No way in 8.2
It's a socket option, managed well in 8.3 and later releases.
If you don't hav large amount of very small syncronius writes, you don't
need it.
- Original Message -
From: Coert Waagmeester lgro...@waagmeester.co.za
To: CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org
Sent: Monday,
Joshua Baker-LePain wrote:
On Mon, 27 Jul 2009 at 1:19pm, Veiko Kukk wrote
I'm not sure for this particular model server, but normally this is a
*BIOS* setting for the SATA controller.
There are no settings in BIOS for AHCI mode, it's only possible to
choose between raid and sata controller
Tony Mountifield wrote:
That's probably why. To use AHCI you need to set it to RAID mode.
Having done that, you can still use the drives independently if you
prefer kernel RAID; you just have to go into the BIOS RAID setup and
set the drives to JBOD mode (or something like that), by telling it
On Tue, 2009-07-28 at 14:31 -0400, William L. Maltby wrote:
When the two hosts are in sync, if I activate more than a few (six or
seven) xen guests, the master server crashes spectacularly and reboots.
I've seen a kernel dump over the serial console, but the machine
restarts
hi,
Whats the 'robust' way to make sure email to a specific destination is
only accepted if it came over the localhost:25 or /usr/sbin/sendmail
route ? anything else should get a 5xx error. Emails to other
destinations should remain unaffected.
Using postfix/c4. Had a look around, and
Hi
I'm having a curious problem with some files. The account has 77GB of
data[1], but there some files with more than 100GB[2], in fact, two of
then have more than 200GB[3].
The OS is Opensuse 10.2 x86_64.
Has anyone seem something like this? How can I inspect more closely what
is going
On 07/29/2009 02:46 PM, Marcelo M. Garcia wrote:
Hi
I'm having a curious problem with some files. The account has 77GB of
data[1], but there some files with more than 100GB[2], in fact, two of
then have more than 200GB[3].
The OS is Opensuse 10.2 x86_64.
Has anyone seem something like
On 07/29/2009 01:58 PM, RedShift wrote:
Emails to other destinations should remain unaffected.
^^
The easiest way is probably to edit master.cf and make smtpd only listen on
localhost:25.
well, no. The machine gets a few thousand other emails from all over the
place. Would not want to stop
RedShift wrote:
Karanbir Singh wrote:
Whats the 'robust' way to make sure email to a specific destination
is only accepted if it came over the localhost:25 or
/usr/sbin/sendmail route ? anything else should get a 5xx error.
Emails to other destinations should remain unaffected.
Using
Hello,
I understand the function and reason of limits.conf, and I have some
limited experience configuring values for (essentially single-user)
Oracle systems.
How do I understand correctly what my limits should be for multiuser
system system, are there best practice guidance?
Are there some
hi,
Whats the 'robust' way to make sure email to a specific destination is
only accepted if it came over the localhost:25 or /usr/sbin/sendmail
route ? anything else should get a 5xx error. Emails to other
destinations should remain unaffected.
I guess you should need to configure two
Hi
2009/7/29 Karanbir Singh mail-li...@karan.org
On 07/29/2009 01:58 PM, RedShift wrote:
Emails to other destinations should remain unaffected.
^^
The easiest way is probably to edit master.cf and make smtpd only listen on
localhost:25.
well, no. The machine gets a few thousand other
On Jul 29, 2009, at 7:52 AM, Andrea Dell'Amico
adel...@sevenseas.org wrote:
On Tue, 2009-07-28 at 14:31 -0400, William L. Maltby wrote:
When the two hosts are in sync, if I activate more than a few (six
or
seven) xen guests, the master server crashes spectacularly and
reboots.
I've
Karanbir Singh wrote:
On 07/29/2009 01:58 PM, RedShift wrote:
Emails to other destinations should remain unaffected.
^^
The easiest way is probably to edit master.cf and make smtpd only listen on
localhost:25.
well, no. The machine gets a few thousand other emails from all over the
On Wed, 2009-07-29 at 09:55 -0400, Ross Walker wrote:
I read on another forum how a user using iSCSI for domUs was
experiencing network hangs due to the fact that dom0 didn't have
enough scheduler credits to handle the network throughput. That might
be related.
On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 9:45 AM, Eugene Vilenskyevilen...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
I understand the function and reason of limits.conf, and I have some
limited experience configuring values for (essentially single-user)
Oracle systems.
