On Thu, 2007-11-29 at 11:56 +, Karanbir Singh wrote:
Just an idea to throw out there...
It seems that moin is capable of adding forms and mostly sane actions to
the forms. Would that be one route that we might be able to take w.r.t
lowering the bar to entry for contributors into
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2007:1063
https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2007-1063.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors:
ia64:
updates/ia64/RPMS/pcre-3.9-10.4.ia64.rpm
updates/ia64/RPMS/pcre-devel-3.9-10.4.ia64.rpm
--
Pasi
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2007:1063
https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2007-1063.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors:
s390:
updates/s390/RPMS/pcre-3.9-10.4.s390.rpm
updates/s390/RPMS/pcre-devel-3.9-10.4.s390.rpm
s390x:
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory CESA-2007:1063
pcre security update for CentOS 3 i386:
https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2007-1063.html
The following updated file has been uploaded and is currently syncing to
the mirrors:
i386:
updates/i386/RPMS/pcre-3.9-10.4.i386.rpm
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory CESA-2007:1063
pcre security update for CentOS 3 x86_64:
https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2007-1063.html
The following updated file has been uploaded and is currently syncing to
the mirrors:
x86_64:
updates/x86_64/RPMS/pcre-3.9-10.4.i386.rpm
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2007:1068
https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2007-1068.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors:
s390:
updates/s390/RPMS/pcre-4.5-4.c4.6.s390.rpm
updates/s390/RPMS/pcre-devel-4.5-4.c4.6.s390.rpm
s390x:
The following errata for CentOS-2 have been built and uploaded to the
centos mirror:
RHSA-2007:1065-01 Moderate: pcre security update
Files available:
pcre-3.4-2.4.i386.rpm
pcre-devel-3.4-2.4.i386.rpm
More details are available from the RedHat web site at
Hola señores voy al grano en mis duda
Deseo copiar un disco duro la imagen disculpen por la comparacion con
windows pero es ccomo usar el ghost copiar la imagen de windows y quemarlo
en un cd o dvd para tenerlo de backup pues como puedo hacer lo mismo en
linux...perdon yo se q linux es mejor
Disculap mi ingnorancia pero como lo haria la verda no tengo mucha
experiencia en lo de linux pero practicando se aprende metiendo le mano como
dicen me puedes explicar o darme unas pautas ya q lo de linux uno tiene q
solucionarlo .
Gracias
2007/11/29, Ing. Ernesto Pérez Estévez [EMAIL
Has intentado buscar en google primero. uso de tar y gzip.
Intenta con eso y no esperes que te solucionen si no haz buscado primero.
tambien lee lee
http://www.sindominio.net/ayuda/preguntas-inteligentes.html
http://www.sindominio.net/ayuda/preguntas-inteligentes.html
Saludos
_
De:
Héctor no te preocupes, no todos en la lista somos tan radicales.
Puedes iniciar tu búsqueda en los siguientes sitios sobre como comprimir y
realiza Respaldo de tus datos:
http://www.macnux.com/portal/articulos_linux/como_comprimir_archivos_en_linu
x.html
Un amigo de otra lista me envio esto y quise compartirlo con ustedes
Espero sirva de algo:
http://www.noooxml.org/petition-es
Slds,
Javier.
___
CentOS-es mailing list
CentOS-es@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es
Hola Amigos de la lista.
Bueno mi consulta es si puedo migrar un pdc samba en centos 5, a
otro con centos 5 pero con distinto hardware
bastara con solo copiar el los archivos de la carpeta /etc/samba, y
el passwd, shadow y gshadow
reemplazarlos, re-iniciar el
de las multiples soluciones de backup que hay a mi m gusta mucho REOBack...
Se configura muy facilmente y hace copias incrementales tanto en local como
por NFS o FTP. El sistema te genera un tar comprimido..
un saludo,
Miguel.
Hector Cuadros Prosopio wrote:
NO ESPERO QUE ME SOLUCIONEN EL
Karanbir Singh napsal(a):
how about start looking from here : http://www.centos.org/mirrors in the
sponsors section. They are the people who suppose CentOS by donating b/w
and servers
I'm gonna use the list. Word of mouth is just word of mouth :o).
D.
Rogelio wrote:
My apologies if this question has been previously answered, but could
anyone here provide me with resources that I might use to help build a
case for exclusively using CentOS in an enterprise environment?
