On Thu, 30 Jul 2009, Jason Pyeron wrote:
As I have said before, I have experience in this matter and we have a current
relationship with tucows. Would the team like our help? We can't and won't
unless asked.
The letter was done in the fashion it was in sorrow, and not
in anger, as my blog
indicated and of record at the
customary keyservers
See:
http://orcorc.blogspot.com/2008/08/gnupg-few-minutes-on-using-detached-and.html
user: R P Herrold herr...@owlriver.com
1024-bit DSA key, ID 9B649644, created 2003-02-09
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux
On Wed, 22 Jul 2009, Christopher G. Stach II wrote:
- David Knierim dknie...@gmail.com wrote:
I am adding code to my installation on dom0 (running CentOS
5.3) to monitor for hardware faults. If there is an issue,
I want to propagate the status to all of the domUs (running
CentOS 4.x
On Tue, 21 Jul 2009, Scott Silva wrote:
You can loopback mount the dvd image, but I don't think you
could easily loopback mount the cd images and get a proper
directory structure.
A little massaging is needed and simple image loopback mounts
seem 'touchy' in practice as outlined in the
On Fri, 3 Jul 2009, Bogdan Nicolescu wrote:
In all fairness to all the rebels, if somebody from the
Cento's team would have responded in a timely matter to the
original yes/no question of this thread,
... and an allegedly 'yes or no' question can take three and a
half 24 line screens to
On Fri, 3 Jul 2009, Bogdan Nicolescu wrote:
BUT... when someone from the Centos team makes a statement
like ...latest release has many up-to-date desktop
packages...
ummm -- it is of course true that changes happen; rebasings do
as well; and the CentOS project [and the upstream] document
On Thu, 2 Jul 2009, Chadley Wilson wrote:
I was a bit quick on the assumption there, I was looking specifically for the
anaconda-runtime src.
But now I see that there isn't specifically a source for the
anaconda-runtime, the source for the rpm is anaconda, is that correct?
If you examine a
On Tue, 30 Jun 2009, Ned Slider wrote:
Rather than dumping *even more work* on the core CentOS project (who are
already clearly struggling to provide even the core distro
at present), ...
It may be clear to Ned, but is not the case.
I wish people not in the know would not purport to
On Tue, 30 Jun 2009, Radu-Cristian FOTESCU wrote:
But I *do* have a problem with RPM Fusion and Karanbir's repo, because
they keep packages in testing even if nothing happens (they could stay
there until 2014, right?).
oh _+please+_ troll elsewhere .. no-one forces you to use any
third
On Wed, 24 Jun 2009, Michael A. Peters wrote:
Is there something funny about rpm in Fedora 11 that causes cpio errors
when trying to install src.rpm's in CentOS 5.3, or am I just getting
repeated bad downloads?
the former. I covered the matter and a workaround within RPM
in a series of blog
On Wed, 17 Jun 2009, Joshua Bahnsen wrote:
I assume you mean this?
http://www.redhat.com/legal/legal_statement.html
That is an assumption you make, all right --- that page does
not state it is exhaustive, however ...
What I mean is, is there a specific Red Hat web page that
defines what
On Wed, 17 Jun 2009, Joshua Bahnsen wrote:
I don't want to cause any trouble here, but what does this
have to do with generating advisory information that is
provided by the vendor?
... if you won't acknowledge the landmines, you get blown
up, eventually, I hear
I believe this
On Tue, 12 May 2009, Ralph Angenendt wrote:
Okay. I'm waiting for comments here - php as a scripting language?
Strange :)
not at all -- have used it for years; did a LUG presentation
as well. It can live well in the inittab and run as a daemon
process for very rapid prototyping.
On Tue, 12 May 2009, William L. Maltby wrote:
For widest possible coverage, something like bash should be considered.
curious -- when coding under that criterion, I end up at:
/bin/sh
in my script's shebang ;)
-- Russ herrold
___
On Tue, 12 May 2009, William L. Maltby wrote:
On Tue, 2009-05-12 at 11:42 -0400, R P Herrold wrote:
For widest possible coverage, something like bash should be considered.
curious -- when coding under that criterion, I end up at:
/bin/sh
in my script's shebang ;)
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root
On Sat, 9 May 2009, David Dreggors wrote:
Oh I have exhausted all those means. I even went into the alsa site
looking for answers. I have seen many *similar* issues and have tried a
few of the fixes (mostly modprobe.conf options). None have worked.
