Re: [CentOS] ath9k in CentOS 5

On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 7:33 PM, James Szinger wrote: > Hi, > > I'm thinking about updating the wireless card on a CentOS 5.3 box. > > The Wiki at http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/Laptops/Wireless says that > the "ath9k driver ships with CentOS", but I can't find it.  I've tried > modinfo, locate, yum

Re: [CentOS] Thunderbird installed for python dependency?

On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 7:09 AM, Bowie Bailey wrote: > I was starting to run a yum update on one of my servers and noticed that > it wanted to install Thunderbird for some reason.  Running yum with the > '-v' option gave this output: > Why is it trying to get the python lib from Thunderbird when t

Re: [CentOS] libesmtp binary RPM ???

On Sun, Aug 23, 2009 at 6:41 PM, fred smith wrote: > Anyone know where I can find a libesmtp binary RPM for EL5/Centos 5? > > (and maybe a RPM for Balsa, too?) I have an old balsa rpm, but there > are newer versions available as source. Both libsmtp and balsa seem to be available from EPEL. Be sur

Re: [CentOS] Access to xorg-x11-server-1.1.1-48.53.el5 (or later) SRPM ?

On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 1:22 PM, James Pearson wrote: > Akemi Yagi wrote: >> On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 12:15 PM, James >> Pearson wrote: >>> Does anyone have access to the xorg-x11-server-1.1.1-48.53.el5 (or >>> later) SRPM - which may be part of 5.4 beta? &g

Re: [CentOS] Access to xorg-x11-server-1.1.1-48.53.el5 (or later) SRPM ?

On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 12:15 PM, James Pearson wrote: > Does anyone have access to the xorg-x11-server-1.1.1-48.53.el5 (or > later) SRPM - which may be part of 5.4 beta? > > It's mentioned as having a fix for Bugzilla #448586 > Looks like the p

Re: [CentOS] FireWire in CentOS 5.3

On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 7:36 AM, Michael A. Peters wrote: > I am being given a digital camcorder. > > It uses Mini DV tapes and either connects via typical RCA cables (IE to > a tv) or via FireWire. I don't have the brand on hand, but I was told it > can be ripped to DV like any standard FireWire c

Re: [CentOS] Kernel NULL pointer vulnerability

On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 8:15 AM, Akemi Yagi wrote: > Upstream bugzilla to follow: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516949 Just a note to say that the issue is also being tracked in the CentOS forums: http://www.centos.org/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?topic_id=21740&for

Re: [CentOS] Kernel NULL pointer vulnerability

Upstream bugzilla to follow: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516949 Akemi ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] glibc update RHBA-2009:1202 release?

On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 5:04 AM, Tim Verhoeven wrote: > It is a new RHBA. I'm guessing it is in the pipeline and should appear soon. > > Regards, > Tim > > On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 2:01 PM, Rainer Traut wrote: >> Hi, >> >> will this update be released by centos? >> Or because it's no security update

Re: [CentOS] Flow-Tools RPM for CentOS 5.3

On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 4:13 PM, Frank Cox wrote: > On Fri, 07 Aug 2009 12:54:26 -1000 > Camron W. Fox wrote: > >> /root/rpm/SOURCES/flow-capture.init;4a7caede: cpio: MD5 sum mismatch > > Fedora 11 uses a different checksum algorithm than Fedora 10 and below. You might want to start with Fedora Cor

Re: [CentOS] Flow-Tools RPM for CentOS 5.3

On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 1:26 PM, Camron W. Fox wrote: > Alle, > >        Does anyone know if there is/where to get an rpm of flow-tools V0.66 or > better for CentOS/RHEL 5.3? >        We've been trying to build from the SRPM @ > http://cng.ateneo.net/cng/wyu/software/srpm/flow-tools-0.68-2.src.rpm >

Re: [CentOS] CentOS Project Infrastructure

On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 8:40 AM, R P Herrold wrote: > Some people are perhaps offended that the less public CentOS > infrastructure levels do not invite them in -- I cannot help > their wounded feelings.  Indeed, in part it may be that some > talented people drift away or withdraw for such a reason

Re: [CentOS] Python 2.4 64-bit problem w/CentOS5.3?

On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 1:21 PM, Filipe Brandenburger wrote: > Hi, > > On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 16:18, Curt Mills wrote: >> I'm getting this on two XF_64 systems by running "yum update" today. >> Perhaps Python 2.4 is missing some lib64 libraries? > > It's a known problem, apparently a bug in yum...

