On Mon, Sep 3, 2012 at 4:32 PM, Giles Coochey gi...@coochey.net wrote:
On 03/09/2012 15:18, Artifex Maximus wrote:
On Mon, Sep 3, 2012 at 11:15 AM, Leonard den Ottolander
leon...@den.ottolander.nl wrote:
On Sun, 2012-09-02 at 07:46 +, Artifex Maximus wrote:
Any idea what is wrong?
On 04/09/2012 07:31, Artifex Maximus wrote:
The first time (16:39:13.653674) client cannot sync to the server but
second time (16:39:43.145984) that was successful even if there is a
'bad udp cksum'. BTW, is it normal? Tcpdump says there was traffic and
sync happened later so rule is OK I
On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 10:36 AM, Giles Coochey gi...@coochey.net wrote:
On 04/09/2012 07:31, Artifex Maximus wrote:
The first time (16:39:13.653674) client cannot sync to the server but
second time (16:39:43.145984) that was successful even if there is a
'bad udp cksum'. BTW, is it normal?
On 2.9.2012 18:22, Artifex Maximus wrote:
On Sun, Sep 2, 2012 at 2:33 PM, Markus Falb
markus.falb-fswcc0fx...@public.gmane.org wrote:
On 2.9.2012 09:46, Artifex Maximus wrote:
Hello!
I would like to setup an NTP server for my Windows network using
CentOS 6.3 with firewall turned on.
...
On Sun, 2012-09-02 at 07:46 +, Artifex Maximus wrote:
Any idea what is wrong?
The iptables rules you specify only allow clients from your local
network access to your proxy ntp server. However, you do not specify
any rules for eth1 to allow that ntp server to synchronise with the
remote
Le lun. 03 sept. 2012 13:15:41 CEST, Leonard den Ottolander a écrit:
On Sun, 2012-09-02 at 07:46 +, Artifex Maximus wrote:
Any idea what is wrong?
The iptables rules you specify only allow clients from your local
network access to your proxy ntp server. However, you do not specify
any
On 03/09/2012 13:00, Philippe Naudin wrote:
Le lun. 03 sept. 2012 13:15:41 CEST, Leonard den Ottolander a écrit:
On Sun, 2012-09-02 at 07:46 +, Artifex Maximus wrote:
Any idea what is wrong?
The iptables rules you specify only allow clients from your local
network access to your proxy
On Mon, Sep 3, 2012 at 11:15 AM, Leonard den Ottolander
leon...@den.ottolander.nl wrote:
On Sun, 2012-09-02 at 07:46 +, Artifex Maximus wrote:
Any idea what is wrong?
The iptables rules you specify only allow clients from your local
network access to your proxy ntp server. However, you do
On 03/09/2012 15:18, Artifex Maximus wrote:
On Mon, Sep 3, 2012 at 11:15 AM, Leonard den Ottolander
leon...@den.ottolander.nl wrote:
On Sun, 2012-09-02 at 07:46 +, Artifex Maximus wrote:
Any idea what is wrong?
The iptables rules you specify only allow clients from your local
network
On Mon, 2012-09-03 at 14:18 +, Artifex Maximus wrote:
My server is able to synchronize with GPSNTP so rules
are fine for that (because my output chain is ACCEPT per default).
And related traffic is allowed too, yes, I overlooked that.
Are you sure your windows clients have addresses in the
Hello!
I would like to setup an NTP server for my Windows network using
CentOS 6.3 with firewall turned on. As I learned the NTP protocol uses
port 123 UDP. I have two NIC cards. One for internal network and one
for access internet. Both cards in private address range. The problem
is when I am
On Sun, 2012-09-02 at 07:46 +, Artifex Maximus wrote:
Hello!
I would like to setup an NTP server for my Windows network using
CentOS 6.3 with firewall turned on. As I learned the NTP protocol uses
port 123 UDP. I have two NIC cards. One for internal network and one
for access internet.
On Sun, Sep 2, 2012 at 8:37 AM, Earl Ramirez earlarami...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, 2012-09-02 at 07:46 +, Artifex Maximus wrote:
Hello!
I would like to setup an NTP server for my Windows network using
CentOS 6.3 with firewall turned on. As I learned the NTP protocol uses
port 123 UDP. I
On 2.9.2012 09:46, Artifex Maximus wrote:
Hello!
