at 7:54 AM, Steve Clark scl...@netwolves.com wrote:
Hello,
Anybody have the above. I haven't been able to locate it via google,
Thanks,
--
Stephen Clark
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Neither rpmfind nor pbone show a 5.0-2 that was built for el6. Only a
5.0-2
Hello,
I have the following setup on linux 2.6.32... CentOS 6.x :
ipsec tunnel eth0-10.255.3.254/25 - eth1-pub add1 - eth1-pub add2 -
eth0-10.255.5.254/25
I am trying to SNAT remote private address 10.255.5.128/25 packets when
they come out of the ipsec tunnel to make it appear like it was from
Never mind. I got it to work. I already had the ping going when I added the
iptables SNAT rule,
conntracking or route caching made it not work. I stopped the ping for a minute
or so then
restarted it and it worked and did the SNATing as I expected.
On 10/13/2012 06:04 PM, Steve Clark wrote
On 10/09/2012 05:36 PM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
On 09/27/2012 05:24 PM, Gordon Messmer wrote:
On 09/27/2012 06:36 AM, Steve Clark wrote:
I was trying to figure out what criteria to use to mark the connection.
FTP is such a
braindead application, using to channels and active and passive
On 10/03/2012 08:46 AM, Manish Kathuria wrote:
I was under the impression that you are running a FTP server inside
and were facing problems with the incoming traffic for the same. If
you are primarily concerned with the outgoing traffic through two ISP
links, please follow the following
On 09/27/2012 09:47 PM, Manish Kathuria wrote:
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 8:55 PM, Steve Clark scl...@netwolves.com wrote:
On 09/27/2012 11:01 AM, Manish Kathuria wrote:
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 7:04 PM, Steve Clark scl...@netwolves.com wrote:
On 09/26/2012 11:57 PM, Manish Kathuria wrote
On 09/26/2012 11:57 PM, Manish Kathuria wrote:
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 7:46 AM, Gordon Messmer yiny...@eburg.com wrote:
On 09/26/2012 09:15 AM, Steve Clark wrote:
Is there a way to make this work correctly?
In addition, you should ideally applying the following patches for
Static
On 09/26/2012 10:16 PM, Gordon Messmer wrote:
On 09/26/2012 09:15 AM, Steve Clark wrote:
Is there a way to make this work correctly?
Shorewall will generate a proper configuration if you specify the
track option in the providers file. It might be a good idea to use
that to generate your
On 09/27/2012 11:01 AM, Manish Kathuria wrote:
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 7:04 PM, Steve Clark scl...@netwolves.com wrote:
On 09/26/2012 11:57 PM, Manish Kathuria wrote:
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 7:46 AM, Gordon Messmer yiny...@eburg.com wrote:
On 09/26/2012 09:15 AM, Steve Clark wrote
Hello,
This is on Centos 6 and not something I think is wrong with Centos 6
but I am looking to see if anybody else has experienced this and
if there is solution. So thanks up front for indulging me.
Because Linux makes routing decisions before SNAT it is causing
problems when trying to use FTP
Hello,
Anybody use this repo. I am looking for fprobe and this repo was the only one
I found it at while googleing.
Thanks,
--
Stephen Clark
*NetWolves*
Director of Technology
Phone: 813-579-3200
Fax: 813-882-0209
Email: steve.cl...@netwolves.com
http://www.netwolves.com
On 09/14/2012 11:14 AM, Sidney Abrahams wrote:
I am new to CentOS and have installed the dgap rpm for the mentioned 16
port board.
I turned on in Services dgap. However, when I reboot the system the ttys
disappear. Could it be that the udev rpm is not installed? When I run the
mpi install and
On 09/06/2012 01:58 PM, Marco Fioretti wrote:
2011 msec
Pretty slow my dig to the same server ran in 113 msec
dig www.google.it @213.179.193.200
; DiG 9.7.4-P1-RedHat-9.7.4-2.P1.fc14 www.google.it @213.179.193.200
;; global options: +cmd
;; Got answer:
;; -HEADER- opcode: QUERY, status:
Hello List,
I am trying to install php-snmp into my CentOS 6.2 system and it doesn't work,
and I am not sure why. It looks like it is trying to install php-snmp from 6.3.