(Approximately 200 servers)
[...]
Reasons thus far I've come up with
Robinson Tiemuqinke wrote:
--- Jancio Wodnik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Robinson Tiemuqinke pisze:
Currently I download the Centos 5.0 upgrade packages from mirror
sites on Internet (.../centos/5/updates/{SRPMS,i386,x86_64}/...),
with the arrival of Centos 5.1, are the existing Centos 5.0
Scott Silva wrote:
Was this thread hijacked, or is Thunderbird being stupid again?
Yes.
Well, don't know about the last thing, I don't use Thunderbird :)
Cheers,
Ralph
pgpFdXBKKS1rQ.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
CentOS mailing list
Have a look at http://zimbra.com. It has an open-source version with
unlimited users. I've tried both it and scalix and much prefer zimbra.
Cheers.
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
[Fred Kienker]
Scalix has
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can
On Nov 29, 2007 12:18 PM, Jun Salen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Have a look at http://zimbra.com. It has an open-source version with
unlimited users. I've tried both it and scalix and much prefer zimbra.
Cheers.
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by
Is it possible to delete a file from dump? I saved it in one dump archive,
and want to save space by deleting it from the others.
Thanks.
Scott
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Tronn Wærdahl wrote:
On Nov 29, 2007 12:18 PM, Jun Salen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Have a look at http://zimbra.com. It has an open-source version with
unlimited users. I've tried both it and scalix and much prefer zimbra.
Why don't you try Open-xchange, I put together a CD based on CentOS
On Nov 28, 2007 8:25 AM, Barry Brimer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a simple rule that determines is I use RHEL or CentOS in
my work environment. Does the software running on this machine
require RHEL in order to have vendor support. An extension of that
rule is whether nor not Red Hat
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Christopher Chan pisze:
grub cannot find its second stage. Are you booting from a mirrored
partition?
Yes
What could be a solution? And what could have happen upon the reboot?
That is weird. I just re-installed centos5 and it is now booting
properly. What
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Christopher Chan pisze:
grub cannot find its second stage. Are you booting from a mirrored
partition?
Yes
What could be a solution? And what could have happen upon the reboot?
That is weird. I just re-installed centos5 and it is now booting
properly. What
On Nov 28, 2007 12:45 PM, Jerry Geis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there a cisco vpn client for linux centso 5 AMD 64 bit?
vpnclient-linux-x86_64-4.8.01.0640-k9.tar.gz
That's the latest 64-bit version of the Cisco VPN client.
But you need to download from Cisco via CCO account
or perhaps your
Ugo Bellavance wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Christopher Chan pisze:
grub cannot find its second stage. Are you booting from a
mirrored partition?
Yes
What could be a solution? And what could have happen upon the reboot?
That is weird. I just re-installed centos5 and it is now
Ugo Bellavance wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Christopher Chan pisze:
grub cannot find its second stage. Are you booting from a
mirrored partition?
Yes
What could be a solution? And what could have happen upon the reboot?
That is weird. I just re-installed centos5 and it is now
Bart Schaefer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Nov 28, 2007 7:23 AM, David G. Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Now everything (sort of) just works (TM). I say sort
of because I'm still running ndiswrapper since every time I've tried
the bcm43xx kernel module it hasn't worked with my WAP.
Christopher Chan wrote:
Ugo Bellavance wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Christopher Chan pisze:
grub cannot find its second stage. Are you booting from a
mirrored partition?
Yes
What could be a solution? And what could have happen upon the
reboot?
That is weird. I just re-installed
Christopher Chan wrote:
Ugo Bellavance wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Christopher Chan pisze:
grub cannot find its second stage. Are you booting from a
mirrored partition?
Yes
What could be a solution? And what could have happen upon the
reboot?
That is weird. I just re-installed
Hi *!
I have to install a xen virtualization host that will start with 4GB RAM
and will maybe grow to 8GB in the future. And there has to be a 32bit
winXP domU. Is CentOS5(.1) x86_64 able to run 32bit HVMs or do i have to
stick with i386/PAE?
/nils.
Matt Hyclak wrote:
On Wed, Nov 28, 2007 at 07:37:46PM -0500, Ugo Bellavance enlightened us:
There is a difference between the help of lvresize and its man page.
