Hi,
On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 9:44 PM, Tim Dunphy bluethu...@gmail.com wrote:
Hey guys,
This is kind of odd, so I wanted to do a sanity check.
I mounted an NFS share like so:
[root@web1:~] #mount -t nfs nfs1.jokefire.com:/home /mnt/home
Seemed to go ok. Then I took a look at the output
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf Of Karanbir Singh
Sent: 03 April 2015 01:00
To: centos@centos.org
Subject: Re: [CentOS] [CentOS-announce] Release for CentOS Linux 7 (1503 ) on
x86_64
On 02/04/15 21:35, Phelps,
On 2 Apr 2015 23:40, J Martin Rushton martinrushto...@btinternet.com
wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
SELinux certainly was causing fun and games. I copied your suggestion
to /etc/systemd/user/timidity.service (mode 750) but it's still not happy:
[root@tamar
Hello all,
Any Vietnamese are on this list?
How about creating a dedicated mailing list, for Vietnamese, in
Vietnamese[1] for the community?
Looking the the list of existing mailing list, I see that there are some
language-specific communities already there[2]
Ref.
[1]
Hello all,
It appears that, for some reason I have thus far failed to understand when
you use marking in iptables you then run into troubles if you attempt to do
NAT (MAQUERADE).
Let me describe this in more detail.
We are attempting to use a network test environment named ATCD running it
on a
Hi,
On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 1:40 AM, Dave Stevens g...@uniserve.com wrote:
I have a degraded raid array (originally raid-10, now only two drives)
that contains an LVM volume. I can see in the appended text that the Xen
domains are there but I don't see how to mount them. No doubt this is just
On Fri, April 3, 2015 9:31 am, Phelps, Matthew wrote:
On Fri, Apr 3, 2015 at 2:19 AM, Tim Bell tim.b...@cern.ch wrote:
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf Of Karanbir Singh
Sent: 03 April 2015 01:00
To:
Hello all,
According to [CentOS-announce] Release for CentOS Linux 7 (1503 ) on x86_64:
Debuginfo packages are also being signed and pushed. Yum configs
shipped in the new release file will have all the context required for
debuginfo to be available on every CentOS Linux install.
Specifically,
On 04/02/2015 07:00 PM, Karanbir Singh wrote:
stretching this a bit futher : lets see if we can find 10 people who
might be considered 'community beacons', who could / would act as
commnuity comms and liason to make sure we are driving in the right
directions and communicating things in the
On 04/03/2015 11:11 AM, Eric Millbrandt wrote:
...Is my Google-fu failing me
or is http://debuginfo.centos.org/7/x86_64/ no longer the current
debuginfo repo?
Karanbir posted yesterday that they were being worked on, so wait a bit
and they'll show up soon. I'm waiting on the same thing
On 04/03/2015 10:31 AM, Phelps, Matthew wrote:
I agree with Tim. CentOS does need to do a much better job communicating
with their customers. And, yes, we are customers.
No, we are not customers in the strict sense, as that implies a purchase
or some other consideration is given for a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Inline
On 03/04/15 08:42, James Hogarth wrote:
On 2 Apr 2015 23:40, J Martin Rushton
martinrushto...@btinternet.com wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1
SELinux certainly was causing fun and games. I copied your
suggestion
On Fri, 2015-04-03 at 17:35 +0100, Always Learning wrote:
Hi Александр (Aleksandr, Alexander),
Apologies to all. That should have gone privately off-list.
--
Regards,
Paul.
England, EU. Je suis Charlie.
___
CentOS mailing list
Hello!
No updates for days until 2015-04-01. Then presented with huge steaming
pile of updates all at once, apparently related to Centos 7.1 release.
Not thinking about it being April Fools Day, I immediately did:
yum -v check-update, then
yum -v update
then rebooted.
After reboot, there is
On 4/2/2015 5:11 PM, J Martin Rushton wrote:
Sorry to mention the opposition here, but I have a family member's
laptop to protect, and I'm not allowed to upgrade it to Linux. What's
the current best recommendation?
I have used Avast, AVG, Avira, and Comodo.
Currently Comodo (firewall and
On Fri, 2015-04-03 at 11:23 -0400, Lamar Owen wrote:
I really think that if someone is actually interested in helping the
project, rather than being a backseat driver and griping at every change
But first one ought to know exactly where the project is going. In
which direction is
On Fri, Apr 03, 2015 at 02:46:56PM -0400, Jerry Geis wrote:
I am trying to setup a centos 7.1 vncserver
I cannot believe they went from a relatively easy process in 6 to the
crazyness that is 7.