Re: [CentOS] Open Letter to Lance Davis

On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 5:36 PM, Jim Perrin wrote: > On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 6:47 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote: >> Why ... we are under no obligation to tell people how how we spend >> monies.  There are costs that are incurred for any organization.  We are >> probably going to disclose how monies are

Re: [CentOS] kvm in Centos 5.3

On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 6:52 PM, Kanwar Ranbir Sandhu wrote: > On Wed, 2009-07-29 at 15:26 -0700, Akemi Yagi wrote: >> kvm is available now.  Here is the CentOS wiki article for kvm-howto. >> >> http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/KVM > > 2. Any idea if moving from this test

Re: [CentOS] relatime in plus kernel

On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 8:13 AM, Yuji Tsuchimoto wrote: > Dear Karanbir and all, > > That sounds nice. > I'll try to make a patch for the current plus kernel. > > Thanks, Yuji Yujiさん, Yes, if you could provide a patch that can be cleanly applied to the CentOS kernel, that would be great. よろしく。

Re: [CentOS] kvm in Centos 5.3

On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 3:22 PM, Kanwar Ranbir Sandhu wrote: > On Wed, 2009-07-29 at 18:06 -0400, Kwan Lowe wrote: >> I don't think kvm is available upstream until 5.4. kvm is available now. Here is the CentOS wiki article for kvm-howto. http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/KVM Akemi _

Re: [CentOS] Quick question: CentOSPlus kernel vs. base kernel.

On Sat, Jul 25, 2009 at 12:17 PM, Robert Heller wrote: > What does the CentOSPlus kernel have that the standard kernel does not? > It is just additional drivers and modules?  Or are there additional > differences? It has a number of kernel drivers enabled and also has some bug fixes. Because the

Re: [CentOS] bizarre firefox/X11 problem on centos 5.3

On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 4:51 PM, fred smith wrote: > I set up a Centos5 box at work a week or two ago. Today I had this > bizarre, repeatable problem: > > fire up firefox 3.5.1, browse to centos.org, go to the wiki, click the > HOWTO button at the top of the page, and either at that point, or a > m

Re: [CentOS] SSH without password on CentOS 5 ?

On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 9:14 AM, Niki Kovacs wrote: > Hi, > > I'd like to use SSH without password so I can use it in scripts (for > example in combination with rsync to do backups). I have Carla > Schroder's "Linux Cookbook" and I'm trying out the various receipts, but > the one for SSH without a

Re: [CentOS] CENTOS 4.8 available time????

On Sun, Jul 19, 2009 at 5:09 AM, Radosław Lidak wrote: > Because he has repeated the question and looks to be in a hurry.    :-D > I have two CentOS 4 boxes and would like to know if I missed something > important. I think there will be no very new things in CentOS 4.8 but I'm > not sure, that's a

Re: [CentOS] Keep lossing wireless - ipw3945

On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 12:25 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote: > Sunday I updated my kernel to 128.1.16 (I had to reboot so it was time > to update).  No problems with wireless in my home. > > Monday I started traveling to IEEE 802 plenary, and I have lost my > wireless numerous times needing to reboot.

Re: [CentOS] Firefox 3.5?

On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 11:34 AM, Frank Cox wrote: > I've been getting a lot of questions over the past day or two about > whether/when Firefox 3.5 will be coming to Centos. This forum thread has some info: http://www.centos.org/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?topic_id=21070&forum=37 Akemi __

Re: [CentOS] Dag's comment at linuxtag

On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 6:39 AM, Ned Slider wrote: > Didi wrote: >> On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 7:45 PM, Akemi Yagi wrote: >>> http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2558/3679382429_d535f79823_o.jpg >>> (info offered by NedSlider) >> >> Have a look at the time the ph

Re: [CentOS] Dag's comment at linuxtag

On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 7:58 AM, Bogdan Nicolescu wrote: > > >From http://distrowatch.com/weekly.php?issue=20090629 > > "Right next to the Gentoo stand was a group of young people, proudly > displaying their affiliation with CentOS. > Dag Wieers, the well-known maintainer of a once very popula

Re: [CentOS] IPVS support in current kernel

On Sun, Jun 28, 2009 at 8:29 PM, fmb fmb wrote: > Is the IP Virtual Server available by default in the stock > 2.6.18-128.1.14.el5?  Or shall I compile my own kernel? I did check > "config-2.6.18-128.1.14.el5" yet I am not that sure! :) It is enabled in the distro kernel: # # IP: Virtual Server C

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5.3 and NTFS

On Sat, Jun 27, 2009 at 6:05 PM, Alan McKay wrote: >> The fuse module is built by dkms.  Make sure you have the kernel devel >> package that *matches* your running kernel.  What is the output of: >> >> uname -mr >> >> and >> >> rpm -qa kernel\* | sort > > [r...@localhost ~]# uname -mr > 2.6.18-128.

