:0864
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
x86_64:
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2021:0851 Important
Upstream details at : https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2021:0851
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
x86_64:
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2021:0855
Upstream details at : https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2021:0855
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
x86_64:
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2021:0858
Upstream details at : https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2021:0858
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
x86_64:
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2021:0859
Upstream details at : https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2021:0859
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
x86_64:
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2021:0869
Upstream details at : https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2021:0869
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
x86_64:
On Thu, 18 Mar 2021, H wrote:
I just checked and I cannot see that the organization publishing
these data files offer any XSLT stylesheet. IOW, I am, perhaps
incorrectly, assuming that the publisher of the data would be one
with said stylesheet. (Although perhaps that is something an
On Thu, 18 Mar 2021, Lamar Owen wrote:
On 3/18/21 10:23 AM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
[what can be done] I am guessing
someone could make an unofficial set of spins which cut out some packages
to try and make it fit in single density.
This is probably the solution at this point for the
On 3/18/2021 6:36 AM, Lamar Owen wrote:
On 3/18/21 1:24 AM, John R. Dennison wrote:
It's not realistic to expect server-class machines not to be able to
boot from dual-layer or USB media in 2021.
There are environments where USB or other writeable media are not
allowed on premises.
While all
On 03/18/2021 04:30 PM, Paul Heinlein wrote:
> On Thu, 18 Mar 2021, H wrote:
>
>> I have a challenge I am interested in getting feedback on.
>>
>> I will on a regular basis download a series of data files from the web where
>> the data is in XML-format. The format is known in advance but is
> At 11:47 AM 3/18/2021, you wrote:
>>On Thu, Mar 18, 2021 at 04:44:18PM -, Mark Woolfson wrote:
>> > I have a requirement to load CentOS 7.3 on to a server. I have the
>> > distribution on a bootable USB key.
>>
>>I know this comes up on the list quite often, but if you want security
On Thu, 18 Mar 2021, H wrote:
I have a challenge I am interested in getting feedback on.
I will on a regular basis download a series of data files from the
web where the data is in XML-format. The format is known in advance
but is different between the various data files. I then plan to
At 11:47 AM 3/18/2021, you wrote:
On Thu, Mar 18, 2021 at 04:44:18PM -, Mark Woolfson wrote:
> I have a requirement to load CentOS 7.3 on to a server. I have the
> distribution on a bootable USB key.
I know this comes up on the list quite often, but if you want security
updates for 7.3,
On 3/18/21 1:47 PM, Jonathan Billings wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 18, 2021 at 04:44:18PM -, Mark Woolfson wrote:
>> I have a requirement to load CentOS 7.3 on to a server. I have the
>> distribution on a bootable USB key.
>
> I know this comes up on the list quite often, but if you want security
>
On Thu, Mar 18, 2021 at 04:44:18PM -, Mark Woolfson wrote:
> I have a requirement to load CentOS 7.3 on to a server. I have the
> distribution on a bootable USB key.
I know this comes up on the list quite often, but if you want security
updates for 7.3, you're going to end up with 7.9 +
I have a challenge I am interested in getting feedback on.
I will on a regular basis download a series of data files from the web where
the data is in XML-format. The format is known in advance but is different
between the various data files. I then plan to extract the various data items
> On Thu, 18 Mar 2021 at 12:44, Mark Woolfson wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>>
>>
>> I wonder if you could help.
>>
>>
>>
>> I have a requirement to load CentOS 7.3 on to a server. I have the
>> distribution on a bootable USB key.
>>
>>
>>
> What kind of server? This is a hardware issue and is going to
On Thu, 18 Mar 2021 at 12:44, Mark Woolfson wrote:
> Hello,
>
>
>
> I wonder if you could help.
>
>
>
> I have a requirement to load CentOS 7.3 on to a server. I have the
> distribution on a bootable USB key.
>
>
>
What kind of server? This is a hardware issue and is going to need to know
what
Hello,
I wonder if you could help.
I have a requirement to load CentOS 7.3 on to a server. I have the
distribution on a bootable USB key.
CentOS boots to the first menu but when I select the option to install
almost immediately I get the error below:
NMI watchdog: BUG: soft lockup
On Thu, 18 Mar 2021 at 10:56, Lamar Owen wrote:
> On 3/18/21 10:23 AM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> > [what can be done] I am guessing
> > someone could make an unofficial set of spins which cut out some
> packages to try and make it fit in single density.
> >
> This is probably the solution at
On 3/14/21 8:13 PM, Robert G. (Doc) Savage via CentOS wrote:
> I need help from someone experienced with the CentOS bug tracking
> system. I gotta say it is one of the most complicated and imposing
> front ends I've ever seen. Could anyone familiar with it please file a
> bug on my behalf?
On 3/18/21 10:23 AM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
[what can be done] I am guessing
someone could make an unofficial set of spins which cut out some packages to
try and make it fit in single density.
This is probably the solution at this point for the 'Full' DVD. In the
interim, older machines
On Thu, 18 Mar 2021 at 09:36, Lamar Owen wrote:
> On 3/18/21 1:24 AM, John R. Dennison wrote:
> > It's not realistic to expect server-class machines not to be able to
> > boot from dual-layer or USB media in 2021.
> There are environments where USB or other writeable media are not
> allowed on
On 3/18/21 1:24 AM, John R. Dennison wrote:
It's not realistic to expect server-class machines not to be able to
boot from dual-layer or USB media in 2021.
There are environments where USB or other writeable media are not
allowed on premises.
While all DVD-ROM drives are supposed to read DL
> On Mar 18, 2021, at 7:30 AM, Robert Heller wrote:
>
> At Thu, 18 Mar 2021 00:24:51 -0500 CentOS mailing list
> wrote:
>
>>
>> On Wed, Mar 17, 2021 at 11:42:40PM -0500, Robert G. (Doc) Savage via CentOS
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> I'm sure it would, but I thought I made it clear that DL or BluRay
All of this could be avoided with a simple external disk reader like this:
At Thu, 18 Mar 2021 00:24:51 -0500 CentOS mailing list
wrote:
>
> On Wed, Mar 17, 2021 at 11:42:40PM -0500, Robert G. (Doc) Savage via CentOS
> wrote:
> >
> > I'm sure it would, but I thought I made it clear that DL or BluRay have
> > never been options in this case. I'm disappointed that
37 matches
Mail list logo