I did the following:
yum install tigervnc-server
cp
On Fri, 2015-04-03 at 10:17 +0300, Александр Кириллов wrote:
Paul, world's a big place. We just see many things differently.
The West pretends the rules invented by the West are universal. They are
not.
Hi Александр (Aleksandr, Alexander),
Agreed. The West is far from perfect and has a
On Fri, Apr 3, 2015 at 10:30 AM, Francis Gerund ranr...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello!
No updates for days until 2015-04-01. Then presented with huge steaming
pile of updates all at once, apparently related to Centos 7.1 release.
After reboot, there is a problem with the video. It seems to
I am trying to setup a centos 7.1 vncserver
I cannot believe they went from a relatively easy process in 6 to the
crazyness that is 7.
I did the following:
yum install tigervnc-server
cp /lib/systemd/system/vncserver@.service
/etc/systemd/system
Is the port opened in the firewall?
I stopped firewalld with systemctl stop firewalld
Jerry
On Fri, Apr 3, 2015 at 2:46 PM, Jerry Geis ge...@pagestation.com wrote:
I am trying to setup a centos 7.1 vncserver
I cannot believe they went from a relatively easy process in 6 to the
On 4/3/2015 1:39 PM, Jerry Geis wrote:
I then used 4 as in your example and it worked.
How do I get port 5900 ?
0
--
john r pierce, recycling bits in santa cruz
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
Well, it could be the same, but the bug report does seem to refer to the
bug being in kernel series 3.18. I am just using whatever 3.10 series
kernel comes standard with Centos 7.x.
I don't know anything about bug reports, and I an not familiar with
swapping out kernels in Centos.
BTW, is El
On 04/03/2015 12:11 PM, Jerry Geis wrote:
Is the port opened in the firewall?
I stopped firewalld with systemctl stop firewalld
Jerry
On Fri, Apr 3, 2015 at 2:46 PM, Jerry Geis ge...@pagestation.com wrote:
I am trying to setup a centos 7.1 vncserver
I cannot believe they
You should:
cp /lib/systemd/system/vncserver at .service
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
/lib/systemd/system/vncserver@:#.service
Where # is the vnc port 590# to open. Like
/lib/systemd/system/vncserver@:4.service to start a vncserver on port 5904.
Then use `systemctl start
Hi
I have recently installed CentOS 7.1 on my laptop. Earlier i was using
Ubuntu 14.04.
I have managed to successfully install all the apps that i was using in
ubuntu in CentOS 7.1 except for the app named as: HomeBank
http://homebank.free.fr/
Here is the information about my system:
On Sat, 04 Apr 2015 00:57:31 +0530
Jatin wrote:
I have managed to successfully install all the apps that i was using in
ubuntu in CentOS 7.1 except for the app named as: HomeBank
I just compiled it for you and anyone else who might want it.
Go here to get it:
No there was nothing. Having said that I think I was having a senior moment.
I have two servers on which I am testing 7.x. These are isolated machines that
if I had to I could just wipe and start over. On one machine the
/etc/sysconfig/iptables was intact after the upgrade. On the other it
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Further to my earlier post. I must confess to occasionally getting to
be a bit stubborn, and in this case didn't want to be beaten by
Poettering. I re-installed your script, modifying some fields in what
I hope was the appropriate manner:
#
- Oorspronkelijk bericht -
Van: Frank Cox thea...@melvilletheatre.com
Aan: centos@centos.org
Verzonden: Vrijdag 3 april 2015 21:56:42
Onderwerp: Re: [CentOS] Installing HomeBank on CentOS 7.1
On Sat, 04 Apr 2015 00:57:31 +0530
Jatin wrote:
I have managed to successfully install all
On 04/03/2015 01:39 PM, Jerry Geis wrote:
You should:
cp /lib/systemd/system/vncserver at .service
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
/lib/systemd/system/vncserver@:#.service
Where # is the vnc port 590# to open. Like
/lib/systemd/system/vncserver@:4.service to start a
On 04/03/2015 08:46 PM, Jerry Geis wrote:
I am trying to setup a centos 7.1 vncserver
I did the following:
yum install tigervnc-server
cp /lib/systemd/system/vncserver@.service
I guess the problem is, that you don't provide the instance name (the
part after
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Yet more information:
As a test I moved the link
/etc/systemd/system/dbus-org.fedoraproject.FirewallD1.service into
/etc/systemd/user and reran systemctl daemon-reload. I then rebooted.
