Yes, it is a known issue, I'm sure it's going to get fixed ASAP.
--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
Nux!
www.nux.ro
- Original Message -
From: Kai Bojens k...@kbojens.de
To: CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org
Sent: Wednesday, 24 June, 2015 10:48:22
Subject:
Hello everybody,
I just tried to run 'yum update' and got this error:
Error: Package: ntp-4.2.6p5-19.el7.centos.x86_64 (@updates)
Requires: ntpdate = 4.2.6p5-19.el7.centos
Removing:
ntpdate-4.2.6p5-19.el7.centos.x86_64 (@updates)
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to
centos-annou...@centos.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
On 06/24/2015 06:31 AM, Gerald Vogt wrote:
Hi all!
I add another problem with todays updates:
Error: Package: fence-agents-all-4.0.11-13.el7_1.x86_64
(centos7-x86_64-updates)
Requires: fence-agents-compute
fence-agents-compute seems to be missing.
Thanks,
Gerald
On 06/24/2015 05:51 AM, Nux! wrote:
Yes, it is a known issue, I'm sure it's going to get fixed ASAP.
--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
Nux!
www.nux.ro
- Original Message -
From: Kai Bojens k...@kbojens.de
To: CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org
Sent:
Hi all!
I add another problem with todays updates:
Error: Package: fence-agents-all-4.0.11-13.el7_1.x86_64
(centos7-x86_64-updates)
Requires: fence-agents-compute
fence-agents-compute seems to be missing.
Thanks,
Gerald
___
CentOS
On 06/23/2015 03:52 PM, g wrote:
On 06/23/2015 02:14 PM, ken wrote:
On 06/23/2015 11:49 AM, g wrote:
hello Ken,
am i correct to presume that you are getting the Bcc: of my post
to the fedora list?
g,
I'm already subscribed to that list, so you needn't bcc me. I've read
your post there.
Hello,
I somehow missed the announcement, but I just updated and Firefox 38.0.1 put me
back to Dutch.
( https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1221286 )
greetings, Johan
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
At Wed, 24 Jun 2015 14:06:30 -0400 CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org
wrote:
Gordon Messmer wrote:
On 06/23/2015 08:10 PM, Marko Vojinovic wrote:
Ok, you made me curious. Just how dramatic can it be? From where I'm
sitting, a read/write to a disk takes the amount of time it takes,
On Wed, 24 Jun 2015 10:40:59 -0700
Gordon Messmer gordon.mess...@gmail.com wrote:
On 06/23/2015 08:10 PM, Marko Vojinovic wrote:
For concreteness, let's say I have a guest machine, with a
dedicated physical partition for it, on a single drive. Or, I have
the same thing, only the
At Wed, 24 Jun 2015 04:10:35 +0100 CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org
wrote:
On Tue, 23 Jun 2015 18:42:13 -0700
Gordon Messmer gordon.mess...@gmail.com wrote:
I wondered the same thing, especially in the context of someone who
prefers virtual machines. LV-backed VMs have
Hello All,
I seem to have run into a bug with the new --bridgeslaves=INTERFACE option.
It would seem that if I tell the bridge device to use a virtual interface (like
bond0) rather than a physical interface (em1/em2) that kickstart completely
barfs on it. I have provided my network section
- Original Message -
| I was wondering, where is the format and options of files like
| /usr/share/system-config-netboot/pxelinux.cfg/default from
| system-config-netboot-cmd described? There are plenty of PXE tutorials
| with examples out there, but nothing that looks like actual
|
On 06/23/2015 08:25 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
Edit the file:
/etc/sysconfig/clock
make sure to set:
ZONE=America/Chicago
it was;
ZONE=Etc/UTC
it is now.
ZONE=America/Chicago
then copy /usr/share/zoneinfo/America/Chicago to /etc/localtime
done.
Run the time tool and make sure
Once upon a time, Marko Vojinovic vvma...@gmail.com said:
On Tue, 23 Jun 2015 18:42:13 -0700
Gordon Messmer gordon.mess...@gmail.com wrote:
I wondered the same thing, especially in the context of someone who
prefers virtual machines. LV-backed VMs have *dramatically* better
disk
On Tue, 23 Jun 2015, John R Pierce wrote:
While it has the same concepts, physical volumes, volume groups, logical
volumes, the LVM in AIX shares only the initials with Linux. I've heard
that Linux's LVM was based on HP-UX's design.
Sure, and IRIX had a similar concept, although my
hey guys,
I need to mount a different volume onto /var so we have more room to
breathe. I'll be turning 3 servers into an elasticsearch cluster. And for
some reason when the servers were ordered the large local volume ended up
being /usr when the ES rpm likes to store it's indexes on /var.