In the manpage, there is nothing about the -r or --resizefs function.
Centos4.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# lvresize
Please specify
Alain Spineux wrote:
On Nov 29, 2007 6:59 AM, Ugo Bellavance [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
This is my current config:
/dev/md0 - 200 MB - sda1 + sdd1 - /boot
/dev/md1 - 36 GB - sda2 + sdd2 - form VolGroup00 with md2
/dev/md2 - 18 GB - sdb1 + sde1 - form VolGroup00 with md1
sda,sdd -
Christopher Chan wrote:
Is there a way to know where grub is installed? I have a few servers
running in RAID 1 software for /boot, I gotta fix this. If I can't
tell whether it is installed or not, is it dangerous to re-install it
using the command above?
It won't hurt to re-install. The
On Nov 29, 2007 2:50 PM, Les Mikesell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Tronn Wærdahl wrote:
On Nov 29, 2007 12:18 PM, Jun Salen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Have a look at http://zimbra.com. It has an open-source version with
unlimited users. I've tried both it and scalix and much prefer zimbra.
What do you call a person that only speak one language ? :-)
British ?
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On Nov 29, 2007 4:21 PM, Ugo Bellavance [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Alain Spineux wrote:
On Nov 29, 2007 6:59 AM, Ugo Bellavance [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
This is my current config:
/dev/md0 - 200 MB - sda1 + sdd1 - /boot
/dev/md1 - 36 GB - sda2 + sdd2 - form VolGroup00
--On Thursday, November 29, 2007 8:50 AM -0500 Scott Ehrlich
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is it possible to delete a file from dump? I saved it in one dump
archive, and want to save space by deleting it from the others.
You'd need to write a new dump file, as it models a physical tape, and
Alain Spineux wrote:
On Nov 29, 2007 4:21 PM, Ugo Bellavance [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Alain Spineux wrote:
On Nov 29, 2007 6:59 AM, Ugo Bellavance [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
This is my current config:
/dev/md0 - 200 MB - sda1 + sdd1 - /boot
/dev/md1 - 36 GB - sda2 + sdd2 - form
Ugo Bellavance wrote:
Alain Spineux wrote:
On Nov 29, 2007 6:59 AM, Ugo Bellavance [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
This is my current config:
/dev/md0 - 200 MB - sda1 + sdd1 - /boot
/dev/md1 - 36 GB - sda2 + sdd2 - form VolGroup00 with md2
/dev/md2 - 18 GB - sdb1 + sde1 -
No, but your close :-)
english?
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On Nov 29, 2007 5:04 PM, Tom Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What do you call a person that only speak one language ? :-)
British ?
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
No, but your
english?
British and English is the same ain't it ..
--
The box said: Requires MS Windows or better, so I installed Linux
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
- Nils Toedtmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] escreveu:
I have to install a xen virtualization host that will start with 4GB
RAM and will maybe grow to 8GB in the future. And there has to be a 32bit
winXP domU. Is CentOS5(.1) x86_64 able to run 32bit HVMs or do i have
to stick with i386/PAE?
Hi,
Tronn Wærdahl wrote:
On Nov 29, 2007 5:04 PM, Tom Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What do you call a person that only speak one language ? :-)
British ?
___
CentOS mailing list
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, Nov 28, 2007 at 08:51:25AM -0800, Bill Campbell wrote:
We haven't had any notable performance problems using this at a regional
ISP customer's site with about 10,000 e-mail users and several machines in
a cluster delivering mail to Maildir
Ugo Bellavance wrote:
Alain Spineux wrote:
On Nov 29, 2007 4:21 PM, Ugo Bellavance [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Alain Spineux wrote:
On Nov 29, 2007 6:59 AM, Ugo Bellavance [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
This is my current config:
/dev/md0 - 200 MB - sda1 + sdd1 - /boot
John R Pierce wrote:
afaik, the updates directory contains the latest updates to all packages
that have been updated since the original .0 release.