Error: Package: php-snmp-5.3.3-14.el6_3.i686 (updates)
Requires: php-common = 5.3.3-14.el6_3
Hi,
Anybody on the list running CentOS 6.3 on the above. If so do you have HP psp
9.10 installed
and working without getting the following error?
cmahealthd[4406]: segfault at f ip 009ff06d sp bfb6fdc4 error 4 in
libc-2.12.so[98e000+18c000]
Do you have any version of the psp working without
On 08/02/2012 01:06 PM, Blackburn, Marvin wrote:
I have a server that allows incoming traffic for ssh and some other
things.
I need to set up a rule that will drop/reject all traffic from a
particular server except ssh.
How can I do that.
_
On 07/11/2012 07:28 AM, Fernando Cassia wrote:
On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 7:36 AM, Natxo Asenjo natxo.ase...@gmail.com wrote:
Most informed people know how much Oracle has
contributed to OSS, but also how it has tried 'monetize' other stuff
Gee, someone could think that they are a for-profit
On 06/24/2012 11:21 AM, ken wrote:
On 06/24/2012 09:41 AM Benjamin Franz wrote:
On 06/24/2012 12:05 AM, Gene Heskett wrote:
And what do you do when this LVM goes corrupt in about a month? I've
had it self destruct on me twice. I hate it when that happens.
I would look for some other issue
On 06/24/2012 12:24 PM, ken wrote:
On 06/24/2012 12:04 PM Steve Clark wrote:
On 06/24/2012 11:21 AM, ken wrote:
On 06/24/2012 09:41 AM Benjamin Franz wrote:
On 06/24/2012 12:05 AM, Gene Heskett wrote:
And what do you do when this LVM goes corrupt in about a month? I've
had it self destruct
On 06/15/2012 06:43 AM, Giles Coochey wrote:
On 14/06/2012 18:07, Steve Campbell wrote:
We have a situation here that is a real mystery.
Our MRTG on our outgoing router and a firewall server that protects our
web servers is showing a spike every six hours. I can't find the server
behind the
Hello,
CentOS 6.2.
I have spent all morning googling and trying different things to get the
permissions
on my ttyUSB0 port set correctly using udev. I am at my wits end. Why is this
so convoluted!?
I would really appreciate it if someone could tell me how to do this.
The default permissions
On 06/13/2012 12:29 PM, James Pearson wrote:
Steve Clark wrote:
Hello,
CentOS 6.2.
I have spent all morning googling and trying different things to get the
permissions
on my ttyUSB0 port set correctly using udev. I am at my wits end. Why is
this so convoluted!?
I would really
Hello List,
I see that installing mysql in Centos 6.x creates a mysql user
with a login shell of /bin/bash. Is a default password also installed?
I certainly hope not, but it makes me nervous.
--
Stephen Clark
*NetWolves*
Director of Technology
Phone: 813-579-3200
Fax: 813-882-0209
Email:
On 06/05/2012 11:13 AM, Leonard den Ottolander wrote:
See for yourself:
# grep mysql /etc/shadow
mysql:!!:15404::
Ah - good, from man 5 shadow...
encrypted password
Refer to crypt(3) for details on how this string is interpreted.