I have a page on the CentOS forums for
On Wed, 29 Apr 2009, Phil Schaffner wrote:
R P Herrold wrote:
On Wed, 29 Apr 2009, Ned Slider wrote:
unknown prior wrote ...
There's always going to be an argument about whether to
put /boot and swap on RAID. It's all about performance
most of the time being slightly better versus
On Thu, 30 Apr 2009, Marcus Moeller wrote:
I personally cannot agree on that. Syncing /boot 'manually' adds much
more complexibility, unless you add scripts that automate the process.
Setup:
/etc/yum.conf contains a:
exclude=kernel\*
/etc/yum-kernel.conf does not
Actions:
On Wed, 29 Apr 2009, Sean Gilligan wrote:
Russ Herrold added the special note on OpenJDK, hopefully he will
chime in.
Sean, I think you are on the right track; I would refactor
the java articles into a couple of them in a sub-tree, with
a chooser at the head, probably forming on pre/post
On Thu, 30 Apr 2009, pjwelsh wrote:
On 04/30/2009 10:22 AM, R P Herrold wrote:
...
To respond to 'the consensus ... overwhelmingly' remark, the
mice also overwhelmingly voted to bell the cat. Counting
noses does not make a bad answer more correct; using raid
rather than flat RO /boot
On Wed, 29 Apr 2009, Ned Slider wrote:
There's always going to be an argument about whether to put /boot and swap
on RAID. It's all about performance most of the time being slightly better
versus stability in the event of device failure.
I can't think of a good argument for not having
On Wed, 29 Apr 2009, nate wrote:
It's more about the repositories themselves, the QA behind them,
the integration of packages. A single unified source for patches,
security fixes etc.
From Debian 5.0 (lenny):
Total package names: 29647 (1186k)
Normal packages: 22400
Pure virtual
On Thu, 23 Apr 2009, Ugo Bellavance wrote:
Mintairov Mihail a écrit :
Hello All, I have a problem with hwclock on centos 5.3. in xen guest
environment.
# hwclock --debug
hwclock from util-linux-2.13-pre7
hwclock: Open of /dev/rtc failed, errno=19: No such device.
No usable clock interface
On Wed, 8 Apr 2009, fred smith wrote:
Downloading Packages:
(1/1): kernel-2.6.18-128. 100% |=| 15 MB05:41
http://centos.mirror.nac.net/5.3/updates/i386/RPMS/kernel-2.6.18-128.1.6.el5.i686.rpm:
[Errno -1] Package does not match intended download
Trying other
On Wed, 8 Apr 2009, Blake Hudson wrote:
Any reason these bad mirrors are not pulled out of the
rotation? I had no idea that a single old mirror would stop
yum in its tracks.
They are. The offending mirror was identified as stale by the
mirrorlist system, and has aged out at this point
On Fri, 3 Apr 2009, Anne Wilson wrote:
The takeaway was that I need to 'test as I do, and do as I
test'. My testing regime will have to include 'cloning' a
test box, and simply 'moving into it' for an afternoon when
doing 'updates' QA testing.
I took it for granted that CentOS would be
On Wed, 1 Apr 2009, Paul Heinlein wrote:
I don't know if it's a bug or a feature, but the
filesystem-2.4.0-2.el5.centos rpm won't upgrade cleanly if /home is an
NFS filesystem.
I confirm this is present in 5.3 where /home is an NFS mount,
and that I missed it in testing. A workaround is:
On Thu, 2 Apr 2009, Anne Wilson wrote:
It seems Paul and I are the last two users of NFS mounted
/home left.
I have /home exported and ran the upgrade from this laptop over the network,
where that directory is mounted and displayed in a folderview under KDE4. I
had no problems whatsoever.
On Thu, 2 Apr 2009, Paul Heinlein wrote:
I just kicked everyone off, killed all apps with open file descriptors
on /home, umounted /home, upgraded the rpm, then re-mounted /home.
That worked just fine.