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5.3 and NTFS

On Sat, Jun 27, 2009 at 5:40 PM, Alan McKay wrote: > Aa, I'm pulling out my hair over here! > > I have an external USB drive which I had at work, connected just fine > to my CentOS 5.3  box.  I recall there was some jiggery-pokery > involved, but do not recall just what. > > So now I'm on my wi

Re: [CentOS] csgfs repo for CentOS 4

On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 11:22 AM, Bowie Bailey wrote: > Is there any update on the csgfs packages for CentOS 4?  The current > rpms are 10 months old unless I'm looking at the wrong mirror. > > -- > Bowie You may want to join in / watch this CentOS bug report: http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=3

Re: [CentOS] card reader not responding

On Sat, Jun 20, 2009 at 5:04 PM, Akemi Yagi wrote: > On Sat, Jun 20, 2009 at 4:55 PM, Michael Klinosky wrote: > You can check to see if the driver works for your hardware.  Run the > lspci command (hint: -n option) and find the device ID.  Compare it > against the following info prov

Re: [CentOS] VMWARE tools on Centos 5.2

On Sun, Jun 21, 2009 at 5:25 AM, Dag Wieers wrote: > VMwareTools is a kludge. It is sad to see how bad a piece of software can be > written by a big company like EMC. Here is a list: open-vm-tools may be a solution. The kmod package included is kABI-tracking. http://people.centos.org/hughesjr/o

Re: [CentOS] card reader not responding

On Sat, Jun 20, 2009 at 4:55 PM, Michael Klinosky wrote: > > Akemi Yagi wrote: > > You might want to try the kernel drivers Alan Bartlett built about > > half an hour ago and released from the ELRepo site ( http://elrepo.org > > ).  The details are in this CentOS fo

Re: [CentOS] card reader not responding

On Sat, Jun 20, 2009 at 6:51 AM, Michael Klinosky wrote: > I saved pictures on an SD card with my Nokia phone (1 GB). Now, I'm > trying to use the card on my Acer Aspire 3680 (laptop) running 5.3 and > gnome. > > Popping the card in (until it clicks) evokes nothing from the system log > or dmesg, a

Re: [CentOS] kABI-tracking kmod-xfs for CentOS-4 (Was: Preventing hour-long fsck on ext3-filesystem)

On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 2:54 PM, Shad L. Lords wrote: > > All the CentOS-4 kmod-xfs have now been promoted to the extras/centosplus > > repositories. > > To call these packages kABI tracking is misleading.  They are kernel > version independent but they don't track the kABI like the el5 packages

Re: [CentOS] applying kernel patch

On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 11:39 AM, Filipe Brandenburger wrote: > > Hi, > > First of all, please do not top post and trim your replies. > > On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 14:31, Mfawa Alfred Onen > wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 7:17 PM, Filipe Brandenburger > > wrote: > >> This information should b

Re: [CentOS] kABI-tracking kmod-xfs for CentOS-4 (Was: Preventing hour-long fsck on ext3-filesystem)

On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 8:24 AM, Akemi Yagi wrote: > On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 1:51 PM, Tru Huynh wrote: >> On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 08:16:42AM -0700, Akemi Yagi wrote: >>> Here is the updated version: >>> >>> http://centos.toracat.org/kmods/CentOS-4/xfs/SRPMS/

Re: [CentOS] OT: rebuild kmod rpm package from src.rpm

On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 1:55 AM, carlopmart wrote: > Hi all, > >  I would like to rebuild a kmod.src.rpm package for a specific kernel. > When I try to do it, this message appears: > > Building target platforms: i686 > Building for target i686 > error: Failed build dependencies: >          kernel-x

Re: [CentOS] PAE or use 64-bit?