If the password field
On 05/24/2012 03:58 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
This is annoying. I've got a user who needs chrome installed. I google,
and find there's a google.repo. I rpm --import the signing key... and
cannot find *where* on google.com I can install their own repo from. Every
hit that looks even vaguely
On 05/05/2012 04:45 PM, Akemi Yagi wrote:
On Sat, May 5, 2012 at 12:40 PM, Steve Clarkscl...@netwolves.com wrote:
http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=5709
I actually took the latest centosplus kernel srpm and got it going in my
environment (would like to have
semi official support though
On 05/14/2012 12:22 PM, Lorenzo Martínez Rodríguez wrote:
I have this problem with my IPSec implementation, whatever I change :O
[root@Carmen ~]# /etc/init.d/ipsec start
failed to start openswan IKE daemon - the following error occured:
addconn:
On 05/14/2012 02:06 PM, Sergio Belkin wrote:
2012/5/14 Steve Clarkscl...@netwolves.com:
On 05/14/2012 12:22 PM, Lorenzo Martínez Rodríguez wrote:
I have this problem with my IPSec implementation, whatever I change :O
[root@Carmen ~]# /etc/init.d/ipsec start
failed to start openswan IKE
On 05/10/2012 06:55 AM, Timothy Madden wrote:
I would like to use dnsmasq to cache nameserver query results, and I
have set dhcp to prepend the 127.0.0.1 name-server to the list of
nameservers. dnsmasq would then automatically exclude the localhost as a
name server and use all the others from
Alan Akemi,
Would it be possible to get CONFIG_ARPD turned on in the
centosplus 6.x kernel? It is required to use opennhrp.
See the link below where is was decided to turn it on in Fedora.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502844
--
Stephen Clark
*NetWolves*
Director of
On 05/05/2012 03:21 PM, Akemi Yagi wrote:
On Sat, May 5, 2012 at 11:22 AM, Steve Clarkscl...@netwolves.com wrote:
AlanAkemi,
Would it be possible to get CONFIG_ARPD turned on in the
centosplus 6.x kernel? It is required to use opennhrp.
See the link below where is was decided to turn
On 03/27/2012 05:48 AM, admin lewis wrote:
2012/3/27 Johnny Hughesjoh...@centos.org:
On 03/26/2012 04:45 PM, admin lewis wrote:
Anyone know if there is a kernel autoconfigure tool to compile from source ?
thanks
luigi
What are you trying to accomplish.
Simply I want enable grsecurity. I
Hi,
Does anyone have the CERT SiLK tools packaged for CentOS 6.x?
--
Stephen Clark
*NetWolves*
Director of Technology
Phone: 813-579-3200
Fax: 813-882-0209
Email: steve.cl...@netwolves.com
http://www.netwolves.com
___
CentOS mailing list
On 03/16/2012 12:26 PM, John Doe wrote:
From: Steve Clarkscl...@netwolves.com
Does anyone have the CERT SiLK tools packaged for CentOS 6.x?
If npbpdy did, they provide a spec file, and there are old instructions on
how to build a rpm...
On 02/15/2012 04:52 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
On 02/14/2012 09:14 AM, Steve Clark wrote:
On 02/14/2012 06:00 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2012:0124
Upstream details at :https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2012-0124.html
The following updated files have been
On 02/14/2012 06:00 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2012:0124
Upstream details at :https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2012-0124.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
i386:
On 02/05/2012 10:17 AM, Robert Spangler wrote:
On Saturday 04 February 2012 19:18, the following was written:
On 02/03/2012 11:56 PM, Robert Spangler wrote:
On Friday 03 February 2012 09:10, the following was written:
On 02/03/2012 08:07 AM, Mihamina Rakotomandimby wrote:
On 02/03/2012 11:56 PM, Robert Spangler wrote:
On Friday 03 February 2012 09:10, the following was written:
On 02/03/2012 08:07 AM, Mihamina Rakotomandimby wrote:
Hi all,
Having a 4 NIC server, I want to bridge eth2 and eth3, with a bridge
named br0.
Searching the
On 02/03/2012 08:07 AM, Mihamina Rakotomandimby wrote:
Hi all,
Having a 4 NIC server, I want to bridge eth2 and eth3, with a bridge
named br0.