I confer 42 geek points on Paul -- hope that's enough to buy
armor to protect him from the
On Thu, 2 Apr 2009, Olaf Mueller wrote:
Paul Heinlein wrote:
I don't know if it's a bug or a feature, but the
filesystem-2.4.0-2.el5.centos rpm won't upgrade cleanly if /home is an
NFS filesystem.
No problem here, /home is exported as nfs4 with sec=kerb5.
As noted later, the problem is
On Thu, 2 Apr 2009, Hywel Richards wrote:
I've got 7 machines here with NFSed /home (and the same problem with the
filesystem rpm).
Should I implement the workaround suggested by Russ for each machine, or
will a fixed rpm come along eventually? (I'm not impatient!)
Thank you for the
On Thu, 2 Apr 2009, Michael A. Peters wrote:
My guess is a scriptlet is failing - quite possibly because an SELinux
chcon command fails in those conditions. They probably need to change
the chcon portion of the scriptlet to add a ||: after the command so it
doesn't bomb out.
Guessing is fun
I have been working with a new translator for the project and
particularly the wiki (whom I have known for perhaps 18
months), and he has put up a test translation for the centos
5.3 release notes at:
http://www.msamir.net/centos-release-notes/
I have encouraged him to subscribe here,
On Mon, 30 Mar 2009, RedShift wrote:
Hello,
Glenn Matthys, answering your page...
;)
taking my particular queston to a PM
-- Russ herrold
___
CentOS-docs mailing list
CentOS-docs@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs
On Mon, 16 Mar 2009, Lanny Marcus wrote:
The web site for CentOS is not responding. I can ping it OK, but the
web site is not responding to http requests from my browser. If the
webmaster should happen to read this...
working fine here, and from two other test locations -- it
might make more
On Sat, 7 Mar 2009, Les Mikesell wrote:
If you think respins containing Centos branding are wrong, make it easy
to to the right thing.
Thanks for offering to have me do work for something I don't
consider a core (or really, a desireable) goal, Les --- I can
always count on you to ask others
On Sat, 7 Mar 2009, Robert Heller wrote:
At Fri, 06 Mar 2009 23:31:08 +0100 CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org
wrote:
I am also not sure if I need to update any of the files the installer
uses to install the system -- is it enough to just drop the alternitive
mkinitrd rpm? Do I need to
On Wed, 18 Feb 2009, Robert Heller wrote:
How big and what engine is the db to be secured?
every 5mins
Backing up that often doesn't make sense to me. If you need to have it
that frequently you better go for a slave or write to two backends.
I have to wonder when I see these kind of
On Tue, 17 Feb 2009, Ralph Angenendt wrote:
moreni...@cdsl.cl wrote:
Well Ralph, anyway, If I paste the 20 pages on the wiki, I will have the
problem with the licence. I want to be free to licence my documentation
with GFDL or another that could be enought free for me. And put pressure
for
On Tue, 17 Feb 2009, moreni...@cdsl.cl wrote:
here. And after have explained what and where I want to contribute, I was
almost forced to re-licence or change the licence of my documentation (and
you didn't think that someone could want to keep his freedom and publish
his documentation with
On Fri, 30 Jan 2009, Filipe Brandenburger wrote:
This is wrong, should be [ $NUMBEROFPRO -gt 150 ] instead.
or for those who are used to being burned:
[ 0$NUMBEROFPRO -gt 150 ]
-- Russ herrold
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
On Fri, 16 Jan 2009, nate wrote:
I would not use CentOS at all if for anything else than Oracle
won't support it. Oracle linux is a clone of RHEL and I believe
is pretty cheap, otherwise RHEL 5 Advanced.
ummm .. a recent UBL was a rebuild of CentOS SRPMs
- Rhss herrold
On Wed, 14 Jan 2009, pjwelsh wrote:
On 01/13/2009 03:48 PM, R P Herrold wrote:
1. Don't
2. Package it
Option 3: *HOPE/PRAY* epel, rpmforge, DAG or rpmfusion has it (or a src.rpm)
I dread, almost more than anything, trying to figure out how to get some
perl modules packaged
On Wed, 14 Jan 2009, jk...@kinz.org wrote:
As a result, the Perl community attitude towards CentOS/RHEL is
disdainful to the point of contempt. At least for the portion of the
community I contacted about the issue.