How do I understand correctly what my limits should be
Dear CentOS lovers,
Is someone interested in the linux-2.6-smarter-relatime.patch for centosplus
kernel?
This patch solves disk I/O performance dramatically on servers,
And recent distributions (fedora9 and later, etc.) and official kernel
applies it.
RHEL6 may include it, but RHEL5 is not.
How
On 07/29/2009 03:54 PM, Yuji Tsuchimoto wrote:
Is someone interested in the linux-2.6-smarter-relatime.patch for centosplus
kernel?
Akemi is managing the plus kernel tree at the moment, but I am
relatively sure that if you were to propose the patch, she would
consider it.
--
Karanbir Singh
Hi,
I need to maintain a same user/group list on multiples systems. Can we
just copy the same passwd and groups file on all machines?
If we create a new user on one system then I will need to copy this to
all other systems. This is quite cumbersome. Any suggestions?
-
CS.
Dear Karanbir and all,
That sounds nice.
I'll try to make a patch for the current plus kernel.
Thanks, Yuji
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf Of Karanbir Singh
Sent: Thursday, July 30, 2009 12:10 AM
To: CentOS mailing
2009/7/29 Carlos Santana neu...@gmail.com:
I need to maintain a same user/group list on multiples systems. Can we
just copy the same passwd and groups file on all machines?
If we create a new user on one system then I will need to copy this to
all other systems. This is quite cumbersome. Any
Hi,
On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 11:13, Carlos Santananeu...@gmail.com wrote:
I need to maintain a same user/group list on multiples systems. Can we
just copy the same passwd and groups file on all machines?
Tipically yes (assuming all systems were freshly installed from
scratch and do not have any
Carlos Santana wrote:
Hi,
I need to maintain a same user/group list on multiples systems. Can we
just copy the same passwd and groups file on all machines?
If we create a new user on one system then I will need to copy this to
all other systems. This is quite cumbersome. Any suggestions?
http://fedoranews.org/mediawiki/index.php/How_to_setup_and_maintain_Open
LDAP_server_for_your_network
this site has a very good howto on how to get started with ldap and how
to migrate existing users in from NIS/passwd+shadow
scping the files around works but unless you use pass-phraseless keys
I intend to install lustre file system on the systems. It does not
support LDAP and need to have etc passwd/groups database. All file
system clients need to have same passwd and groups so that UID and
GID are the same when they contact file system server. So I am not
sure, how will I manage
Hi,
On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 11:45, Carlos Santananeu...@gmail.com wrote:
I intend to install lustre file system on the systems. It does not
support LDAP and need to have etc passwd/groups database.
Where does that information come from?
Even though Lustre might not support LDAP directly, it
Carlos Santana wrote:
I intend to install lustre file system on the systems. It does not
support LDAP and need to have etc passwd/groups database. All file
system clients need to have same passwd and groups so that UID and
GID are the same when they contact file system server. So I am not
Pushing passwd, group and shadow files can just be scripted to scp them
from one master machine to all the client nodes. an ssh key can be used
with the private key only existing on the master node so only it can
push out changes (protect it with your life as this has the potential to
be a nasty
On Wed, 2009-07-29 at 10:13 -0500, Carlos Santana wrote:
Hi,
I need to maintain a same user/group list on multiples systems. Can we
just copy the same passwd and groups file on all machines?
Don't forget about /etc/shadow.
If we create a new user on one system then I will need to copy
Slashdot carried this story yesterday on a BIND vulnerability:
http://it.slashdot.org/story/09/07/29/0028231/New-DoS-Vulnerability-In-All-Versions-of-BIND-9
The upstream report:
https://www.isc.org/node/474
Red Hat's Bugzilla:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514292
From what I'm
On 07/29/2009 05:15 PM, Kenneth Porter wrote:
From what I'm reading, if one has an Internet-facing master for a zone, one
is vulnerable, even if dynamic DNS isn't being used.
yes, which is one of many reasons why a zone masters is usually setup to
not be publicly available.
--
Karanbir Singh
Lustre 1.6+ versions do not support LDAP.
Thank you all for sighting different methods. I am exploring them for now.
More comments welcome.
-
CS.