On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 8:30 PM, Filipe Brandenburger wrote: > Even though PAE might work reasonably well if you have 4GB or 6GB or > 8GB and with your current applications, 64-bit will keep working well > when you need to upgrade your machine to 16GB or 32GB and run > additional applications or ne

Re: [CentOS] How to remove the wrong wireless firmware module

On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 7:12 AM, David McGuffey wrote: > BTW, it appears that support for the Broadcom wireless device is not in the > CentOS repositories. I think I 'm going to have to download the Broadcom > files and "make" the firmware module. I'd like to avoid that...any guidance? You might

Re: [CentOS] Yum update failure

On Sat, May 30, 2009 at 5:30 PM, wrote: > Hi, > > I have 5.3 and am trying to do the latest update: > >  sudo yum  update > > Resolving Dependencies > --> Running transaction check (snip) > ---> Package file.i386 0:4.17-15.el5_3.1 set to be updated > --> Processing Dependency: /usr/share/magic.m

Re: [CentOS] Thinkpad T60 - Intel 3945ABG wireless

On Sat, May 30, 2009 at 11:39 AM, Julian Thomas wrote: > Centos 5.3 won't activate this. Anyone know if there is a way to get it > going, and if so, how? 3945 is fully supported in CentOS 5.3. Have you checked the Wiki? http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/Laptops/Wireless?highlight=(wireless)#head-0

Re: [CentOS] Adding a kernel module to the ISO/installer initrd?

On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 10:17 AM, Tim Nelson wrote: > Because of the sheer number of box (re)installations we do that have a CentOS > base, I've converted our provisioning process to PXE. However, I've found > that an alarming number of motherboards are coming with the Realtek RTL8168 > ethern

[CentOS] kABI-tracking kmod-xfs for CentOS-4 (Was: Preventing hour-long fsck on ext3-filesystem)

On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 1:51 PM, Tru Huynh wrote: > On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 08:16:42AM -0700, Akemi Yagi wrote: >> Here is the updated version: >> >> http://centos.toracat.org/kmods/CentOS-4/xfs/SRPMS/ >> >> Please discard the obsoleted ones (I did not bump the ve

Re: [CentOS] Preventing hour-long fsck on ext3-filesystem

On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 7:14 AM, Akemi Yagi wrote: > On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 12:46 AM, Tru Huynh wrote: >> We can push either version in the next weeks, say June 15th? >> to their final repositories. Does that sound good? > > Not quite.  That version is now obsolete

Re: [CentOS] Preventing hour-long fsck on ext3-filesystem

On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 12:46 AM, Tru Huynh wrote: > On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 03:07:00PM -0700, Akemi Yagi wrote: >> The one for the .22 centosplus kernel will be nice to have as well. > Btw I have rebuild the kmod-xfs independant version for the .22 kernel > (regular > and

Re: [CentOS] Preventing hour-long fsck on ext3-filesystem

On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 12:46 AM, Tru Huynh wrote: > On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 03:07:00PM -0700, Akemi Yagi wrote: >> The one for the .22 centosplus kernel will be nice to have as well. > Btw I have rebuild the kmod-xfs independant version for the .22 kernel > (regular > and

Re: [CentOS] Preventing hour-long fsck on ext3-filesystem

On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 2:49 PM, Tru Huynh wrote: > On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 10:10:58AM -0700, Akemi Yagi wrote: >> If you are running CentOS-4, the last 2 kernels do not (yet) have >> corresponding kmod-xfs.  You need to wait for CentOS devs to build >> those kmods or to su

Re: [CentOS] ntfs-3g question

On Sat, May 23, 2009 at 10:52 AM, Lanny Marcus wrote: > On Sat, May 23, 2009 at 12:12 PM, Akemi Yagi wrote: > Akemi: I'm using the stock (32 bit) kernel. As I recall, after I > upgraded from CentOS 5.2 to 5.3 and I couldn't see the NTFS partition, > you wrote something a

Re: [CentOS] ntfs-3g question

On Sat, May 23, 2009 at 10:00 AM, Lanny Marcus wrote: > The only possible issue I saw was that after the upgrade to 5.3, it > didn't work. Possibly I needed to wait longer for it to kick in, or > reboot again. Akemi I think commented on that thread. The issue about NTFS and CentOS 5.3 is that th

Re: [CentOS] Missing Thunderbird Updates

On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 3:00 PM, nate wrote: > Ned Slider wrote: > >> I think the point is that there must be something very wrong/broken if >> a) security updates are missing for over a month, and b) people don't >> even like to ask for fear of offending someone, and c) no one really >> talks abo

Re: [CentOS] Missing Thunderbird Updates

On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 3:00 PM, John R Pierce wrote: > >> We can't be the only ones still using C4 i386. > > indeed not.  quite a lot of our development/test systems are Centos 3 > and 4 i386.  Many of them are hardware that doesn't support am64 Yes, my own servers (not many -- nevertheless) are