Searching the web I only found about creating a file
/etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-br0, but did not find where to
explicitely list what
On 02/02/2012 05:41 AM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
On 02/02/2012 11:28 AM, Nick wrote:
And if it isn't, is there anything I should bear in mind when hacking a
script
to do this sort of thing, in order to avoid breaking my system or generally
fighting against the system's assumptions?
I
On 02/01/2012 02:03 PM, Nick wrote:
Hi,
I'm wanting to configure a CentOS 6 server to have a fall-back default route
via
a second network interface.
Given:
- eth0 with 192.168.0.10 on subnet 192.168.0.0/24 gateway 192.168.0.1
- eth1 with 192.168.1.10 on subnet 192.168.1.0/24 gateway
On 02/01/2012 04:06 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 1:35 PM, Steve Clarkscl...@netwolves.com wrote:
I'm wanting to configure a CentOS 6 server to have a fall-back default
route via
a second network interface.
Given:
- eth0 with 192.168.0.10 on subnet 192.168.0.0/24
On 01/27/2012 11:43 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
On 01/25/2012 10:46 AM, Steve Clark wrote:
Hello,
We are running units in the field that are headless. Sometimes we get units
returned
that we when we boot them up have some type of filesystem inconsistency that
the default preen
doesn't fix
On 01/27/2012 12:19 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 10:43 AM, Johnny Hughesjoh...@centos.org wrote:
On 01/25/2012 10:46 AM, Steve Clark wrote:
Hello,
We are running units in the field that are headless. Sometimes we get units
returned
that we when we boot them up have some
Hello,
We are running units in the field that are headless. Sometimes we get units
returned
that we when we boot them up have some type of filesystem inconsistency that
the default preen
doesn't fix but running fsck -y does.
I want to eliminate the -p (preen option) and always do the -y option
Hi,
Does anyone have rsyslog-5.8.7 for el6?
Thanks,
--
Stephen Clark
*NetWolves*
Director of Technology
Phone: 813-579-3200
Fax: 813-882-0209
Email: steve.cl...@netwolves.com
http://www.netwolves.com
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
On 01/24/2012 11:26 AM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
On 01/24/2012 04:22 PM, Steve Clark wrote:
Does anyone have rsyslog-5.8.7 for el6?
I do not see any 3rd party repo offering it.
Me neither.
I am trying to build a syslog server and this version has the capability
to create separate
On 01/24/2012 11:36 AM, Steve Clark wrote:
On 01/24/2012 11:26 AM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
On 01/24/2012 04:22 PM, Steve Clark wrote:
Does anyone have rsyslog-5.8.7 for el6?
I do not see any 3rd party repo offering it.
Me neither.
I am trying to build a syslog server
On 01/24/2012 12:02 PM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
On 01/24/2012 05:40 PM, Steve Clark wrote:
On 01/24/2012 11:36 AM, Steve Clark wrote:
On 01/24/2012 11:26 AM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
On 01/24/2012 04:22 PM, Steve Clark wrote:
Does anyone have rsyslog-5.8.7 for el6?
I do not see any 3rd
On 11/28/2011 07:41 PM, Corey Henderson wrote:
On 11/28/2011 2:13 PM, Steve Clark wrote:
Hello,
Can someone explain why I don't get a timeout when I use the community
string public even if I don't have it
defined in my snmpd.conf file. It doesn't return data but it also doesn't
timeout
Hello,
Can someone explain why I don't get a timeout when I use the community string
public even if I don't have it
defined in my snmpd.conf file. It doesn't return data but it also doesn't
timeout. See example below.
...
rocommunity nobody 127.0.0.1
...
[root@L703108 pgsql]# snmpwalk -v 1 -c
On 11/15/2011 09:35 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 15.11.2011 14:56, schrieb Timothy Murphy:
But isn't everyone today using laptops for everyday use?
this is what some braindead developers seems to think
but it is not true nor will it never get true!
why in the world should i use a laptop in my
On 11/10/2011 07:05 PM, Timothy Murphy wrote:
James A. Peltier wrote:
Fedora 16 moved to GRUB 2 as well. It will be in RHEL/CentOS in the next
release. Get used to it. ;)
Grub2 really seems extraordinarily verbose.