On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 11:07 AM, ja...@aers.ca wrote:
Pushing passwd, group and shadow files can just be scripted to scp them
from one master
Kenneth Porter wrote:
Slashdot carried this story yesterday on a BIND vulnerability:
http://it.slashdot.org/story/09/07/29/0028231/New-DoS-Vulnerability-In-All-Versions-of-BIND-9
According to a commenter, this should provide a temporary countermeasure:
iptables -A INPUT -p udp --dport 53
At Wed, 29 Jul 2009 10:13:46 -0500 CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org
wrote:
Hi,
I need to maintain a same user/group list on multiples systems. Can we
just copy the same passwd and groups file on all machines?
If we create a new user on one system then I will need to copy this to
I have a partition set up as software RAID-1 on a CentOS 5.3 machine.
Today, the system was rebooted, when it came back up I noticed that it
had started to resync. It completes the sync, then immediately starts again.
From the log:
Jul 29 09:46:02 cbserver kernel: md: syncing RAID array md2
RedShift napsal(a):
According to a commenter, this should provide a temporary countermeasure:
iptables -A INPUT -p udp --dport 53 -j DROP -m u32 --u32 '30270xF=5'
Haven't tested it, would like to know the results...
Well, good point, but Centos does not ship libipt_u32.so. Even more
On Thu, 23 Jul 2009, Fred Moyer wrote:
Looks like d...@httpd is aware of the issue and will be
releasing a fix. Haven't tried 5.3 centos but this sounds
like they shipped a version of apache that caused this.
http://www.mail-archive.com/d...@httpd.apache.org/msg44177.html
Hello, it seems
Do you need to roll your own PHP build to support MySQL now? I don't see
support built into the included libphp module..
Thx,
CC
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 1:24 PM, Chuckchuck.car...@gmail.com wrote:
Do you need to roll your own PHP build to support MySQL now? I don't see
support built into the included libphp module..
You need to install the php-mysql module :)
___
CentOS
On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 1:24 PM, Chuckchuck.car...@gmail.com wrote:
Do you need to roll your own PHP build to support MySQL now? I don't see
support built into the included libphp module..
It's not compiled in statically. It's built as a module. You need to
install php-mysql.
yum list php\*
On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 5:59 PM, David Hrbáčhrbac.c...@seznam.cz wrote:
RedShift napsal(a):
According to a commenter, this should provide a temporary countermeasure:
iptables -A INPUT -p udp --dport 53 -j DROP -m u32 --u32 '30270xF=5'
Haven't tested it, would like to know the results...
Chuck wrote:
Do you need to roll your own PHP build to support MySQL now? I don't see
support built into the included libphp module..
Thx,
CC
Use yum search php and watch the output very closely, that should
On 07/29/2009 06:29 PM, luc...@lastdot.org wrote:
Those looking for patched bind for Centos 4.x may use packages I have
built with CVE-2009-0696 patch.
http://fs12.vsb.cz/hrb33/el4/hrb/testing/i386/repoview/letter_b.group.html
At Wed, 29 Jul 2009 12:24:44 -0500 CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org
wrote:
Do you need to roll your own PHP build to support MySQL now? I don't see
support built into the included libphp module..
You need to include some additional packages:
(CentOS 4Plus):
So PHP now supports modules and you can add/remove features on the fly? Or
does installing the php-mysql module replace the libphp.so module in the
apache tree?
-Chuck
On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 12:29 PM, Jim Perrin jper...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 1:24 PM,
On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 1:41 PM, Chuckchuck.car...@gmail.com wrote:
So PHP now supports modules and you can add/remove features on the fly? Or
does installing the php-mysql module replace the libphp.so module in the
apache tree?
PHP supports modules, though not on the fly. You still have to
Hi !
I am running CentOS 5 using grub 0.97
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On Wednesday, July 29, 2009 6:36 PM +0100 Karanbir Singh
mail-li...@karan.org wrote:
there are packages linked to people.redhat.com that point at the ones in
QA at Red Hat at the moment, I would recommend you use those
RHEL errata are up:
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5
Via RHSA-2009:1179
On Wed, 2009-07-29 at 16:16 +0200, Andrea Dell'Amico wrote:
On Wed, 2009-07-29 at 09:55 -0400, Ross Walker wrote:
I'm pretty sure the crash is DRBD related: until the secondary drbd
server is detached, all is working well. There are 23 guests running,
right now, some of them paravirtualized,
Let's try this again :)
I am running CentOS 5 (core pkgs) / x86_64 using grub 0.97 and I am trying to
configure a fallback between two partitions on my local disk, each installed
with a CentOS image. The idea is to be able to install a new test OS image
and fall back in case of a problem to
At Wed, 29 Jul 2009 12:41:59 -0500 CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org
wrote:
So PHP now supports modules and you can add/remove features on the fly? Or
does installing the php-mysql module replace the libphp.so module in the
apache tree?