If a 'unknown' person wants posting authorization, I think it
is probably a
On Tue, 13 Jan 2009, jk...@kinz.org wrote:
First items i want to add to the wiki are:
#1 - some notes about how to use Perl and cpan on Centos
proabbly in section 16 on the how to page.
http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos
Two possible entries come to mind as welcome in a CentOS
context:
On Mon, 12 Jan 2009, Vandaman wrote:
There are security updates upstream for CentOS (4 and 5)
and it looks like the CentOS 5 ones have been rebuilt
and rolled out. How come the CentOS 4 branch lags behind,
or are the CentOS 5 devs different from the CentOS 4 devs?
If more volunteers are
On Mon, 12 Jan 2009, Vandaman wrote:
R P Herrold wrote:
... you do NOT file bugs in the bug tracker to make formal
your concern.
I made last month about security updates missing for almost
a month.
no bug - no issue.
Members of the CentOS community should, in a free world be
able
On Fri, 9 Jan 2009, Warren, Eucke wrote:
... To suggest a shaming only makes the Centos community
look bad as it would be done so without understanding the
entire environment and situation.
Thank you for the restrained reply, Eucke
Wearing my '@centos.org' hat, let me add that I strongly
On Thu, 8 Jan 2009, Scott Silva wrote:
on 1-8-2009 1:28 PM Warren, Eucke spake the following:
Is there a process for finding status updates to open bugs
within Centos?
-- view it in a web browser, and optionally 'monitor' it so
emails of updated state are received
-- offer to buy support
On Thu, 8 Jan 2009, Amos Shapira wrote:
I found Perl's Conf::INI module but it expects comments beginning with
;, not #.
and
| sed -e 's...@^#@;@g'
cannot cure that bad habit on generated files or an input
stream?
[herr...@centos-5 ~]$ cat - END | sed -e 's...@^#@;@g'
one
two#two
On Sat, 3 Jan 2009, Dag Wieers wrote:
On Sat, 3 Jan 2009, R P Herrold wrote:
On Fri, 2 Jan 2009, Vitor Afonso Strabello wrote:
Can I post a link to the prominent North American
Enterprise Linux vendor about it also?
https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2008-0397.html
Counsel
On Sun, 4 Jan 2009, Dag Wieers wrote:
On Sun, 4 Jan 2009, R P Herrold wrote:
On Sat, 3 Jan 2009, Dag Wieers wrote:
On Sat, 3 Jan 2009, R P Herrold wrote:
Counsel for the PNAELV expressly asked that CentOS NOT 'deep
link' into their site.
Do we have the complete text available ?
yes -- I
On Thu, 4 Dec 2008, Matej Cepl wrote:
On 2008-12-04, 00:42 GMT, Christopher Chan wrote:
What would you pick? Learn a few new commands/configuration
files or have to prep up a new desktop rollout every six
months?
12 -- Fedora 8 is still pretty good and only now you would have
to switch to
On Mon, 17 Nov 2008, Tom Brown wrote:
Currently devs check code into perforce and we have to checkout package
update repo deploy
I know this could be scripted but are there any tools out
there that can take code from a repository and build rpm's
in a continuous integration type manner? I
On Tue, 11 Nov 2008, Karanbir Singh wrote:
The sheer existence of this stale content on the wiki today,
makes me and other people think that the idea of moving
content isn't going to work at all. It's too short sighted,
ill-conceived and badly implemented.
yup, probably won't work well, [GI
On Tue, 28 Oct 2008, Tom Brown wrote:
I need to create some local users but then 'disable' that user. I know i can
enable and disable the user by using usermod -L and -U but does anyone know
if there is a way for me to see the current status of the user? ie locked or
unlocked?
[EMAIL
On Sun, 26 Oct 2008, Spike Turner wrote:
R P Herrold wrote:
You know after all this time the CentOS frontpage
is still showing out of date info.
Please remind me of your bug number filed on this. I have
read all new filings to date and must have missed it.