One can't help wondering if the simplicity of the old grub
offended the
On 10/20/2011 01:47 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Jerry Geis wrote:
Hi gang - Love CentOS - you guys to a fabulous job.
It has been a while since I saw any update...
I went to twitter.com/centos nothing there,
twitter.com/centos6 nothing there,
went to the qa calendar stuff nothing there.
On 09/15/2011 06:03 PM, Jerry Geis wrote:
I think the fdisk in 6 tries to align on 4k boundaries. Does fdisk -c do the
same thing?
Scott - thanks I just tried -cu and same result.
jerry
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
On 09/16/2011 08:10 AM, Jerry Geis wrote:
On 09/16/2011 06:59 AM, Steve Clark wrote:
On 09/15/2011 06:03 PM, Jerry Geis wrote:
I think the fdisk in 6 tries to align on 4k boundaries. Does fdisk -c do the
same thing?
Scott - thanks I just tried -cu and same result.
jerry
On 08/25/2011 09:18 AM, ken wrote:
On 08/25/2011 08:47 AM Timothy Murphy wrote:
I don't think that is necessary;
this newsgroup does not seem to me to be over-loaded
with OT material, or indeed with material of any kind.
Splitting it would just be a nuisance, in my case at least.
Surely it is
On 08/25/2011 11:38 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Ross Walker wrote:
On Aug 25, 2011, at 6:53 AM, Karanbir Singhmail-li...@karan.org wrote:
On 08/25/2011 11:00 AM, Keith Roberts wrote:
Could we have a centos-offtopic list please, so anything
that would be considered OT can be posted there?
On 08/18/2011 11:10 AM, Helmut Drodofsky wrote:
To route a subnet in ipv6 there are two possibilities:
-add route commands for the subnet in each computer
-or use neighbor proxy in the router server
I prefer neighbor proxy.
So I have to activate neighbor proxy in the router:
sysctl -w
On 08/01/2011 03:23 PM, Kenneth Porter wrote:
--On Wednesday, July 20, 2011 10:44 AM -0500 cbul...@gmail.com wrote:
We are trying to track some specific rules using LOG as target.
Everything is working well but the problem is that iptables is flooding
the console with LOG messages.
In
On 07/29/2011 07:48 AM, Thomas Harold wrote:
On 7/28/2011 5:01 PM, Spiro Harvey wrote:
the thing is that not all mail clients will set the in-reply-to
headers, whuch is why clients like thunderbird, evolution and mutt
will use the subject line as well to thread messages.
Apple Mail does that
On 07/19/2011 10:21 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
I finally switched workstations, and am running into a lot of truly
annoying details with CentOS 6, and the software with it. For one, I'm
doing this by webmail, and this version of Firefox *insists* on putting
what I'm typing in gray, rather than
On 07/18/2011 01:00 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
On 7/18/2011 11:25 AM, ?? ?? wrote:
So do you typically provide helpful answers to forum questions sooner
after they are posted when you have to forum-hop than you would if they
land in your inbox or later?
Obviously some level of activity must be
On 07/18/2011 02:37 PM, Steve Clark wrote:
On 07/18/2011 01:00 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
On 7/18/2011 11:25 AM, ?? ?? wrote:
So do you typically provide helpful answers to forum questions sooner
after they are posted when you have to forum-hop than you would if they
land in your inbox or later
On 07/17/2011 09:32 PM, Christopher Chan wrote:
On Monday, July 18, 2011 01:52 AM, Michel Donais wrote:
I want to get a look at Cents-6
The computer is a portable Thinkpad T-42
The base OS is Windows XP Professionnal
I tried to use both Microsoft Virtual PC and Oracle Virtual Box with the
same
On 07/15/2011 02:06 PM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
Jake Shipton wrote:
On 07/15/2011 05:45 PM, Timothy Murphy wrote:
I've installed CentOS-6 on my server
(in parallel to CentOS-5.6)
and now I'm trying to set up dhcpd.