Installing php-mysql *adds* a module (shared
On Jul 29, 2009, at 11:21 AM, Karanbir Singh wrote:
yes, which is one of many reasons why a zone masters is usually
setup to
not be publicly available.
The localhost 127.0.0.1 zone can also be used as an attack vector
according to the folks on the DNS Ops list, so it's looking like
On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 02:10:56PM -0500, Chris Boyd wrote:
On Jul 29, 2009, at 11:21 AM, Karanbir Singh wrote:
yes, which is one of many reasons why a zone masters is usually
setup to
not be publicly available.
The localhost 127.0.0.1 zone can also be used as an attack vector
On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 6:36 PM, Karanbir Singhmail-li...@karan.org wrote:
On 07/29/2009 06:29 PM, luc...@lastdot.org wrote:
Those looking for patched bind for Centos 4.x may use packages I have
built with CVE-2009-0696 patch.
On Jul 29, 2009, at 2:19 PM, Ray Van Dolson wrote:
Do you have a link to a mailing lists post describing this? Would
like
to pass it along...
This is the head of the thread:
https://lists.dns-oarc.net/pipermail/dns-operations/2009-July/004315.html
Some of the relevant discussion:
On
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf Of Kai Schaetzl
Sent: Sunday, July 26, 2009 5:32 PM
To: centos@centos.org
Subject: Re: [CentOS] SSH attacks from china
Sorin Srbu wrote on Sat, 25 Jul 2009 19:40:28 +0200:
What if you have
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf Of luc...@lastdot.org
Sent: Sunday, July 26, 2009 11:27 PM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] SSH attacks from china
Vietnam and Indonezia are also suspects in my list.
The biggest
luc...@lastdot.org napsal(a):
Well done, David but there's a little problem with those rpms:
Preparing...### [100%]
package bind-libs-9.2.4-30.el4_7.2 (which is newer than
bind-libs-9.2.4-30.el4.hrb.2.1) is already installed
On 07/29/2009 08:27 PM, luc...@lastdot.org wrote:
where exactly am I to see something useful on people.redhat.com? I can
only see an image.
The CentOS update have now been released, you should be able to yum
update on C5 already.
--
Karanbir Singh : http://www.karan.org/ : 2522...@icq
On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 9:10 PM, Sorin Srbusorin.s...@orgfarm.uu.se wrote:
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf Of luc...@lastdot.org
Sent: Sunday, July 26, 2009 11:27 PM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] SSH attacks
luc...@lastdot.org napsal(a):
Ok, thanks, but
where exactly am I to see something useful on people.redhat.com? I can
only see an image.
Maybe he is pointing to http://people.redhat.com/atkac/bind/. But I do
not see the point. This is RHEL 4.8 version with patch. Anyone running
Centos 4.8?
On 07/29/2009 09:19 PM, David Hrbáč wrote:
Maybe he is pointing to http://people.redhat.com/atkac/bind/. But I do
not see the point. This is RHEL 4.8 version with patch.
http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/2009-July/004794.html
I've updated 2 machines, and had no problems here. But
David HrbÃ¡Ä wrote:
Maybe he is pointing to http://people.redhat.com/atkac/bind/. But I do
not see the point. This is RHEL 4.8 version with patch. Anyone running
Centos 4.8? I'm still with 4.7 so bind-libs-9.2.4-30.el4_7.2 with patch
is the way for me, far better then having unpatched bind,
Hi All,
Is KVM support in CentOS 5.3 complete? That is, can a CentOS 5.3 system
host KVM VMs or does CentOS 5.3 only support being virtualized via KVM?
I ask because I installed KVM on a CentOS 5.3 host, but I can't find a
kvm module anywhere in /lib/modules/* (let alone the running kernel).
On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 6:01 PM, Kanwar Ranbir
Sandhum3fr...@thesandhufamily.ca wrote:
Hi All,
Is KVM support in CentOS 5.3 complete? That is, can a CentOS 5.3 system
host KVM VMs or does CentOS 5.3 only support being virtualized via KVM?
I ask because I installed KVM on a CentOS 5.3 host,
On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 5:01 PM, Kanwar Ranbir
Sandhum3fr...@thesandhufamily.ca wrote:
Hi All,
Is KVM support in CentOS 5.3 complete? That is, can a CentOS 5.3 system
host KVM VMs or does CentOS 5.3 only support being virtualized via KVM?