-- Russ herrold
On Thu, 23 Oct 2008, Spike Turner wrote:
totalitarian republic of CentOS. I believe an announcement
All sources used by CentOS are freely available under a
distributable license, as are those for patched RPMs
consistent with its GPL obligation when _distributing_ the
product of another;
On Fri, 17 Oct 2008, Scott Silva wrote:
This thread has got to have beaten the CentOS record for
most posts about nothing!
Or the longest off-topic thread about off-topic threads!
or a sad demonstation by people who know better ignoring
Godwin's Law
If people are unwilling to follow long
On Thu, 16 Oct 2008, John R Pierce wrote:
I'd have to suggest that the 'default' list (eg this one) should be the most
general and beginner oriented, and any new additional lists should be the
ones with the narrower focus (centos-tech, for instance, or centos-sysadmin).
in my experience with
On Sun, 5 Oct 2008, Akemi Yagi wrote:
I always welcome people who wish to help make our wiki
better and up-to-date. The java page is referenced quite
often not only in the forums but in all other channels.
You might want to coordinate with MikaelFridh whose name
appears as the maintainer
On Sun, 5 Oct 2008, Akemi Yagi wrote:
I have been wondering on this subject. Why not make the menu (info
and other options) available to people who do not have edit rights?
dunno for sure -- preventing 'lowhanging fruit' automated
webbish spamming comes to mind
-- Russ herrold
On Wed, 17 Sep 2008, Marcus Moeller wrote:
...
If you want me to say we should replace the Website by the Wiki, I will :)
I agree on that. There is nearly nothing that couldn't be done in the
wiki (but the forums and the mirrorlist). Even the news could be part
of the wiki if they are
On Sat, 13 Sep 2008, Karanbir Singh wrote:
Do we have a policy w.r.t adding details about packages in
the testing repo on the wiki ?
(sad but true mode answer) add a ! and tell them in a red box:
1. chime in as to results
2. do not rely on systematic security AT ALL on these
On Sat, 13 Sep 2008, RobertH wrote:
Any 4.7 update issues or horror stories yet?
Part of the QA which I mentioned earlier in the week was
looking for problems. This late in point respins of the 4
series, however, nothing major comes to mind from the looking
we did during that testing.
On Sat, 13 Sep 2008, Shad L. Lords wrote:
James Pearson wrote:
I can't find the kernel-2.6.9-78.0.1.EL.src.rpm and
kernel-2.6.9-78.0.1.plus.c4.src.rpm on the download sites - the binary
i386/x86_64 RPMS are there, but not the matching SRPMs
There are actually quite a few missing sources:
On Sat, 13 Sep 2008, John R Pierce wrote:
RobertH wrote:
Marcus,
Exactly, I have often wondered upstream does it that way so that I always
have to go fix the /etc/hosts file after every CentOS install.
Since functionally, it is wrong.
indeed, having the hostname bound to the loopback
On Thu, 11 Sep 2008, Todd Deshane wrote:
My experience has primarly been with Xen.
I have helped a company successfully deploy Xen on CentOS. They had
a really nice cobbler setup and were able to leverage it nicely to make
the transition to virtuals easy.
They found our running xen book
On Thu, 11 Sep 2008, MHR wrote:
On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 12:26 AM, Anne Wilson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I had similar messages on this laptop. Acer accepted liability and replaced
the disk.
I'm pretty sure the Seagate warranty is no longer in force - most of
them are a year.
you
On Wed, 10 Sep 2008, Joseph L. Casale wrote:
My boss seems most interested in a paid XenSource enterprise solution,
which apparently runs on CentOS?
You can't even do a snapshot in xensource yet.
umm ...
xm save (domain-id) (state-file)
... misc copy actions
xm restore
On Wed, 10 Sep 2008, Scott Silva wrote:
on 9-10-2008 1:02 AM Josh Donovan spake the following:
Hi folks,
Normally people ask when is CentOS 4.7 coming and they
are told when it is ready. Dag posted on his blog about
it going to testing in July while it was supposed to be
syncing to the
On Tue, 9 Sep 2008, Miark wrote:
My wife's office server was compromised today. It appears
they ssh'ed in through
ehh? exposed to the public internet? oh my ;)
account pcguest which was set up for Samba. (I don't
remember setting up that account, but maybe I did.)
ssh will of course
On Thu, 4 Sep 2008, Spiro Harvey, Knossos Networks Ltd wrote:
A final point I'll note is that this is a CentOS list, aimed
at helping people with CentOS. It's not a place to spam with
ads for your website unless they are CentOS specific.