Re: [CentOS] Missing Thunderbird Updates

On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 2:36 AM, Karanbir Singh wrote: >>> There are a few updates pending, I am going to look into this today. For >>> both c4 and c5. We should be all caught up within the next 24 hrs. >> Any update on this is greatly appreciated.  I'm asking because of this >> forum post [1]: >

Re: [CentOS] Missing Thunderbird Updates

On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 2:33 AM, Karanbir Singh wrote: > Filipe Brandenburger wrote: >> Hello, >> >> I recently noticed that Thunderbird updates are missing from CentOS 5. > > There are a few updates pending, I am going to look into this today. For > both c4 and c5. We should be all caught up with

Re: [CentOS] Preventing hour-long fsck on ext3-filesystem

On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 9:30 AM, Filipe Brandenburger wrote: > Use kmod-xfs from extras (it should be already enabled in your yum > config) unless you already need the centosplus kernel for another > reason. > > See here: > http://wiki.centos.org/AdditionalResources/Repositories/CentOSPlus#line-7

Re: [CentOS] Missing Dependency: /usr/share/magic.mime

On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 9:17 AM, JohnS wrote: > > On Sun, 2009-05-10 at 03:52 -0700, Akemi Yagi wrote: >> Run a 'yum clean all' and try again.  Please see: >> >> http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=3613 >> >> Akemi / toracat > --- > Let the Re

Re: [CentOS] Missing Dependency: /usr/share/magic.mime

On Sun, May 10, 2009 at 3:41 AM, Robert Moskowitz wrote: > Can someone help me figure out what I have to do about to get update to > work with this happening: > --> Processing Dependency: /usr/share/magic.mime for package: httpd > --> Finished Dependency Resolution > httpd-2.2.3-22.el5.centos.i38

Re: [CentOS] Missing Thunderbird Updates

On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 7:35 PM, Filipe Brandenburger wrote: > CentOS Developers, could you please build the RPMs for the latest > version 2.0.0.21, and investigate why the issue with 2.0.0.19 not > being present in the "updates" repo 5.3 happened, and why the new > package 2.0.0.21 was not rebuil

Re: [CentOS] Best mobile SSH client?

On Sun, May 3, 2009 at 5:39 PM, Brian Mathis wrote: > The iphone runs UNIX natively underneath, so if you jailbreak it you > get access to a full openssh install as well as a bash shell.  There > are also ssh terminal apps available from the Apple App store, though > I have not used them so I cann

Re: [CentOS] 5.3 on an EeePC??

On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 11:55 AM, Beartooth wrote: > >        I have an ASUS EeePC 701 (with 2GB of RAM and an 8 GB card), on > which I've installed CentOS on the hard-drive-plus-card. But it can't > even use my eth0. > >   Anybody know what drivers (for wireless as well as ethernet cable) I > nee

Re: [CentOS] Weird performance problem

On Sun, Apr 19, 2009 at 8:34 AM, JohnS wrote: > I don't reacall any one really saying if there was indeed a fix put into > that PAE or any Specific Kernel for CentOS. Can the CentOS Kernel > Builder Comment Please? > > Also See: +1 > http://wiki.centos.org/TipsAndTricks/VMWare_Server?highlight=(1

Re: [CentOS] [centos] libata-core kernel errors

On Sat, Apr 18, 2009 at 4:19 AM, Gordon McLellan wrote: > I'm experiencing lots of kernel errors when reading or writing to a > disk that is part of an mdadm softraid-5 array. Since originally > detecting this problem, I have isolated it to one disk, but I'm not > sure what the cause of the error

Re: [CentOS] 5.3 and XFS

On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 7:21 AM, Karanbir Singh wrote: > Joseph L. Casale wrote: >> I never thought of that given that they come from the plus repo. So its only >> a matter of time then before it appears for the 5.3 kernels... If I have >> time this >> weekend, I'll yank an srpm down from the 5.2

Re: [CentOS] re-install package

On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 10:49 AM, Jerry Geis wrote: > nothing sinister here was not getting HDMI sound on my motherboard, > did some searching > seemed like I needed to update to alsa 1.0.19 so I tried it. compiling > from source. Ran into compile errors so > I wanted to backout to the defaul