I'm not sure if there has been a change in dhcpd
under CentOS-6, but I'm
On 07/13/2011 12:46 AM, Ron Blizzard wrote:
On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 2:54 PM, John R Piercepie...@hogranch.com wrote:
On 07/12/11 11:53 AM, Ron Blizzard wrote:
On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 10:29 AM, Steve Clarkscl...@netwolves.comwrote:
With an HP DL140 we open the cover and temporarily
On 07/12/2011 09:59 AM, Brunner, Brian T. wrote:
centos-boun...@centos.org wrote:
this machine can boot only from a ... HardDrive. USB is not an
option.
What I did: Move said hard drive to a system that has a DVD, and install
there.
I had to tweak a few things because of how the install
On 06/16/2011 12:41 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
On 6/16/2011 10:43 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
runlevels, traditionally, have not been defined (although the LSB has
In Linux? I mean, runlevel 3 was multi-user text mode as far back as Sun
OS - I can remember putting things into 3, because X would
On 06/16/2011 12:58 PM, Steve Clark wrote:
On 06/16/2011 12:41 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
On 6/16/2011 10:43 AM,m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
runlevels, traditionally, have not been defined (although the LSB has
In Linux? I mean, runlevel 3 was multi-user text mode as far back as Sun
OS - I can
On 06/02/2011 04:20 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
On 6/2/2011 3:04 PM, Robert Heller wrote:
I know. But you need to setup sudo for users, I never bothered so far.
It is one of the *first* things I do when I freshly install Linux (*ANY*
distro, both on my machines and anyone else's I set up).
And
On 06/03/2011 06:56 AM, Stephen Harris wrote:
On Fri, Jun 03, 2011 at 06:52:30AM -0400, Steve Clark wrote:
On 06/02/2011 04:20 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
And the first thing I do when I need to change something on a system set
up like that is 'sudo su -'... Too lazy to type it more than once
On 05/27/2011 05:29 AM, John Doe wrote:
From: aurfal...@gmail.comaurfal...@gmail.com
In Windows and OSX its easy to get TRIM working, does any know of TRIM
for linux?
You apparently need a 2.6.33+ kernel (I read somewhere RH backported what was
needed to their 2.6.32) and an fs like ext4 or
On 05/27/2011 08:28 AM, John Doe wrote:
From: Steve Clarkscl...@netwolves.com
On 05/27/2011 05:29 AM, John Doe wrote:
Test =
https://sites.google.com/site/lightrush/random-1/checkiftrimonext4isenabledandworking
Tested on Fedora (15) and it worked.
Hmmm How do you determine whether TRIM
On 05/27/2011 10:04 AM, John Doe wrote:
From: Steve Clarkscl...@netwolves.com
Unfortunately when I try it on SL 6.0 hdparm gets a segment
violation on the --read-sector command.
The fedora one is 9.36
And the one we used on CentOS 5.6 was 9.37 (compiled it).
Maybe try a more recent
On 05/24/2011 02:01 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
On 05/24/11 10:32 AM, Gordon Messmer wrote:
On 05/24/2011 09:57 AM, John R Pierce wrote:
also you want SSD that has a supercap on its internal cache so pending
writes aren't lost in a power failure scenario.
You know, I've asked people about
On 05/12/2011 09:49 AM, Rob Kampen wrote:
Johnny Hughes wrote:
On 05/12/2011 01:08 AM, Mark Bradbury wrote:
Do you expect the C6.0 - C6.1 differences to be more complex, or less
complex than the C5.5 - C5.6 differences ?