* cough *nor even then --- We encounter this in
On Mon, 1 Sep 2008, Paul wrote:
Hmmm, Processor Technologies used to have a voice coil actuated dual
drive that shared it between both drives IIRC. Interesting drive with a
motorized eject, thing is you had to wait for the disk to complete eject
before you grabbed it, if you grabbed it before
On Thu, 28 Aug 2008, Robert wrote:
We might be entering first liar don't have a chance
territory here. Do you remember where you were when Kennedy
was shot?
sadly, yes
I was in the last Ramac 305 class ever held, on
lunch break and had watched the motorcade pass from a
lunchroom window.
On Fri, 29 Aug 2008, Jim Perrin wrote:
On Fri, Aug 29, 2008 at 8:58 AM, R P Herrold [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
you win ;) -- I don't want to be older, and in my head, I'm still in my
twenties.
Face it. Your golden buckeye card has a registration number of 1. you
cannot escape this fact
On Thu, 28 Aug 2008, William L. Maltby wrote:
PIKER! I've mobos still running (when I fire 'em up). Although I'm
seriously considering ditching the 386SX with Win 3.11. Don't find any
three words: Processor Tech Sol
-- Russ herrold
___
CentOS
On Thu, 28 Aug 2008, Akemi Yagi wrote:
three words: Processor Tech Sol
-- Russ herrold
Ahh, I was waiting for you to show up. OK, everyone, if you are
trying to show your age, stop now -- because no one can win orc_orc
(Russ, our CentOS dev).
Actually from slightly before that era, I
PROTECTED] .gnupg]$ gpg --clearsign import-key-howto.txt
You need a passphrase to unlock the secret key for
user: R P Herrold [EMAIL PROTECTED]
1024-bit DSA key, ID 9B649644, created 2003-02-09
File`import-key-howto.txt.asc' exists. Overwrite? (y/N) y
[EMAIL PROTECTED] .gnupg]$
10
On Fri, 22 Aug 2008, R P Herrold wrote:
... Hopefully this attched writeup will transit the CentOS
mailing list manager intact. I also include it inline below,
but this may mangle the signature.
'attached' of course -- part of the 'orc_orc' spelling
authenticity test. ;)
Following up
On Wed, 13 Aug 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
1) I have the following in it:
clearpart --all
which is OK if I am installing over a previous installation. But for new
machines it does not seem to recognize the clearpart or it is not enough
because I am still prompted whether I want to
On Tue, 5 Aug 2008, Matt wrote:
I am wanting to uninstall an rpm off my CentOS 4.6 box. Namely
caching-nameserver. Is there anywhere I can look at the uninstall
script to see what it all does on its way out?
Run as an unpriv'd user:
rpm -q --scripts caching-nameserver
will show
On Tue, 5 Aug 2008, Mohsen Pahlevanzadeh wrote:
When i install CentOS, it doesn't install yum package. How i
do it? when i haven't yum, it is like that i haven't
apt-get. Please help me
you appeared in the IRC channel earlier today, and were told
that the fork you are runing -- a
On Sat, 19 Jul 2008, Marcus Moeller wrote:
Dear Russ.
I wonder what in the world, which is material, you think is
** not ** covereed between the Ed Bailey, and the Eric
Foster-Johnson, the GuruLabs resources (each down those
links).
I am speaking about the CentOS Wiki and nothing more. I
On Sat, 19 Jul 2008, Alan Bartlett wrote:
Have you replied to Russ Herrold's comment? Perhaps I missed it.
No, but others did and I agree with their comments.
I think it would have been polite of you to have responded to Russ'
comments. (Speaking as an Englishman.)
Polite to one side, as
On Sat, 19 Jul 2008, Martyn Hare wrote:
Yes but Linus could be guest speaker at LinuxChix, Bill has to pay for
his women ;-)
hey now -- she worked in tech too -- a product manager for
MSFT's 'Bob' product (clippy on steroids) ... oh, hmmm, so he
_did_ indirectly pay for ...