Re: [CentOS] Building a kernel without kabichk

On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 7:44 AM, Terry Hull wrote: > It may also be of note that I've done this on two separate machines.  I > guess I'm a little puzzled by this.  It must be true that very few people > actually have to turn off kABI, or this would have come up before.  I know > that I can turn o

Re: [CentOS] Building a kernel without kabichk

On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 7:33 AM, Terry Hull wrote: > > On 4/14/09 3:12 AM, in article > bfa89a870904140112s490d223ch440cf009d20e8...@mail.gmail.com, "Akemi Yagi" > wrote: > >> On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 8:08 PM, Terry Hull wrote: >>>

Re: [CentOS] Building a kernel without kabichk

On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 3:53 PM, Terry Hull wrote: > I’m trying to build a 2.6.18-128.1.6.el5 kernel without kabichk.  I have > downloaded the sources, installed the compiler, etc and ran the following > command > > rpmbuild  -bb --target=`uname -m`  --without kabichk --with baseonly > --without d

Re: [CentOS] mock %post(pam) failure

On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 7:47 AM, Rex Dieter wrote: > Akemi Yagi wrote: >> So, we can use mock-0.9.14 from EPEL on CentOS 5.3 (with the current >> CentOS yum) without any issue? > > of course.  (what would make you think otherwise?) Well, I heard from one of the CentOS devs

Re: [CentOS] mock %post(pam) failure

On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 7:18 AM, Rex Dieter wrote: > interestingly, I can no longer reproduce this failure myself on a recently > upgraded centos-5.3 box using mock-0.9.14 (from epel). So, we can use mock-0.9.14 from EPEL on CentOS 5.3 (with the current CentOS yum) without any issue? Akemi

Re: [CentOS] [SOLVED] Re: Desktop update (32 bit) from 5.2 to 5.3 - fuse & ntfs-3g-mount

On Sat, Apr 11, 2009 at 11:35 AM, Lanny Marcus wrote: > Les: Years ago (before CentOS 5?), I did have a FAT partition like > that. The current SW available for CentOS, for NTFS, has been doing a > great job for me. I don't recall having this problem, with previous > CentOS upgrades, and it was ea

Re: [CentOS] [SOLVED] Re: Desktop update (32 bit) from 5.2 to 5.3 - fuse & ntfs-3g-mount

On Sat, Apr 11, 2009 at 6:26 AM, Lanny Marcus wrote: > On 4/11/09, Akemi Yagi wrote: >> Good to hear things are working again.  When you boot to a new kernel, >> dkms kicks in and rebuilds kernel modules automatically.   You >> probably saw some delay during the first boot

Re: [CentOS] [SOLVED] Re: Desktop update (32 bit) from 5.2 to 5.3 - fuse & ntfs-3g-mount

On Sat, Apr 11, 2009 at 5:15 AM, Lanny Marcus wrote: > Follow on:  I read the 5.3 Release Notes (again) and the NTFS "Tips > and Tricks" on the Wiki (again) and started following the > instructions, again. I am not sure whether it was trying to install > the NTFS packages again, or the shutdown l

Re: [CentOS] Trouble with 5.2==>5.3 upgrade

On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 11:22 AM, fred smith wrote: > I finally, as someone else suggested, downloaded the desired kernel file > from one of the mirrors, did "rpm -uvh" on it followed by "yum -y update" > and it all applied without complaint. Please do NOT install the kernel with the -Uvh option.

Re: [CentOS] DKMS and new(er) Nvidia-drivers

On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 11:19 AM, Scott Silva wrote: > on 4-6-2009 5:55 AM Sorin Srbu spake the following: >> My question is who updates those drivers, as the v173.08 Nvidia drivers are >> now almost a year old? Would there be any other good repo with more current >> drivers suitable for use with

Re: [CentOS] New Centos 5.3 gnome backgroup

On Sun, Apr 5, 2009 at 5:11 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote: >> I just did a Google Image search for "centos 5 wallpaper" and found >> the "old" CentOS 5 background. It was 1024x768 so it was perfect for me. > > I still have a couple systems not upgraded, what is the file name of the > "old" wallpaper

Re: [CentOS] Centos Forum is down??