I ask because I installed KVM on a CentOS 5.3 host,
there is a python update
...snippel
$ yum update
...
Updating:
python i386
2.4.3-24.el5_3.6 updates 5.9 M
Installing for dependencies:
kernel-PAE i686
2.6.18-128.1.6.el5 updates
On Wed, 2009-07-29 at 18:06 -0400, Kwan Lowe wrote:
I don't think kvm is available upstream until 5.4.
I figured that out about 5 minutes after sending the email. Just great.
Anyone know when 5.4 is hitting?
Thanks for the reply!
Regards,
Ranbir
--
Kanwar Ranbir Sandhu
Linux
On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 3:22 PM, Kanwar Ranbir
Sandhum3fr...@thesandhufamily.ca wrote:
On Wed, 2009-07-29 at 18:06 -0400, Kwan Lowe wrote:
I don't think kvm is available upstream until 5.4.
kvm is available now. Here is the CentOS wiki article for kvm-howto.
http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/KVM
On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 4:30 PM, Jerry Geisge...@pagestation.com wrote:
I am getting this message quite often lately.
Centos 5.3, AMD dual core 5050e system x64
1 GIG ram, 4 GIG swap
Well that is a lot of swap for a server.. if something really starts
using that much swap its going to most
Markus Falb wrote:
there is a python update
...snippel
$ yum update
...
Updating:
python i386
2.4.3-24.el5_3.6 updates 5.9 M
Installing for dependencies:
kernel-PAE i686
2.6.18-128.1.6.el5 updates
Markus Falb wrote:
i found out the libxml2-python rpm is triggering the kernel dependency.
when i uninstall libxml2-python the dep goes away.
...snippel
[r...@bombas ~]# yum deplist libxml2-python
...
dependency: /usr/lib/python2.4
provider: python.i386 2.4.3-24.el5
provider:
On Jul 29, 2009, at 2:30 PM, Andrea Dell'Amico
adel...@sevenseas.org wrote:
On Wed, 2009-07-29 at 16:16 +0200, Andrea Dell'Amico wrote:
On Wed, 2009-07-29 at 09:55 -0400, Ross Walker wrote:
I'm pretty sure the crash is DRBD related: until the secondary drbd
server is detached, all is
On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 04:03:37PM -0700, Benjamin Franz wrote:
I'm getting dependency issues on the python update itself:
I'm getting a missing dependency of /usr/lib64/python2.4 on the python
update. :(
This happened on one of two identical (mirror image) servers of
John R. Dennison wrote:
On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 04:03:37PM -0700, Benjamin Franz wrote:
I'm getting dependency issues on the python update itself:
I'm getting a missing dependency of /usr/lib64/python2.4 on the python
update. :(
This happened on one of two identical
Hi Guy,
I'm curious if you found a solution to the headless automount problem
on centos? I'm running into a similar problem, though I am not using
VNC. My machine is simply headless, with only network and power
supplied, and I'm trying to trigger a bash script to run when a new
device is
On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 8:13 AM, Yuji Tsuchimoton...@sea-mew.jp wrote:
Dear Karanbir and all,
That sounds nice.
I'll try to make a patch for the current plus kernel.
Thanks, Yuji
Yujiさん,
Yes, if you could provide a patch that can be cleanly applied to the
CentOS kernel, that would be
In-Reply-To=4a70b20c.5020...@karan.org
Reply-To:
(Apologies if this isn't in the thread properly; I'm trying to fake it from
the website headers :-))
Karanbir Singh wrote:
http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/2009-July/004794.html
I've updated 2 machines, and had no problems here.
On Tue, 28 Jul 2009 22:14:25 -0500, Robert wrote:
[...]
Don't you just hate it when you know something and can't remember it!?!
Yes, and it happens more often as time passes.
Mike.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
On Wed, 2009-07-29 at 15:26 -0700, Akemi Yagi wrote:
kvm is available now. Here is the CentOS wiki article for kvm-howto.
http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/KVM
I noticed that, too. The version in the testing repo is the one I'd be
interested in. But, I have a couple of questions:
1. How
Dear list,
I have inherited a CentOS-5 box with a LSI Sata Raid controller.