# ls -l /etc/systemd/user
total 4
Hello all,
iptables provides a way to mark/tag packets for future
identification/accounting, etc. A brief discussion of it is offered here:
https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Advanced_traffic_control
Here is a more detailed description of the issue I am working on:
On 04.04.2015 02:32, James B. Byrne wrote:
I am seeing log file entries like this:
IN=eth0 OUT=eth1 SRC=109.74.193.253 DST=x.y.z.34 LEN=122 TOS=0x00
PREC=0x00 TTL=48 ID=49692 PROTO=ICMP TYPE=3 CODE=3 [SRC=x.y.z.34
DST=109.74.193.253 LEN=94 TOS=0x00 PREC=0x00 TTL=53 ID=41330 PROTO=UDP
On 03/04/15 09:25 PM, Always Learning wrote:
On Fri, 2015-04-03 at 20:01 -0500, Francis Gerund wrote:
Here it is, in their own words: what Redhat thinks of Centos, and it's
plans for the future of Centos.
community.redhat.com/centos-faq
It is what many of us feared.
I never
I have added it to the nux-dextop repo for EL7, too.
HTH
--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
Nux!
www.nux.ro
- Original Message -
From: Jatin daveyja...@gmail.com
To: CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org
Sent: Friday, 3 April, 2015 20:27:31
Subject: [CentOS]
Just a suggestion:
Have you tried Gnucash? It is in the EPEL repository, works fine in Centos
7, and is really well done.
P.S. - I can not comment on HomeBank, as I haven't used it.
On Fri, Apr 3, 2015 at 7:27 PM, Nux! n...@li.nux.ro wrote:
I have added it to the nux-dextop repo for EL7,
Thank you very much. I installed it.
Thanks
Jatin
On 04/04/2015 05:57 AM, Nux! wrote:
I have added it to the nux-dextop repo for EL7, too.
HTH
--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
Nux!
www.nux.ro
- Original Message -
From: Jatin daveyja...@gmail.com
To: CentOS
Posted on behalf of Mark (m.r...@5-cent.us) who is currently
experiencing technical difficulties with his Internet connection
-
On Fri, 2015-04-03 at 11:23 -0400, Lamar Owen wrote:
I really think that if someone is actually interested in helping the
project,
On 03/04/15 20:41, Francis Gerund wrote:
Well, it could be the same, but the bug report does seem to refer to the
bug being in kernel series 3.18. I am just using whatever 3.10 series
kernel comes standard with Centos 7.x.
Well, the CentOS kernel is a 3.10 kernel in name (or number) only.
Almost everyone here has probably read this by now. If so, move along,
nothing new here. But just in case you haven't, please take the time to
read this.
Here it is, in their own words: what Redhat thinks of Centos, and it's
plans for the future of Centos.
Can you read between the lines? In
On 03/04/15 09:01 PM, Francis Gerund wrote:
Almost everyone here has probably read this by now. If so, move along,
nothing new here. But just in case you haven't, please take the time to
read this.
Here it is, in their own words: what Redhat thinks of Centos, and it's
plans for the future
On Fri, 2015-04-03 at 21:30 -0400, Digimer wrote:
If you and others believe this to be the case, then form an
organization and fork CentOS. Or, do as CentOS did in the beginning
and recompile the RHEL binaries to be binary-compatible and create
your own OS.
It is the open-source way, and
On 03/04/15 09:46 PM, Always Learning wrote:
On Fri, 2015-04-03 at 21:30 -0400, Digimer wrote:
If you and others believe this to be the case, then form an
organization and fork CentOS. Or, do as CentOS did in the beginning
and recompile the RHEL binaries to be binary-compatible and
I am seeing log file entries like this:
IN=eth0 OUT=eth1 SRC=109.74.193.253 DST=x.y.z.34 LEN=122 TOS=0x00
PREC=0x00 TTL=48 ID=49692 PROTO=ICMP TYPE=3 CODE=3 [SRC=x.y.z.34
DST=109.74.193.253 LEN=94 TOS=0x00 PREC=0x00 TTL=53 ID=41330 PROTO=UDP
SPT=34679 DPT=53 LEN=74 ]
This is found on our gateway
On Fri, 2015-04-03 at 20:01 -0500, Francis Gerund wrote:
Here it is, in their own words: what Redhat thinks of Centos, and it's
plans for the future of Centos.
community.redhat.com/centos-faq
It is what many of us feared.
I never noticed any of the Centos bosses stating they are on a
On 03/04/15 09:39 PM, Always Learning wrote:
On Fri, 2015-04-03 at 21:27 -0400, Digimer wrote:
Being on CentOS, it is then trivial for these
companies to switch the RHEL proper.
Not if Centos and RHEL become too incompatible.
Exactly why I believe it will not come to be.