On Sat, Apr 4, 2009 at 4:41 PM, IT-Oregon Administrator wrote: > I am having a problem logging in too.  Also tried to request my password > but got nothing.  I want to change my settings to daily digest to avoid > flooding my mailbox.  Everytime I wake up I have 100s of messages. If you are talki

Re: [CentOS] live audio feed via telephone link

On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 8:23 AM, JohnS wrote: > > On Sun, 2009-03-29 at 08:54 -0500, Lanny Marcus wrote: > Now, what about a long element yagi? Good, but not dependable. What's wrong with me ??? :-P Akemi YAGI ___ CentOS maili

Re: [CentOS] tar with -N option still picking up old files

On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 3:16 PM, Neil Aggarwal wrote: > Hello: > > I tried this command to tar up a set of data files > updated since yesterday (The data directory contains > multiple files with varying dates): > > /bin/tar -z -c -N 2009-03-25 -f /tmp/test.tgz data > > When I look at the content o

Re: [CentOS] How to get usb storage under /media in runlevel 3?

On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 11:28 AM, Kimmo Koivisto wrote: > Hello > > I have previously used Centos 4.x in runlevel 3, when I plug in my usb > storage device/cd in cd-rom, it is shown under /media, for example > /media/MyUsbStick. > > Now in Centos 5.2, when I insert usb storage device, nothing is s

Re: [CentOS] Correct way to provide kernel patch

On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 1:24 PM, Chris Miller wrote: > > I work with a USB device that is intercepted by the USB HID driver. > In order to stop this behavior, the device needs to be added to the > HID blacklist (hid-core.c) and a custom kernel needs to be compiled. > > If I create a CentOS specifi

Re: [CentOS] That RTL8169 thing...

2009/3/16 Drew Weaver : > Motherboard - Intel DG41TY > > Device: RealTek: 8111D > > Driver: RTL8169 > > Causes Kernel panic during install and boot. > It seems that the newer the card that uses this driver, the worse the > problems are. > Is there any plan to roll a newer version into the install

Re: [CentOS] Unable to use DRBD after a reboot

On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 1:42 AM, Fabian Arrotin wrote: > robert mena wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I have two servers in a drbd primary/secondary setup.   Everything was >> fine until I had to reboot both servers. >> rpm -qa | grep drbd >> drbd82-8.2.6-1.el5.centos >> kmod-drbd82-8.2.6-2 >> >> Kernel 2.6.1

Re: [CentOS] Video Editing

On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 7:33 AM, Bo Lynch wrote: > On Wed, March 11, 2009 8:30 am, Akemi Yagi wrote: >> On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 5:05 AM, Bo Lynch >> wrote: >>> This is kind of a new area for me so I thought I would get the lists >>> opinion. >>> I have

Re: [CentOS] Video Editing

On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 5:05 AM, Bo Lynch wrote: > This is kind of a new area for me so I thought I would get the lists opinion. > I have a avi video that I need to edit. The main thing that I need to > accomplish is to maybe cut the top 1/3 of the frame and blur out a few > faces. What would you

[CentOS] Please test kmod packages for CentOS-4

Hello, There are currently 3 kmod packages in CentOS-4 that require re-installation upon each kernel update: kmod-drbd kmod-drbd82 kmod-xfs CentOS is going to offer a kernel-independent version of these kmod packages. With this version, you install once, and they should survive kernel updates.

Re: [CentOS] Why are multiple architecture rpms installed?

On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 4:47 AM, Marten Lehmann wrote: > Hello, > > I noticed, that whenever I install a package on CentOS 5.x, rpms for > multiple architectures are installed: See, for example, for a solution: http://www.centos.org/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?topic_id=17812 > Thats pretty annoy

Re: [CentOS] Need Broadcom 4311 firmware for CentOS 5

On Tue, Mar 3, 2009 at 12:49 PM, Phil Schaffner wrote: > Robert Nichols wrote: >> Any hope of getting my laptop's Broadcom BCM94311 wireless running >> on CentOS 5? >> I was hoping that CentOS 5.3 might >> include a backported b43 driver, but I grabbed a preliminary >> version of the new kernel (

Re: [CentOS] centos.plus kernels

2009/2/24 Rob Kampen : > > Alain Terriault wrote: >> I experienced 3 problems that i am 99% sure related to >> kernel-2.6.18-92.1.22.el5.centos.plus.x86_64.rpm You cannot be sure 99% until you can reproduce the problems... >> #1 on a nfs server >> problem : constantly appearing on all my machine

Re: [CentOS] Recover rpm DB corrupted by disk failure?