It is configured as a RAID5 w/hot-standby. My concern is that
I have no present means of determining the RAID status w/o
downing the system and going into the bios to get status. If
a disk has failed and brought the
http://www.monitoringexchange.org/cgi-bin/page.cgi?g=2416.html;d=1
google has more.
On Wednesday, July 29, 2009, Raymond Lillard rlill...@sonic.net wrote:
Dear list,
I have inherited a CentOS-5 box with a LSI Sata Raid controller.
It is configured as a RAID5 w/hot-standby. My concern is
I would much prefer a simple command line tool that I can
wrap a script around and run it under cron.
I did this when I didn't have a Nagios environment or an snmp
setup (LSI provides an SNMP monitoring package for it).
Simply use the MegaCLI to query for status of all LD's and
grep for failure
Can I rattle this cage open?
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
I seem to be having network and email issues tonight; please
excuse any duplication
-- Russ herrold
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
HTML dump on Thu Jul 30 00:30:33 EDT 2009
http://www.centos.org/
Open Letter to Lance Davis
July 30, 2009 04:39 UTC
This is
Thanks to both of you who replied.
Mr. Vilensky's approach seemed easiest and his google powers
exceed mine.
The link he provided was the key.
http://www.monitoringexchange.org/cgi-bin/page.cgi?g=2416.html;d=1
The only issue for me was that the megarc URL has been
changed. I found the package
On 07/28/2009 11:39 PM, Akemi Yagi wrote:
Evolution (aka JimPerrin - or is this the other way around?) has been
working on this excellent wiki article:
http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/OS_Protection
the page looks ripe for a split into sections and perhaps setup for
sub-pages.
Looking good at
Jim Perrin wrote:
But I guess with Akemi dragging me out over the OS_Protection page,
I'm a member now :-P
I've got no problem discussing it or other changes here. I set it up
on my blog mostly because there wasn't a way to have comments on the
page, and I didn't want to open the wiki page
On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 6:46 AM, Ralph Angenendtra+cen...@br-online.de wrote:
I've got no problem discussing it or other changes here. I set it up
on my blog mostly because there wasn't a way to have comments on the
page, and I didn't want to open the wiki page up to editing by outside
Ralph Angenendt wrote:
Jim Perrin wrote:
But I guess with Akemi dragging me out over the OS_Protection page,
I'm a member now :-P
I've got no problem discussing it or other changes here. I set it up
on my blog mostly because there wasn't a way to have comments on the
page, and I didn't want
Jim Perrin wrote:
On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 6:46 AM, Ralph Angenendtra+cen...@br-online.de
wrote:
I've got no problem discussing it or other changes here. I set it up
on my blog mostly because there wasn't a way to have comments on the
page, and I didn't want to open the wiki page up to
On 07/29/2009 12:33 PM, Jim Perrin wrote:
Should we have a wiki.centos.org/Security/ section with Security/OS
and Security/Daemons or Services?
I'd vote for that. Not sure about the namespace though. Much of this
would be howto while others would be tips and plenty would be neither of
those.
On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 3:10 AM, David Hrbáčhrbac.c...@seznam.cz wrote:
Well,
+ /proc/sys/net/ipv4/tcp_timestamps ?
Good recommendation, I'll add that in.
--
During times of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act.
George Orwell
On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 4:44 AM, Karanbir Singhmail-li...@karan.org wrote:
On 07/28/2009 11:39 PM, Akemi Yagi wrote:
Evolution (aka JimPerrin - or is this the other way around?) has been
working on this excellent wiki article:
http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/OS_Protection
the page looks ripe
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2009:1164 Important
Upstream details at : http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2009-1164.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename )
i386:
c2397a0c364f33d374e133129599c2db
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2009:1164 Important
Upstream details at : http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2009-1164.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename )
x86_64:
cd8e7e724cdb8c70d540aff9e097919f
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2009:1176 Moderate
Upstream details at : http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2009-1176.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename )
i386:
8924617a1e44000d303a52f1b1854e6f
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2009:1179 Important
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2009-1179.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename )
i386:
544a05af9819f3ea8d1c6a490cfaddda
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2009:1179 Important
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2009-1179.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename )
x86_64:
0f252bb2790ca6c3409c6d1077dbde2a
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory CESA-2009:1181
bind security update for CentOS 3 i386:
https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2009-1181.html
The following updated file has been uploaded and is currently syncing to
the mirrors:
i386:
updates/i386/RPMS/bind-9.2.4-25.el3.i386.rpm
1 - 100 of 118 matches
Mail list logo