Thats not true, the rel/updates/ dir will only contain updates
released from the time that the rel/os/ was released. However, that is
not an
Hi All
I've just shifteed over to linux,form Windows.I 'm having 5 partations
for use by my windows XP Professional and another one by linux.The
partation table is as shown :
On Thu, Nov 29, 2007, Rodrigo Barbosa wrote:
On Wed, Nov 28, 2007 at 08:51:25AM -0800, Bill Campbell wrote:
We haven't had any notable performance problems using this at a regional
ISP customer's site with about 10,000 e-mail users and several machines in
a cluster delivering mail to Maildir
on 11/29/2007 2:44 AM Ralph Angenendt spake the following:
Scott Silva wrote:
Was this thread hijacked, or is Thunderbird being stupid again?
Yes.
Well, don't know about the last thing, I don't use Thunderbird :)
Cheers,
Ralph
I meant my thunderbird being stupid. Sometimes it thinks
On Nov 29, 2007 9:23 AM, Saurabh Sharma [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi All
I've just shifteed over to linux,form Windows.I 'm having 5 partations
for use by my windows XP Professional and another one by linux.The
partation table is as shown :
on 11/29/2007 7:56 AM Tronn Wærdahl spake the following:
On Nov 29, 2007 2:50 PM, Les Mikesell
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Tronn W�rdahl wrote:
On Nov 29, 2007 12:18 PM, Jun Salen
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Have a
Hello,
I'm hitting a problem with heartbeat which might be related to the use of
x86_64.
My test system is CentOS 5 Xen DomU x86_64 under CentOS 5 Dom0.
Can I run i386 CentOS 5 DomU under x86_64 Dom0?
Thanks,
--Amos
___
CentOS mailing list
Ross S. W. Walker wrote:
What are you trying to accomplish storage wise?
Is this for commerical or personal use?
Commercial, but non-critical use.
If for personal use, then it isn't as critical how it is setup,
but if this is for commercial use then you need to target your
storage to your
Ross S. W. Walker wrote:
Ugo Bellavance wrote:
Ross S. W. Walker wrote:
What are you trying to accomplish storage wise?
Is this for commerical or personal use?
Commercial, but non-critical use.
If for personal use, then it isn't as critical how it is
setup, but if
this is for commercial
--- Ugo Bellavance [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Christopher Chan wrote:
Ugo Bellavance wrote:
Hi,
I have a Dell poweredge 400SC here with an
LSI scsi card.
I installed Centos4 a while ago and put it in a
datacenter. I
rebooted many weeks after, and the machine didn't
come
Hi,
Does anyone know how to prevent snmpd from writing the below into
/var/log/messages/
Nov 29 19:35:02 serenity snmpd[2287]: Received SNMP packet(s) from
UDP: [127.0.0.1]:34309
Nov 29 19:35:02 serenity snmpd[2287]: Connection from UDP: [127.0.0.1]:34309
Nov 29 19:35:02 serenity last message
on 11/29/2007 7:53 AM Les Mikesell spake the following:
Christopher Chan wrote:
Is there a way to know where grub is installed? I have a few servers
running in RAID 1 software for /boot, I gotta fix this. If I can't
tell whether it is installed or not, is it dangerous to re-install it
On Nov 29, 2007 7:33 PM, Les Mikesell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Tronn Wærdahl wrote:
What do you call a person that only speak one language ? :-)
I'd call him normal, but what's the punch line?
--
Les Mikesell
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Scott Silva wrote:
It won't hurt to re-install. The tricky part is knowing where the 2nd
drive in the set will appear when the first fails so you can do the
configuration correctly.
This isn't as tricky as you think. It just takes some thought.
Yes, but you need to think from the bios
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Enyo wrote:
I do not care about seeing normal connection info from snmpd, but
retaining logging for other info such as malformed packets, bad
community strings etc is of interest.
I think you can just put your logging level in
I was just wondering if there are special tricks people do
that compile A LOT on centos? Do RAM disks help or something else I dont
about that minimizes your compile time? I presently have and AMD x2
4800+ with 2GIG ram.
Just curious if I can reduce any more time out of my compiles.
Jerry
Around 04:48pm on Thursday, November 29, 2007 (UK time), Tronn Wærdahl scrawled:
British and English is the same ain't it ..
No, England is one of the countries in Britain. English, Scots and
Welsh are all British.
Steve
--
A: Because it messes up the order in which people
On Wed, 2007-11-28 at 14:27 -0800, Bart Schaefer wrote:
On Nov 28, 2007 11:27 AM, Mike [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I googled unable to handle kernel paging request and didn't really find
anything useful (to me).