I would like to setup an NTP server for my Windows network using
CentOS 6.3 with firewall turned on. As I learned the NTP protocol uses
port 123 UDP. I have two NIC cards. One for internal network and one
for access internet. Both cards in
On Sun, Sep 2, 2012 at 2:33 PM, Markus Falb markus.f...@fasel.at wrote:
On 2.9.2012 09:46, Artifex Maximus wrote:
Hello!
I would like to setup an NTP server for my Windows network using
CentOS 6.3 with firewall turned on. As I learned the NTP protocol uses
port 123 UDP. I have two NIC cards.
Seems like a well thought out and thorough explanation of how to do what
you're looking for.
http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=579418
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
I have a need to run a centos server CUT-off from any connected network.
So the NTP server that is running on this very small network cannot
connect to
any other site to do what NTP does.
however, I have devices on this small network that I wish to use the
centos server
as the time source and
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org
[mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Jerry Geis
Sent: Thursday, July 01, 2010 10:28 AM
To: CentOS ML
Subject: [CentOS] ntp server
I have a need to run a centos server CUT-off from any
connected network.
So
On Thu, 2010-07-01 at 10:51 -0400, Brunner, Brian T. wrote:
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org
[mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Jerry Geis
Sent: Thursday, July 01, 2010 10:28 AM
To: CentOS ML
Subject: [CentOS] ntp server
I have a need
On 7/1/2010 9:28 AM, Jerry Geis wrote:
I have a need to run a centos server CUT-off from any connected network.
So the NTP server that is running on this very small network cannot
connect to
any other site to do what NTP does.
however, I have devices on this small network that I wish to use
You can get an assortment of devices that receive time signals from
satellites to act as good authoritative time sources on your private
network if you are willing to spend some money. If you just want to
fake it, I think the trick is to lower the stratum number in the 'fudge'
setting
Jerry Geis wrote:
You can get an assortment of devices that receive time signals from
satellites to act as good authoritative time sources on your private
network if you are willing to spend some money. If you just want to
fake it, I think the trick is to lower the stratum number in the
Try setting it like this:
fudge 127.127.1.0 stratum 10
server 127.127.1.0 prefer
Bowie
That did not work either.
jerry
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Scott Ehrlich schrieb:
I have a Centos 5 64-bit server that has ntp service enabled. Windows
XP with SP2 cannot properly sync to it for time, but can communicate
with it via samba, ssh, and anything else.I also disabled the
Windows Firewall. The C5 system does not have any firewall
I have a Centos 5 64-bit server that has ntp service enabled. Windows XP
with SP2 cannot properly sync to it for time, but can communicate with it
via samba, ssh, and anything else.I also disabled the Windows
Firewall. The C5 system does not have any firewall enabled.
Other C5
-Original Message-
From: Scott Ehrlich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 01, 2008 11:37 AM
To: centos@centos.org
Subject: [CentOS] NTP server
I have a Centos 5 64-bit server that has ntp service enabled. Windows XP
with SP2 cannot properly sync to it for time, but can
On Fri, 2008-02-01 at 11:43 -0800, James D. Parra wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Scott Ehrlich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 01, 2008 11:37 AM
To: centos@centos.org
Subject: [CentOS] NTP server
I have a Centos 5 64-bit server that has ntp service enabled
To: centos@centos.org
Subject: [CentOS] NTP server
I have a Centos 5 64-bit server that has ntp service enabled. Windows XP
with SP2 cannot properly sync to it for time, but can communicate with it
via samba, ssh, and anything else.I also disabled the Windows
Firewall. The C5 system does not have
Scott Ehrlich wrote:
I have a Centos 5 64-bit server that has ntp service enabled. Windows
XP with SP2 cannot properly sync to it for time, but can communicate
with it via samba, ssh, and anything else.I also disabled the
Windows Firewall. The C5 system does not have any firewall
On Fri, 2008-02-01 at 13:49 -0700, Jason Ross wrote:
On Fri, 2008-02-01 at 11:43 -0800, James D. Parra wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Scott Ehrlich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 01, 2008 11:37 AM
To: centos@centos.org
Subject: [CentOS] NTP server
I
30 matches
Mail list logo
