On Thu, 2009-04-30 at 13:31 +0200, Kai Schaetzl wrote:
JohnS wrote on Thu, 30 Apr 2009 02:17:13 -0400:
Kai, I read the Xen list and the way your doing it (the last option)
looks like something I may try for testing in VMs.
It works fine, I'm converting all my setups to that now.
On Tue, 2009-04-28 at 23:31 +0200, Kai Schaetzl wrote:
JohnS wrote on Mon, 27 Apr 2009 11:09:56 -0400:
If you don't mind when you come to an answer would you please let me
know. I am interested to know.
I could not find a real solution. I had to go to another way of creating
the
JohnS wrote on Thu, 30 Apr 2009 02:17:13 -0400:
Kai, I read the Xen list and the way your doing it (the last option)
looks like something I may try for testing in VMs.
It works fine, I'm converting all my setups to that now.
Indeed also I when I installed Xen I had to manually take out peth0
On Apr 30, 2009, at 7:31 AM, Kai Schaetzl mailli...@conactive.com
wrote:
JohnS wrote on Thu, 30 Apr 2009 02:17:13 -0400:
Kai, I read the Xen list and the way your doing it (the last option)
looks like something I may try for testing in VMs.
It works fine, I'm converting all my setups to
I have a strange problem on one machine where eth0 gets killed when I add
a virtual interface. It's got something to do with the NIC ordering or
with the xen network script having a problem with multiple NICs and
virtual interfaces. I could need some help/comments on this.
Some history:
I
On Sat, 2009-04-25 at 20:33 +0200, Kai Schaetzl wrote:
I have a strange problem on one machine where eth0 gets killed when I add
a virtual interface. It's got something to do with the NIC ordering or
with the xen network script having a problem with multiple NICs and
virtual interfaces. I
JohnS wrote:
On Sat, 2009-04-25 at 20:33 +0200, Kai Schaetzl wrote:
I have a strange problem on one machine where eth0 gets killed when I add
a virtual interface. It's got something to do with the NIC ordering or
with the xen network script having a problem with multiple NICs and
virtual
On Sat, 2009-04-25 at 14:52 -0500, Les Mikesell wrote:
JohnS wrote:
On Sat, 2009-04-25 at 20:33 +0200, Kai Schaetzl wrote:
I have a strange problem on one machine where eth0 gets killed when I add
a virtual interface. It's got something to do with the NIC ordering or
with the xen
On Sat, 2009-04-25 at 14:52 -0500, Les Mikesell wrote:
JohnS wrote:
On Sat, 2009-04-25 at 20:33 +0200, Kai Schaetzl wrote:
I have a strange problem on one machine where eth0 gets killed when I add
a virtual interface. It's got something to do with the NIC ordering or
with the xen
JohnS wrote:
On Sat, 2009-04-25 at 14:52 -0500, Les Mikesell wrote:
JohnS wrote:
On Sat, 2009-04-25 at 20:33 +0200, Kai Schaetzl wrote:
I have a strange problem on one machine where eth0 gets killed when I add
a virtual interface. It's got something to do with the NIC ordering or
with the
At Sat, 25 Apr 2009 16:32:06 -0400 CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org
wrote:
On Sat, 2009-04-25 at 14:52 -0500, Les Mikesell wrote:
JohnS wrote:
On Sat, 2009-04-25 at 20:33 +0200, Kai Schaetzl wrote:
I have a strange problem on one machine where eth0 gets killed when I
add
JohnS wrote on Sat, 25 Apr 2009 16:32:06 -0400:
You *must* specify the HWADDR field in the ifcfg-* files in order to
have persistent ethernet naming.
And that is what I always do. Never done it another way.
You may have overlooked that part in my message where I state that it
works without a
12 matches
Mail list logo