On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 8:59 AM, Bill Campbell wrote: > On Mon, Feb 23, 2009, Bart Schaefer wrote: >>Over the weekend my workstation (still on CentOS 3) started showing >>SMART errors, so we shut it down and moved everything onto a new >>drive. On reboot, the RPM database reports as corrupted and

Re: [CentOS] Is the NFS lockd bug fixed ? (update)

On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 8:13 AM, Alain Terriault wrote: > problematic setup : > nfs server was running 2.6.18-92.1.22.el5.centos.plus > clients where running 2.6.18-92.1.22.el5.x86_64 > > healty setup : > nfs server is running 2.6.18-92.1.22.el5.x86_64 + kmod-xfs-0.4-2 > clients are still on

Re: [CentOS] Is the NFS lockd bug fixed ?

On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 7:57 AM, Filipe Brandenburger wrote: > Hi, > > On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 10:44, Alain Terriault wrote: >> I am runing x86_64 versions of "kernel-2.6.18-92.1.22.el5.centos.plus" ( >> i need XFS) > > You no longer need CentOS Plus kernel for XFS. > > See: > http://wiki.centos.

Re: [CentOS] network driver at installation time

On Sun, Feb 15, 2009 at 7:34 PM, Jerry Geis wrote: > Is there anyway to load a network driver at installation time. Centos > 5.2 x86_64. The driver disks are available. Please check out Section 7 of: http://wiki.centos.org/AdditionalResources/HardwareList/RealTekRTL8111b Akemi _

Re: [CentOS] Missing EL4 glibc update

On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 11:11 AM, Scott Silva wrote: > on 2-12-2009 3:08 AM CentOS User spake the following: >> Seeing upstream has an update for glibc >> http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2009-0052.html >> I rebuilt the glibc-2.3.4-2.41.el4_7.1.src.rpm and >> it produced the following rpms :- >>

Re: [CentOS] OT: Digital Video Editor for CentOS 5.2 - Suggestions?

On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 6:09 AM, Lanny Marcus wrote: > On Tue, Aug 5, 2008 at 4:36 PM, Akemi Yagi wrote: >> On Tue, Aug 5, 2008 at 2:26 PM, Lanny Marcus >> wrote: >>> We are finally going to replace our VHS-C Camcorder, with a Digital >>> Camcorder, tomorrow.

Re: [CentOS] update for 5.3

On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 12:08 PM, Scott Silva wrote: > on 2-5-2009 9:56 AM Jerry Geis spake the following: >> By the way, KB, when I got married I had the understanding that I at >> least got a new computer every year! >> Got to set things straight from the beginning! >> >> Seriously, have a great

Re: [CentOS] Missing latest kmod-xfs and kmod-drbd82?

On Wed, Feb 4, 2009 at 7:25 AM, Alan Sparks wrote: > Alan Sparks wrote: >> Since December there have been several kernel updates to the centosplus >> repository for centos4... but no updates to kmod-xfs or kmod-drbd82. >> Latest kernel is 2.6.9-78.0.13.plus.c4, but latest kmod-xfs is >> 2.6.9_78.0

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5.3

On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 7:57 AM, wrote: > Hey folks! > Does any one have an idea as to when centOS 5.3 will be out Please see http://www.centos.org/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?topic_id=18223&forum=37 >and if so then I would like to hear from you coz I am waiting for it day and >night coz I hea

Re: [CentOS] OT: Digital Video Editor for CentOS 5.2 - Suggestions?

On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 5:37 AM, Lanny Marcus wrote: > On Tue, Aug 5, 2008 at 4:36 PM, Akemi Yagi wrote: >> Cinelerra. It is very powerful, and Dag kindly added to his repo >> quite sometime ago. >> http://cinelerra.org/ > Akemi: A follow on to last nights message. A

Re: [CentOS] OT? File order on CentOS/Samba server

On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 3:20 PM, Les Mikesell wrote: > The quick/dirty fix might be to cifs-mount a windows directory where the > linux side wants to see it and let the windows side work natively if > that gives the behavior you want. Using the automounter might help if > the windows side is not

Re: [CentOS] RHEL 5.3 released

On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 4:04 PM, Karanbir Singh wrote: > Akemi Yagi wrote: >> >> http://www.centos.org/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?topic_id=18223&forum=37 >> > > Would it be possible to migrate this info to a wiki page ? So more > people can edit the main con

Re: [CentOS] RHEL 5.3 released

On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 2:03 PM, Scott Silva wrote: > on 1-20-2009 1:40 PM Pasi � spake the following: >> Hello list! >> >> http://www.redhat.com/about/news/prarchive/2009/rhel_5_3.html >> >> kernel (2.6.18-128.el5) changelog: >> http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2009-0225.html >> >> -- Pasi > > I

<    3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   >