And given that C5.6 took 3 months,
On 05/11/2011 05:46 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
On 05/10/2011 05:42 AM, Steve Clark wrote:
On 04/26/2011 08:24 AM, Steve Clark wrote:
Hello,
Anybody know the reason RedHat decided not to support the
VIA Eden Processor?
cat /proc/cpuinfo
processor : 0
vendor_id : CentaurHauls
cpu
On 05/11/2011 05:46 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
On 05/10/2011 05:42 AM, Steve Clark wrote:
On 04/26/2011 08:24 AM, Steve Clark wrote:
Hello,
Anybody know the reason RedHat decided not to support the
VIA Eden Processor?
cat /proc/cpuinfo
processor : 0
vendor_id : CentaurHauls
cpu
On 05/11/2011 08:49 AM, Nicolas Thierry-Mieg wrote:
Steve Clark wrote:
Hello,
does anyone have updates to this page for 6.0. I would like
to try to build a 2.6.32.xx kernel.org kernel and see if I still gets
hangs on my CentuarHauls boxes.
http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/Custom_Kernel
check
On 05/11/2011 04:01 PM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
Leonard den Ottolander wrote:
Hello Steve,
On Wed, 2011-05-11 at 09:10 -0400, Steve Clark wrote:
On 05/11/2011 08:49 AM, Nicolas Thierry-Mieg wrote:
I had looked there before and there we no kernels for 6.0.
Just checking now and still
On 04/26/2011 08:24 AM, Steve Clark wrote:
Hello,
Anybody know the reason RedHat decided not to support the
VIA Eden Processor?
cat /proc/cpuinfo
processor : 0
vendor_id : CentaurHauls
cpu family : 6
model : 13
model name : VIA Eden Processor 500MHz
I am
Yes,
We are using one to HE and one to SIXXS. We don't rely on any of the standard
redhat config stuff - we do it all thru our own configs.
Been working great.
On 05/10/2011 11:17 AM, David Mehler wrote:
Hello,
Is anyone using an ipv6 to ipv4 tunnel? I've got one through Hurricane
On 05/10/2011 02:24 PM, Ashley M. Kirchner wrote:
I have a CentOS 5.6 system (recently installed) that, for some
reason, has decided to mangle one of its drives, specifically /dev/hde1
... No errors anywhere, just rebooted the machine over the weekend and
it's gone. Up till the reboot,
On 05/10/2011 02:28 PM, Steve Clark wrote:
On 05/10/2011 02:24 PM, Ashley M. Kirchner wrote:
I have a CentOS 5.6 system (recently installed) that, for some
reason, has decided to mangle one of its drives, specifically /dev/hde1
... No errors anywhere, just rebooted the machine over
On 05/05/2011 07:18 PM, Bill Campbell wrote:
I have an installation where we're replacing a rather old Linux
box with a new one that has no parallel ports. The old box has
two parallel ports going to Okidata printers.
The IOGEAR GUC1284B USB to Parallel Adapter cable looks like it
might be a
On 05/03/2011 09:25 AM, Les Mikesell wrote:
On 5/3/11 8:17 AM, Brunner, Brian T. wrote:
centos-boun...@centos.org wrote:
On 5/2/2011 10:25 AM, Les Mikesell wrote:
Trying to save a few seconds when rebooting a server seems
pointlessto me
The Linux kernel is also used in laptops/desktops
Fast
On 05/02/2011 10:47 AM, Les Mikesell wrote:
On 5/2/2011 8:57 AM, Steve Clark wrote:
On 05/02/2011 09:38 AM, Lamar Owen wrote:
On Monday, May 02, 2011 06:48:37 AM Christopher Chan wrote:
biosdevname for nics...bye bye eth0!
Not by default, and according to the release notes only for certain
On 05/02/2011 09:38 AM, Lamar Owen wrote:
On Monday, May 02, 2011 06:48:37 AM Christopher Chan wrote:
biosdevname for nics...bye bye eth0!
Not by default, and according to the release notes only for certain Dell
servers ATM.
