[CentOS] Re: CentOS] Thank you: Wiki data for adding 3rd party repository, ProtectBase and Priorities

On 26 July 2007, Akemi Yagi wrote: >The CentOS team is great. That's an understatement. They are truly putting super effort into this distribution. > See who contributed to that articular >article: >http://wiki.centos.org/Repositories?action=info The revision history is interesting! _

Re: [CentOS] Thank you: Wiki data for adding 3rd party repository, ProtectBase and Priorities

On Thu, 26 Jul 2007, Akemi Yagi wrote: > On 7/26/07, Kenneth Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --On Thursday, July 26, 2007 11:52 AM -0700 Akemi Yagi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > wrote: > > > > > If you ever set up your own local repo, that should be given the > > > highest priority. In that case,

Re: [CentOS] Thank you: Wiki data for adding 3rd party repository, ProtectBase and Priorities

On 7/26/07, Kenneth Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: --On Thursday, July 26, 2007 11:52 AM -0700 Akemi Yagi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > If you ever set up your own local repo, that should be given the > highest priority. In that case, you'd better start with a 2 for base > etc. Is there a HO

Re: [CentOS] Thank you: Wiki data for adding 3rd party repository, ProtectBase and Priorities

--On Thursday, July 26, 2007 11:52 AM -0700 Akemi Yagi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: If you ever set up your own local repo, that should be given the highest priority. In that case, you'd better start with a 2 for base etc. Is there a HOWTO for this (setting up a personal repo) in the wiki? I h

Re: [CentOS] Thank you: Wiki data for adding 3rd party repository, ProtectBase and Priorities

--On Thursday, July 26, 2007 12:59 PM -0600 drew einhorn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Great idea, But to take it one step further, think I'll use 10, 20, 30, ... That way I'll have room to insert new levels where ever I need them. I smell an old-time BASIC programmer. ;)

Re: [CentOS] Thank you: Wiki data for adding 3rd party repository, ProtectBase and Priorities

drew einhorn wrote: > > > Great minds think alike. I just sent a message suggesting the > same thing. > > > > Also, I think I've found that if you really want to use the "plus" > > repo it needs to be the same priority as "base" and "updates". > > > > > >

Re: [CentOS] Thank you: Wiki data for adding 3rd party repository, ProtectBase and Priorities

> Great minds think alike. I just sent a message suggesting the same thing. > > Also, I think I've found that if you really want to use the "plus" > repo it needs to be the same priority as "base" and "updates". > > > That could be a problem. Thanks. Well ... actually, having plus low

Re: [CentOS] Thank you: Wiki data for adding 3rd party repository, ProtectBase and Priorities

On 7/26/07, Johnny Hughes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Well ... actually, having plus lower is a good thing. BUT, it requires you to exclude the packages that exist in Base/Updates if you use the Plus repo. Sounds like a choice between "some of plus" versus "all of plus", correct? -- Dave K U

Re: [CentOS] Thank you: Wiki data for adding 3rd party repository, ProtectBase and Priorities

epel exists, but not ready for prime time? I'm assuming that > when it is ready it will go here. EPEL isn't a CentOS repo ... as all the other ones you have listed above are. It is your box though, so you can put it where you want. I would have it in the other 3rd party repos section t

Re: [CentOS] Thank you: Wiki data for adding 3rd party repository, ProtectBase and Priorities

drew einhorn wrote: > > > On 7/26/07, *Dave K* <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > wrote: > > On 7/26/07, Akemi Yagi <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > wrote: > > > If you ever set up your own local repo, that should be given the > > highest priority.

Re: [CentOS] Thank you: Wiki data for adding 3rd party repository, ProtectBase and Priorities

drew einhorn wrote: > Here's how I set up my repository priorities, with some questions, > and request for comments on whether there are better ways of doing > things. I'm running on CentOS 5, some of the repositories do not > exist, some exist but are empty, etc. > > Depending on whether I am in

Re: [CentOS] Thank you: Wiki data for adding 3rd party repository, ProtectBase and Priorities

On 7/26/07, Dave K <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 7/26/07, Akemi Yagi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > If you ever set up your own local repo, that should be given the > highest priority. In that case, you'd better start with a 2 for base > etc. I'm just starting to "play with" priorities, but I a

Re: [CentOS] Thank you: Wiki data for adding 3rd party repository, ProtectBase and Priorities

Here's how I set up my repository priorities, with some questions, and request for comments on whether there are better ways of doing things. I'm running on CentOS 5, some of the repositories do not exist, some exist but are empty, etc. Depending on whether I am in production, test, or developme

Re: [CentOS] Thank you: Wiki data for adding 3rd party repository, ProtectBase and Priorities

Great idea, But to take it one step further, think I'll use 10, 20, 30, ... That way I'll have room to insert new levels where ever I need them. On 7/26/07, Akemi Yagi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 7/26/07, drew einhorn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Here's how I set up my repository priorities,

Re: [CentOS] Thank you: Wiki data for adding 3rd party repository, ProtectBase and Priorities

On 7/26/07, Akemi Yagi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: If you ever set up your own local repo, that should be given the highest priority. In that case, you'd better start with a 2 for base etc. I'm just starting to "play with" priorities, but I actually made mine all multiples of 10 on the first s

Re: [CentOS] Thank you: Wiki data for adding 3rd party repository, ProtectBase and Priorities

On 7/26/07, drew einhorn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Here's how I set up my repository priorities, with some questions, and request for comments on whether there are better ways of doing things. I'm running on CentOS 5, some of the repositories do not exist, some exist but are empty, etc. If yo

Re: [CentOS] Thank you: Wiki data for adding 3rd party repository, ProtectBase and Priorities

On 7/26/07, Johnny Hughes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: We should probably wait until they announce that the EPEL repo is released and correct all the missing dependencies first. Yes, now if only they marked their packages in some identifiable way that could be easily seen. /time to stir the

Re: [CentOS] Thank you: Wiki data for adding 3rd party repository, ProtectBase and Priorities

drew einhorn wrote: > Information about the epel repository should be added > > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL > > But since it is an immutable page someone with more privileges > than I will have to do it. We should probably wait until they announce that the EPEL repo is released and co

Re: [CentOS] Thank you: Wiki data for adding 3rd party repository, ProtectBase and Priorities

Information about the epel repository should be added http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL But since it is an immutable page someone with more privileges than I will have to do it. On 7/26/07, Akemi Yagi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 7/26/07, Lanny Marcus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > This is

Re: [CentOS] Thank you: Wiki data for adding 3rd party repository, ProtectBase and Priorities

On 7/26/07, Lanny Marcus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: This is a public thank you, to whoever wrote the Wiki's for adding 3rd party repositories, ProtectBase and Priorities. Clear, excellent, step by step instructions. I did this late last night and I missed the thing that Priorities is the recommen

[CentOS] Thank you: Wiki data for adding 3rd party repository, ProtectBase and Priorities

This is a public thank you, to whoever wrote the Wiki's for adding 3rd party repositories, ProtectBase and Priorities. Clear, excellent, step by step instructions. I did this late last night and I missed the thing that Priorities is the recommended plugin, so I will change to that, from ProtectBase