SIGs/variants
On Fri, 2015-04-03 at 22:47 -0400, Digimer wrote:
No, people are speculating about the future of CentOS.
I agree with your point that if RH is to commercially benefit from
Centos installations transferring to (or upgrading to) RH, then the base
systems should not be radically different or even
I have tried gnucash and it is a good app but homebank is much simpler
and fits into my simple usage.
Thanks
Jatin
On 04/04/2015 06:14 AM, Francis Gerund wrote:
Just a suggestion:
Have you tried Gnucash? It is in the EPEL repository, works fine in Centos
7, and is really well done.
P.S. -
Okay, thanks to all who took the time to reply.
What a shame; I hadn't planned on spending Easter weekend learning to do
kernel upgrades, but . . . here it goes.
On Fri, Apr 3, 2015 at 5:59 PM, Ned Slider n...@unixmail.co.uk wrote:
On 03/04/15 20:41, Francis Gerund wrote:
Well, it
On Fri, 2015-04-03 at 21:27 -0400, Digimer wrote:
Being on CentOS, it is then trivial for these
companies to switch the RHEL proper.
Not if Centos and RHEL become too incompatible.
--
Regards,
Paul.
England, EU. Je suis Charlie.
___
Updated the kernel as suggested to 3.19, did not solve problem.
Unbelievable! Oh, well . . .
On Fri, Apr 3, 2015 at 8:13 PM, Francis Gerund ranr...@gmail.com wrote:
Okay, thanks to all who took the time to reply.
What a shame; I hadn't planned on spending Easter weekend learning to do
On Fri, April 3, 2015 8:29 am, James B. Byrne wrote:
On Thu, April 2, 2015 17:11, J Martin Rushton wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Sorry to mention the opposition here, but I have a family member's
laptop to protect, and I'm not allowed to upgrade it to Linux. What's
On Fri, Apr 3, 2015 at 2:19 AM, Tim Bell tim.b...@cern.ch wrote:
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf Of Karanbir Singh
Sent: 03 April 2015 01:00
To: centos@centos.org
Subject: Re: [CentOS] [CentOS-announce] Release
On 04/03/2015 09:16 AM, James B. Byrne wrote:
Hm. I wonder how the proposed 7.1.1503 became 7.1503 in practice.
Bait and switch?
The versioning of the ISO's is 7.1503 (in one way of reading the actual
name; you could read it as 7 spin 1503 or whatnot), but my
/etc/centos-release says:
On Thu, April 2, 2015 15:25, Jim Perrin wrote:
On 04/02/2015 01:28 PM, Phelps, Matthew wrote:
Soliciting our feedback *before* changing everything regarding
release names would have been nice.
We did.
http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/2015-February/012873.html
You mean
On Thu, April 2, 2015 17:11, J Martin Rushton wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Sorry to mention the opposition here, but I have a family member's
laptop to protect, and I'm not allowed to upgrade it to Linux. What's
the current best recommendation?
Thanks,
We (Harte
On Fri, Apr 3, 2015 at 10:07 AM, Valeri Galtsev
galt...@kicp.uchicago.edu wrote:
When I start feeling particular distribution does not fill the bill of
requirements, I (realizing I will not be able to affect its future route)
just start looking for different distribution which is more suitable
On Fri, Apr 3, 2015 at 9:33 AM, Lamar Owen lo...@pari.edu wrote:
BTW. What happens if a bad ISO gets spun, released and then is
replaced in the same month? Does it become: 7.1504_a?; 7.1504b?;
7.1504_1?; 7.150403?
Already happened; it had a -01 added.
Wiill the directories here:
Il 19/03/2015 15:46, George Dunlap ha scritto:
On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 2:39 PM, Karanbir Singh mail-li...@karan.org wrote:
On 03/19/2015 12:23 PM, George Dunlap wrote:
On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 12:20 PM, Sandro Bonazzola sbona...@redhat.com
wrote:
Hi,
following Cloud SIG example[1] I would
Buenas tardes amigos de la lista.
Hace 3 años que tenemos varios servidores virtuales contratados en la
empresa IPLAN en Argentina. Los mismos son gerenciados bajo VMWare TIER1
y TIER3, y las VM con Centos 6 64bits.
Pues bien, hace unos meses notamos una baja pronunciada en el acceso a
Hola Alexis, bienevenido al mundo linux, debido a que eres nuevo y deseas
un aprendizaje no muy largo en una configuracion basica, yo te recomendaria
el fedora, ya que es es una las distros basadas en redhat, esta distro
tambien tiene una version servidor, te sera amigable y sus repositorios
estan
63 matches
Mail list logo