But, yes, a different way of looking at NICs is coming down the
On 05/02/2011 11:07 AM, Les Mikesell wrote:
On 5/2/2011 9:58 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
But, yes, a different way of looking at NICs is coming down the pipe.
It's about
time.
EGADS Why? After working with FreeBSD for ten years it so nice not to
have to worry
is this rl0, vr0, em0, fxp0,
Hello,
Anybody know the reason RedHat decided not to support the
VIA Eden Processor?
cat /proc/cpuinfo
processor : 0
vendor_id : CentaurHauls
cpu family : 6
model : 13
model name : VIA Eden Processor 500MHz
I am testing, (using ayplus kernel) and get the
On 04/26/2011 08:43 AM, Brunner, Brian T. wrote:
centos-boun...@centos.org wrote:
Hello,
Anybody know the reason RedHat decided not to support the
VIA Eden Processor?
Possibly ... Does that processor have PAE? The non-PAE kernel was
dropped, the current 'normal' kernel requires a PAE-capable
On 04/26/2011 09:55 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
On 04/26/2011 07:48 AM, Steve Clark wrote:
On 04/26/2011 08:43 AM, Brunner, Brian T. wrote:
centos-boun...@centos.org wrote:
Hello,
Anybody know the reason RedHat decided not to support the
VIA Eden Processor?
Possibly ... Does that processor
On 04/10/2011 05:00 AM, Akemi Yagi wrote:
On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 7:16 AM, Steve Clarkscl...@netwolves.com wrote:
On 04/07/2011 05:14 PM, Akemi Yagi wrote:
Great. Please keep us posted. If the patches work as expected, they
will be a worthy addition to the cplus kernel.
I got a kernel built
On 04/11/2011 07:25 AM, Steve Clark wrote:
On 04/10/2011 05:00 AM, Akemi Yagi wrote:
On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 7:16 AM, Steve Clarkscl...@netwolves.com wrote:
On 04/07/2011 05:14 PM, Akemi Yagi wrote:
Great. Please keep us posted. If the patches work as expected, they
will be a worthy addition
On 04/11/2011 01:08 PM, Akemi Yagi wrote:
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 9:51 AM, Steve Clarkscl...@netwolves.com wrote:
On 04/11/2011 07:25 AM, Steve Clark wrote:
On 04/10/2011 05:00 AM, Akemi Yagi wrote:
I got a kernel built with the patches using the wiki and your notes in
0004586 (thanks). I am
On 04/11/2011 01:19 PM, Akemi Yagi wrote:
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 10:15 AM, Steve Clarkscl...@netwolves.com wrote:
Hmm... without looking at the dates of the files I had downloaded the
kernel-2.6.32-71.18.2.el6.centos.ayplus.i686.rpm 09-Mar-2011
11:36
files let me try the
On 04/11/2011 01:51 PM, Akemi Yagi wrote:
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 10:45 AM, Steve Clarkscl...@netwolves.com wrote:
On 04/11/2011 01:19 PM, Akemi Yagi wrote:
Yes, that ( 2.6.32-71.24.1.el6.centos.ayplus.1 ) is the right one. :)
Akemi
HOORAY - it works.
I got an ipv6 address:
$ ip6 a s eth2
On 04/07/2011 05:14 PM, Akemi Yagi wrote:
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 10:40 AM, Steve Clarkscl...@netwolves.com wrote:
On 04/07/2011 01:18 PM, Akemi Yagi wrote:
I had a quick look at the patches. The first one seems to be
applicable without any modifications. The second one will need an
adjustment.
On 04/08/2011 11:35 AM, Akemi Yagi wrote:
On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 7:16 AM, Steve Clarkscl...@netwolves.com wrote:
On 04/07/2011 05:14 PM, Akemi Yagi wrote:
I have just installed the kernel and will now start testing.
Great. Please keep us posted. If the patches work as expected, they
will be a
201 - 300 of 332 matches
Mail list logo