In my experience this probably means that you have some RAM going bad
and you
On Thu, Nov 29, 2007, Steve Searle wrote:
Around 04:48pm on Thursday, November 29, 2007 (UK time), Tronn Wærdahl
scrawled:
British and English is the same ain't it ..
No, England is one of the countries in Britain. English, Scots and
Welsh are all British.
And all speak different
On Thu, 29 Nov 2007 16:36:39 -0500
Jerry Geis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was just wondering if there are special tricks people do
that compile A LOT on centos? Do RAM disks help or something else I dont
about that minimizes your compile time? I presently have and AMD x2
4800+ with 2GIG ram.
On Nov 29, 2007 10:36 PM, Jerry Geis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was just wondering if there are special tricks people do
that compile A LOT on centos? Do RAM disks help or something else I dont
about that minimizes your compile time? I presently have and AMD x2
4800+ with 2GIG ram.
# make -j
on 11/29/2007 2:20 PM Robinson Tiemuqinke spake the following:
--- Karanbir Singh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
John R Pierce wrote:
afaik, the updates directory contains the latest
updates to all packages
that have been updated since the original .0
release.
Thats not true, the rel/updates/
Sad to say one of my file servers was exploited and used to run a
Phishing scam. Have identified subject virus amongst other things. It
appears twice in a virus scan; /sbin/z (which I assume can just be
deleted) and /sys/bus/serio/drivers/atkbd/description. The latter file
is also present in
On 30/11/2007, B.J. McClure [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sad to say one of my file servers was exploited and used to run a
Phishing scam. Have identified subject virus amongst other things. It
appears twice in a virus scan; /sbin/z (which I assume can just be deleted)
and
Robinson Tiemuqinke wrote:
The problem is whether there is a way to achieve the
following:
Continue to install machines with Centos 5.0(!!)
distro (not 5.1, 5.2, etc snapshots|subreleases), But
have .../centos/5/updates/{SRPMS|i386|x86_64}/
repositories|directories which contains updates
On Thu, 29 Nov 2007 16:43:44 -0600
B.J. McClure [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sad to say one of my file servers was exploited and used to run a
Phishing scam.
One of the problems with being r00ted is that you can never be sure that you
have found all of the stuff that the bad guy left behind.
Jerry,
--- Jerry Geis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was just wondering if there are special tricks
people do
that compile A LOT on centos? Do RAM disks help or
something else I dont
about that minimizes your compile time? I presently
have and AMD x2
4800+ with 2GIG ram.
Just curious if I
More importantly, mount your dev filesys with atimes disabled and ext3 indexing
on.
Use tmpfs for /tmp, /usr/tmp, /var/tmp, it uses swappable ram filesys which
helps a lot too. Make sure nothing gets put in those tmp dirs that needs to
persist across a reboot and limit the max size each can
Find out how they got in and make sure that hole is fixed.
Do an rpm verify on all installed packages (excluding configs), reinstall the
rpms that fail the verify.
Find all binaries that are not accountable in rpm and nuke them.
Harden your host with selinux and audit, keep audit logs of all
--- Les Mikesell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Robinson Tiemuqinke wrote:
The problem is whether there is a way to achieve
the
following:
Continue to install machines with Centos 5.0(!!)
distro (not 5.1, 5.2, etc snapshots|subreleases),
But
have
Robinson Tiemuqinke wrote:
Continue to install machines with Centos 5.0(!!)
distro (not 5.1, 5.2, etc snapshots|subreleases), But
have .../centos/5/updates/{SRPMS|i386|x86_64}/
repositories|directories which contains updates since
5.0 to current level. This way I only need to feed yum
with two
My dell SC430 came with instructions on how to set up booting from
software raid under RHEL. I can't find an online copy but this might help
http://lists.us.dell.com/pipermail/linux-poweredge/2003-July/008898.html
Normally before I move a machine from testing to production I like to do
some
On 30/11/2007, Ross S. W. Walker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Find out how they got in and make sure that hole is fixed.
Do an rpm verify on all installed packages (excluding configs), reinstall
the rpms that fail the verify.
Find all binaries that are not accountable in rpm and nuke them.