Never mind --
On Fri, 11 Jul 2008, Filipe Brandenburger wrote:
As discussed on the centos-users list, I would like to create some
pages on the CentOS Wiki with instructions on how to set up your
environment to build RPMs and how to rebuild RPMs.
ummm ... it exists several places .. also, out pointers at:
On Thu, 10 Jul 2008, Clint Dilks wrote:
I have been following the instructions here
http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/JavaOnCentOS but trying to modify them for
jdk-6u7-linux-amd64.rpm but there doesn't see to be a compatible
java-1.6.0-sun-compat-*.rpm.Does one exist ?
What's wrong with
On Mon, 23 Jun 2008, Miguel Medalha wrote:
Let me be the first (maybe):
CentOS 5.2 is here (at least):
http://mirror.chpc.utah.edu/pub/centos/5.2/
ummm ... PLEASE -- no unofficial announcements as there are
some last minute tweaks still in process.
as Hughesjr pointed out in one channel:
On Fri, 13 Jun 2008, Nicholas wrote:
Would anyone know if CentOS 4 and 5 is LSB certified?
We have been offered a pass through the process by the LSB,
but there has not been demand for it.
I have not found any info on RH being LSB certified either. Is RH also LSB
certified?
One assumes
On Thu, 22 May 2008, Niels de Vos wrote:
Alain Reguera Delgado wrote:
Take a look at:
http://wiki.centos.org/ArtWork/WikiDesign/FrontPageStructure
I see a boring balanced two equal column block design; from a
matter of page layout, the old inverted L has disappeared from
the net (think
On Fri, 16 May 2008, Les Mikesell wrote:
I'm not sure I've ever seen the words 'easy' and 'pine' used
in the same sentence before. Pine has to have the most
counterintuitive interface known to man.
I usually hold the shift key down while using the down-arrow
to move over the parts to
On Wed, 7 May 2008, James Bunnell wrote:
What are the requirements to get a Centos IRC cloak in
freenode? Thanks in advance.
As of the last discussion by the centos group of developers,
IRC cloaks were not something that was going to be generally
'purchasable' by way of a donation, as if
On Sat, 22 Mar 2008, Ray Van Dolson wrote:
What we need is a case that's been taken to court and a verdict given.
:)
umm -- Istrongly disagree.
There are services sold by people called 'lawyers' whom sell
authoritative analysis, guidance, and answers they'll stand
behind as a professional
On Sat, 8 Mar 2008, Niki Kovacs wrote:
I can run 'latex document.tex' ok: the resulting .dvi looks
nice in xdvi. When running 'dvips -o document.dvi', I get a
.ps file that I can view OK in Evince.
But when I run 'pdflatex document.tex', the fonts in the
resulting PDF are all ragged and
On Sat, 8 Mar 2008, Niki Kovacs wrote:
R P Herrold a écrit :
known issue; using a similar creation chain, see the xpdf (left) and
Evince (right) rendering of the same file:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=291595
Curiously enough, the problem disappears when I just leave out
On Tue, 4 Mar 2008, Alain Reguera Delgado wrote:
Don't know if you really want theses updates, but here we have some
significant changes that I would like to put in your consideration.
Sincerely, I get tiered of writing changes into a readme file ... so I
took some screenshots for you. If
On Sat, 1 Mar 2008, Akemi Yagi wrote:
* CentOS: Only two typos in the default install, in more than 4 years.
One each by hughesjr and orc_orc
We've been training Evolution, to get the count up.
- R
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
On Sat, 16 Feb 2008, Thorsten Kampe wrote:
does something like the SUSE/Novell ntsutils (previously called
supportconfig) or Microsoft's MPS Reports exist for CentOS or Red
Hat Enterprise Linux? I mean a program that reads and exports various
configurations and parameters to facilitate
On Sat, 16 Feb 2008, Jim Perrin wrote:
There's sosreport in centos 5.1, formerly sysreport in
previous ...
beat me by 36 sec. on the post -- but I _did_ explain details
on why the other two platforms vary ;)
- R
___
CentOS mailing list
301 - 400 of 421 matches
Mail list logo