So
On 06/23/2015 09:00 PM, Marko Vojinovic wrote:
On Tue, 23 Jun 2015 19:08:24 -0700
Gordon Messmer gordon.mess...@gmail.com wrote:
1) LVM makes MBR and GPT systems more consistent with each other,
reducing the probability of a bug that affects only one.
2) LVM also makes RAID and non-RAID systems
Gordon Messmer wrote:
On 06/23/2015 08:10 PM, Marko Vojinovic wrote:
Ok, you made me curious. Just how dramatic can it be? From where I'm
sitting, a read/write to a disk takes the amount of time it takes, the
hardware has a certain physical speed, regardless of the presence of
LVM. What am I
On 06/24/2015 11:06 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Here's a question: all of the arguments you're giving have to do with VMs.
Do you have some for straight-on-the-server, non-VM cases?
Marko sent two messages and suggested that we keep the VM performance
question as a reply to that one. My
On 06/24/2015 09:42 AM, Tim Dunphy wrote:
And for
some reason when the servers were ordered the large local volume ended up
being /usr when the ES rpm likes to store it's indexes on /var.
So I'm syncing the contents of both directories to a different place, and
I'm going swap the large local
On Wed, 24 Jun 2015 12:42:19 -0400
Tim Dunphy wrote:
Does anyone have a good guess as to why these 'out of space' failures
are occurring?
Hi Tim,
At first glance, I don't see anything obvious, but if it were me, I'd
do the following:
a) add the 'n' flag to do a dry run (no actual copying)
On Wed, 24 Jun 2015 12:42:19 -0400
Tim Dunphy wrote:
how come I am running out of space in doing my rsync?
Are you running out of room for file and directory names, which is a different
thing than simple free disk space?
--
MELVILLE THEATRE ~ Real D 3D Digital Cinema ~
Does anyone have a good guess as to why these 'out of space' failures
are
occurring?
Probaly sparse files or hard links? Try
# rsync -aHASWXv --delete src/ dst/
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
On 06/23/2015 08:10 PM, Marko Vojinovic wrote:
Ok, you made me curious. Just how dramatic can it be? From where I'm
sitting, a read/write to a disk takes the amount of time it takes, the
hardware has a certain physical speed, regardless of the presence of
LVM. What am I missing?
Well, there's
Hey Carl,
Hi Tim,
At first glance, I don't see anything obvious, but if it were me, I'd
do the following:
a) add the 'n' flag to do a dry run (no actual copying)
b) increase rsync's verbosity
(A single -v will give you information about what files are being
transferred and a brief
Gordon Messmer wrote:
On 06/24/2015 09:42 AM, Tim Dunphy wrote:
And for some reason when the servers were ordered the large
local volume ended up being /usr when the ES rpm likes to
store it's indexes on /var.
So I'm syncing the contents of both directories to a different place,
and I'm
On 06/24/2015 12:06 PM, Chris Adams wrote:
LVM snapshots make it easy to get point-in-time consistent backups,
including databases. For example, with MySQL, you can freeze and flush
all the databases, snapshot the LV, and release the freeze.
Exactly. And I mention this from time to time...
On 06/24/2015 12:35 PM, Gordon Messmer wrote:
Interesting. I wasn't aware that LVM had that option. I've been
looking at bcache and dm-cache. I'll have to look into that as well.
heh. LVM cache *is* dm-cache. Don't I feel silly.
___
CentOS
On 6/24/2015 2:06 PM, Chris Adams wrote:
Once upon a time, m.r...@5-cent.us m.r...@5-cent.us said:
Here's a question: all of the arguments you're giving have to do with VMs.
Do you have some for straight-on-the-server, non-VM cases?
I've used LVM on servers with hot-swap drives to migrate to
Once upon a time, m.r...@5-cent.us m.r...@5-cent.us said:
Here's a question: all of the arguments you're giving have to do with VMs.
Do you have some for straight-on-the-server, non-VM cases?
I've used LVM on servers with hot-swap drives to migrate to new storage
without downtime a number of
On 6/24/2015 1:06 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Gordon Messmer wrote:
On 06/23/2015 08:10 PM, Marko Vojinovic wrote:
Ok, you made me curious. Just how dramatic can it be? From where I'm
sitting, a read/write to a disk takes the amount of time it takes, the
hardware has a certain physical speed,
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2015:1181
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2015-1181.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
i386:
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2015:1180
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2015-1180.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
i386:
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2015:1182
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2015-1182.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
x86_64:
35 matches
Mail list logo