Frank Cox wrote:
On Thu, 29 Nov 2007 16:36:39 -0500
Jerry Geis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was just wondering if there are special tricks people do
that compile A LOT on centos? Do RAM disks help or something else I dont
about that minimizes your compile time? I presently have and AMD x2
Is there a way to know where grub is installed? I have a few servers
running in RAID 1 software for /boot, I gotta fix this. If I can't
tell whether it is installed or not, is it dangerous to re-install it
using the command above?
So long as you have all the necessary grub files, there
We have some LaCie 1 TB external disks which work fine on
other Linux servers (running Red Hat 9, and Ubuntu 7.04),
but which fail to be seen on our CentOS 4.3 system with
kernel 2.6.9-34.107.plus.c4smp
The interface card is a Sunix 64 bit Firewire 800 ieee1394b
adapter plugged
Looks good. The important part is that it references the drive when
doing the installation.
What do you mean?
The problem is that grub stage1 is loaded but its instructions for
locating stage2 point it to another disk which may or may not be at the
location stored. That was the problem
I think it's just too new and shiny. ccache is installed by default with
Fedora 8.
Wow, fedora 8?
Where have I been?
Sheesh, most of us are still dealing with considering centos 5 migrations
from rock solid centos 4 as necessary eh?
Isn't this fedora thing getting a little bit cat outta
On Fri, Nov 30, 2007, Christopher Chan wrote:
Bill Campbell wrote:
On Thu, Nov 29, 2007, Rodrigo Barbosa wrote:
On Wed, Nov 28, 2007 at 08:51:25AM -0800, Bill Campbell wrote:
We haven't had any notable performance problems using this at a regional
ISP customer's site with about 10,000 e-mail users
fred smith wrote:
I'm coming in here kind of in the middle, but I find this discussion to
be confusing... In the past I've always found that my centos/RHEL machines
automagically updated themselves to the latest dot-release without me
having to do anything other than run yum/up2date.
Are you
ccache does not appear to be part of the centos base or core or whatever you
wanna call it
I see that karan and dag have it in their space
Is there any downside to installing ccache?
If so, in what terms?
How about on an internet facing box?
- rh
Bill Campbell wrote:
On Thu, Nov 29, 2007, Rodrigo Barbosa wrote:
On Wed, Nov 28, 2007 at 08:51:25AM -0800, Bill Campbell wrote:
We haven't had any notable performance problems using this at a regional
ISP customer's site with about 10,000 e-mail users and several machines in
a cluster
On Fri, 2007-11-30 at 12:26 +1100, Amos Shapira wrote:
On 30/11/2007, Ross S. W. Walker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Find out how they got in and make sure that hole is fixed.
Do an rpm verify on all installed packages (excluding
configs), reinstall the rpms
On Thu, 29 Nov 2007 20:26:21 -0500
Jerry Geis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Frank - HEY that is fantastic Dropped complete compile from 27
seconds to 14.
I was not aware of this...
Oddly enough, a lot of people don't seem to be aware of it. I think it's right
up there with sliced bread and
On Thu, 29 Nov 2007 18:25:47 -0800
Robert - elists [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ccache does not appear to be part of the centos base or core or whatever you
wanna call it
I think it's just too new and shiny. ccache is installed by default with
Fedora 8.
Is there any downside to installing
Very. We have a single Linux box facing the Internet which
runs everything through postfix, amavisd, and clamav to weed out
the phishing and worms that attack the Microsoft virus, Windows,
then hands off messages that pass to the internal cluster using
round-robin DNS as the poor-mans load
On Fri, 30 Nov 2007, Indunil Jayasooriya wrote:
I am runnig posfix on Centos 4.4 as a Mailgateway. It only accepts mails for
domains and then forwards mails to Lotus domino Server.
All clients sends outgoing mails to that Lotus domino Server. Then , That
Lotus Domino Server sends mails to
I am runnig posfix on Centos 4.4 as a Mailgateway. It only accepts mails for
domains and then forwards mails to Lotus domino Server.
All clients sends outgoing mails to that Lotus domino Server. Then , That
Lotus Domino Server sends mails to Postfix mailgateway. This postfix
mailgateway sends
It should be one of these:
bounce_queue_lifetime = 1d
maximal_queue_lifetime = 1d
Hi, Thanks for your quick answer.
I think it is
maximal_queue_lifetime = 1d
I got it from below URLs.
http://www.postfix.org/rate.html
*maximal_queue_lifetime* (default: 5 days) How long a message stays in
98 matches
Mail list logo
